Prolactin levels in risperidone treatment of first-episode schizophrenia

Immunoendocrine Peripheral Effects Induced by Atypical Antipsychotics

Atypical antipsychotics (AAP) or second-generation antipsychotics are the clinical option for schizophrenia treatment during acute psychoses, but they are also indicated for maintenance during lifetime, even though they are being used for other psychiatric conditions in clinical practice such as affective disorders and autism spectrum disorder, among others. These drugs are differentiated from typical antipsychotics based on their clinical profile and are a better choice because they cause fewer side effects regarding extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS). Even though they provide clear therapeutic benefits, AAP induce peripheral effects that trigger phenotypic, functional, and systemic changes outside the Central Nervous System (CNS). Metabolic disease is frequently associated with AAP and significantly impacts the patient's quality of life. However, other peripheral changes of clinical relevance are present during AAP treatment, such as alterations in the immune and endocrine systems as well as the intestinal microbiome. These less studied alterations also have a significant impact in the patient's health status. This manuscript aims to revise the peripheral immunological, endocrine, and intestinal microbiome changes induced by AAP consumption recommended in the clinical guidelines for schizophrenia and other psychiatric disorders.

One-year follow-up of patients with first-episode schizophrenia (comparison between remitters and non-remitters)

Patients admitted to hospital after being diagnosed with first-episode schizophrenia were comprehensively assessed prior to acute treatment (on admission), at the end of the acute treatment (at discharge), and at follow-up after 1 year. The psychopathology was evaluated using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). 93 patients were reassessed after 1 year. 73/93 (78%) of the patients fulfilled the criteria for remission. No statistically significant differences in the total PANSS or subscales scores were found between remitters and non-remitters before or after the first episode treatment. However, non-remitters had a significantly higher total PANSS score after 1 year than remitters. There was no significant difference in mean psychopathology on admission or at discharge, with the exception of items conceptual disorganization, difficulty in abstract thinking, and lack of judgment and insight between remitters and non-remitters. However, significantly higher mean values were found for all items after 1 year in non-remitters than remitters. On admission the occurrence of positive, negative and general symptoms was balanced; at discharge and after 1 year negative and general symptoms were the most frequently observed. At the 1-year follow-up the impairment of insight and judgment is one of the most frequent symptoms in both remitters (10%) and non-remitters (70%).