Tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy treatment and discontinuation in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase in the United States: a clinical practice perspective

Real-world Management of CML: Outcomes and Treatment Patterns

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a disease that previously signified a poor prognosis, but treatment options and outcomes have improved over the last several decades. Despite this, challenges remain in optimal management in clinical practice, as the characteristics in trial populations differ from patients who are treated in a real-world setting. This review describes recent updates in real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with CML.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several analyses describing real-world practice patterns show that tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the most commonly prescribed agents in multiple lines of therapy. First-generation (1G) and second-generation (2G) TKIs are the most commonly prescribed, even in the third line and beyond. Third-generation (3G) TKIs are typically utilized in patients with resistant disease who are younger with fewer comorbidities. Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is utilized significantly less, given other treatment options available. The goals of treatment with CML have shifted to quality of life, cost savings, and treatment-free response (TFR). Despite clear guidelines for attempting TFR, discontinuation practice patterns remain inconsistent. TKIs are the mainstay of CML treatment, including those in later lines of therapy. In real-world practice, several challenges still remain with regard to optimal management. Specifically, ideal sequencing of treatments, side effect profiles of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), current role and timing of transplant, and adherence to recommendations for attempting to achieve a treatment-free response (TFR). A national registry could characterize these practice patterns in order to find ways to optimize care for CML patients.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy discontinuation in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase in the United States after clinical practice guideline updates

A physician survey (July 2019-August 2019) and a retrospective patient medical chart review (November 2019-December 2019) were conducted to assess TKI therapy discontinuation practice in patients with Ph + CML-CP in the US after the publication of practice guidelines updated with recommendations for TKI discontinuation. After guideline updates, 90% of physicians from the survey reported attempting TKI discontinuation and 24% of their patients discontinued TKI after achieving an adequate response. Although TKI therapy discontinuation practice is increasing, particularly in community-based practice, a little more than half of physicians were aware of these updated guidelines resulting in TKI discontinuation attempted under suboptimal conditions, mainly limited to first-line TKI therapy, with more than half of physicians without access to at least MR4.5 sensitivity level of detection monitoring. Stricter response criteria per guideline recommendations were observed to relate to lower relapse rates following TKI discontinuation, emphasizing the importance of communicating these recommendations and access to adequate monitoring tools.

Low-dose tyrosine kinase inhibitors before treatment discontinuation do not impair treatment-free remission in chronic myeloid leukemia patients: Results of a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Long-term treatment-free remission (TFR) represents a new goal for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). In clinical practice, tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) dose reductions can be considered a means of preventing adverse effects and improving quality of life. We hypothesized that administration of low-dose TKIs before treatment discontinuation does not impair TFR in patients with CML who have a deep molecular response (DMR, ≥MR⁴ ).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 77 patients with CML who discontinued treatment with TKIs. Twenty-six patients had been managed with low-dose TKIs before stopping treatment. Patients were to be exposed to TKIs for ≥5 years and to low-dose TKIs for ≥1 year and in DMR for ≥2 years. The loss of major molecular response (MMR) was considered a trigger for restarting therapy.

RESULTS

In the low-dose group, 61.5% of patients received second-generation TKIs, and dose reduction was ≥50% for 65.4% of patients. With a median follow-up of 61.5 months, TFR at 12 months was 56.8% in the full-dose TKI group and 80.8% in the low-dose group, and TFR at 60 months was 47.5% and 58.8%, respectively. The median time to molecular recurrence (≥MMR) from TKI discontinuation in the entire cohort was 6.2 months. All patients quickly achieved MMR after resuming TKI therapy. Results appear independent of both dose reduction and potential pretreatment with interferon-α.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study shows that TFR was not impaired by low-dose TKI regimens before TKI cessation in Patients with CML. Nevertheless, prospective randomized clinical trials must be undertaken to analyze the probability of successful TFR in patients managed with TKI dose de-escalation strategies before TKI discontinuation.

Patient-Initiated Discontinuation of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) has revolutionised the management of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) over the last twenty years, but despite significant improvements in survival, patients exhibit long-term side effects that impact on quality of life. A major advance in CML management has been the ability to discontinue TKI therapy achieving a treatment-free remission (TFR), yet this option is only available to eligible patients who present with low-risk disease and who subsequently attain deep and sustained molecular responses. A case is described of a patient with CML who self-initiated stopping of TKI therapy when in a less than optimal molecular remission. Despite this action, the patient continues to experience a TFR with prospective close molecular monitoring performed. It is emphasized that this approach may lead to ineffective treatment discontinuation, molecular relapse, and increased patient anxiety. As TFR for patients with CML moves from clinical trials into routine clinical practice, emphasis is placed on adherence to (evolving) guidelines critical to ensure optimal counselling, selection, monitoring, and continued management of patients whether TFR is successful or not.