1
|
Hevink M, Linden I, de Vugt M, Brodaty H, Low LF, Phillipson L, Jeon YH, Gresham M, Doucet S, Luke A, Vedel I, McAiney C, Szcześniak D, Błaszkiewicz M, Rymaszewska J, Verhey F, Wolfs C. Moving forward with dementia: an explorative cross-country qualitative study into post-diagnostic experiences. Aging Ment Health 2024; 28:1447-1456. [PMID: 38656033 DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2024.2342968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This explorative cross-country qualitative study aims to describe experiences of receiving a dementia diagnosis and experiences of support following a diagnosis in Australia, Canada, the Netherlands and Poland. METHOD Qualitative study using projective techniques during online focus groups, online and telephone interviews with people with dementia and caregivers. RESULTS Twenty-three people with dementia and 53 caregivers participated. Qualitative content analysis revealed five themes; (1) 'Coming to terms with dementia' helped people deal with complex emotions to move forward. (3) 'The social network as a source of support' and (4) 'The challenges and realities of formal support' and impacted 'Coming to terms with dementia'. (2) 'Navigating life with dementia as a caregiver' highlights caregiver burden and was impacted by (4) 'The challenges and realities of formal support'. People were (5) 'Self-caring and preparing for tomorrow' as they focused on maintaining current health whilst planning the future. Despite differences in healthcare and post-diagnostic support systems, there were more similarities across countries than differences. CONCLUSION Across countries, formal support and support from friends and family are crucial for people with dementia and caregivers to come to terms with dementia and maintain carer wellbeing to ultimately live well with dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maud Hevink
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Alzheimer Centre Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Iris Linden
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Alzheimer Centre Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolein de Vugt
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Alzheimer Centre Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Henry Brodaty
- Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing, Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Lee-Fay Low
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Lyn Phillipson
- School of Health and Society, Faculty of Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
| | - Yun-Hee Jeon
- Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Meredith Gresham
- Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing, Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Shelly Doucet
- Department of Nursing and Health Sciences, The Centre for Research in Integrated Care, University of New Brunswick, Saint John, Canada
| | - Alison Luke
- Department of Nursing and Health Sciences, The Centre for Research in Integrated Care, University of New Brunswick, Saint John, Canada
| | - Isabelle Vedel
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
| | - Carrie McAiney
- School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo and Schlegel-UW Research Institute for Aging, Waterloo, Canada
| | - Dorota Szcześniak
- Department of Psychiatry, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | | | | | - Frans Verhey
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Alzheimer Centre Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Claire Wolfs
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Alzheimer Centre Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Balvert SCE, Del Sordo GC, Milders MV. The efficacy of dyadic interventions for community-dwelling people with dementia and their caregivers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev 2024; 96:102258. [PMID: 38479479 DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2024.102258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Revised: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/03/2024] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Abstract
Most people with dementia live at home and depend on informal caregivers for care. Both caregivers and persons with dementia can experience negative psychological and behavioural effects as the disease progresses. Non-pharmacological interventions can alleviate these effects and dyadic interventions, involving both caregiver and person with dementia, may be particularly effective. In this systematic review, the effect of dyadic interventions involving community-dwelling persons with dementia and their informal caregivers was researched. This article is an update of a review of dyadic interventions up to 2012 (Van't Leven et al., 2013). Twenty-two randomized controlled trials published between January 2012 and March 2023 met eligibility criteria, representing 3857 dyads. Results of a meta-analysis showed no overall intervention effect. Thirteen studies reported positive intervention effects, 9 studies reported no intervention effects. Intervention content and participant characteristics and knowledge of the disease varied widely between the studies reviewed. Effective interventions were those that matched activities for the person with dementia to their interests and abilities and educating the caregiver about dementia and communication. Interventions of moderate length (3-4 months) tended to be more effective than longer or shorter interventions. Future studies should further explore the factors contributing to the effects of dyadic interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanne C E Balvert
- Department of Clinical Neuropsychology, VU University Amsterdam, van der Boechorststraat 7, Amsterdam 1081 BT, the Netherlands
| | - Giovanna C Del Sordo
- New Mexico State University, Psychology Department, 1780 E University Ave, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA
| | - Maarten V Milders
- Department of Clinical Neuropsychology, VU University Amsterdam, van der Boechorststraat 7, Amsterdam 1081 BT, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Karska J, Pszczołowska M, Gładka A, Leszek J. Correlations between Dementia and Loneliness. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 25:271. [PMID: 38203442 PMCID: PMC10779072 DOI: 10.3390/ijms25010271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Revised: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
This review describes associations between dementia and loneliness on the neurobiological and epidemiological levels according to the recent body of literature. The aim of this study was to highlight major lines of research in this field. Sociocognitive skills and social interactions present complex interdependencies with dementia which may be explained by two theories. According to the first one, not sufficiently engaging in social or cognitive activities results in brain atrophy. The second one claims that brain neurogenesis and synaptic density are being increased by social connections. The relationship between loneliness and dementia could be mediated by sensory loss, including hearing and visual impairment, as well as depression and psychotic symptoms. Loneliness itself might cause a depletion in sensory and cognitive stimulation which results in a decrease in neural reserve. Certain changes in the structures of the brain caused by loneliness were found in imaging examination. Loneliness appears to be a crucial risk factor for dementia in recent times due to the modern lifestyle and consequences of the outbreak of COVID-19. Additional studies are required to understand more completely the key tenets of this topic and therefore to improve the prevention and treatment of dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Karska
- Department of Psychiatry, Wrocław Medical University, Pasteura 10, 50-367 Wrocław, Poland; (J.K.)
| | | | - Anna Gładka
- Department of Psychiatry, Wrocław Medical University, Pasteura 10, 50-367 Wrocław, Poland; (J.K.)
| | - Jerzy Leszek
- Department of Psychiatry, Wrocław Medical University, Pasteura 10, 50-367 Wrocław, Poland; (J.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bhatt J, Kohl G, Scior K, Charlesworth G, Muller M, Dröes RM. Comparing the stigma experiences and comfort with disclosure in Dutch and English populations of people living with dementia. DEMENTIA 2023; 22:1567-1585. [PMID: 37480343 PMCID: PMC10521157 DOI: 10.1177/14713012231188503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES People living with dementia can feel hesitant disclosing their diagnosis to social networks, partly due to stigma. Little attention has been paid to the measurement of disclosure decisions and stigma, and few standardised stigma tools have been validated in languages other than English. We investigated the psychometric properties of Dutch translations of three stigma measures, and explored the stigma experiences of Dutch and English people living with dementia as well as patterns and predictors of comfort with disclosure. METHODS Community-dwelling adults living with dementia in the Netherlands (n = 40) and England (n = 40) completed either the English versions or the Dutch translations of the Comfort with Disclosure scale and three stigma measures (Stigma Impact, Stigma Stress, and Secrecy Scale). We established the psychometric properties of the stigma measures and conducted correlation and regression analyses. RESULTS Internal consistency was good to excellent for all measures in the Dutch sample. Small but significant differences were found between the Dutch and English samples on the total score of the Stigma Impact Scale and its subscale social isolation. Age was negatively associated with comfort disclosing to family, and desire for secrecy was negatively associated with comfort disclosing to both family and friends. CONCLUSIONS The psychometric properties of the Dutch scales were satisfactory. Many people living with dementia would feel comfortable disclosing their diagnosis to family and friends, but stigma experiences can greatly affect this decision. Cross-cultural differences in stigma experiences in persons with dementia require further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jem Bhatt
- UCL Unit for Stigma Research, Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Gianna Kohl
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Katrina Scior
- UCL Unit for Stigma Research, Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Georgina Charlesworth
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
- Research and Development, North East London Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Majon Muller
- Department of Internal Medicine, Geriatric Medicine Section, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rose-Marie Dröes
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUmc/Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sadura-Sieklucka T, Szczuka J, Targowski T. Emotional and cognitive states of geriatric patients during the COVID-19 pandemic - an observational study. Reumatologia 2023; 61:169-174. [PMID: 37522137 PMCID: PMC10373168 DOI: 10.5114/reum/168344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The authors of the study assessed the emotional and cognitive state of geriatric patients during the COVID-19 pandemic and tried to answer the question: were there any differences in this state in geriatric patients at different stages of the pandemic? Material and methods The study included 518 patients of 60 years old and above of the Department of Geriatrics in Warsaw. To collect data, the following tools of psychological measurement were applied: the Mini-Mental State Examination scale and Geriatric Depression Scale. In order to test the differences in the means between the groups, a Chi-square test (with Yates's correction for continuity when the class size did not exceed 8 items) was used. For the comparison of the three groups, the Kruskal-Wallis (ANOVA) test was performed. Results It was found that the majority of geriatric patients (73% of respondents) do not show symptoms of depressed mood. But there are statistically significant differences in the results of the patients' cognitive state tests depending on the time of examination. Patients examined before the pandemic tended to demonstrate a better cognitive state than patients at the beginning of the pandemic and in its later stages. Nevertheless, there are no significant differences in the cognitive functioning of patients examined at the beginning and later in the pandemic. Conclusions The number of geriatric patients with symptoms of depression significantly increased when visits of relatives prohibition were introduced. However, the number of patients with depression returned to its previous level later in the pandemic.This phenomenon may indicate psychological adaptation to the situation. The presented results of observation suggest that the introduction of limitations is less important than the particular perception of one's situation and adaptation to that.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa Sadura-Sieklucka
- Department of Geriatrics, National Institute of Geriatrics, Rheumatology, and Rehabilitation, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Joanna Szczuka
- Department of Geriatrics, National Institute of Geriatrics, Rheumatology, and Rehabilitation, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Tomasz Targowski
- Department of Geriatrics, National Institute of Geriatrics, Rheumatology, and Rehabilitation, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Low LF, Gresham M, Phillipson L. Further development needed: models of post-diagnostic support for people with dementia. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2023; 36:104-111. [PMID: 36705009 DOI: 10.1097/yco.0000000000000848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW There is increasing recognition of a service gap immediately after diagnosis for people with dementia and carers. This narrative review of models of post-diagnostic support focuses on recent developments and offers suggestions for future development. We present the current evidence for these models and consider the service components they provide against the recommendations of clinical guidelines and principles underpinning ideal post-diagnostic support. RECENT FINDINGS Models of post-diagnostic support include a short-term support worker, ongoing support worker, centre-based support, primary care management, and specialist dementia clinics. Of these, specialist dementia clinics that include ongoing support workers provide most components of an ideal and timely post-diagnostic support framework, but may be more costly to implement universally. The greatest research evidence is for the benefits of long-term support models, specifically case management, though this does not necessarily include medical care or nonpharmacological interventions. There is sparce evidence for the benefits of short-term support worker models such as dementia advisers for people with dementia and carers. SUMMARY Further development is needed to create whole-system models of dementia support which meet the needs of people with dementia and their carers, are timely, accessible and equitable, and can be implemented universally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lee-Fay Low
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney
| | - Meredith Gresham
- Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing, Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney
| | - Lyn Phillipson
- School of Health and Society, Faculty of the Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rand SE, Silarova B, Towers A, Jones K. Social care-related quality of life of people with dementia and their carers in England. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY 2022; 30:e2406-e2418. [PMID: 34921481 PMCID: PMC9541270 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2021] [Revised: 11/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
People with dementia and their carers are a growing subgroup of people who use community-based social care. These services are designed to maintain people's quality of life while living at home. The ASCOT measure of social care-related quality of life (SCRQoL), designed to evaluate quality and effectiveness of social care, has been adapted for proxy-report when someone is unable to self-report. The ASCOT-Carer has been developed to measure carer's own SCRQoL. This study sought to establish the factors related to SCRQoL of people living with dementia (PLWD, proxy-reported by carers) and their carers. Data were collected via a self-administered postal or online survey of 313 carers in England, from January 2020 to April 2021. Carers were eligible if they supported someone living with dementia at home, who was unable to self-complete questionnaires. The person living with dementia or their carer had to use at least one social care service, e.g. home care. We recruited participants via an online volunteer panel and NHS sites. Multiple regression was applied to explore the factors significantly related to ASCOT SCRQoL by self- and proxy-report. Key influences on carers' own SCRQoL were their health, financial difficulties associated with caring, and satisfaction with social care support. Inadequate home design was significantly negatively associated with SCRQoL for PLWD. The latter stages of the pandemic-related restrictions (the tier system from 2nd December 2020 to study end, April 2021) were associated with significantly worse SCRQoL for PLWD, but not for carers. The study offers insight into the factors associated with SCRQoL. In particular, the findings highlight the importance of adequate home design for people with dementia; satisfactory social care support and limiting any adverse financial impact of caring are important for carers. The findings indicate a negative effect of COVID restrictions on SCRQoL of people with dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacey E. Rand
- Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU)University of KentCanterburyUK
| | - Barbora Silarova
- Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU)University of KentCanterburyUK
| | - Ann‐Marie Towers
- Centre for Health Services Research (CHSS)University of KentCanterburyUK
| | - Karen Jones
- Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU)University of KentCanterburyUK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Morton T, Evans SB, Brooker D, Williamson T, Wong G, Tinelli M, Frost F, Bray J, Hullah N. Sustainability of locally driven centres for those affected by dementia: a protocol for the get real with meeting centres realist evaluation. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e062697. [PMID: 35501073 PMCID: PMC9062872 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Improving support for people with early to moderate dementia to live at home in their communities is a global public health goal. Community adult social care is not robust in many parts of the UK, however, with the pandemic increasing pressure on services for this population. Community-led interventions can play a key role in supporting people postdiagnosis, helping delay decline, but many interventions struggle to sustain beyond 1-2 years. Meeting Centres (MCs) are one such intervention, which many UK community groups find attractive and achievable. However, it is not understood how these communities can ensure they are putting in place strategies that will help them sustain in the longer term, beyond start-up phase. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This realist evaluation aims to understand the factors affecting sustainability of MCs in rural areas and learn lessons from MCs that have sustained beyond 3 years. Data will be collected using mixed methods: interviews and group discussions with stakeholders involved at every level in three case study locations in England and Wales, analysed with Soft Systems modelling; a Discrete Choice Experiment exploring what people across the UK value and are willing to pay for MCs, analysed with regression modelling. All data will be synthesised using a Realist logic of analysis to build a theoretical model of how, why, for whom, in what contexts and to what extent MCs can be successfully implemented for the long term. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION As participants may lack capacity for informed consent, favourable ethical opinion was received from a Health Research Authority research ethics committee. Resulting recommendations will be of interest to stakeholders including those commissioning, planning, running, supporting or attending MCs, as well as policy-makers and healthcare professionals. Knowledge will be shared with emerging MCs to help accelerate scale up of this intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Morton
- Association for Dementia Studies, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK
| | - Shirley B Evans
- Association for Dementia Studies, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK
| | - Dawn Brooker
- Association for Dementia Studies, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK
| | - Tracey Williamson
- Association for Dementia Studies, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK
| | - Geoff Wong
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| | - Michela Tinelli
- PSSRU, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Faith Frost
- Association for Dementia Studies, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK
| | - Jennifer Bray
- Association for Dementia Studies, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK
| | - Nigel Hullah
- 3 Nations Working Group for Dementia, Swansea, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Balvert SCE, Milders MV, Bosmans JE, Heymans MW, van Bommel S, Dröes RM, Scherder EJA. The MOMANT study, a caregiver support programme with activities at home for people with dementia: a study protocol of a randomised controlled trial. BMC Geriatr 2022; 22:295. [PMID: 35392818 PMCID: PMC8991890 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-022-02930-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 03/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Because of the expected increase in the number of people with dementia, and the associated social and economic costs, there is an urgent need to develop effective and cost-effective care for people with dementia and their caregivers. The intervention proposed here combines two approaches to caregiver support that have shown to be effective in empowering caregivers, i.e., multiple components for caregiver support and actively engaging caregivers to involve the person with dementia in activities at home. The aim is to investigate whether the intervention is effective in improving quality of life in the caregiver and the person with dementia. A further aim will be to investigate whether this intervention can improve caregivers' feeling of competence, experience of caregiving, and mood. METHODS The study design is a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial with cost-effectiveness analysis. The study participants are informal caregivers and home-living persons with dementia for whom they care, recruited in various regions in the Netherlands. The trial will compare outcomes in two groups of participants: 85 dyads who receive the intervention, and 85 dyads who receive care as usual. The intervention is a caregiver support training that is manual based and consists of 6 group sessions over 2 months. Training takes place in small groups of caregivers led by a health care professional presented at dementia day care centres. Randomisation occurs at the level of the day care centre. Participants are assessed on the outcome measures at baseline, prior to the intervention, and at 3 and 6 months after baseline. DISCUSSION The study will provide insight into effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an intervention that has not previously been evaluated or implemented in the Netherlands. The intervention potentially adds to the effective support options for informal caregivers of people with dementia without greatly increasing the workload for health- or social care professionals. TRIAL REGISTRATION The trial is registered at the Dutch Trial Register at NTR6643 ; August 22nd, 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S C E Balvert
- Department of Clinical Neuropsychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - M V Milders
- Department of Clinical Neuropsychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J E Bosmans
- Department of Health Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M W Heymans
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - S van Bommel
- Management & Support, Stadionweg 53HS, 1077 RZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R-M Dröes
- Department of Psychiatry, Department of Research and Innovation, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VU University Medical Center, GGZ inGeest, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E J A Scherder
- Department of Clinical Neuropsychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bartels SL, van Knippenberg RJM, Viechtbauer W, Simons CJP, Ponds RW, Myin-Germeys I, Verhey FRJ, de Vugt ME. Intervention mechanisms of an experience sampling intervention for spousal carers of people with dementia: a secondary analysis using momentary data. Aging Ment Health 2022; 26:294-304. [PMID: 33291998 DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2020.1857692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Objectives: A psychosocial intervention for spousal carers of people with dementia promoted emotional well-being through self-monitoring and personalized feedback, as demonstrated in a previous randomized controlled trial. The mechanism behind the intervention effects is thought to lie in increased awareness of, and thus, engagement in behaviours that elicit positive emotions (PA). This secondary analysis tests the assumption by investigating momentary data on activities, affect, and stress and explores the relevance of personalized feedback compared to self-monitoring only.Methods: The intervention was based on the experience sampling method (ESM), meaning that carers self-monitored own affect and behaviours 10 times/day over 6 weeks. The experimental group received personalized feedback on behaviours that elicit PA, while the pseudo-experimental group performed self-monitoring only. A control group was also included. ESM-data of 72 carers was analysed using multilevel mixed-effects models.Results: The experimental group reported significant increases in passive relaxation activities over the 6 weeks (B = 0.28, SE = 0.12, Z = 2.43, p < .05). Passive relaxation in this group was negatively associated with negative affect (r = -0.50, p = .01) and positively associated with activity-related stress (r = 0.52, p = .007) from baseline to post-intervention. Other activities in this or the other groups did not change significantly.Conclusion: Carer's daily behaviours were only affected when self-monitoring was combined with personalized feedback. Changing one's daily behaviour while caring for a person with dementia is challenging and aligned with mixed emotions. Acknowledging simultaneously positive and negative emotions, and feelings of stress is suggested to embrace the complexity of carer's life and provide sustainable support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Laureen Bartels
- Alzheimer Center Limburg, Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Rosalia J M van Knippenberg
- Alzheimer Center Limburg, Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Wolfgang Viechtbauer
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Claudia J P Simons
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,GGzE, Institute of Mental Health Care Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Rudolf W Ponds
- Alzheimer Center Limburg, Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Inez Myin-Germeys
- Department of Neurosciences, Center for Contextual Psychiatry, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Frans R J Verhey
- Alzheimer Center Limburg, Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Marjolein E de Vugt
- Alzheimer Center Limburg, Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gonella S, Mitchell G, Bavelaar L, Conti A, Vanalli M, Basso I, Cornally N. Interventions to support family caregivers of people with advanced dementia at the end of life in nursing homes: A mixed-methods systematic review. Palliat Med 2022; 36:268-291. [PMID: 34965759 DOI: 10.1177/02692163211066733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most people with dementia transition into nursing homes as their disease progresses. Their family caregivers often continue to be involved in their relative's care and experience high level of strain at the end of life. AIM To gather and synthesize information on interventions to support family caregivers of people with advanced dementia at the end of life in nursing homes and provide a set of recommendations for practice. DESIGN Mixed-Methods Systematic Review (PROSPERO no. CRD42020217854) with convergent integrated approach. DATA SOURCES Five electronic databases were searched from inception in November 2020. Published qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method studies of interventions to support family caregivers of people with advanced dementia at the end of life in nursing home were included. No language or temporal limits were applied. RESULTS In all, 11 studies met the inclusion criteria. Data synthesis resulted in three integrated findings: (i) healthcare professionals should engage family caregivers in ongoing dialog and provide adequate time and space for sensitive discussions; (ii) end-of-life discussions should be face-to-face and supported by written information whose timing of supply may vary according to family caregivers' preferences and the organizational policies and cultural context; and (iii) family caregivers should be provided structured psychoeducational programs tailored to their specific needs and/or regular family meetings about dementia care at the end of life. CONCLUSION The findings provide useful information on which interventions may benefit family caregivers of people with advanced dementia at the end of life and where, when, and how they should be provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Gonella
- Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.,Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Gary Mitchell
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, Medical Biology Centre, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - Laura Bavelaar
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Alessio Conti
- Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Mariangela Vanalli
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Roma Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy
| | - Ines Basso
- School of Nursing, Azienda Ospedaliera "SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo," Alessandria, Italy
| | - Nicola Cornally
- Catherine McAuley School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Henderson C, Rehill A, Brooker D, Evans SC, Evans SB, Bray J, Saibene FL, Scorolli C, Szcześniak D, d'Arma A, Lion K, Atkinson T, Farina E, Rymaszewska J, Chattat R, Meiland F, Dröes RM, Knapp M. Costs and cost-effectiveness of the meeting centres support programme for people living with dementia and carers in Italy, Poland and the UK: The MEETINGDEM study. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY 2021; 29:1756-1768. [PMID: 33506538 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2020] [Revised: 11/08/2020] [Accepted: 11/25/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
We examined the costs and cost-effectiveness of the Meeting Centre Support Programme (MCSP) implemented and piloted in the UK, Poland and Italy, replicating the Dutch Meeting Centre model. Dutch Meeting Centres combine day services for people with dementia with carer support. Data were collected over 2015-2016 from MCSP and usual care (UC) participants (people with dementia-carer dyads) at baseline and 6 months. We examined participants' health and social care (HSC), and societal costs, including Meeting Centre (MC) attendances. Costs and outcomes in MCSP and UC groups were compared. Primary outcomes: Persons with dementia: quality-adjusted life years (EQ-5D-5L-derived); QOL-AD. DQoL was examined as a secondary outcome. Carers: Short Sense of Competence Questionnaire (SSCQ). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves were obtained by bootstrapping outcome and cost regression estimates. Eighty-three MCSP and 69 UC dyads were analysed. The 6-month cost of providing MCSP was €4,703; participants with dementia attended MC a mean of 45 times and carers 15 times. Including intervention costs, adjusted 6-month HSC costs were €5,941higher in MCSP than in UC. From the HSC perspective: in terms of QALY, the probability of cost-effectiveness was zero over willingness-to-pay (WTP) ranging from €0 to €350,000. On QOL-AD, the probability of cost-effectiveness of MCSP was 50% at WTP of €5,000 for a one-point increase. A one-point gain in the DQoL positive affect subscale had a probability of cost-effectiveness of 99% at WTP over €8,000. On SSCQ, no significant difference was found between MCSP and UC. Evidence for cost-effectiveness of MCSP was mixed but suggests that it may be cost-effective in relation to gains in dementia-specific quality of life measures. MCs offer effective tailored post-diagnostic support services to both people with dementia and carers in a context where few evidence-based alternatives to formal home-based social services may be available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Henderson
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Amritpal Rehill
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Dawn Brooker
- Association for Dementia Studies, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK
| | - Simon C Evans
- Association for Dementia Studies, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK
| | - Shirley B Evans
- Association for Dementia Studies, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK
| | - Jennifer Bray
- Association for Dementia Studies, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Teresa Atkinson
- Association for Dementia Studies, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK
| | | | | | | | - Franka Meiland
- Amsterdam University Medical Centres, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rose-Marie Dröes
- Amsterdam University Medical Centres, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martin Knapp
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|