Can you trust self‐reports among injectable drug users in clinical setting?

An efficient method for simultaneous detection of Pheniramine, Pentazocine and cotinine in urine by Gas Chromatography in De-addiction program

Background

Nonmedical use of prescription drugs for recreational purposes is a major health problem that raises high concerns for public health. Recently, several laboratory studies have reported the misuse of pentazocine, an agonist-antagonist opioid in combination with antihistamines in opioid addicts. Illicit self-administration of prescription drugs has been increasingly reported in India. Urinalysis as an adjunct to self-report plays a key role in providing additional information in the treatment of drug users. This paper aims to discuss a simple, convenient, and rapid capillary column gas-liquid chromatography method for simultaneous detection of pentazocine, pheniramine, and cotinine in urine.

Methods

The sample was extracted with chloroform and isopropanol (3:1,v/v) and evaporated to dryness. After reconstitution with methanol, it was directly subjected to gas chromatography analysis. Method performance was evaluated and validated in terms of sensitivity, precision, the limit of detection (LOD), and the limit of quantification (LOQ).

Findings

The linearity obtained was in the range of 50-1000 ng/ml with a correlation coefficient (r) above 0.999 for each drug. Good LOQ (50ng/ml) was obtained with each drug. Also, the developed method was effective in analyzing samples from patients with suspected abuse of these drugs.

Conclusion

The technique was found to be simple, robust, sensitive, and precise in the simultaneous analysis of drugs (pentazocine, pheniramine, and cotinine). This method was proved to be useful and cost-effective in treating and monitoring patients seeking help for addiction in clinical settings.

Screening and Brief Interventions for Illicit Drug Use and Alcohol Use in Methadone Maintained Opiate-Dependent Patients: Results of a Pilot Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial Feasibility Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The present study evaluated the effectiveness of a single clinician delivered brief intervention (BI) to reduce problem alcohol use and illicit substance use in an opiate-dependent methadone maintained cohort of patients attending for treatment.

METHODS

Four addiction treatment centers were randomly assigned to either treatment as usual (TAU; control group) or BI (intervention group). Clinicians screened patients using the alcohol, smoking, and substance involvement screening test (ASSIST) screening tool at baseline and again at three-month follow up. Fidelity checks were performed to ensure that training was delivered effectively and uniformly across all study sites. Feasibility of administering a BI within daily practice was assessed through intervention fidelity checks, patient satisfaction questionnaires and process evaluation.

RESULTS

A total of 465 patients were screened (66% of the overall eligible population) with a total of 433 (93%) ASSIST positive cases. Randomization was effective, with no differences in the control versus the intervention arms at baseline for key demographic or clinical indicators including substance us. There was a statistically significant difference between global risk score for the intervention (x = 39.36, sd = 25.91) group and the control group (x = 45.27, SD = 27.52) at 3-month follow-up (t(341) = -2.07, p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

This trial provides the first evidence that a single clinician delivered BI can result in a reduction in substance use within a methadone maintained opiate-dependent cohort, and this effect is sustained at three month follow up.

The impact of non-concordant self-report of substance use in clinical trials research

BACKGROUND

Studies comparing self-report substance use data to biochemical verification generally demonstrate high rates of concordance. We argue that these rates are due to the relatively high true negative rate in the general population, and high degree of honestly in treatment seeking individuals. We hypothesized that high risk individuals not seeking treatment would demonstrate low concordance and a high false negative rate of self-reported substance use.

METHODS

A sample of 500 individuals from a smoking cessation clinical trial was assessed over 1 year. Assessments included semi-structured interviews, questionnaires (e.g. Addiction Severity Index, etc.), and urine drug screen assays (UDS). Generalized estimating equations (GEEs) were used to predict false negative reports for various substances across the study and determine the influence of substance use on the primary study outcome of smoking cessation.

RESULTS

Participants demonstrated high false negative rates in reporting substances use, and the false negative rates increased as the study progressed. Established predictors of false negatives generalized to the current sample. High concordance and low false negative rates were found in self-report of nicotine use. A small but significant relationship was found in for effect of biochemically verified substance use on smoking cessation.

CONCLUSIONS

Biochemical verification of substance use is needed in high risk populations involved in studies not directly related to the treatment of substance use, especially in populations with high threat of stigmatization. Testing should continue through the time period of the study for maximal identification of substance use.