DC in multiple myeloma immunotherapy

Understanding the Role of T-Cells in the Antimyeloma Effect of Immunomodulatory Drugs

Immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) are effective treatments for patients with multiple myeloma. IMiDs have pleotropic effects including targeting the myeloma cells directly, and improving the anti-myeloma immune response. In the absence of myeloma cells, lenalidomide and pomalidomide induce CD4⁺ T cell secretion of IL-2 and indirect activation of Natural Killer (NK) cells. In the context of T cell receptor ligation, IMiDs enhance T cell proliferation, cytokine release and Th1 responses, both in vivo and in vitro. Furthermore, combination treatment of IMiDs and myeloma-targeting monoclonal antibodies eg. daratumumab (anti-CD38) and elotuzumab (anti-SLAMF7), checkpoint inhibitors, or bispecific T cell engagers showed synergistic effects, mainly via enhanced T and NK cell dependent cellular toxicity and T cell proliferation. Conversely, the corticosteroid dexamethasone can impair the immune modulatory effects of IMiDs, indicating that careful choice of myeloma drugs in combination with IMiDs is key for the best anti-myeloma therapeutic efficacy. This review presents an overview of the role for T cells in the overall anti-myeloma effects of immunomodulatory drugs.

The T Cell in Myeloma

An active role for the immune system in controlling the malignant plasma cell clone in myeloma has been postulated for many years. The clinical states of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, plateau phase disease, and smoldering myeloma all suggest that a significant host-tumor interaction is taking place. The fundamental role of the cytotoxic T cell in tumor elimination and control has been exemplified by the dramatic efficacy of adoptive T-cell therapies in many hemopoietic malignancies. However, tumor-host cross-talk results in suppression of the endogenous cytotoxic T-cell response against the malignant plasma cell. Whereas patients with myeloma do not clinically exhibit a T-cell immunodeficiency state, with, for example, increased mycobacterial infections, a number of abnormalities of T-cell function are evident. The major abnormalities of T cells include clonal expansions and associated immunosenescence, alterations of regulatory T cells/T helper 17 cells (Treg/Th17 ratio) and acquired membrane abnormalities, due to trogocytosis, which result in acquired Treg cells. Dendritic cell dysfunction associated with impaired antigen processing and presentation caused by abnormalities of the bone marrow microenvironment plays an additional role. In this perspective, we examine the T-cell abnormalities in myeloma and postulate that, whereas cytotoxic T cells interacting with the tumor are dysfunctional, residual T cells still function adequately against external pathogens and thus protect patients from the infections normally associated with a generalized T-cell immunodeficiency state. The so-called 3 E's of host-tumor interaction (elimination, equilibrium, and escape) are clearly reflected in the immune landscape and clinical behavior of myeloma.

Immunotherapeutic approaches to treat multiple myeloma

Cellular immunotherapy can be an effective adjuvant treatment for multiple myeloma (MM), as demonstrated by induction of durable remissions after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. However, anti-myeloma immunity is often hampered by suppressive mechanisms in the tumor micro-environment resulting in relapse or disease progression. To overcome this immunosuppression, new cellular immunotherapies have been developed, based on the important effector cells in anti-myeloma immunity, namely T cells and natural killer cells. These effectors can be modulated to improve their functionality, activated by dendritic cell vaccines, or combined with immune stimulating antibodies or immunomodulatory drugs to enhance their efficacy. In this review, we discuss promising pre-clinical and clinical data in the field of cellular immunotherapy in MM. In addition, we address the potential of combining these strategies with other therapies to maximize clinical effects without increasing toxicity. The reviewed therapies might pave the way to effective personalized treatments for MM patients.

Clinical-grade myeloma Ag pre-loaded DC vaccines retain potency after cryopreservation

BACKGROUND

The use of myeloma Ag-loaded mature DC vaccines, cryopreserved in single-use aliquots, is an attractive immunotherapeutic strategy. In this study we investigated the retention of phenotype, viability and potency of DC vaccines after freezing and thawing.

METHODS

Plastic-adherent monocytes, derived from a steady-state leukapheresis, were cultured in serum-free media containing GM-CSF and IL-4. DC were loaded on day 6 with myeloma lysate (ML) or idiotype (Id) Ag and keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH), induced to mature on day 7 with CD40-ligand and cryopreserved on day 9. Seventeen clinical-scale cultures were evaluated for DC yield, recovery and immunophenotype after potency was validated with allogeneic mixed lymphocyte culture and Ag presentation assays.

RESULTS

We produced 88 individual vaccines from 17 clinical-scale cultures. Median DC yield at harvest was 131 x 10(6) (range 37-375 x 10(6)) and median recovery of viable DC after thawing was 69% (range 11-100%). We confirmed viability (7AAD-), phenotype (CD14-, CD83+/CD40+, CD83+/CD80+, CD83+/CD86+, CD83+/CD54+, HLA-DR++) and the ability of the DC to present Ag and stimulate allogeneic T cells post-thawing.

DISCUSSION

We have validated a serum-free culture system for the production of DC. Cryopreservation did not interfere with DC activity, allowed time for rigorous quality control (QC) and flexible scheduling of intranodal vaccination, and reduced the time to prepare multiple vaccines.

Current approaches in dendritic cell generation and future implications for cancer immunotherapy

The discovery of tumor-associated antigens, which are either selectively or preferentially expressed by tumors, together with an improved insight in dendritic cell biology illustrating their key function in the immune system, have provided a rationale to initiate dendritic cell-based cancer immunotherapy trials. Nevertheless, dendritic cell vaccination is in an early stage, as methods for preparing tumor antigen presenting dendritic cells and improving their immunostimulatory function are continuously being optimized. In addition, recent improvements in immunomonitoring have emphasized the need for careful design of this part of the trials. Still, valuable proofs-of-principle have been obtained, which favor the use of dendritic cells in subsequent, more standardized clinical trials. Here, we review the recent developments in clinical DC generation, antigen loading methods and immunomonitoring approaches for DC-based trials.

CMRF-56 Immunoselected Blood Dendritic Cell Preparations Activated With GM-CSF Induce Potent Antimyeloma Cytotoxic T-cell Responses

The efficient antigen-presenting function of dendritic cells (DC) makes them an attractive cellular adjuvant for clinical immunotherapeutic protocols aimed at eradicating minimal residual disease after conventional treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) and other malignancies. We used single-step positive immunoselection with biotinylated CMRF-56 monoclonal antibody to generate a CD11c blood DC (BDC) enriched antigen-presenting cell population, which, after exposure to activation stimuli for as little as 2 hours, displayed a mature costimulatory BDC phenotype and secreted inflammatory cytokines. Of the activation stimuli tested, granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) provided optimal activation of the CMRF-56 immunoselected preparations and primed efficient cytotoxic T cell (CTL) responses using MART-1 peptide as a model tumor-associated antigen. In addition, GM-CSF activated CMRF-56 immunoselected cells cross-presented MM cell lysate and improved the MM-specific polyclonal CTL response (no activation 18.8%+/-4.3% vs. GM-CSF activation 40.9%+/-7.3%, P=0.051). CMRF-56 immunoselected BDC migrated in vitro both spontaneously and specifically toward the secondary lymphoid chemokine CCL21. Their migration was also significantly improved by GM-CSF and prostaglandin E2 activation and a greater percentage of activated BDC migrated specifically compared with monocyte-derived DC. These results indicate that the CMRF-56 immunoselected BDC preparations can cross-present antigen for effective anti-MM CTL responses and that limited exposure to maturation stimuli can produce phenotypically and functionally mature migrating DC. CMRF-56 immunoselected cells are suitable for use as part of an immunotherapeutic anti-MM vaccine.

A novel source of viable peripheral blood mononuclear cells from leukoreduction system chambers

BACKGROUND

Buffy coats are becoming less available as a source of research-grade peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNCs). Therefore, alternative sources of these cells were investigated.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

PBMNCs isolated from the cells retained in leukoreduction system chambers (LRSCs) and those eluted from white blood cell filters were compared. From LRSCs (1.88 +/- 0.40) x 10(9) PBMNCs (n = 13) versus (0.43 +/- 0.15) x 10(9) PBMNCs were isolated from leukofilter eluates (LFEs, n = 8; p < 0.0001).

RESULTS

Cells from LRSCs and LFEs produced similar numbers of burst-forming unit-erythroid, colony-forming unit (CFU)-granulocyte-macrophage, and CFU-granulocyte-erythrocyte-monocyte-macrophage-megakaryocyte colonies. The percentages of cells positive for CD3, CD4, CD8, CD14, CD19, and CD56 in the PBMNCs isolated from LRSCs and LFEs were indistinguishable. Cells isolated from LRSCs expressed higher levels of CD69 and CD25 in reaction to staphylococcal enterotoxin B than the cells isolated from LFEs. The source of cells affected neither the yield and purity of immunomagnetically isolated CD3+ cells, CD14+ cells, and CD56+ cells nor the function of T cells, natural killer cells, and in vitro matured dendritic cells (DCs). DC yield from LRSC-derived CD14+ cells, however, was higher.

CONCLUSION

LRSCs are a novel source of fully functional PBMNCs that can replace the more traditional sources of research-grade cellular products.

Vaccine strategies to treat lymphoproliferative disorders

Lymphoproliferative disorders, including follicular lymphoma (FL), multiple myeloma (MM) and chronic lymphatic leukaemia (CLL), are slowly progressive malignancies which remain incurable despite advances in therapy. Harnessing the immune system to recognise and destroy tumours is a promising new approach to treating these diseases. Dendritic cells (DC) are unique antigen-presenting cells that play a central role in the initiation and direction of immune responses. DC loaded ex vivo with tumour-associated antigens and administered as a vaccine have already shown promise in early clinical trials for a number of lymphoproliferative disorders, but the need for improvement is widely agreed. Recent advances in the understanding of basic DC biology and lessons from early clinical trials have provided exciting new insights into the generation of anti-tumour immune responses and the design of vaccine strategies. In this review we provide an overview of our current understanding of DC biology and their function in patients with lymphoproliferative disorders. We discuss the current status of clinical trials and new approaches to exploit the antigen presenting capacity of DC to design vaccines of the future.

Results of a Phase I study utilizing monocyte-derived dendritic cells pulsed with tumor RNA in children with Stage 4 neuroblastoma

BACKGROUND

A Phase I study of 11 pediatric patients with newly diagnosed, Stage 4 neuroblastoma was conducted using monocyte-derived dendritic cells (DC) pulsed with tumor RNA to produce antitumor vaccines (DC(RNA)).

METHODS

Patients received two courses of induction with carboplatin followed by standard chemotherapy, surgery, radiation, high-dose therapy, stem cell rescue, and DC(RNA) vaccine therapy.

RESULTS

The results showed that this method for producing and administering DC(RNA) from a single leukapheresis product was both feasible and safe in this pediatric neuroblastoma population. Two courses of carboplatin maintained lymphocyte counts at normal levels. However, immune function 6 weeks after high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell rescue and prior to receiving DC(RNA) was impaired in all patients tested. There was an alteration in the ratio of CD4-positive and CD80-positive T cells. CD4-positive cell numbers were below normal, whereas CD8-positive cell numbers were above normal for all patients. In addition, CD19-positive cell numbers were below normal for all but one patient. It was found that humoral responses to recall antigens (diphtheria and tetanus) and cellular responses to mitogen and recall antigens were below normal in most patients. Despite this, two of three patients tested showed a tumor-specific humoral immune response to DC(RNA). Among the patients who had measurable disease at the time of DC(RNA) vaccine, none showed any objective tumor response.

CONCLUSIONS

DC(RNA) vaccines were both safe and feasible in children with Stage 4 neuroblastoma. Humoral responses to tumor were detected, although remained immunosuppressed at the time of administration, limiting efficacy.