Decreasing pressure injuries and acute care length of stay in patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury

Honduran nursing care to pressure injuries in patients with invasive mechanical ventilation: A qualitative study

Background

Although substantial evidence exists regarding the treatment of pressure ulcers, there is a lack of studies demonstrating a comprehensive nursing approach for managing pressure ulcers in the ICU, particularly among patients with invasive mechanical ventilation from developing countries like Honduras. This gap in research is significant as the risk and impact of pressure ulcers on health recovery cannot be disregarded.

Objective

This study aimed to analyze Honduran nursing care for pressure ulcers in patients with invasive mechanical ventilation admitted to Intensive Care Units.

Methods

A qualitative study approach was used, with in-depth interviews conducted with 12 critical care nurses from July to September 2022. The interviews were recorded, and data analysis was performed using the participants' narratives following Colaizzi's steps.

Results

Three themes were obtained, which provide insight into the phenomenon: "The strengths in Honduran nursing interventions," "Negligence in the Honduran nursing care processes," and "Vulnerabilities in the organizational structures."

Conclusion

Nurses' experiences highlighted their timely reports and comprehensive, holistic care. However, they undergo negligence in their caring processes, such as low frequency of repositioning, lack of caring plans, and absence of self-training, leading to interdisciplinary work codependency for decision-making. Allocating resources toward nursing care and their professional growth is an investment in providing humane treatment and ensuring the prevention and management of pressure injuries in critical care patients. This study highlights the importance of comprehensive training and standardized protocols for intensive care nurses to improve pressure injury prevention and management in mechanically ventilated patients, emphasizing the need for regular patient repositioning, effective communication, and adequate resources to enhance patient care quality.

Hospital Course and Complications of Subaxial Cervical Trauma Patients With Tetraplegia or Paraplegia: A Case Series and Literature Review

STUDY DESIGN

A single-institution, retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to present demographic characteristics, mechanism of injuries, lengths of stay, intensive care unit (ICU) days, discharge locations, and causes of 90-day readmission for patients with subaxial spinal cord injuries resulting in paraplegia or tetraplegia.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Spinal cord injuries resulting in paraplegia or tetraplegia are rare injuries with debilitating outcomes. Numerous advances have occurred in caring for these patients, but patients still experience multiple complications. The severity of these injuries and numerous complications result in prolonged hospital stays and the need for extensive rehabilitation.

METHODS

Twelve patients with subaxial spinal cord injury resulting in paraplegia or tetraplegia from a level 1 adult trauma center were reviewed. The primary outcomes included hospital length of stay, ICU days, intrahospital complications, 90-day readmission rates, and discharge location. We reviewed the literature for these outcomes in spinal cord injuries.

RESULTS

For patients with subaxial spinal cord injuries resulting in paraplegia and tetraplegia, the average age was 36.0 years, and most were male [91.7% (11/12)]. The most common mechanism of injury was gunshot wounds[41.7% (5/12)]. Patients spent an average of 46.3 days in the hospital and 30.7 days in the ICU. Respiratory complications were the most common (9 patients). Fifty percent of patients (6/12) were discharged to the inpatient spinal cord rehab center, and 16.7% (2/12) expired while in the hospital. Two patients (20.0%) were readmitted within 90 days of discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients with subaxial spinal cord injuries resulting in paraplegia or tetraplegia were young males with high-energy traumas. Many patients had intrahospital complications, and most were discharged to the hospital spinal rehab center. These findings likely stem from the severity of paraplegia and tetraplegia injuries and the need for rehabilitation.

Sacral interface pressure can be alleviated by repositioning with a small-angle change using an automated bed in patients with spinal cord injury

AIM OF THE STUDY

This study aimed to compare interface pressure and total contact area of the sacral region in different positions, including small-angle changes, in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). Furthermore, we analyzed the clinical factors influencing pressure to identify the pressure injury (PI) high-risk group.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An intervention was conducted for patients with paraplegia (n = 30) with SCI. In the first and second trials, interface pressure and total contact area of the sacral region were recorded from large- and small-angled positions using the automatic repositioning bed, which can change the angle of the back, lateral tilt, and knee.

RESULTS

Positions with back raised ≥45° showed significantly higher pressure on the sacrum than most other positions. The pressure and contact area differences were statistically insignificant for combinations of small-angled changes <30°. Additionally, the duration of injury (β = 0.51, p = 0.010) and neurological level of injury (NLI) (β = -0.47, p = 0.020) were significant independent predictors of average pressure. Similarly, the duration of injury (β = 0.64, p = 0.001), the Korean version of the spinal cord independence measure-III (β = -0.52, p = 0.017), and body mass index (BMI; β = -0.34, p = 0.041) were significant independent predictors of peak pressure.

CONCLUSIONS

For repositioning, combinations of small-angle changes <30° effectively reduce pressure on the sacral region in patients with SCI. Lower BMI, longer duration of injury, lower functioning score, and NLI ≥ T7 are predictors of high sacral pressures, which increase the risk for PI. Therefore, patients with these predictors require strict management.

Risk factors for hospital acquired pressure injury in patients with spinal cord injury during first rehabilitation: prospective cohort study

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective observational cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

First, describe pressure injury (PI) and associated risk factors in individuals with spinal cord injury/disorder (SCI/D) during first rehabilitation. Second, evaluate a prediction model for hospital acquired PI (HAPI) development.

SETTING

Acute care and rehabilitation clinic specialized in SCI/D.

METHODS

Patients ≥18 years of age with SCI/D were included during first rehabilitation between 08/2018 and 12/2019. We performed a systematic literature search to identify risk factors for PI development. Patients were classified according to HAPI developed. Between group differences of patients' characteristics and risk factors were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Logistic predictive models were performed to estimate HAPI development and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was used to test the model.

RESULTS

In total, 94 patients were included, 48 (51.1%) developed at least one HAPI and in total 93 were observed, mainly stage I and stage II HAPI according to the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. We found nine significantly associated risk factors: completeness of SCI/D, pneumonia, sedative medications, autonomic dysreflexia, Braden ≤12 points, SCIPUS ≥9 points, lower admission SCIM and lower admission FIM-cognition, longer length of stay (LOS) (p ≤ 0.0005). In a predictive model, none of the risk factors was associated with HAPI development (AUC = 0.5).

CONCLUSION

HAPIs in patients with SCI/D during first rehabilitation are a frequent and complex condition and associated with several risk factors. No predictive model exists but with the identified risk factors of this study, larger studies can create a tailored and flexible HAPI risk prediction model.

Surveillance for Pressure Injuries on Admission to Inpatient Rehabilitation Hospitals During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Objective

To determine if the incidence of pressure injuries (PIs) on admission to an inpatient rehabilitation hospital (IRH) system of care was increased during the early coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic period.

Design

Retrospective survey chart review of consecutive cohorts. Admissions to 4 acute IRHs within 1 system of care over the first consecutive 6-week period of admitting patients positive for COVID-19 during the initial peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, April 1-May 9, 2020. A comparison was made with the pre–COVID-19 period, January 1-February 19, 2020.

Setting

Four acute IRHs with admissions on a referral basis from acute care hospitals.

Participants

A consecutive sample (N=1125) of pre–COVID-19 admissions (n=768) and COVID-19 period admissions (n=357), including persons who were COVID-19–positive (n=161) and COVID-19–negative (n=196).

Main Outcome Measures

Incidence of PIs on admission to IRH.

Results

Prevalence of PIs on admission during the COVID-19 pandemic was increased when compared with the pre–COVID-19 period by 14.9% (P<.001). There was no difference in the prevalence of PIs in the COVID-19 period between patients who were COVID-19–positive and COVID-19–negative (35.4% vs 35.7%). The severity of PIs, measured by the wound stage of the most severe PI the patient presented with, worsened during the COVID-19 period compared with pre–COVID-19 (χ² 32.04%, P<.001). The length of stay in the acute care hospital before transfer to the IRH during COVID-19 was greater than pre–COVID-19 by 10.9% (P<.001).

Conclusions

During the early part of the COVID-19 pandemic time frame, there was an increase in the prevalence and severity of PIs noted on admission to our IRHs. This may represent the significant burden placed on the health care system by the pandemic, affecting all patients regardless of COVID-19 status. This information is important to help all facilities remain vigilant to prevent PIs as the pandemic continues and potential future pandemics that place strain on medical resources.

An evaluation of the representativeness of a national spinal cord injury registry: a population-based cohort study

STUDY DESIGN

Population-based cohort study for the western part of Quebec.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the impact of declining to participate in a national spinal cord injury (SCI) registry on patient outcomes and continuum of care.

SETTING

Level-1 trauma center specialized in SCI care in Montreal, Canada.

METHODS

This cohort study compared the outcomes of 444 patients who were enrolled in the Rick Hansen SCI registry and 140 patients who refused. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the association between voluntary participation and the outcomes, while adjusting for confounding factors. The main outcomes were: attendance to follow-up 6- to 12-month post injury, 1-year mortality, and the occurrence of pressure injury during acute care.

RESULTS

Declining to be enrolled in the registry was a significant predictor of lower attendance to specialized follow-up (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.02-0.08). It was also associated with a higher 1-year mortality rate (OR 12.50, CI 4.50-33.30) and higher occurrence of pressure injury (OR 2.56, CI 1.56-4.17).

CONCLUSIONS

This study sheds invaluable insight on individuals that researchers and clinicians are usually blind to in SCI cohort studies. This study suggests that decline to participate in a registry during the care hospitalization may be associated with worsened health, poorer outcomes, and reduced follow-up to specialized care. Declining the enrollment to voluntary registry could represent a potential prognostic factor for future research.

Factors associated with discharge destination following inpatient functional rehabilitation in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of data from a prospective database of a Level 1 trauma center.

OBJECTIVES

This project aims to identify factors collected during the acute and rehabilitative care following a traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) associated with success and failure to return home after inpatient intensive functional rehabilitation (IFR).

SETTING

Level 1 trauma center specialized in TSCI care in Montreal, Canada.

METHODS

All eligible patients from our prospective database were separated into two groups according to discharge destination following IFR. Clinical variables collected during the acute and rehabilitative care as well as demographic variables were compared between patients who managed to return home (Group 1) and those who were discharged elsewhere (Group 2). Multivariable regression analyses were conducted with variables that were significant at the univariate level.

RESULTS

Out of the 193 patients included, 22 (11%) failed to return home following IFR. Six variables were associated with failure to return home at the univariate level: longer acute length of stay (LOS), longer rehabilitation LOS, living alone, higher neurological level of injury, having comorbidities, and having a pressure injury (PI) during acute care. Three variables remained significant at the multivariate level: living alone, increasing acute LOS and presenting a high cervical (C1-C4) neurological level of injury.

CONCLUSIONS

It is important that acute care clinicians recognize the aforementioned factors early after TSCI in order to optimize patients for community reintegration.