Access to reproductive health care services in countries of conflict: the double impact of conflict and COVID-19

Investigating the impact of armed conflict, cultural factors, and demographic characteristics on access to family planning services in Northwest Syria: a cross-sectional study

Against the backdrop of a protracted conflict, northwest Syria faces significant challenges in delivering sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) services. The conflict, which began in 2011, has severely impacted maternal and child health, women's wellbeing, and agency. This disruption has been exacerbated by widespread displacement, infrastructure damage, and interruptions in reproductive healthcare provision. Addressing these challenges is crucial for advancing family planning and empowering women in the region. This study investigates the factors influencing family planning service accessibility in northwest Syria, considering the intricate interplay of cultural norms, beliefs, and the backdrop of armed conflict. The study employed a cross sectional-methods approach incorporating structured surveys with a sample size of 2175 women, representing diverse demographics across the region.38% of the 2175 participants were in early marriages, defined as any formal marriage or informal union between a child under the age of 18 and an adult or another child (UNICEF India, Child marriage, 2017). Among them, 58% reported current contraceptive use. Analysis by age groups revealed that individuals aged 26-35 exhibited the highest proportion of contraceptive usage at 41.5%, while the under-18 age group showed the lowest at 7.7%. Predominantly, oral contraceptive pills were the most used contraceptive method (40%), followed by intrauterine devices (IUDs) (31%), condoms (7%), and injectables (5%). Of contraceptive users, 29% reported experiencing side effects, with bleeding between periods or spotting being the most prevalent (26%), followed by irregular periods (21%). Despite 75.5% of participants being internally displaced persons (IDPs), there was no significant difference in usage between IDPs and residents (p = 0.337), although IDPs residing in camps showed the highest usage at 67%. Attending awareness sessions on family planning was associated with increased contraceptive usage, with 67% of attendees reporting usage compared to 44% of non-attendees. Education level and family monthly income strongly influenced usage, with higher education and income correlating with increased usage (p < 0.001 for both). Moreover, the number of children significantly impacted usage, with higher rates observed among women with more children (p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis further demonstrated that awareness of family planning methods significantly influenced usage (OR: 2.39, p < 0.001).Our findings underscore the pronounced influence of cultural beliefs on individuals' attitudes towards family planning. Displacement, infrastructure damage, and interruptions in healthcare delivery pose formidable barriers, further marginalising vulnerable populations. Community engagement and resilient healthcare infrastructure emerge as critical facilitators, fostering trust and service utilisation. Conversely, stigma, misinformation, and resource constraints hinder access, underscoring the need for targeted interventions.This research illuminates the complex dynamics surrounding family planning practices in northwest Syria. Holistic strategies are needed to ensure equitable access to family planning services in northwest Syria and similar contexts globally. By addressing the intersecting challenges of culture and conflict, efforts can be directed towards meeting the reproductive health needs of populations enduring humanitarian crises.

The impact of the military conflict in Sudan on maternal health: a mixed qualitative and quantitative study

Objectives

Ongoing military conflict in Sudan has had significant repercussions on the health and well-being of the population, particularly among women of reproductive age. This study aimed to investigate the impact of conflict on maternal health by employing a mixed qualitative and quantitative research approach.

Methods

Through in-depth interviews and survey questionnaires (388 women), this study examined the experiences and challenges faced by pregnant women and new mothers and the availability and accessibility of maternal healthcare services in conflict-affected areas. Using a qualitative approach, in-depth interviews were conducted with 35 women who had recently given birth or were pregnant in regions affected by the Khartoum State-Sudan conflict. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data collected from the interviews.

Result

Most women did not have access to healthcare services (86.6%), and out of the total sample, 93 (24%) experienced adverse outcomes. The factors associated with adverse effects were parity (OR 1.78, CI [1.15-2.75], p-value 0.010), gestational age (OR 2.10, CI [1.36-3.25], p-value 0.002), access to healthcare (OR 2.35, CI [1.48-3.72], p-value 0.001), and delivery mode (OR 1.68, CI [1.05-2.69], p = 0.030). Factors significantly associated with accessibility to maternal healthcare services included age (OR, 1.28; = 0.042) and higher conflict levels (1.52 times higher odds, p = 0.021). The narratives and experiences shared by women exposed the multifaceted ways in which the conflict-affected maternal health outcomes.

Conclusion

The significance of this study lies in its potential to contribute to the existing literature on maternal health in conflict-affected areas, especially in Sudan, and to help us understand how women can receive maternal health services.

Disruptions in Accessing Women's Health Care Services: Evidence Using COVID-19 Health Services Disruption Survey

INTRODUCTION

The world is experiencing the Coronavirus pandemic and the aftermath consequences leading to lockdown and travel restrictions. The pandemic has brought a far-reaching impact on various sectors, including the economic, and health sectors. Therefore, this study analyses the possible impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the disruption - in accessing family planning measures i.e. contraception facilities; and in seeking help from women organizations for health services.

METHODS

This study has used the COVID-19 health services disruption survey-2020 and data was obtained from the Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation. This survey was conducted in 76 countries using the smartphone-based premise data collection platform. Respondents were individual members of the general population ages 15-49 years who were identified as women. Data were collected from 12,354 respondents. Our data analysis has been done on both aggregate samples as well as region-wise samples (i.e. Africa, Asia, Europe, and Latin America & the Caribbean) to assess the change in levels of service delivery in both pre-COVID and post-COVID periods.

RESULTS

Descriptive statistics results shows that two particular reasons - unable to access due to lockdown restrictions (5.4%), and fear of being infected with COVID-19 (9.7%) were reported as mostly impacting the access to contraception facilities due to lockdown restriction. Further, the logit regression using socio-economic and demographic variables suggests that geographical location (rural), and poor financial status turned out negative and significant, showing higher odds of facing difficulty than the reference category for the aggregate sample. The region-wise analysis suggests that Europe and Asia are the regions with the highest percentage of respondents reporting unavailability of services during COVID-19.

CONCLUSION

The study concludes that pandemic-related emergencies affect the health care system, especially women-related health care services. The implication of our study indicates the requirement of a supply chain strategy for managing health care demand during emerging situations. So, the disruptions and bottlenecks in health care facilities should be addressed by various governments through appropriate policies and interventions.

Magnitude, Trends, and Determinants of Institutional Delivery Among Reproductive Age Women in Kersa Health and Demographic Surveillance System Site, Eastern Ethiopia: A Multilevel Analysis

Background

Institutional delivery service utilization is a critical and proven intervention for reducing maternal and neonatal mortality. Institutional delivery service utilization can improve maternal health and wellbeing by ensuring safe delivery and reducing problems occurring during childbirth. In Ethiopia, almost all previous researches were cross-sectional studies and most of them were based on small sample sizes and there are no sufficient reports for the trends. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the magnitude, trends, and determinants of institutional delivery using surveillance data from the Kersa Health and Demographic Surveillance System (HDSS), in Eastern Ethiopia from 2015 to 2020.

Methods

The study was conducted among reproductive-aged women selected from the Kersa HDSS site, Eastern Ethiopia for the duration of 2015 to 2020. Data were extracted from the Kersa HDSS database system. After coding and recoding, the data was exported to R software for further analysis. A chi-squared test was used for trends to examine the significance of the change. A multilevel logistic regression model was fitted to identify determinants of institutional delivery. An adjusted odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to measure the strength of the associations. Statistical significance was declared at a p-value < 0.05.

Results

A total of 20,033 reproductive age women were employed for analysis. The overall magnitude of institutional delivery was 45.03% with 95% CI (44.33–45.72). The institutional delivery has shown a decreasing trend over the 6 years' and there is statistical significance for the declining. Semi-urban resident [AOR = 2.33, 95% CI: 1.37–4.48], urban resident [AOR = 7.18, 95% CI: 5.24, 8.71], read and write [AOR = 1.54, 95% CI: 1.18, 2.01], literate [AOR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.34–1.59], and antenatal care [AOR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.58–1.88] were significantly associated with institutional delivery.

Conclusion

The magnitude of institutional delivery was relatively low and has shown a decreasing trend. Community-based interventions should be strengthened to reverse the decreasing trend of institutional delivery. Targeted information dissemination and communication should be provided to those mothers who have no formal education and attention should be given to rural residents.

Use of healthcare services during the COVID-19 pandemic in urban Ethiopia: evidence from retrospective health facility survey data

OBJECTIVES

In recent years, Ethiopia has made enormous strides in enhancing access to healthcare, especially, maternal and child healthcare. With the onset and spread of COVID-19, the attention of the healthcare system has pivoted to handling the disease, potentially at the cost of other healthcare needs. This paper explores whether this shift has come at the cost of non-Covid related healthcare, especially the use of maternal and child health (MCH) services.

SETTING

Data covering a 24-month period are drawn from 59 health centres and 29 public hospitals located in urban Ethiopia.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES MEASURES

The primary outcome measures are the use of MCH services including family planning, antenatal and postnatal care, abortion care, delivery and immunisation. The secondary outcome measures are the use of health services by adults including antiretroviral therapy (ART), tuberculosis (TB) and leprosy and dental services RESULTS: There is a sharp reduction in the use of both inpatient (20%-27%, p<0.001) and outpatient (27%-34%, p<0.001) care, particularly in Addis Ababa, which has been most acutely affected by the virus. This decline does not come at the cost of MCH services. The use of several MCH components (skilled birth attendant deliveries, immunisation, postnatal care) remains unaffected throughout the period while others (family planning services, antenatal care) experience a decline (8%-17%) in the immediate aftermath but recover soon after.

CONCLUSION

Concerns about the crowding out of MCH services due to the focus on COVID-19 are unfounded. Proactive measures taken by the government and healthcare facilities to ring-fence the use of essential healthcare services have mitigated service disruptions. The results underline the resilience and agility displayed by one of the world's most resource-constrained healthcare systems. Further research on the approaches used to mitigate disruptions is needed.

Changes in Access to Health Services during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review

The COVID-19 pandemic and the measures adopted are having a profound impact on a major goal of public healthcare systems: universal access to health services. The objective is to synthesize the available knowledge on access to health care for non-COVID-19 conditions and to identify knowledge gaps. A scoping review was conducted searching different databases (Medline, Google Scholar, etc.) for original articles published between December 2019 and September 2021. A total of 53 articles were selected and analyzed using the Aday and Andersen framework as a guide. Of these, 37 analyzed changes in levels of use of health services, 15 focused on the influencing factors and barriers to access, and 1 studied both aspects. Most focused on specific diseases and the early stages of the pandemic, based on a review of records. Analyses of the impact on primary care services' use, unmet needs or inequalities in access were scarce. A generalized reduction in the use of health services was described. The most frequent access barrier described for non-COVID-19 conditions related to the services was a lack of resources, while barriers related to the population were predisposing (fear of contagion, stigma, or anticipating barriers) and enabling characteristics (worse socioeconomic status and an increase in technological barriers). In conclusion, our results show a general reduction in services' use in the early stages of the pandemic, as well as new barriers to access and the exacerbation of existing ones. In view of these results, more studies are required on the subsequent stages of the pandemic, to shed more light on the factors that have influenced access and the pandemic's impact on equity of access.