Cost-consequence analysis of different active flowable hemostatic matrices in cardiac surgical procedures

Review of Evidence Supporting the Arista™ Absorbable Powder Hemostat

Background

Uncontrolled and diffuse bleeding is a dreaded event during open and laparoscopic surgery that may lead to postoperative complications, obstruction of the surgical field that reduces visualization, and prolonged operating times. Powder hemostats can be used to control bleeding and are easy to use, have a safe profile, and can achieve broad coverage area at a low cost.

Methods

A strategic literature search of peer-reviewed, English language studies was conducted to capture evidence on the clinical efficacy and safety of a Microporous Polysaccharide Hemosphere (MPH) based Hemostat (Arista™ Absorbable Hemostat (Arista™ AH)).

Results

Six preclinical studies were found which supported the use of MPH in various animal models of laparoscopic and open surgery, all of which demonstrated its safety and efficacy. Five single-arm and 11 comparative clinical studies similarly supported the efficacy and safety of MPH in various surgery types, including cardiac, renal, and dermatologic surgery.

Conclusion

Published evidence supports the safe and effective use of MPH across a variety of surgical settings.

Topical hemostatic agents in neurosurgery, a comprehensive review: 15 years update

Hemostasis in neurosurgery is of utmost importance. Bleeding management is one of the crucial steps of each neurosurgical procedure. Several strategies, namely thermal, mechanical, electric, and chemical, have been advocated to face blood loss within the surgical field. Over time, countless hemostatic agents and devices have been proposed. Furthermore, the ever-growing recent technological innovation has made available several novel and interesting tools. Pursuant to their impact on surgical practice, we perceived the imperative to update our previous disclosure paper. Therefore, we reviewed the literature and analyzed technical data sheets of each product in order to provide an updated and comprehensive overview in regard to chemical properties, mechanisms of action, use, complications, tricks, and pitfalls of topical hemostatic agents.

Valutazione dell’utilizzo di Floseal®, un agente emostatico topico, in chirurgia cardiotoracica

Introduction:

Achieving haemostasis is critical in surgical procedures. Surgical bleeding is associated with an increased risk of mortality and morbidity with consequences at both clinical and organizational level, and with significant economic implications. In addition to conventional methods for controlling intraoperative bleeding, many topical adjunctive hemostatic products are available; among them Floseal® (Baxter Healthcare Corporation), a gelatin-based hemostatic matrix.

The aim of this study is to provide an updated systematic literature review of Floseal® in cardiac surgery and estimate its associated economic impact in an Italian hospital.

Methods:

A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library over the period 2013-2016 to identify new publications related to Floseal® in cardiac surgery, in addition to those already included in the systematic review of Echave et al. Furthermore, we investigated the economic impact of the use of Floseal® adapting the model elaborated by Tackett et al. to the Italian NHS. Four new studies were selected.

Results:

High variability in surgical procedures, choice of hemostatic products compared to Floseal® and outcome definition is confirmed. Clinical, organizational, and economics endpoints were investigated. A cost-consequence analysis estimated relevant savings. A scenario analysis, despite showing a high variability in patient level savings (€ 441-2.831), confirmed economic advantages associated with Floseal®.

Discussion:

Results support prior research both in terms of heterogeneity of evidence on the effectiveness of Floseal® in cardiac surgery and cost implications. The use of Floseal® achieves substantial cost savings in a hypothetical Italian hospital with a cardiac surgery unit.

[Local hemostatic agent - fluid active hemostatic matrix]

Uncontrolled surgical bleeding can have significant clinical and economic consequences including advanced medical expenses and impairment of the outcomes. Effective and safe local hemostatic agents based on a fluid active hemostatic matrix are reviewed in the article. The use of this agent is followed by reduced hospital-stay, number of redo interventions for bleeding, reduced time of surgery, intra- and postoperative complication rate and high economic efficiency.

Cost-consequence analysis of a hemostatic matrix alone or in combination for spine surgery patients

BACKGROUND

A five-year retrospective database analysis comparing the use of Floseal ¹ flowable topical hemostat alone (F) and in combination with gelatin/thrombin (F + G/T) to achieve hemostasis and control surgical bleeding showed higher resource utilization for F + G/T cases relative to F matched pairs during spinal surgery. Lower resource use in the F group was characterized by shorter hospital length of stay and surgical time as well as fewer blood transfusions and less hemostat agent used per surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the cost-consequence of using F compared to F + G/T in minor, major and severe spinal surgery from the US hospital perspective.

METHODS

A cost-consequence model was developed using the US hospital perspective. Model inputs include clinical inputs from the literature, cost inputs (hemostatic matrices, blood product transfusion, hospital stay and operating room time) from the literature, and an analysis of annual spine surgery volume (minor, major and severe) using the 2012 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. Costs are reported in 2017 US dollars. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses address sources of variability in the results.

RESULTS

A medium-volume hospital (130 spine surgeries per year) using F versus F + G/T for spine surgeries is expected to require 85 less hours of surgical time, 58 fewer hospital days and 7 fewer blood transfusions in addition to hemostat volume savings (F: 1 mL, thrombin: 1994 mL). The cost savings associated with the hospital resources for a medium-volume hospital are expected to be $317,959 (surgical hours = $154,746, hospital days = $125,237, blood transfusions = $19,023, hemostatic agents = $18,953) or $2445 per spine surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of F versus F + G/T could lead to annual cost savings for US hospitals performing a low to high volume of spinal surgeries per year.

Floseal only versus in combination in spine surgery: a comparative, retrospective hospital database evaluation of clinical and healthcare resource outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Flowable agents such as Floseal® (F) are often reserved as adjuncts to non-flowable agents (i.e. gelatin (G) sponges and thrombin (T)) when bleeding is not sufficiently controlled. Based on their perceived positive impact, it is postulated that flowable agents alone may result in better clinical and resource utilization outcomes. Clinical and health-care utilization outcomes were compared in this retrospective analysis of spine surgery cases with charges for Floseal only (FO) and F + G/T.

METHODS

The United States Premier Hospital Database was searched for adult spine surgeries performed between October 2010 and September 2015 with FO or F and G/T charges. To obtain an unbiased treatment estimate, 1:1 propensity-score matching was used to identify FO and F + G/T cohorts. The cohorts were compared for rates of intraoperative, perioperative, postoperative and transfusion; blood loss-related, serious and other complications; hospital length-of-stay (LOS), surgical time, and volume of hemostat charged.

RESULTS

Among 40,335 spine surgeries, 15,105 FO and F + G/T matched pairs were compared. Significantly (p < 0.0001) lower percentages of FO than F + G/T cases received intraoperative (1.4% vs. 2.5%), perioperative (1.6% vs. 2.8%), postoperative (1.6% vs 3.0%), and any transfusion (2.3% vs. 4.3%). FO cases had significantly less blood loss complications than F + G/T cases (0.5% vs. 0.8%, p = 0.0022) and significantly (p < 0.0001) shorter hospital LOS (-0.45 days), surgical time (-39.0 min), and used less hemostat (-12.5 mL).

CONCLUSIONS

Results from this observational hospital database analyses indicate that FO use in spine surgery is associated with lower blood transfusion use and blood loss complications compared to its use with adjunct non-flowable hemostatic agents. The shorter hospital stay, reduced surgical time, and less hemostat volume health-care utilization outcomes that favored FO versus combination use may translate to health system cost savings. Further validation of these findings using controlled clinical trials and cost-consequence studies is warranted.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The use of flowable hemostatic agents alone may result in better clinical and possibly economic outcomes in spine surgery.

Efficacy of Topical Hemostatic Agents: A Comparative Evaluation of Two Gelatin/Thrombin-Based Hemostatic Matrices in a Porcine Kidney Surgical Model

Purpose: Topical hemostatic agents are an important means of controlling or preventing bleeding. This study was performed to compare gelatin-thrombin matrix with smooth particles (SmGM) versus gelatin-thrombin matrix with stellate particles (StGM) in a porcine kidney bleeding model. Materials and methods: In male pigs, reproducible lesions (diameter and depth ∼10 mm) were created in the renal cortex. Each lesion was treated topically using either SmGM or StGM. Blood loss was quantified before and 2, 5 and 10 minutes after treatment. Dry mass, ultrastructural and histologic analyses were also performed. Results: Thirty-two lesions were treated with SmGM and 32 with StGM; median initial bleeding rates were 27.6 and 29.1 mL/min, respectively. Two minutes post-application, SmGM was associated with significantly less bleeding than StGM (0.574 vs 0.920 mL/min; p < .0001). This difference stemmed principally from lesions with initial blood loss >29 mL/min, where bleeding rates at 2 minutes were ∼3-fold higher with StGM (1.636 vs 0.567 mL/min; p ≥ 0.040). Dry mass per unit volume of hemostatic agent was significantly higher with SmGM versus StGM. SmGM formed discrete, smooth particles, while StGM particles were stellate and tended to coalesce. Histologic analysis showed more solid mass, larger particles and less intervening space with SmGM versus StGM. Conclusions: In a severe, high-volume bleeding model, residual bleeding at 2 minutes was significantly lower with SmGM versus StGM, and SmGM showed greater consistency across bleeding intensities. These findings may be attributable to dry mass per unit volume and/or ultrastructural differences between the two agents.

Use of a flowable haemostat versus an oxidised regenerated cellulose agent in primary elective cardiac surgery: economic impact from a UK healthcare perspective

Background

Flowable haemostatic agents have been shown to be superior to non-flowable agents in terms of haemostatic control and need for transfusion products in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. We investigated the economic impact of the use of a flowable haemostatic agent (Floseal) compared with non-flowable oxidised regenerated cellulose (ORC) agent in primary elective cardiac surgery from the perspective of the UK National Health Service (NHS).

Methods

A cost-consequence framework based upon clinical data from a prospective trial and an observational trial and NHS-specific actual reference costs (2016) was developed to compare the economic impact of Floseal with that of ORC. The individual domains of care investigated comprised complications (major and minor) avoided, operating room time savings, surgical revisions for bleeding avoided and transfusions avoided. The cost impact of Floseal versus ORC on ICU days and extended bed days avoided was modelled separately.

Results

Compared with ORC, the use of Floseal would be associated with overall net savings to the NHS of £178,283 per 100 cardiac surgery patients who experience intraoperative bleeding requiring haemostatic therapy. Cost savings were apparent in all individual domains of care (complications avoided: £83,536; operating room time saved: £63,969; surgical revisions avoided: £34,038; and blood transfusions avoided: £22,317). Cost savings per 100 patients with Floseal over ORC in terms of ICU days avoided (n = 30) and extended bed days avoided (n = 51.7) were £57,960 and £21,965, respectively. A sensitivity analysis indicated that these findings remained robust when the model parameters representing the clinical benefit of Floseal over ORC were reduced by up to 20%.

Conclusions

Despite higher initial acquisition costs, the use of flowable haemostatic agents achieves substantial cost savings over non-flowable agents in cardiac surgery. These cost savings commence during the operating theatre and appear to continue to be realised throughout the postoperative period.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13019-017-0660-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.