"Nobody Will Tell You. You've Got to Ask!": An Examination of Patient-Provider Communication Needs and Preferences among Black and White Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer

Racial and ethnic disparities in conversion to mastectomy following lumpectomy

PURPOSE

Advances in contemporary breast cancer care (e.g., early detection, increased use of preoperative chemotherapy, and updated SSO-ASTRO margin guidelines) have the collective potential to influence successful breast conservation. We evaluated contemporary trends in conversion to mastectomy (lumpectomy followed by definitive mastectomy) among women with breast cancer undergoing initial lumpectomy.

METHODS

Women with unilateral clinical stage 0-III breast cancer were identified from the National Cancer Database (2009-2019). Treatment sequence was categorized into surgery first or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by surgery. We used a multivariable logistic regression model to calculate the predicted probability of conversion to mastectomy across diagnosis year and race and ethnicity, controlling for socio-demographic and clinical factors. We then calculated the relative change in conversion to mastectomy over time for each race and ethnic group.

RESULTS

The study included N = 1,543,702 women. Approximately 9.2% received NACT. Conversion to mastectomy differed significantly between those who underwent surgery first (10.6%) versus women who received NACT (6.1%, p < 0.0001). For those who underwent surgery first, success of breast conservation differed significantly by race/ethnicity. During the study period, White women had a relative decrease of 7.6% (95% CI - 10.58, - 4.59), while Black women had a relative increase of 8.9% (95% CI 1.53, 16.19) in predicted probability of conversion to mastectomy.

CONCLUSION

Over the past decade, Black women deemed candidates for initial lumpectomy were more likely to be converted to mastectomy when compared to White women. A greater understanding of contributing factors is needed to improve disparities in successful breast conservation.

Racial equity in and through medical interaction scholarship: A scoping review

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a systematic scoping review to characterize the landscape of communication scholarship within racial health equity in and through the patient-provider interaction.

METHODS

We employed three waves of data collection to identify relevant articles (N = 454) about racial equity within provider-patient interactions. We iteratively developed a codebook concerning article characteristics, coding for journal names, data source, descriptive characteristics for the study samples, and presence of theory and equity in sections of the manuscripts.

RESULTS

This search identified studies (N = 206) that were published in 76 peer-reviewed scientific journals. The majority of studies reported primary data analyses and used survey and interview methodology. Many studies examined participants as patients generally rather than in reference to particular health conditions. Among those with a specific health condition, the largest proportion focused on cancer control. Very few studies included samples with Native American and Pacific Island heritage. Most studies included cisgender men and/or women, but none included transgender men or women. The vast majority of research focused on the patient experience; few centered on providers' and caregivers' experiences. The body of scholarship was largely atheoretical; the most frequently noted constructs were patient-provider communication (including patient-centered communication and patient-centered care), implicit/explicit racial bias, shared decision-making. There was wide variation in the extent to which equity was woven through the manuscripts. Equity is typically mentioned in the literature review, and racial identity in the sample may serve as a marker of racialized experiences.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the need for the development of theory that elevates the centrality of health equity to attend to the bi- or multi-directional flow of communication that shapes the quality of these interactions.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

These insights can serve as a strong foundation for the development of interventions to address equity in clinical interactions.

Culturally appropriate patient-provider communication methods for Black women with breast cancer: a scoping review

PURPOSE

Black women with breast cancer experience a 40% higher mortality rate compared to white women, and this disparity may be influenced by suboptimal patient-provider communication. Evidence has suggested that Black patients with breast cancer have unique informational needs, yet few studies focus on patient-provider communication for this community. The aim of this scoping review was to identify best practices for communicating breast cancer diagnosis and treatment options with Black women.

METHODS

Following PRISMA-ScR, a search strategy was developed and implemented in 4 databases and grey literature. Coders achieved reliability and independently screened articles by title and abstract, then full-text. Articles were included if they studied Black patients with breast cancer and reported on patient-provider communication. Outcomes of interest included patients' appraisals of their communication, and associated health outcomes.

RESULTS

A final sample of 27 studies were included. Black patients' positive appraisal of their providers was based on their interactions, rather than providers' perceived expertise. Patients had negative appraisal of communication when they received limited information regarding their treatment plan, side-effects, or possibility of disease recurrence. High-quality communication was associated with adherence to adjuvant therapy; low-quality communication was associated with treatment discontinuation or delay, and lower self-rating of physical well-being.

CONCLUSION

Patients' perceptions of their quality of communication with their healthcare providers was associated with their treatment decisions and health outcomes. Future research is needed to test interventions that optimize communication between Black breast cancer patients and their providers, including discussing navigating barriers to care.

Implementing motivational interviewing to improve endocrine therapy adherence among breast cancer patients: a qualitative process evaluation of the getset pilot intervention

BACKGROUND

This study evaluates the implementation of the GETSET (Guiding Endocrine Therapy Success through Empowerment and Teamwork) pilot, a motivational interviewing (MI) intervention aimed at improving endocrine therapy (ET) adherence among patients with breast cancer.

METHODS

Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), qualitative interviews were conducted with site staff (N = 2), patients (N = 4), and counselors (N = 2).

RESULTS

The thematic analysis identified facilitators such as high-quality materials, ease of scheduling sessions, and effective communication among staff. However, barriers included lack of personalization and systemic issues like understaffing.

CONCLUSIONS

The study underscores the need to adapt implementation of behavioral interventions in a healthcare setting to improve ET adherence. As this was a process evaluation of a pilot study, future work should evaluate the barriers and facilitators to a larger clinical trial to identify if the same strategies should be refined.

The "Strong Black Woman" Paradox: Insights from a Cohort of Black Breast and Ovarian Cancer Patients and Family Members

BACKGROUND

The strong Black woman (SBW) stereotype can be seen as a positive view of Black women and even a standard to uphold. SBW internalization is a coping mechanism for dealing with racism and sexism. However, multiple recent studies have indicated that Black women in the modern era experience the paradox of SBW internalization having negative generational health effects. We interviewed Black women with a personal or relation diagnosis of breast or ovarian cancer to understand their views and experiences, including how the perception of the SBW stereotype influenced their care.

METHODS

Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted via telephone or video conference and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were qualitatively analyzed for iterative themes related to cancer care and psychosocial support.

RESULTS

Sixty-one Black women completed an interview. Responses in multiple transcripts expressed experiences and sentiments consistent with the SBW stereotype, including the importance of maintaining the appearance of strength during their cancer journey. This resulted in some patients declining assistance during their cancer journeys. Participants shared a hope that there would be more willingness to show vulnerability so that future generations of cancer patients receive adequate support. Key aspects of the SBW stereotype were also cited as potential contributors to ongoing racial disparities in breast and ovarian cancer outcomes.

CONCLUSION(S)

Participants described a paradox of the SBW stereotype that is ultimately detrimental to health and wellbeing. Healthcare professionals and cancer researchers should be aware of this phenomenon to address cancer care more appropriately in Black women.

Evaluating racial disparities in cancer patient-provider communication about cannabis in a state without a legal cannabis marketplace

PURPOSE

Cancer survivors in a state with no legal access to cannabis may be hesitant to discuss their cannabis use with providers, particularly in light of legal consequences which disproportionately affect certain racial groups. This study examined potential racial disparities in the relationship of cannabis use status with patient-provider discussions of and attitudes toward cannabis in a state where there is no legal cannabis marketplace.

METHODS

Survivors of cancer (N = 1003, Mage = 62.36; 13% Black/African-American; 41% male) completed a cross-sectional survey. Weight-adjusted regressions examined racial differences in the relationship between cannabis use status with (a) comfort and discussion of cannabis with providers, and (b) beliefs about impact of legalization on patients' and providers' comfort discussing cannabis.

RESULTS

No racial differences were observed in rates of cannabis use or discussion, and patients who used cannabis were more comfortable discussing cannabis. Black patients who had used cannabis reported the greatest comfort discussing cannabis with providers, but also the greatest perceived improvement in comfort in the event of legalization.

CONCLUSIONS

Results highlight comfort and willingness to discuss cannabis with cancer care providers, particularly among Black patients who already use cannabis, which was not the hypothesized direction of findings. Further work is needed to inform recommendations for provider-led communication about cannabis.

Perceived everyday discrimination, socioeconomic status, and mammography behavior

Black women (BW) experience age-adjusted breast cancer mortality rates that are 40% higher than White women. Although, screening rates for breast cancer are similar between White and Black women, differences in mammography utilization exist among women with lower socioeconomic status (SES). Moreover, perceived everyday discrimination (PED) has been shown to have an inverse relationship on health screening behavior among BW. However, mammography behaviors of BW with low SES, who also report higher levels of PED, is not well known. This study aims to explore the relationship between perceived discrimination, SES, and mammography behavior. Participants were recruited between 2020 and 2022 through the Bench to Community Initiative, a community-based participatory research study, and completed a 41-item survey. Logistic regression was used to test the associations of mammography utilization with PED (assessed by a shortened version of the Everyday Discrimination Scale), SES, and race/ethnicity. Most participants (77%) identified as BW (African American, African, and Caribbean) followed by White (17%) and other groups (6%). Many respondents (87%) had health insurance; 67% reported having had a mammogram; and 41% were breast cancer survivors. Most respondents (63%) had a college education and income between $51,000 and $75,000. In an initial logistic regression model, race/ethnicity, income, and PED significantly predicted mammography behavior (χ2 (8) = 45.464, p < .01). In an additional stepwise logistic regression model that controlled for a history of breast cancer, race/ethnicity, income, PED, and education accounted for 35% of mammogram screening behavior (χ2 (12) = 112.410, p < .01). Race/ethnicity, income, education, and PED were associated with mammography behavior. Addressing these social determinants of health factors may improve our understanding of ways discrimination leaves BW vulnerable to disparate health outcomes, including breast cancer.

Patient-Physician Communication Experience Modifies Racial/Ethnic Health Care Disparities Among Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Participants With Colorectal Cancer and Multiple Chronic Conditions

PURPOSE

After cancer diagnosis, non-White patients and those with multimorbidity use less primary care and more acute care than non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients and those lacking comorbidities. Yet, positive patient experiences with physician communication (PC) are associated with more appropriate health care use. In a multimorbid cohort, we measured associations between PC experience, race and ethnicity, and health care use following colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis.

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

We identified 2606 participants using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Consumer Assessment of Health Care Providers and Systems (CAHPS) data who were diagnosed with CRC from 2001 to 2017 with pre-existing chronic conditions. Self-reported PC experiences were derived from Medicare CAHPS surveys. Chronic condition care, emergency department, and hospital use following CRC diagnosis were identified from Medicare claims. Simple survey-weighted multivariable logistic regression stratified by experiences with care analyzed associations between race and ethnicity and health care use.

RESULTS

Among patients reporting excellent PC experience, non-Hispanic Black (NHB), Hispanic, and non-Hispanic Asian (NHA) patients were more likely to use sufficient chronic condition care than NHW patients (NHB: OR=1.48, 99.38% CI=1.38-1.58; Hispanic: OR=1.34, 99.38% CI=1.26-1.42; NHA: OR=2.31, 99.38% CI=2.12-2.51). NHB and NHA patients were less likely than NHW patients to visit the emergency department when reporting excellent PC experience (NHB: OR=0.66, 99.38% CI=0.63-0.69; NHA: OR=0.67, 99.38% CI=0.64-0.71). Among patients reporting excellent PC, NHB, Hispanic, and NHA patients were less likely than NHW patients to be hospitalized (NHB: OR=0.93, 99.38% CI=0.87-0.99; Hispanic: OR=0.93, 99.38% CI=0.87-0.99; NHA: OR=0.20, 99.38% CI=0.19-0.22).

CONCLUSION

Improving patient experiences with PC, particularly among older racial and ethnic minority cancer survivors with chronic conditions, may help reduce disparities in adverse healthcare use following CRC diagnosis.

Mobile Patient-Provider Communication and Lifestyle Improvement: Examining the Role of Mobile Technology Identity and Health Empowerment

In the span of a decade, smartphones have gained popularity and acceptance among both patients and physicians thanks to their advantages in health care delivery. However, research investigating mobile patient-provider communication (MPPC) and its impact on patients' lifestyles is only just beginning. Drawing on the pathway model of health communication and mobile technology (MTI) theory, we developed a research model to explore the effect of MPPC on lifestyle improvement, using health empowerment as a mediator and MTI as a moderator. The findings from 432 participants (Mage = 32.5 years old, female = 212) suggested that after controlling for respondents' age, gender, education, income, and general health status, having greater communication with healthcare providers through mobile devices was positively related to lifestyle improvement and that health empowerment mediated this relationship. Moreover, MTI-emotional energy (MTIE) moderated the direct relationship between MPPC and lifestyle improvement, while MTI-dependency (MTID) moderated the indirect impact of MPPC. Individuals who hold a greater MTIE/MTID were more likely to benefit from MPPC such that they are more likely to be empowered for self-care and maintain healthy lifestyles. This study not only contributes to the growing literature on mobile health communication but also plays a reference role for interventions in patient empowerment and health promotion. Theoretical and practical implications were discussed.

The Influence of Perceived Provider Empathic Communication on Disclosure Decision-Making

Provider empathy is a crucial component in establishing therapeutic provider-patient relationships. The benefits of increased perceptions of empathy can support patient psychological adjustment to their cancer as well as patients' comfort and confidence in disclosing to providers, ultimately promoting patient engagement. Guided by the disclosure decision-making model, this manuscript explores how perceptions of empathy influence patient psychological adjustment and how those variables influence patient disclosure efficacy. The model ultimately predicts patient sharing and withholding of information during the medical interaction. This study tested a mediation model to investigate how current (n = 111) and former (n = 174) breast cancer patients' psychological adjustment mediates the relationship between patient perceptions of oncologist empathic communication and efficacy to disclose health information to their oncologist and their disclosure enactment in sharing and withholding. Overall, former patients compared to current patients had more positive perceptions of their oncologist's empathic communication, had better psychological adjustment, felt more self-efficacy to disclose to their oncologist, and shared more and withheld less information from their oncologist (p < .05 in all cases). Structural equation modeling revealed good fit to the data for both current and former patients such that more perceived empathic communication was associated with more efficacy for disclosure, which was associated with more sharing and less withholding. Additionally, there was an indirect relationship from perceptions of empathic communication to disclosure efficacy through patients' psychological adjustment to the diagnosis. Results reinforce the importance of providers' empathic communication for cancer patients' psychological adjustment because patient sharing and withholding of information remain crucially important to achieving holistic care across the cancer trajectory.

Factors and Beliefs Affecting Women Diagnosed With Breast Cancer to Initiate Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Initiating treatment within the optimal time is critical for women with breast cancer. A delay in cancer treatment initiation can result in increased morbidity and mortality and decreased overall survival.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aims to investigate the literature for the factors and beliefs affecting women diagnosed with breast cancer with regard to initiating cancer treatment.

METHODS

The PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases were searched using the terms of breast cancer, initiating or seeking treatment, and beliefs. The Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice Research Evidence Appraisal Tool was used to evaluate the included articles.

RESULTS

Sixteen articles were included in this review. The addressed factors were classified as (1) patient-related factors, (2) disease-related factors, (3) provider-related factors, and (4) system-related factors. The identified beliefs were cultural beliefs and perceived barriers to initiating treatment.

CONCLUSION

Although the literature reported multiple factors and beliefs that impact the time of initiating treatment among women with breast cancer, more research is needed to fully understand the beliefs influencing treatment initiation. It is essential to address and screen the factors and beliefs identified for women diagnosed with breast cancer to enhance treatment initiation early and prevent any possible delay. Interventions can be developed to overcome the factors and beliefs that may lead to late treatment initiation. Advocacy for new policies should be in action to reduce the disparities associated with treatment initiation among women with breast cancer.

Evolution of community outreach and engagement at National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Centers, an evolving journey

Cancer mortality rates have declined during the last 28 years, but that process is not equitably shared. Disparities in cancer outcomes by race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, sexual orientation and gender identity, and geographic location persist across the cancer care continuum. Consequently, community outreach and engagement (COE) efforts within National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Center (NCI-DCC) catchment areas have intensified during the last 10 years as has the emphasis on COE and catchment areas in NCI's Cancer Center Support Grant applications. This review article attempts to provide a historic perspective of COE within NCI-DCCs. Improving COE has long been an important initiative for the NCI, but it was not until 2012 and 2016 that NCI-DCCs were required to define their catchment areas rigorously and to provide specific descriptions of COE interventions, respectively. NCI-DCCs had previously lacked adequate focus on the inclusion of historically marginalized patients in cancer innovation efforts. Integrating COE efforts throughout the research and operational aspects of the cancer centers, at both the patient and community levels, will expand the footprint of COE efforts within NCI-DCCs. Achieving this change requires sustained commitment by the centers to adjust their activities and improve access and outcomes for historically marginalized communities.

Experiences and Challenges of African American and Sub-Saharan African Immigrant Black Women in Completing Pap Screening: a Mixed Methods Study

BACKGROUND

Understanding Black women's Papanicolaou (Pap) screening experiences can inform efforts to reduce cancer disparities. This study examined experiences among both US-born US Black women and Sub-Saharan African immigrant women.

METHOD

Using a convergent parallel mixed methods design, Black women born in the USA and in Sub-Saharan Africa age 21-65 years were recruited to participate in focus groups and complete a 25-item survey about patient-centered communication and perceived racial discrimination. Qualitative and quantitative data were integrated to provide a fuller understanding of results.

RESULTS

Of the 37 participants, 14 were US-born and 23 were Sub-Saharan African-born Black women. The mean age was 40.0 ± 11.0, and 83.8% had received at least one Pap test. Five themes regarding factors that impact screening uptake emerged from the focus groups: (1) positive and negative experiences with providers; (2) provider communication and interaction; (3) individual barriers to screening uptake, (4) implicit bias, discrimination, and stereotypical views among providers, and (5) language barrier. Survey and focus group findings diverged on several points. While focus group themes captured both positive and negative experiences with provider communication, survey results indicated that most of both US-born and Sub-Saharan African-born women experienced positive patient-centered communication with health care providers. Additionally, during focus group sessions many participants described experiences of discrimination in health care settings, but less than a third reported this in the survey.

CONCLUSION

Black women's health care experiences affect Pap screening uptake. Poor communication and perceived discrimination during health care encounters highlight areas for needed service improvement to reduce cervical cancer disparities.

Advancing equity in challenging times: A qualitative study of telehealth expansion and changing patient-provider relationships in primary care settings during the COVID-19 pandemic

Objective

The patient-provider relationship is critical for achieving high-quality care and better health outcomes. During the COVID-19 pandemic, primary care practices rapidly transitioned to telehealth. While telehealth provided critical access to services for many, not all patients could optimally utilize it, raising concerns about its potential to exacerbate inequities in patient-provider relationships. We investigated technical and workforce-related barriers to accessing telehealth and the impacts on patient-provider relationships for vulnerable populations.

Methods

Qualitative, semi-structured interviews from May 2021 to August 2021 with 31 individuals (medical directors, physicians, and medical assistants) working at 20 primary care practices in Massachusetts, North Carolina, and Texas. Thematic analysis to better understand how barriers to using telehealth complicated patient-provider relationships.

Results

Interviewees shared challenges for providers and patients that had a negative effect on patient-provider relationships, particularly for vulnerable patients, including older adults, lower socio-economic status patients, and those with limited English proficiency. Providers faced logistical challenges and disruptions in team-based care, reducing care coordination. Patients experienced technological challenges that made accessing and engaging in telehealth difficult. Interviewees shared challenges for patient-provider relationships as commonly used telephone-only telehealth reduced channels for non-verbal communication.

Conclusion

This study indicates that barriers to virtual interaction with patients compared to in-person care likely led to weaker personal relationships that may have longer-term effects on engagement with and trust in the healthcare system, particularly among vulnerable patient groups. Additional support and resources should be available to primary care providers to optimize telehealth utilization.

Silent suffering: the impact of sexual health challenges on patient-clinician communication and adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy among Black women with early-stage breast cancer

PURPOSE

Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) increases sexual health challenges for women with early-stage breast cancer. Black women are more likely than women of other racial/ethnic groups to report adverse symptoms and least likely to initiate and maintain AET. Little is known about how sexual health challenges influence patient-clinician communication and treatment adherence. This study explores facilitators of and barriers to patient-clinician communication about sexual health and how those factors might affect AET adherence among Black women with early-stage breast cancer.

METHODS

We conducted 32 semi-structured, in-depth interviews among Black women with early-stage breast cancer in the U.S. Mid-South region. Participants completed an online questionnaire prior to interviews. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Participants' median age was 59 (range 40-78 years, SD = 9.0). Adverse sexual symptoms hindered participants' AET adherence. Facilitators of patient-clinician communication about sexual health included female clinicians and peer support. Barriers included perceptions of male oncologists' disinterest in Black women's sexual health, perceptions of male oncologists' biased beliefs about sexual activity among older Black women, cultural norms of sexual silence among Southern Black women, and medical mistrust.

CONCLUSIONS

Adverse sexual symptoms and poor patient-clinician communication about sexual health contribute to lower AET adherence among Black women with early-stage breast cancer. New interventions using peer support models and female clinicians trained to discuss sexual health could ameliorate communication barriers and improve treatment adherence.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Black women with early-stage breast cancer in the U.S. Mid-South may require additional resources to address sociocultural and psychosocial implications of cancer survivorship to enable candid discussions with oncologists.

Health care experiences of Black cancer survivors: A qualitative study exploring drivers of low and high Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems global ratings of care

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to understand the experiences of Black patients with cancer in health care by comparing drivers of high and low ratings.

METHODS

Semistructured in-depth interviews were conducted with 18 Black patients with cancer recruited from cancer survivorship support groups and Facebook between May 2019 and March 2020. Interviews were coded across all transcripts by using a thematic analysis approach before comparing low- and high-rating groups.

RESULTS

There were three major themes that influenced whether patients rated their care as low or high, which included the patient-provider relationship, health care staff interactions, and cancer care coordination. For example, the high-rating group described good communication with the health care team as physicians listening to their needs, being responsive to their concerns, and providing recommendations on how to address side effects. In contrast, the low-rating group described poor communication with their health care team as their needs being dismissed and being excluded from decision-making processes. Additionally, there were two distinct themes that influenced patients' low ratings: insurance and financial toxicity issues and experiences of health care discrimination.

CONCLUSIONS

In an effort to promote equitable cancer care experiences for Black patients, it is important that health systems work to prioritize patient interactions with health care providers and staff, comprehensive care management for patients with cancer, and reductions in the financial burden of caring for cancer.

Associations between race/ethnicity and SEER-CAHPS patient care experiences among female Medicare beneficiaries with breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to determine if racial/ethnic disparities exist in survivorship care patient experiences among older breast cancer survivors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nineteen thousand seventeen female breast cancer survivors aged ≥65 at post-diagnosis survey contributed data via the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers & Systems (CAHPS) data linkage (2000-2019). Multivariable linear regression models were used to estimate adjusted beta (β) coefficients and standard error (SE) estimates for associations between race/ethnicity and survivorship care patient experiences.

RESULTS

Most women were non-Hispanic (NH)-White (78.1%; NH-Black [8.1%], NH-Asian [6.5%], Hispanic [6.2%]). On average, women reported 76.3 years (standard deviation [SD] = 7.14) at CAHPS survey and 6.10 years since primary diagnosis (SD = 3.51). Compared with NH-White survivors, NH-Black survivors reported lower mean scores for Getting Care Quickly (β = -5.17, SE = 0.69, p ≤0.001), Getting Needed Care (β = -1.72, SE = 0.63, p = 0.006), and Overall Care Ratings (β = -2.72, SE = 0.48, p ≤0.001), mirroring the results for NH-Asian survivors (Getting Care Quickly [β = -7.06, SE = 0.77, p ≤0.001], Getting Needed Care [β = -4.43, SE = 0.70, p ≤0.001], Physician Communication [β = -1.15, SE = 0.54, p = 0.03], Overall Care Rating [β = -2.32, SE = 0.53, p ≤0.001]). Findings among Hispanic survivors varied, where mean scores were lower for Getting Care Quickly (β = -2.83, SE = 0.79, p ≤0.001), Getting Needed Care (β = -2.43, SE = 0.70, p = 0.001), and Getting Needed Prescription Drug(s) (β = -1.47, SE = 0.64, p = 0.02), but were higher for Health Plan Rating (β = 2.66, SE = 0.55, p ≤0.001). Education, Medicare plan, and multimorbidity significantly modified various associations among NH-Black survivors, and education was a significant modifier among NH-Asian and Hispanic survivors.

DISCUSSION

We observed racial/ethnic disparities in the associations with survivorship care patient experience among NH-Black, Hispanic, and NH-Asian breast cancer survivors. Future research should examine the impact of education, Medicare plans, and multimorbidity on these associations.

Patients' and carers' priorities for cancer research in Aotearoa/New Zealand

BACKGROUND

Discrepancies have been reported between what is being researched, and what patients/families deem important to be investigated. Our aim was to understand research priorities for those who live with cancer in Aotearoa/New Zealand, with emphasis on Māori.

METHODS

Adult outpatients with cancer and their whānau/family completed a survey (demographics, selecting keywords, free-text comments) at Christchurch hospital. Quantitative and qualitative data were evaluated using standard statistical and thematic analyses, respectively.

RESULTS

We recruited 205 participants, including both tūroro/patients (n = 129) and their whānau/family/carer (n = 76). Partnership with Māori health workers enabled greater recruitment of Māori participants (19%), compared to the proportion of Māori in Canterbury (9%). Cancer research was seen as a priority by 96% of participants. Priorities were similar between Māori and non-Māori participants, with the keywords 'Cancer screening', 'Quality of Life' and 'Development of new drugs' chosen most often. Free-text analysis identified three themes; 'Genetics and Prevention', 'Early Detection and Treatment', and 'Service Delivery', with some differences by ethnicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Cancer research is a high priority for those living with cancer. In addition, participants want researchers to listen to their immediate and practical needs. These findings may inform future cancer research in Aotearoa.

MāORI TERMS AND TRANSLATION

Aotearoa (New Zealand) he aha ō whakaaro (what are your thoughts) hui (gathering) mate pukupuku (cancer) mokopuna (descendent) Ōtautahi (Christchurch) rongoā (traditional healing) tāne (male) te reo (Māori language) Te Whatu Ora (weaving of wellness, Health New Zealand) tikanga (methods, customary practices) tūroro (patients) (alternative terms used: whānau affected by cancer or tangata whaiora (person seeking health)) wahine (female) Waitaha (Canterbury) whakapapa (genealogy) whānau ((extended) family, based on whakapapa, here also carer).

Colorectal cancer screening disparities in Asian Americans: the influences of patient-provider communication and social media use

PURPOSE

We examined the role of patient-provider communication (PPC) during in-person visits and via electronic communication and social media use on colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among Asian Americans (AAs) and Non-Hispanic Whites (NHWs) aged 50 and older.

METHODS

Health Information National Trends Survey 2017-2020 data were analyzed.

RESULTS

AAs tended to evaluate the quality of PPC during their in-person visits to a health care provider lower than NHWs. AAs' CRC screening rate was lower than the rate of NHWs (78.8% vs. 84.4%). After adjusting for sociodemographics, healthcare access, and health status, the quality of PPC was the only significant predictor associated with a lower probability of CRC screening among AAs (Adjusted OR 0.74; 95% CI 0.56, 0.96); while the Internet to communicate with a health care provider was the only significant predictor of CRC screening among NHWs (Adjusted OR 1.76; CI 1.11, 2.79). AAs were more likely to use YouTube to watch a health-related video than NHWs (43.5% vs, 24%). However, social media use was not associated with CRC screening in both AAs and NHWs.

CONCLUSION

Use of electronic communication technology may contribute to improve health information literacy and reduce the disparity. On-line communication may empower the culturally and linguistically diverse AAs by improving their confidence in communication with health care providers. Thus, communication technologies need to be strategically utilized and tailored to better meet the communication needs of racial/ethnic minorities. Online communication technologies may reduce the disparities in PPC related to cancer screening and cancer burden experienced by AAs.

Refusal of transplant organs for non-medical reasons including COVID-19 status

Transplant centers and physicians in the United States have limited guidance on the information which they can and cannot provide to transplant candidates regarding donors of potential organs. Patients may refuse organs for a variety of reasons ranging from pernicious requests including racism to misinformation about emerging medicine as with the COVID-19 vaccine and infection. Patient autonomy, organ stewardship, and equity are often at odds in these cases, but precedent indeed exists to help address these challenges. This work uses such cases to highlight the urgent need for uniform, national policy prohibiting informational requests unrelated to well-established risks.

Patient-provider communication quality as a predictor of medical mistrust among young Black women

The present study explores the association between patient-provider communication quality and medical mistrust in a sample of 174 young Black women, aged 18-24. Data were collected as part of a larger mixed-methods study examining sexual health communication and behaviors. Participants were recruited via non-probabilistic sampling methods between June 2018 and December 2018. Eligible respondents completed a self-administered online study that examined, among other components, healthcare experiences and medical mistrust. Hierarchical linear regression was used to explore the relationship between patient-provider communication quality and medical mistrust. Patient-provider communication quality was a significant predictor of medical mistrust; as communication quality increased, medical mistrust decreased (p < .001). Educational attainment also emerged as a significant predictor. Relative to not completing any college, completing some college was associated with lower medical mistrust (p= .031). Our findings suggest that for providers seeking to address medical mistrust in patients identifying as young Black women, focusing on patient-centered communication may be particularly impactful.

Importance of Communication Skills Training and Meaning Centered Psychotherapy Concepts among Patients and Caregivers Coping with Advanced Cancer

Latinos are more likely to be diagnosed with advanced cancer and have specific existential and communication needs. Concepts within Meaning-Centered Psychotherapy (MCP) interventions and Communications Skills Training (CST) assist patients in attending to these needs. However, Latino-tailored MCP interventions have yet to be adapted for advanced cancer patients and caregivers. A cross-sectional survey was administered to Latino advanced cancer patients and caregivers where participants rated the importance of the goals and concepts of MCP and CST. Fifty-seven (n = 57) Latino advanced cancer patients and fifty-seven (n = 57) caregivers completed the survey. Most participants rated MCP concepts as extremely important, ranging from 73.75% to 95.5%. Additionally, 86.8% favored finding meaning in their life after a cancer diagnosis. Participants (80.7%) also selected the concept of finding and maintaining hope to cope with their cancer diagnosis. Finally, participants found CST concepts and skills acceptable, ranging from 81.6% to 91.2%. Results indicate the acceptability of Meaning-Centered Therapy and Communication Skills Training among Latino advanced cancer patients and caregivers coping with advanced cancer. These results will inform the topics to be discussed in a culturally adapted psychosocial intervention for advanced cancer patients and their informal caregivers.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer stage at diagnosis according to race

PURPOSE

To determine if the COVID-19 pandemic has further exacerbated racial disparities in late-stage presentation of breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers.

METHODS

We conducted a registry-based retrospective study of patients with newly reported diagnoses of breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers between March 2019-June 2019 (pre-COVID-19) and March 2020-June 2020 (early-COVID-19). We compared the volume of new diagnoses and stage at presentation according to race between both periods.

RESULTS

During the study period, a total of 3528 patients had newly diagnosed cancer; 3304 of which had known disease stages and were included in the formal analyses. 467 (14.1%) were Blacks, and 2743 were (83%) Whites. 1216 (36.8%) had breast, 415 (12.6%) had colorectal, 827 (25%) had lung, and 846 (25.6%) had prostate cancers, respectively. The pre-COVID-19 period included 2120 (64.2%), and the early-COVID-19 period included 1184 (35.8%), representing a proportional 44.2% decline in the volume of new cases of breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers, p < 0.0001. Pre-COVID-19, 16.8% were diagnosed with metastatic disease, versus 20.4% early-COVID-19, representing a proportional increase of 21.4% in the numbers of new cases with metastatic disease, p = 0.01. There was a non-significant proportional decline of 1.9% in Black patients diagnosed with non-metastatic breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers early-COVID-19 (p = 0.71) and a non-significant proportional increase of 7% in Black patients diagnosed with metastatic disease (p = 0.71). Difference-in-difference analyses showed no statistically significant differences in metastatic presentation comparing Black to White patients.

CONCLUSION

While we identified substantial reductions in the volume of new cancer diagnoses and increases in metastatic presentations due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the impact was similar for White and Black patients.

Real time patient-reported outcome measures in patients with cancer: Early experience within an integrated health system

BACKGROUND

While patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have benefit in cancer clinical trials, real-world applications are lacking. This study describes the method of implementation of a cancer enterprise-wide PROMs platform.

METHODS

After establishing a multispecialty stakeholder group within a large integrated health system, domain-specific instruments were selected from the National Institutes of Health's Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) instruments (pain interference, fatigue, physical function, and depression) and were administered at varying frequencies throughout each patient's cancer journey. All cancer patients with an oncologic visit were eligible to complete the PROMs prior to the visit using a patient portal, or at the time of the visit using a tablet. PROMs were integrated into clinical workflow. Clinical partnerships were essential for successful implementation. Descriptive preliminary data were compared using multivariable logistic regression to determine the factors associated with method of PROMs completion.

RESULTS

From September 16, 2020 to July 23, 2021, 23 of 38 clinical units (60.5%) implemented PROMs over 2392 encounters and 1666 patients. Approximately one third of patients (n = 629, 37.8%) used the patient portal. Black patients (aOR 0.70; 95% CI: 0.51-0.97) and patients residing in zip codes with higher percentage of unemployment (aOR: 0.07, 95% CI: 0.01-0.41) were among the least likely to complete PROMs using the patient portal.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful system-wide implementation of PROMs among cancer patients requires engagement from multispecialty stakeholders and investment from clinical partners. Attention to the method of PROMs collection is required in order to reduce the potential for disparities, such as Black populations and those residing in areas with high levels of unemployment.

"You start feeling comfortable, you just start sharing:" A qualitative study of patient distress screening in Black and White patients with endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVES

Black patients with endometrial cancer are less likely to express distress and receive referrals for support services compared to White patients. We aim to characterize patient perceptions of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer and Problem List (NCCN DT & PL), a common distress screening tool, among Black and White patients with endometrial cancer and determine strategies to improve equity in referral to appropriate support services.

METHODS

We conducted semi-structured interviews with 15 Black and 15 White patients with endometrial cancer who reported varying levels of distress on the NCCN DT & PL. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, evaluated through staged content analysis, and salient themes were compared by patient race.

RESULTS

The NCCN DT & PL was generally considered understandable, however the word "distress" could be alienating to participants who considered their stress to be less "drastic." Black participants mentioned fewer negative emotions such as worry and sadness in describing distress and spoke more often of a positive outlook. Additionally, Black participants emphasized the importance of relationship-building with clinicians for open communication on the NCCN DT & PL and clinical encounter. Finally, participants were divided on whether they would alter the way they completed the NCCN DT & PL given more information on cut off scores for referrals, but generally expressed a desire for more direct offers of support services.

CONCLUSIONS

Relationship-building, open communication around emotion, and longitudinal direct offers of support emerged as avenues to reduce inequities in referral to supportive services for patients with endometrial cancer.

Mutual Role Expectations by Patients and General Practitioners-A Mixed Methods Study on Complementarity

Background: Changes in public attitudes toward “authorities” in general, as well as shifts in medical practice toward participative models of diagnosis and treatment, imply fundamental transformations in the patient−doctor relationship. However, consistency in reciprocal role expectations cannot be assumed, and this study reveals significant discrepancies in attitudes and behaviors in primary health consultations. Methods: We conducted a study in the tri-lingual northeastern Italian region of South Tyrol to determine whether perceptions of the patient’s role were congruent or differed. In a mixed method approach, the quantitative research part consisted of a survey with 34 identical questions for general practitioners (n = 109) and adult primary care patients (n = 506) on verbal communication, self-initiative and health literacy, interpersonal and social qualities of the patient−physician relationship, and formal aspects of the consultation. Patients were interviewed via telephone, and general practitioners responded online. In the qualitative part, 26 semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with the patients and analyzed. Results: General practitioners considered patients’ communicative efforts (p < 0.001), self-initiative (p < 0.001), compliance (p = 0.0026), and openness regarding psychosocial issues (p < 0.001) to be significantly more important, whereas patients showed a tendency to give increased importance to formal aspects such as politeness and hygiene (p < 0.001). Perception of the patient’s role differed significantly between the Italian and German linguistic groups. Conclusions: Patients and general practitioners differ in their understanding of patients’ roles. These data suggest that a considerable proportion of the population lacks a clear and tangible idea of the active role they could play in consultations. Targeted information on the identified aspects of patient−provider communication may facilitate participatory behavior and positively impact the longitudinal quality of the patient−general practitioner relationship.

Preferred Communication Strategies Used by Physical Therapists in Chronic Pain Rehabilitation: A Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis

OBJECTIVE

Lack of clarity regarding effective communication behaviors in chronic pain management is a barrier for implementing psychologically informed physical therapy approaches that rely on competent communication by physical therapist providers. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-synthesis to inform the development of a conceptual framework for preferred communication behaviors in pain rehabilitation.

METHODS

Ten databases in the health and communication sciences were systematically searched for qualitative and mixed-method studies of interpersonal communication between physical therapists and adults with chronic pain. Two independent investigators extracted quotations with implicit and explicit references to communication and study characteristics following Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research and Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. Methodological quality for individual studies was assessed with Critical Appraisal Skills Programme, and quality of evidence was evaluated with GRADE-CERQual. An inductive thematic synthesis was conducted by coding each quotation, developing descriptive themes, and then generating behaviorally distinct analytical themes.

RESULTS

Eleven studies involving 346 participants were included. The specificity of operationalizing communication terms varied widely. Meta-synthesis identified 8 communication themes: (1) disclosure-facilitating, (2) rapport-building, (3) empathic, (4) collaborative, (5) professional accountability, (6) informative, (7) agenda-setting, and (8) meta-communication. Based on the quality of available evidence, confidence was moderate for 4 themes and low for 4 themes.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed limited operationalization of communication behaviors preferred by physical therapists in chronic pain rehabilitation. A conceptual framework based on 8 communication themes identified from the literature is proposed as a preliminary paradigm to guide future research.

IMPACT

This proposed evidence-based conceptual framework for preferred communication behaviors in pain rehabilitation provides a framework for clinicians to reflect on their own communication practices and will allow researchers to identify if and how specific communication behaviors impact clinical outcomes.

Understanding clinical communication about mood disturbance symptoms among breast cancer patients: A mixed methods analysis

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to characterize the relationships between breast cancer patient mood symptom severity and demographic/medical factors with clinical communication about mood, and to explore mood discussion content.

METHODS

134 breast cancer patients (mean age=58.3; 14% minority; 13% metastatic) had oncology clinic visits audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded for mood communication. Patient Care Monitor assessed mood symptoms (anxiety/depression presence/severity). Logistic regressions measured associations between mood, demographic/medical factors, and communication. Thematic analysis characterized discussion topics.

RESULTS

Over half of patients (55%; n = 73) reported mood symptoms. Worse mood symptoms were associated with younger age and current treatment (p's < 0.05). 19% of clinic visits (n = 26/134) contained mood discussions. Discussions were more common for younger women and those with non-metastatic disease (p's < 0.05). Odds of discussing mood increased with symptom severity (OR=4.52, p = 0.018). Cancer-related anxiety and medication management were among the most common topics discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

Communication about mood occurred infrequently, with women currently undergoing treatment, with metastatic disease, or with mild mood symptoms at potentially increased risk for inadequate discussion. Both patient-focused and provider-focused interventions to improve clinical communication about mood symptoms could be beneficial.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Clinicians hold a key role in supporting cancer patients' well-being by using and encouraging effective communication about patients' mood.

Coping With Changes to Sex and Intimacy After a Diagnosis of Metastatic Breast Cancer: Results From a Qualitative Investigation With Patients and Partners

Objective

Prior research examining sexual and intimacy concerns among metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients and their intimate partners is limited. In this qualitative study, we explored MBC patients' and partners' experiences of sexual and intimacy-related changes and concerns, coping efforts, and information needs and intervention preferences, with a focus on identifying how the context of MBC shapes these experiences.

Methods

We conducted 3 focus groups with partnered patients with MBC [N = 12; M age = 50.2; 92% White; 8% Black] and 6 interviews with intimate partners [M age = 47.3; 83% White; 17% Black]. Participants were recruited through the Fox Chase Cancer Center Tumor Registry and the Cancer Support Community. Qualitative data were analyzed using the Framework Method and Dedoose software.

Results

Qualitative analyses revealed several key themes reflecting ways in which MBC shapes experiences of sex/intimacy: (1) the heavy disease/treatment burden leads to significant, long-term sexual concerns (e.g., loss of interest and vaginal dryness/discomfort) and consequent heightened emotional distress for both patients (e.g., guilt around not being able to engage in intercourse) and partners (e.g., guilt around pressuring the patient to engage in sexual activity despite pain/discomfort); (2) viewing the relationship as having "an expiration date" (due to expected earlier mortality) influences patients' and partners' concerns related to sex/intimacy and complicates coping efforts; and (3) information needs extend beyond managing sexual side effects to include emotional aspects of intimacy and the added strain of the life-limiting nature of the disease on the relationship. The heightened severity of sexual concerns faced by patients with MBC, compounded by the terminal nature of the disease, may place patients and partners at risk for significant adverse emotional and interpersonal consequences.

Conclusion

Findings suggest unique ways in which sex and intimate relationships change after a diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer from both patients' and partners' perspectives. Consideration of the substantial physical and emotional burden of MBC and the broader context of the relationship and intimacy overall is important when developing a sexuality-focused intervention in this population. Addressing sexual concerns is a critical part of cancer care with important implications for patients' health and quality of life.

Marginalized patient identities and the patient-physician relationship in the cancer care context: a systematic scoping review

PURPOSE

We sought to examine and categorize the current evidence on patient-physician relationships among marginalized patient populations within the context of cancer care using a systemic scoping review approach.

METHODS

Web-based discovery services (e.g., Google Scholar) and discipline-specific databases (e.g., PubMed) were queried for articles on the patient-physician relationship among marginalized cancer patients. The marginalized populations of interest included (1) race and ethnicity, (2) gender, (3) sexual orientation and gender identity, (4) age, (5) disability, (6) socioeconomic status, and (7) geography (rural/urban). Study screening and data extraction were facilitated through the Covidence software platform.

RESULTS

Of the 397 screened studies, 37 met study criteria-most articles utilized quantitative methodologies (n = 28). The majority of studies focused on racial and ethnic cancer disparities (n = 27) with breast cancer (n = 20) as the most common cancer site. Trust and satisfaction with the provider were the most prevalent issues cited in the patient-physician relationship. Differences in patient-physician communication practices and quality were also frequently discussed. Overall, studies highlighted the need for increased culturally congruent care among providers.

CONCLUSION

Results from this review suggest marginalized cancer patients face significant barriers in establishing culturally and linguistically congruent patient-physician relationships. Future studies should focus on the intersectionality of multiple marginalized identities and optimization of the patient-physician relationship.

Person-centered communication about weight and weight management: Focus group discussions in a diverse sample of women with nonmetastatic breast cancer and obesity

BACKGROUND

Women with obesity are at higher risk for high-grade and/or advanced-stage breast cancer in comparison with women without obesity. Many women with a high body mass index (BMI) at breast cancer diagnosis experience further weight gain during and after treatment. This study investigated Black and White patient perspectives on conversations with their oncologists about weight and weight management.

METHODS

Focus groups using a virtual platform (Zoom) were conducted with women after primary treatment for stage I to III breast cancer who were 21 years or older and had a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m² : 2 with Black women (n = 12) and 2 with White women (n = 14).

RESULTS

Participants asked that their oncologists be "transparent" about weight gain as a potential side effect of their cancer treatment and how excess weight might affect their prognosis and survival. They asked to be "seen as an individual" to facilitate both person-centered and culturally appropriate conversations about behavioral changes needed for weight management. Participants urged clinicians to take the lead in initiating conversations about weight to underscore its importance in cancer care and survivorship. They welcomed actionable recommendations about nutrition and exercise from either the oncology clinician or a specialist. Participants offered specific suggestions on how clinicians could initiate weight-related conversations, beginning with questions eliciting patients' perspectives on their weight and lifestyle.

CONCLUSIONS

Many women with early-stage breast cancer and obesity have concerns about weight and weight gain and urge their oncologists to use an active and personalized approach in recommending and supporting efforts at weight management.

LAY SUMMARY

Focus group discussions with Black and White women with early-stage breast cancer and obesity have elicited patient perspectives on conversations with their oncologists about weight and weight management. Many patients have concerns about weight and weight gain and urge their oncologists to use an active and personalized approach in recommending and supporting efforts at weight management.

An Interview With Janeane N. Anderson Regarding Patient-Provider Communication and Health Disparities

This month's column is an interview with Dr Janeane N. Anderson, assistant professor, College of Nursing, at the University of Tennessee Health Science Center (UTHSC) in Memphis who is a health communication scholar with a focus on patient-provider communication and healthcare disparities.

Chronic Illness Management in Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Patients: Exploring the Needs, Access, and Understanding of Information

In Canada, people from culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) backgrounds are at a greater risk of developing a chronic illness, and are more likely to experience adverse health effects and challenges in accessing high-quality care compared with Canadian-born individuals. This, in part, has been attributed to having inadequate access to information and resources needed to manage their illness(es). A qualitative descriptive design and inductive content analysis were used to explore the information needs of 24 CALD patients with chronic illnesses. Participants identified medical, lifestyle, and psychosocial information needs. How much information was needed depended on such antecedents as illness trajectory, severity, and perception. Most information needs remained unmet. A number of communication strategies were identified to bridge language barriers that go beyond translation and are based on effective health education strategies. Findings can help health care professionals better identify CALD patients' information needs and provide strategies that go beyond translation.

Patient-provider discussion about emotional and social needs, mental health outcomes, and benefit finding among U.S. Adults living with cancer

Background

A discussion about patient's nonmedical needs during treatment is considered a crucial component of high‐quality patient–provider communication. We examined whether having a patient–provider discussion about cancer patients’ emotional and social needs is associated with their psychological well‐being.

Methods

Using the 2016–2017 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey‐Experiences with Cancer Survivorship Supplement (MEPS–ECSS) data, we identified the cancer survivors in the United States (US) who reported having a detailed discussion about emotional and social needs during cancer care. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess the association between having a patient–provider discussion and the patients’ psychological well‐being outcomes (depressive symptoms, severe psychological distress, and worrying about cancer recurrence/worsening condition) and benefit finding experience after a cancer diagnosis.

Results

Among 1433 respondents (equivalent to 13.8 million cancer survivors in the US), only 33.6% reported having a detailed patient–provider discussion about their emotional and social needs. Having a discussion was associated with 55% lower odds (odds ratio [OR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26–0.77) of having depressive symptoms and 97% higher odds (OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.46–2.66) of having benefit finding experience. There was no statistically significant association between patient–provider discussion and psychological distress or worrying about cancer recurrence/worsening.

Conclusion

Detailed patient–provider discussion about the cancer patients’ emotional and social needs was associated with a lower likelihood of depressive symptoms and a higher likelihood of experiencing benefit finding. These findings stress the importance of improving the patient–provider discussion about psychosocial needs in cancer survivorship.

THRIVE intervention development: using participatory action research principles to guide a mHealth app-based intervention to improve oncology care

Background:

Women with hormone receptor-positive, early-stage breast cancer who adhere to adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) reduce the risk of cancer recurrence and mortality. AET, however, is associated with adverse symptoms that often result in poor adherence. We applied participatory action research (PAR) principles to conduct focus groups and interviews to refine and enhance a web-enabled app intervention that facilitates patient-provider communication about AET-related symptoms and other barriers to adherence.

Methods:

We conducted four focus groups with women with early-stage breast cancer on AET (N=28), stratified by race (Black and White) and length of time on AET (<6 months and >6 months), to determine preferences and refine the app-based intervention. A fifth mixed-race focus group was convened (N=6) to refine THRIVE app content using high-fidelity mock-ups and to develop new, tailored feedback messages. We also conducted interviews with oncology nurses (N=5) who participated in the THRIVE randomized controlled trial.

Results:

Participants reported preferences for weekly reminder messages to use the THRIVE app, a free-text option to write in AET-related symptoms, and app aesthetics. Other requested app features included: a body map for identifying pain, sleep and dental problems on the symptom list, a dashboard, tailored feedback messages, and information about social support resources. Participants also developed new intervention messages, decided which messages to keep, and edited language for appropriateness and sensitivity. They also discussed the type of electronic pill monitor and incentive plan to be used in the intervention. Nurses reported THRIVE alerts integrated seamlessly into their clinical workflow and increased patient-provider communication, facilitating quicker response to patients’ reported symptoms. Nurses reported no negative feedback or usability concerns with the app.

Conclusions:

THRIVE app content reflects researchers’ partnership with a racially diverse sample of breast cancer survivors and healthcare providers and adherence to participatory design by incorporating patient-requested app features, app aesthetics, and message content. The app has the potential to improve AET adherence and quality of life among breast cancer survivors and reduce disparities in mortality rates for Black women by facilitating communication with healthcare providers.