1
|
Kersen J, Kurbatfinski S, Thomas A, Ibadin S, Hezam A, Lorenzetti D, Chandarana S, Dort JC, Sauro KM. Are there opportunities to improve care as patients transition through the cancer care continuum? A scoping review. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e078210. [PMID: 39672587 PMCID: PMC11647354 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/12/2024] [Indexed: 12/15/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with cancer experience many Transitions in Care (TiC), occurring when a patient's care transfers between healthcare providers or institutions/settings. Among other patient populations, TiC are associated with medical errors, patient dissatisfaction and elevated healthcare use and expenditure. However, our understanding of TiC among patients with cancer is lacking. OBJECTIVE To map and characterise evidence about TiC among patients with cancer. PARTICIPANTS Adult patients with cancer at any stage in the cancer continuum. INTERVENTION Evidence sources exploring TiC among patients with cancer were eligible. OUTCOME Evidence sources exploring TiC among patients with cancer using any outcome were eligible. SETTING Any setting where a patient with cancer received care. DESIGN This scoping review included any study describing TiC among patients with cancer with no restrictions on study design, publication type, publication date or language. Evidence sources, identified by searching six databases using search terms for the population and TiC, were included if they described TiC. Two independent reviewers screened titles/abstracts and full texts for eligibility and completed data abstraction. Quantitative data were summarised using descriptive statistics and qualitative data were synthesised using thematic analysis. RESULTS This scoping review identified 801 evidence sources examining TiC among patients with cancer. Most evidence sources focused on the TiC between diagnosis and treatment and breast or colorectal cancer. Six themes emerged from the qualitative evidence sources: the transfer of information, emotional impacts of TiC, continuity of care, patient-related factors, healthcare provider-related factors and healthcare system-related factors. Interventions intended to improve TiC among patients with cancer were developed, implemented or reviewed in 163 evidence sources. CONCLUSION While there is a large body of research related to TiC among patients with cancer, there remains a gap in our understanding of several TiC and certain types of cancer, suggesting the need for additional evidence exploring these areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaling Kersen
- Department Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Stefan Kurbatfinski
- Department Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Abigail Thomas
- Department Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Seremi Ibadin
- Department of Surgery, Community Health Sciences, and Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calagary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Areej Hezam
- Department Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Diane Lorenzetti
- Department Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Shamir Chandarana
- Department of Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Joseph C Dort
- Department of Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Khara M Sauro
- Department of Surgery, Community Health Sciences, and Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calagary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Reay G, Rankin JA, Then KL, Fung T, Smith-MacDonald L. Emergency department triage decision-making by registered nurses: An instrument development study. J Adv Nurs 2024; 80:4725-4735. [PMID: 38825956 DOI: 10.1111/jan.16252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2023] [Revised: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/04/2024]
Abstract
AIM To develop and psychometrically test the triage decision-making instrument, a tool to measure Emergency Department Registered Nurses decision-making. DESIGN Five phases: (1) defining the concept, (2) item generation, (3) face validity, (4) content validity and (5) pilot testing. METHODS Concept definition informed by a grounded theory study from which four domains emerged. Items relevant to the four domains were generated and revised. Face validity was established using three focus groups. The target population upon which the reliability and validity of the triage decision-making instrument was explored were triage registered nurses in emergency departments. Three expert judges assessed 89 items for content and domain designation using a 4-point scale. Psychometric properties were assessed by exploratory factor analysis, following which the names of the four domains were modified. RESULTS The triage decision-making instrument is a 22-item tool with four factors: clinical judgement, managing acuity, professional collaboration and creating space. Focus group data indicated support for the domains. Expert review resulted in 46 items with 100% agreement and 13 with 66% agreement. Fifty-nine items were distributed to a convenience sample of 204 triage nurses from six hospitals in 2019. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measures indicated that the data were sufficient for exploratory factor analysis. Bartlett's test indicated patterned relationships among the items (X 2 (231) = 1156.69). An eigenvalue of >1.0 was used and four factors explained 48.64% of the variance. All factor loadings were ≥0.40. Internal consistency was demonstrated by Cronbach's alphas of .596 factor 1, .690 factor 2, .749 factor 3 and .822 for factor 4. CONCLUSION The triage decision-making instrument meets the criteria for face validity, content validity and internal consistency. It is suitable for further testing and refinement. IMPACT The instrument is a first step in quantifying triage decision-making in real-world clinical environments. The triage decision-making instrument can be used for targeted triage interventions aimed at improving throughput and staff education. STATISTICAL SUPPORT Dr. Tak Fung who is a member of the research team is a statistician. STATISTICAL METHODS Development, validation and assessment of instruments/scales. Descriptive statistics. REPORTING METHOD STROBE cross-sectional checklist. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE The TDI makes the complexity of triage decision-making visible. Identifying the influence of decision-making factors in addition to acuity that affect triage decisions will enable nurse managers and educators to develop targeted interventions and staff development initiatives. By extension, this will enhance patient care and safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gudrun Reay
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - James A Rankin
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- School of Nursing, Thompson Rivers University, Kamloops, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Karen L Then
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Tak Fung
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
de Lange S, Heyns T, Filmalter C. Clinical practice guidelines for person-centred handover practices in emergency departments: a scoping review. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e082677. [PMID: 39477267 PMCID: PMC11529586 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/17/2024] [Indexed: 11/03/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review the available information on clinical practice guidelines for person-centred and current handover practices between emergency care practitioners (ECPs) and healthcare professionals in emergency departments (EDs). Collating existing clinical practice guidelines may improve handover practices. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Clinical practice guidelines for person-centred handover practices between ECPs and healthcare professionals in EDs. ECPs transporting and handing patients over to healthcare professionals in EDs. Healthcare professionals including doctors and nurses working in EDs, who are involved in handovers with ECPs. Studies conducted in EDs, emergency rooms or emergency centres in any geographical area. No language or time restrictions were applied. The search included published and unpublished studies, opinion papers as well as primary sources, and evidence synthesis. All qualitative and quantitative research designs were included. SOURCES OF EVIDENCE The literature on clinical practice guidelines for person-centred handover practices was reviewed. Three electronic databases were searched: MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL (EBSCO) and Scopus from inception to May 2023 with no time limits set for the inclusion of published literature in the review. Six guideline organisations were also searched. CHARTING METHODS A data extraction tool was developed, pilot-tested and used to extract data from the included studies. RESULTS 19 studies met the inclusion criteria. Various mnemonics exist for handover practices. Where mnemonics are not used, participants have identified important information that should be included during handover practices. We did not find any clinical practice guidelines or information on person-centred handover practices in any of the reviewed articles. CONCLUSIONS Currently, there is no gold standard for person-centred handover practices, which has led to various practices being implemented. Currently, there is a paucity of literature on person-centred handover practices. Most articles expressed a need for standardised handover practices; however, not all aspects of handover practices can be standardised and should be kept patient and context-specific. TRIAL AND PROTOCOL REGISTRATION This scoping review protocol was registered on Figshare (10.6084/m9 /m9.figshare.21731528).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Santel de Lange
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Tanya Heyns
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Celia Filmalter
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mangus CW, James TG, Parker SJ, Duffy E, Chandanabhumma PP, Cassady CM, Bellolio F, Pasupathy KS, Manojlovich M, Singh H, Mahajan P. Frontline Providers' and Patients' Perspectives on Improving Diagnostic Safety in the Emergency Department: A Qualitative Study. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2024; 50:480-491. [PMID: 38643047 PMCID: PMC11473193 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Revised: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few studies have described the insights of frontline health care providers and patients on how the diagnostic process can be improved in the emergency department (ED), a setting at high risk for diagnostic errors. The authors aimed to identify the perspectives of providers and patients on the diagnostic process and identify potential interventions to improve diagnostic safety. METHODS Semistructured interviews were conducted with 10 ED physicians, 15 ED nurses, and 9 patients/caregivers at two separate health systems. Interview questions were guided by the ED-Adapted National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Diagnostic Process Framework and explored participant perspectives on the ED diagnostic process, identified vulnerabilities, and solicited interventions to improve diagnostic safety. The authors performed qualitative thematic analysis on transcribed interviews. RESULTS The research team categorized vulnerabilities in the diagnostic process and intervention opportunities based on the ED-Adapted Framework into five domains: (1) team dynamics and communication (for example, suboptimal communication between referring physicians and the ED team); (2) information gathering related to patient presentation (for example, obtaining the history from the patients or their caregivers; (3) ED organization, system, and processes (for example, staff schedules and handoffs); (4) patient education and self-management (for example, patient education at discharge from the ED); and (5) electronic health record and patient portal use (for example, automatic release of test results into the patient portal). The authors identified 33 potential interventions, of which 17 were provider focused and 16 were patient focused. CONCLUSION Frontline providers and patients identified several vulnerabilities and potential interventions to improve ED diagnostic safety. Refining, implementing, and evaluating the efficacy of these interventions are required.
Collapse
|
5
|
Khirekar J, Badge A, Bandre GR, Shahu S. Disaster Preparedness in Hospitals. Cureus 2023; 15:e50073. [PMID: 38192940 PMCID: PMC10771935 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.50073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Disaster preparedness in hospitals is a critical global concern that involves proactive measures to mitigate the impact of natural or artificial disasters. The review emphasizes the role of organizations such as India's National Disaster Management Authority in the development of response strategies. Hospitals face challenges in protecting facilities and healthcare workers during disasters, highlighting the need for effective training, equipment, and communication access. Differentiating disasters into natural, technological, and artificial types showcases the varied challenges each presents. Key challenges include resource allocation, interoperability of the communication system, evacuation strategies, and ethical considerations. Essential strategies include risk assessment, staff training, communication, and collaboration with external partners. Hospital disaster preparedness requires a comprehensive approach that involves strategies, training, and community participation to ensure safety during emergencies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janhavi Khirekar
- Hospital Administration, School of Allied Health Sciences, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research (Deemed to Be University), Nagpur, IND
| | - Ankit Badge
- Microbiology, Datta Meghe Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research (Deemed to Be University), Nagpur, IND
| | - Gulshan R Bandre
- Microbiology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research (Deemed to Be University), Wardha, IND
| | - Shivani Shahu
- Hospital Administration, School of Allied Health Sciences, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research (Deemed to Be University), Nagpur, IND
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Degabriel D, Petrino R, Frau ED, Uccella L. Factors influencing patients' experience of communication with the medical team of the emergency department. Intern Emerg Med 2023; 18:2045-2051. [PMID: 37142863 PMCID: PMC10543488 DOI: 10.1007/s11739-023-03298-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
The Emergency Department (ED) setting often presents situations where the doctor-patient relationship is fundamental and may be challenging. Thus, it is important to use effective communication to improve outcomes. This study explores patients' experience of communication with the medical team aiming to discover whether there are some objective factors which may affect their perception. A prospective, cross-sectional study in two hospitals: an urban, academic trauma center and a small city hospital. Adult patients discharged from the ED in October 2021 were consecutively included. Patients filled out a validated questionnaire, the Communication Assessment Tool for Teams (CAT-T), assessing communication perception. Additional data about the participants were collected by the physician in a dedicated tab to assess whether there were objective factors influencing the patient's perception of the medical team's communication skills. Statistical analysis was then performed. 394 questionnaires were analyzed. The average score for all items exceeded 4 (good). Younger patients and patients who were conveyed by ambulance attributed lower scores than other groups (p value < 0.05). A significant difference between the two hospitals was also observed in favour of the bigger hospital. In our study long waiting times did not generate less satisfied responses. The item which received the lowest scores was "the medical team encouraged me to ask questions". Overall, patients were satisfied with doctor-patient communication. Age, setting, way of conveyance to the hospital are objective factors that may influence patients' experience and satisfaction in the ED.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dea Degabriel
- Internal Medicine Department, EOC-Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, via Tesserete 46, 6900, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Roberta Petrino
- Emergency Department, EOC-Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, via Tesserete 46, 6900, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Eleonora Dafne Frau
- Emergency Department, EOC-Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, via Tesserete 46, 6900, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Laura Uccella
- Emergency Department, EOC-Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, via Tesserete 46, 6900, Lugano, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kamta J, Fregoso B, Lee A, Kutsuris C, Kadow E, Walker C, Sensenbach B, O'Donnell C, Porter A, Blankenberg J, Acquisto N, Mazzillo J, Farney A, Cushman JT, Dorsett M. Improving Emergency Medicine Clinician Awareness of Prehospital-Administered Medications. PREHOSP EMERG CARE 2023; 28:506-512. [PMID: 37478002 DOI: 10.1080/10903127.2023.2238815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Revised: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/16/2023] [Indexed: 07/23/2023]
Abstract
Background/problem: Information transfer between emergency medical services (EMS) and emergency medicine (EM) is at high risk for omissions and errors. EM awareness of prehospital medication administration affects patient management and medication error. In April 2020, we surveyed emergency physicians and emergency department nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs) regarding the EMS handoff process. Emergency physicians and NPs/PAs endorsed knowing what medications were given, or having received direct verbal handoff from EMS "Often" or "Always" only 20% of the time (n = 71), identifying a need to improve the written handoff process. To assess rates of medication error due to lack of awareness of prehospital administered medications, we measured glucocorticoid redosing in the emergency department (ED) following prehospital dexamethasone administration. In 2020, glucocorticoids were redosed 30% of the time, and our aim was to reduce glucocorticoid redosing to 10% by June 2022. Intervention: We developed and implemented a system innovation where prehospital-administered medications documented in a nursing flowsheet during verbal handoff are pulled directly into the triage note where they are more likely to be reviewed by receiving EM clinicians. Results: Shewhart p-charts were used to evaluate for statistical process change in the process measure of triage note documentation of prehospital medication administration and the outcome measure of glucocorticoid redosing. While the frequency of prehospital dexamethasone administration in the triage note increased, no statistical process change outcome measure of glucocorticoid redosing was observed. However, on repeat survey of EM clinicians in July 2022, 50% now indicated they were aware of prehospital medication administration "Often" or "Always" (n = 61, p = 0.003), 87% maintained they use the triage note as the main source of information regarding prehospital medication administration, and 81% "Always" review the triage note. Conclusions: Innovations that improve accessibility of written documentation of prehospital medication administration were associated with improved subjective assessment of EM clinician awareness of prehospital medications, but not the outcome measure of medication error. Effective error reduction likely requires better system integration between prehospital and EM records.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeff Kamta
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
- Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Fairfax, Virginia
| | - Bryan Fregoso
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Andrew Lee
- School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
| | - Catherine Kutsuris
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Elizabeth Kadow
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Christopher Walker
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Benjamin Sensenbach
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | | | - Andrew Porter
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Jessica Blankenberg
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Nicole Acquisto
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Justin Mazzillo
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Aaron Farney
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Jeremy T Cushman
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Maia Dorsett
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mastrogiovanni MJ, Michelle Moccia J. Optimizing handover in patients with stroke symptoms utilizing an organized protocol between emergency department providers and emergency medical personnel. Int Emerg Nurs 2022; 61:101129. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ienj.2021.101129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2021] [Revised: 11/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
9
|
Lubin JS, Shah A. An Incomplete Medical Record: Transfer of Care From Emergency Medical Services to the Emergency Department. Cureus 2022; 14:e22446. [PMID: 35345754 PMCID: PMC8942169 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.22446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Transition of care from Emergency Medical Services (EMS) to the Emergency Department (ED) represents an intersection at high risk for error. Minimal research has quantitatively examined data transfer at this point. In Pennsylvania, this handoff consists of a transfer-of-care form (TOC) provided by EMS to ED in addition to a verbal report. A prehospital patient care report (PCR) is later filed by EMS up to 72 hours after concluding care. Objective: To evaluate the congruence between prehospital records provided at handoff and the final PCR found in the patient’s medical record. Our hypothesis was that there would be discrepancies between the TOC and final PCR. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted comparing the TOC from a single EMS agency to the final PCR found in the electronic medical record. A convenience sample of 200 patients who received advanced life support transport over a one-month period were included. Metrics to assess the discrepancy between the reports included chief complaint, allergies, medications, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP), pulse, respiratory rate (RR), Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), and prehospital treatment provided. The level of agreement between the two sources was compared using kappa statistics and concordance correlation coefficients (CCC) with 95% confidence intervals. Results: Of the 200 encounters that met inclusion criteria, 72% had matching chief complaints between the TOC and PCR. Medications matched in 66% and allergies matched in 82%. Up to three BP, pulse, and RR readings were collected; only 30% of the third BP readings were available from the TOC, while 68% were available from the PCR. Comparing the three SBP values on the TOC to respective counterparts on the PCR showed a substantial correlation (all CCC >0.95). Pulse and DBP values had moderate-to-substantial correlation (CCC: 0.93, 0.94, 0.96 and 0.77, 0.92, 0.94 respectively). RR showed inconsistent correlation (CCC: 0.37, 0.84, 0.94). GCS showed a moderate correlation between the two forms (CCC: 0.81). Conclusion: There were significant differences between the information transferred to the ED through the TOC compared to what was recorded in the PCR. Further evaluation of the TOC process is needed to improve accuracy.
Collapse
|
10
|
Analysis, Design and Experimental Research of a Novel Bilateral Patient Transfer Robot. MACHINES 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/machines10010033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Patient transfer has always been a difficult problem in the hospital. For medical staff, there are problems including high risk of infection, heavy physical labor and low efficiency of transfer; for patients, there are problems including poor comfort and secondary injury. In this paper, a novel bilateral patient transfer robot is investigated and designed. The following tasks are conducted: (1) Based on the process of patient transfer, a transfer model, which consists of two degrees of freedom, is proposed, and the working principle of bilateral patient transfer robot is obtained and analyzed in detail. (2) Force analysis of the patient transfer robot is conducted. The corresponding relationship between the patient comfort and the insertion angle is proposed, and the optimal sizes of mechanical structure are obtained. (3) Based on the theoretical analysis, the mechanical structure and the control system of the robot are designed, and the prototype is manufactured. (4) Experimental research is conducted. The results show that the prototype can complete the required motion performance with a carrying capacity up to 150 kg and patient comfort is excellent. The results of this paper prove that this kind of patient transfer robot has good performance, it can also reduce the burden on medical staff.
Collapse
|
11
|
Park JY. Real-Time Monitoring Electronic Triage Tag System for Improving Survival Rate in Disaster-Induced Mass Casualty Incidents. Healthcare (Basel) 2021; 9:877. [PMID: 34356255 PMCID: PMC8307670 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare9070877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2021] [Revised: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
This study was conducted to contribute to active disaster response by developing internet of things (IoT)-based vital sign monitoring e-triage tag system to improve the survival rate at disaster mass casualty incidents fields. The model used in this study for developing the e-triage tag system is the rapid prototyping model (RAD). The process comprised six steps: analysis, design, development, evaluation, implementation, and simulation. As a result of detailed assessment of the system design and development by an expert group, areas with the highest score in the triage sensor evaluation were rated "very good", with 5 points for continuous vital sign data delivery, portability, and robustness. In addition, ease of use, wearability, and electricity consumption were rated 4.8, 4.7, and 4.6 points, respectively. In the triage application evaluation, the speed and utility scored a perfect 5 points, and the reliability and expressiveness were rated 4.9 points and 4.8 points, respectively. This study will contribute significantly to increasing the survival rate via the development of a conceptual prehospital triage for field applications and e-triage tag system implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ju Young Park
- College of Nursing, Konyang University, 158 Gwanjedong-ro, Seo-gu, Daejeon 35365, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Addressing Communication Breakdowns during Emergency Care Transitions of Older Adults: Evaluation of a Standardized Inter-Facility Health Care Communication Form. Can J Aging 2021; 41:15-25. [PMID: 34018474 DOI: 10.1017/s0714980821000039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Transitions for older persons from long-term care (LTC) to the emergency department (ED) and back, can result in adverse events. Effective communication among care settings is required to ensure continuity of care. We implemented a standardized form for improving consistency of documentation during LTC to ED transitions of residents 65 years of age or older, via emergency medical services (EMS), and back. Data on form use and form completion were collected through chart review. Practitioners' perspectives were collected using surveys. The form was used in 90/244 (37%) LTC to ED transitions, with large variation in data element completion. EMS and ED reported improved identification of resident information. LTC personnel preferred usual practice to the new form and twice reported prioritizing form completion before calling 911. To minimize risk of harmful unintended consequences, communication forms should be implemented as part of broader quality improvement programs, rather than as stand-alone interventions.
Collapse
|
13
|
Clinical Utility of Delta Lactate for Predicting Early In-Hospital Mortality in Adult Patients: A Prospective, Multicentric, Cohort Study. Diagnostics (Basel) 2020; 10:diagnostics10110960. [PMID: 33212827 PMCID: PMC7697598 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics10110960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2020] [Revised: 11/12/2020] [Accepted: 11/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
One of the challenges in the emergency department (ED) is the early identification of patients with a higher risk of clinical deterioration. The objective is to evaluate the prognostic capacity of ΔLA (correlation between prehospital lactate (pLA) and hospital lactate (hLA)) with respect to in-hospital two day mortality. We conducted a pragmatic, multicentric, prospective and blinded-endpoint study in adults who consecutively attended and were transported in advanced life support with high priority from the scene to the ED. The corresponding area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) was obtained for each of the outcomes. In total, 1341 cases met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 71 years (interquartile range: 54–83 years), with 38.9% (521 cases) females. The total 2 day mortality included 106 patients (7.9%). The prognostic precision for the 2 day mortality of pLA and hLA was good, with an AUROC of 0.800 (95% CI: 0.74–0.85; p < 0.001) and 0.819 (95% CI: 0.76–0.86; p < 0.001), respectively. Of all patients, 31.5% (422 cases) had an ΔLA with a decrease of <10%, of which a total of 66 patients (15.6%) died. A lactate clearance ≥ 10% is associated with a lower risk of death in the ED, and this value could potentially be used as a guide to determine if a severely injured patient is improving in response to the established treatment.
Collapse
|
14
|
Preckel B, Staender S, Arnal D, Brattebø G, Feldman JM, Ffrench-O'Carroll R, Fuchs-Buder T, Goldhaber-Fiebert SN, Haller G, Haugen AS, Hendrickx JFA, Kalkman CJ, Meybohm P, Neuhaus C, Østergaard D, Plunkett A, Schüler HU, Smith AF, Struys MMRF, Subbe CP, Wacker J, Welch J, Whitaker DK, Zacharowski K, Mellin-Olsen J. Ten years of the Helsinki Declaration on patient safety in anaesthesiology: An expert opinion on peri-operative safety aspects. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2020; 37:521-610. [PMID: 32487963 DOI: 10.1097/eja.0000000000001244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
: Patient safety is an activity to mitigate preventable patient harm that may occur during the delivery of medical care. The European Board of Anaesthesiology (EBA)/European Union of Medical Specialists had previously published safety recommendations on minimal monitoring and postanaesthesia care, but with the growing public and professional interest it was decided to produce a much more encompassing document. The EBA and the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA) published a consensus on what needs to be done/achieved for improvement of peri-operative patient safety. During the Euroanaesthesia meeting in Helsinki/Finland in 2010, this vision was presented to anaesthesiologists, patients, industry and others involved in health care as the 'Helsinki Declaration on Patient Safety in Anaesthesiology'. In May/June 2020, ESA and EBA are celebrating the 10th anniversary of the Helsinki Declaration on Patient Safety in Anaesthesiology; a good opportunity to look back and forward evaluating what was achieved in the recent 10 years, and what needs to be done in the upcoming years. The Patient Safety and Quality Committee (PSQC) of ESA invited experts in their fields to contribute, and these experts addressed their topic in different ways; there are classical, narrative reviews, more systematic reviews, political statements, personal opinions and also original data presentation. With this publication we hope to further stimulate implementation of the Helsinki Declaration on Patient Safety in Anaesthesiology, as well as initiating relevant research in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedikt Preckel
- From the Department of Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Academic Medical Center (AMC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands (BP), Institute for Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Spital Männedorf AG, Männedorf, Switzerland (SS), Department of Anaesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria (SS), Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, University Hospital Fundación Alcorcón Madrid, Spain (DA), Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Haukeland University Hospital (GB, ASH), Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway (GB), Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA (JMF), Anaesthetic Department, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland (RF-OC), Department of Anesthesiology & Critical Care, University de Lorraine, CHRU Nancy, Brabois University Hospital, Nancy, France (TF-B), Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA (SNG-F), Department of Anaesthesiology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland (GH), Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (GH), Department of Anesthesiology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital Aalst, Aalst, Belgium (JFAH), Division of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands (CJK), Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine & Pain Therapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt (PM, KZ), Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg (PM), Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (CN), Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (DØ), Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (DØ), Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (AP), Product Management Anesthesiology, Drägerwerk AG & Co. KGaA, Lübeck, Germany (HUS), Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Lancaster Infirmary, Lancaster, UK (AFS), Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands (MMRFS), Department of Basic and Applied Medical Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium (MMRFS), Department of Acute Medicine, Ysbyty Gwynedd Hospital, Bangor, UK (CPS), School of Medical Science, Bangor University, Bangor, UK (CPS), Institute of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care IFAI, Hirslanden Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland (JWa), Department of Critical Care, University College Hospital, London (JWe), Department of Anaesthesia, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK (DKW) and Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Baerum Hospital, Sandvika, Norway (JM-O)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Austin EE, Blakely B, Tufanaru C, Selwood A, Braithwaite J, Clay-Williams R. Strategies to measure and improve emergency department performance: a scoping review. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2020; 28:55. [PMID: 32539739 PMCID: PMC7296671 DOI: 10.1186/s13049-020-00749-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2020] [Accepted: 05/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Over the last two decades, Emergency Department (ED) crowding has become an increasingly common occurrence worldwide. Crowding is a complex and challenging issue that affects EDs' capacity to provide safe, timely and quality care. This review aims to map the research evidence provided by reviews to improve ED performance. METHODS AND FINDINGS We performed a scoping review, searching Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, EMBASE, CINAHL and PubMed (from inception to July 9, 2019; prospectively registered in Open Science Framework https://osf.io/gkq4t/). Eligibility criteria were: (1) review of primary research studies, published in English; (2) discusses a) how performance is measured in the ED, b) interventions used to improve ED performance and their characteristics, c) the role(s) of patients in improving ED performance, and d) the outcomes attributed to interventions used to improve ED performance; (3) focuses on a hospital ED context in any country or healthcare system. Pairs of reviewers independently screened studies' titles, abstracts, and full-texts for inclusion according to pre-established criteria. Discrepancies were resolved via discussion. Independent reviewers extracted data using a tool specifically designed for the review. Pairs of independent reviewers explored the quality of included reviews using the Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews tool. Narrative synthesis was performed on the 77 included reviews. Three reviews identified 202 individual indicators of ED performance. Seventy-four reviews reported 38 different interventions to improve ED performance: 27 interventions describing changes to practice and process (e.g., triage, care transitions, technology), and a further nine interventions describing changes to team composition (e.g., advanced nursing roles, scribes, pharmacy). Two reviews reported on two interventions addressing the role of patients in ED performance, supporting patients' decisions and providing education. The outcomes attributed to interventions used to improve ED performance were categorised into five key domains: time, proportion, process, cost, and clinical outcomes. Few interventions reported outcomes across all five outcome domains. CONCLUSIONS ED performance measurement is complex, involving automated information technology mechanisms and manual data collection, reflecting the multifaceted nature of ED care. Interventions to improve ED performance address a broad range of ED processes and disciplines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth E Austin
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Brette Blakely
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Catalin Tufanaru
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Amanda Selwood
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jeffrey Braithwaite
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Robyn Clay-Williams
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|