1
|
Herrman H, Patel V, Kieling C, Berk M, Buchweitz C, Cuijpers P, Furukawa TA, Kessler RC, Kohrt BA, Maj M, McGorry P, Reynolds CF, Weissman MM, Chibanda D, Dowrick C, Howard LM, Hoven CW, Knapp M, Mayberg HS, Penninx BWJH, Xiao S, Trivedi M, Uher R, Vijayakumar L, Wolpert M. Time for united action on depression: a Lancet-World Psychiatric Association Commission. Lancet 2022; 399:957-1022. [PMID: 35180424 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)02141-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 474] [Impact Index Per Article: 158.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2020] [Revised: 09/15/2021] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Herrman
- Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
| | - Vikram Patel
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Sangath, Goa, India; Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christian Kieling
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil; Child & Adolescent Psychiatry Division, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Michael Berk
- Deakin University, IMPACT Institute, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Claudia Buchweitz
- Graduate Program in Psychiatry, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Toshiaki A Furukawa
- Department of Health Promotion and Human Behavior, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine/School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Ronald C Kessler
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Brandon A Kohrt
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Mario Maj
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Campania L Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Patrick McGorry
- Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Charles F Reynolds
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Myrna M Weissman
- Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA; Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA; New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dixon Chibanda
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe; Centre for Global Mental Health, The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Christopher Dowrick
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Louise M Howard
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Christina W Hoven
- Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA; Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA; New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Martin Knapp
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Helen S Mayberg
- Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery, Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Brenda W J H Penninx
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Shuiyuan Xiao
- Central South University Xiangya School of Public Health, Changsha, China
| | - Madhukar Trivedi
- Peter O'Donnell Jr Brain Institute and the Department of Psychiatry, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Rudolf Uher
- Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| | - Lakshmi Vijayakumar
- Sneha, Suicide Prevention Centre and Voluntary Health Services, Chennai, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Renemane L, Kivite-Urtane A, Rancans E. Suicidality and Its Relation with Physical and Mental Conditions: Results from a Cross-Sectional Study of the Nationwide Primary Care Population Sample in Latvia. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2021; 57:970. [PMID: 34577893 PMCID: PMC8472357 DOI: 10.3390/medicina57090970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2021] [Revised: 09/02/2021] [Accepted: 09/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Physical and mental conditions are important risk factors for suicidality. However, there is no clear understanding of these relationships and the effect of co-occurrence on suicidality. We aimed to investigate the associations between current suicidality and mental disorders, physical conditions, and health-related factors in the nationwide primary care population in Latvia. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed within the framework of the National Research Program BIOMEDICINE 2014-2017 at 24 primary care settings across Latvia in 2015. Adult patients were evaluated over one week at each facility. Socio-demographic variables, physical condition, and health-related factors were assessed on-site by trained psychiatrists. Mental disorders and suicidality were determined using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview, and assessments were conducted over the telephone within two weeks after the visit to the general practitioner. Results: Of the 1485 cases, 18.6% reported suicidality. Only current depression, any anxiety disorder, any alcohol use disorder, and physical-mental multimorbidity were significantly associated with suicidality in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. Gastrointestinal diseases were associated with current depression alone (odds ratio (OR) 10.36; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.34-45.76) and comorbid depression with any anxiety disorder (OR 7.55; 95% CI 2.15-26.49) among persons with current suicidality. Conclusions: Screening for depression, anxiety, and alcohol use disorders regularly among patients with physical illness may be important to help recognise suicidality in primary care that could improve the quality of life of patients and prevent suicides.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lubova Renemane
- Department of Psychiatry and Narcology, Riga Stradins University, Tvaika Street 2, LV-1005 Riga, Latvia;
| | - Anda Kivite-Urtane
- Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, Institute of Public Health, Riga Stradins University, Dzirciema Street 16, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia;
| | - Elmars Rancans
- Department of Psychiatry and Narcology, Riga Stradins University, Tvaika Street 2, LV-1005 Riga, Latvia;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rancans E, Vrublevska J, Kivite-Urtane A, Ivanovs R, Ziedonis D. Prevalence of major depression and associated correlates in Latvian primary care population: results from the National Research Program BIOMEDICINE 2014-2017. Nord J Psychiatry 2020; 74:60-68. [PMID: 31553274 DOI: 10.1080/08039488.2019.1668961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Purpose and aim. In Latvia, the 12-month prevalence of depression in the general population has been estimated at 7.9%, but the data of the National Health Service show that general practitioners (GP's) saw only 3514 unique patients with a diagnosis of mood disorders in 2014. This is the first study conducted at the national level that was aimed to estimate the point and lifetime prevalence of depression and associated factors in primary care settings in Latvia.Materials and methods. This study was conducted at 24 primary care facilities in 2015. During a 1-week period, all consecutive adult patients were invited to complete the study questionnaires. Within a period of 2 weeks, the respondents were interviewed over the phone using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.), Version 6.0.0. A hierarchical multivariate data analysis was performed.Results. The study population consisted of 1485 patients. According to the M.I.N.I., 28.1% (95% CI 25.9-30.4) of the patients had at least one depressive episode in the past, and 10.2% (95% CI 8.7-11.8) had current depression. In the final multivariate analysis model, current major depression was associated with the female gender (OR 2.01), basic or unfinished basic education (OR 1.86), loss of marital ties (OR 1.86), and gastrointestinal (OR 3.46) and oncological (OR 2.26) diseases as a reason for visiting the GP.Conclusions. The prevalence of major depression in primary care is consistent with that in other European countries but is significantly underdiagnosed. Enhanced training in Latvian primary care settings may improve clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elmars Rancans
- Department of Psychiatry and Narcology, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia
| | - Jelena Vrublevska
- Department of Psychiatry and Narcology, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia
| | - Anda Kivite-Urtane
- Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, Institute of Public Health, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia
| | - Rolands Ivanovs
- Department of Psychiatry and Narcology, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia
| | - Douglas Ziedonis
- Health Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rantanen AT, Korkeila JJA, Kautiainen H, Korhonen PE. Poor or fair self-rated health is associated with depressive symptoms and impaired perceived physical health: A cross-sectional study in a primary care population at risk for type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Eur J Gen Pract 2019; 25:143-148. [PMID: 31280603 PMCID: PMC6713142 DOI: 10.1080/13814788.2019.1635114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Psychosocial factors such as depressive symptoms should be considered when assessing cardiovascular (CV) risk. Depressive symptoms are suggested to be associated with poor perception of one's health, i.e. self-rated health (SRH). Thus, assessing SRH could be a practical tool in CV risk prediction. However, SRH may also emphasize physical, mental or social aspects. Objectives: To assess the relationship of SRH and depressive symptoms, classic CV risk factors and perceived physical health among persons at risk for type 2 diabetes (T2D) and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Methods: In this cross-sectional study in a primary care population, 2555 persons (mean age 58 ± 7, 56% women) at risk for T2D or CVD were evaluated. Generalized linear statistical models were used to evaluate the association of depressive symptoms (Beck's Depression Inventory score ≥10), CV risk factors, and perception of SRH and physical health (assessed by Short Form Health Survey). Results: Poor or fair health was reported by 40% of the participants. They had more unhealthy lifestyle habits and CV risk factors than subjects rating their health as at least good. Among those with poor or fair SRH, the prevalence of depressive symptoms was 36% and associated with perception of physical health. Conclusion: Poor SRH is associated with depressive symptoms and impaired perceived physical health. Assessing SRH might be useful for detecting possible depressive symptoms in patients in CV risk management and diabetes care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ansa Talvikki Rantanen
- a Department of General Practice, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital , Turku , Finland.,b Salo Health Center , Salo , Finland
| | - Jyrki Jaakko Antero Korkeila
- c Department of Psychiatry, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital , Turku , Finland.,d Department of Psychiatry, Hospital District of Satakunta , Pori , Finland
| | - Hannu Kautiainen
- e Folkhälsan Research Center , Helsinki , Finland.,f Unit of Primary Health Care, Kuopio University Hospital , Kuopio , Finland
| | - Päivi Elina Korhonen
- a Department of General Practice, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital , Turku , Finland.,g Central Satakunta Health Federation of Municipalities , Harjavalta , Finland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kielmann K, Vidal N, Riekstina V, Krutikov M, van der Werf MJ, Biraua E, Duric P, Moore DAJ. "Treatment is of primary importance, and social assistance is secondary": A qualitative study on the organisation of tuberculosis (TB) care and patients' experience of starting and staying on TB treatment in Riga, Latvia. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0203937. [PMID: 30332406 PMCID: PMC6192559 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2018] [Accepted: 08/30/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vulnerable individuals with tuberculosis (TB) struggle to access and stay on treatment. While patient-related and social barriers to TB treatment adherence are well documented, less is known about how the organisation and delivery of TB care influences adherence behaviour. AIM To examine the influence of TB service organisation and culture on patients' experience of starting and staying on treatment in Riga, Latvia. METHODS An intervention package to support adherence to TB treatment amongst vulnerable patients in Riga, Latvia was piloted between August 2016 and March 2017. Qualitative observations (5), interviews with staff (20) and with TB patients (10) were conducted mid-way and at the end of the intervention to understand perceptions, processes, and experiences of TB care. RESULTS The organisation of TB services is strongly influenced by a divide between medical and social aspects of TB care. Communication and care practices are geared towards addressing individual risk factors for non-adherence rather than the structural vulnerabilities that patients experience in accessing care. Support for vulnerable patients is limited because of standardised programmatic approaches, resource constraints and restricted job descriptions for non-medical staff. CONCLUSION Providing support for vulnerable patients is challenged in this setting by the strict division between medical and social aspects of TB care, and the organisational focus on patient-related rather than systems-related barriers to access and adherence. Potential systems interventions include the introduction of multi-disciplinary approaches and teams in TB care, strengthening patient literacy at the point of treatment initiation, as well as stronger linkages with social care organisations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karina Kielmann
- Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Nicole Vidal
- Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Vija Riekstina
- Centre for Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Riga East University Hospital, Riga, Latvia
- University of Latvia, Faculty of Medicine, Internal Medicine Department, Riga, Latvia
| | - Maria Krutikov
- TB Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Evita Biraua
- Centre for Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Riga East University Hospital, Riga, Latvia
| | - Predrag Duric
- Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - David A. J. Moore
- University of Latvia, Faculty of Medicine, Internal Medicine Department, Riga, Latvia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Experiencing mental health diagnosis: a systematic review of service user, clinician, and carer perspectives across clinical settings. Lancet Psychiatry 2018; 5:747-764. [PMID: 29680468 DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(18)30095-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2018] [Revised: 02/14/2018] [Accepted: 02/15/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Receiving a mental health diagnosis can be pivotal for service users, and it has been described in both positive and negative terms. What influences service-user experience of the diagnostic process is unclear; consequently, clinicians report uncertainty regarding best practice. This Review aims to understand and inform diagnostic practice through a comprehensive synthesis of qualitative data on views and experiences from key stakeholders (service users, clinicians, carers, and family). We searched five databases and identified 78 papers for inclusion, originating from 13 countries and including 2228 participants. Eligible papers were assessed for quality, and data were coded and then developed into themes, which generated a model representing factors to consider for clinicians conveying, and individuals receiving, mental health diagnoses. Themes included disclosure, information provision, collaboration, timing, stigma, and functional value of diagnosis for recovery. Variations between different stakeholders and clinical contexts are explored. Findings support an individualised, collaborative, and holistic approach to mental health diagnosis.
Collapse
|
7
|
Vrublevska J, Trapencieris M, Rancans E. Adaptation and validation of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 to evaluate major depression in a primary care sample in Latvia. Nord J Psychiatry 2018; 72:112-118. [PMID: 29105551 DOI: 10.1080/08039488.2017.1397191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Depression is one of the most common mental disorders in primary care settings and is often underdiagnosed and undertreated by general practitioners (GPs). To date, no depression screening instruments have been validated for use in primary care settings in Latvia. The aim of this study was to establish the validity and cutoff score of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) among primary care patients in Latvia. MATERIALS AND METHODS During a one-week period, all consecutive patients aged 18 years or older visiting their GP of health concerns at 6 primary care settings were invited to complete the PHQ-9 questionnaire in their native language (Latvian or Russian). Criterion validity was assessed against the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.), which was conducted over the telephone by a psychiatrist less than 2 weeks after a primary care physician visit. RESULTS In total, 324 patients were evaluated using the PHQ-9, 272 of whom agreed to be interviewed with the M.I.N.I. Overall, the PHQ-9 items showed good internal (Cronbach's alpha 0.84) reliability. A cutoff score of 10 was established for the PHQ-9 (sensitivity 86.49%, specificity 89.36%), correctly classifying 86.4% of patients with current depression. CONCLUSIONS The PHQ-9 appears to be a reliable and valid instrument that can be used to diagnose major depression among Latvian and Russian speaking adults at the primary care level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jelena Vrublevska
- a Department of Psychiatry and Narcology , Riga Stradins University , Riga , Latvia
| | - Marcis Trapencieris
- b Institute of Philosophy and Sociology , University of Latvia , Riga , Latvia
| | - Elmars Rancans
- a Department of Psychiatry and Narcology , Riga Stradins University , Riga , Latvia
| |
Collapse
|