Preoperative steroids for hearing preservation cochlear implantation: A review

Robotic assistance during cochlear implantation: the rationale for consistent, controlled speed of electrode array insertion

Cochlear implants (CI) have revolutionized the treatment of patients with severe to profound sensory hearing loss by providing a method of bypassing normal hearing to directly stimulate the auditory nerve. A further advance in the field has been the introduction of "hearing preservation" surgery, whereby the CI electrode array (EA) is carefully inserted to spare damage to the delicate anatomy and function of the cochlea. Preserving residual function of the inner ear allows patients to receive maximal benefit from the CI and to combine CI electric stimulation with acoustic hearing, offering improved postoperative speech, hearing, and quality of life outcomes. However, under the current paradigm of implant surgery, where EAs are inserted by hand, the cochlea cannot be reliably spared from damage. Robotics-assisted EA insertion is an emerging technology that may overcome fundamental human kinetic limitations that prevent consistency in achieving steady and slow EA insertion. This review begins by describing the relationship between EA insertion speed and generation of intracochlear forces and pressures. The various mechanisms by which these intracochlear forces can damage the cochlea and lead to worsened postoperative outcomes are discussed. The constraints of manual insertion technique are compared to robotics-assisted methods, followed by an overview of the current and future state of robotics-assisted EA insertion.

Variability in Perioperative Steroid Therapy Regimen for Cochlear Implantation as It Relates to Hearing Preservation

HYPOTHESIS

We aimed to identify practice trends and association between physician training and administration of perioperative steroids for cochlear implantation (CI) as it relates to hearing preservation.

BACKGROUND

Perioperative steroid therapy regimens are postulated to protect residual hearing and improve hearing preservation outcomes in CI.

METHODS

A 27-question online survey was developed by the senior authors using the Qualtrics Survey Tool, then distributed via email from September to November 2022 to otolaryngologists specializing in otology or neurotology and who practice in the United States or Canada.

RESULTS

The survey was sent to 463 physicians, 162 (35.0%) of whom completed the survey. One hundred forty-four (31.1%) responses underwent analysis. All physicians administering preoperative steroids (n = 31) prefer preoperative oral prednisone. Of 143 physicians administering intraoperative steroids, 54.5% prefer intraoperative intravenous dexamethasone. More than half (77.6%) of 85 physicians administering postoperative steroids prefer postoperative oral prednisone. Postoperative steroid administration (p < 0.006) and taper utilization (p < 0.041) were greater among physicians who complete greater than 40 CIs annually (n = 47 [71.2%]; n = 30 [49.2%]) than physicians who complete up to 40 CIs annually (n = 37 [48.7%]; n = 20 [31.3%]), respectively. Physicians practicing for 5 to 20 years after residency are more prevalent in using postoperative steroid tapers than physicians practicing for fewer than 5 years after and more than 20 years after residency (n = 37 [51.4%] versus n = 14 [25.5%], p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Consensus is needed about the optimal steroid treatment for CI patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Inner Ear Drug Delivery for Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Current Challenges and Opportunities

Most therapies for treating sensorineural hearing loss are challenged by the delivery across multiple tissue barriers to the hard-to-access anatomical location of the inner ear. In this review, we will provide a recent update on various pharmacotherapy, gene therapy, and cell therapy approaches used in clinical and preclinical studies for the treatment of sensorineural hearing loss and approaches taken to overcome the drug delivery barriers in the ear. Small-molecule drugs for pharmacotherapy can be delivered via systemic or local delivery, where the blood-labyrinth barrier hinders the former and tissue barriers including the tympanic membrane, the round window membrane, and/or the oval window hinder the latter. Meanwhile, gene and cell therapies often require targeted delivery to the cochlea, which is currently achieved via intra-cochlear or intra-labyrinthine injection. To improve the stability of the biomacromolecules during treatment, e.g., RNAs, DNAs, proteins, additional packing vehicles are often required. To address the diverse range of biological barriers involved in inner ear drug delivery, each class of therapy and the intended therapeutic cargoes will be discussed in this review, in the context of delivery routes commonly used, delivery vehicles if required (e.g., viral and non-viral nanocarriers), and other strategies to improve drug permeation and sustained release (e.g., hydrogel, nanocarriers, permeation enhancers, and microfluidic systems). Overall, this review aims to capture the important advancements and key steps in the development of inner ear therapies and delivery strategies over the past two decades for the treatment and prophylaxis of sensorineural hearing loss.

Triamcinolone acetonide can be detected in cerebrospinal fluid after intratympanic injection

Intratympanically applied treatments are of increasing interest to the otologic community to treat sudden sensorineural hearing loss or vestibular disorders but also to deliver gene therapy agents, or biologics to the inner ear. Further diversion from the middle ear and perilymph to blood circulation and cerebrospinal fluid via the cochlear aqueduct are one of the limiting factors and so far not understood well enough. In this study, intratympanically applied triamcinolone acetonide was determined in cerebrospinal fluid. Additionally, perilymph was sampled through the round window membrane as well as at the lateral semicircular canal to determine drug levels. Of the twenty-one included patients, triamcinolone acetonide was quantifiable in cerebrospinal fluid in 43% at very low levels (range 0 ng/ml - 6.2 ng/ml) which did not correlate with perilymph levels. Drug levels at the two different perilymph sampling sites were within a range of 13.5 ng/ml to 1180.0 ng/ml. Results suggest an equal distribution of triamcinolone acetonide to semicircular canals, which might support the use of triamcinolone acetonide as a treatment option for vestibular pathologies such as Menièrés disease. On the other hand, the distribution to cerebrospinal fluid might be limiting current approaches in gene therapy where a central distribution is unwanted.

Improving Clinical Outcomes in Cochlear Implantation Using Glucocorticoid Therapy: A Review

Cochlear implant surgery is a successful procedure for auditory rehabilitation of patients with severe to profound hearing loss. However, cochlear implantation may lead to damage to the inner ear, which decreases residual hearing and alters vestibular function. It is now of increasing interest to preserve residual hearing during this surgery because this is related to better speech, music perception, and hearing in complex listening environments. Thus, different efforts have been tried to reduce cochlear implantation-related injury, including periprocedural glucocorticoids because of their anti-inflammatory properties. Different routes of administration have been tried to deliver glucocorticoids. However, several drawbacks still remain, including their systemic side effects, unknown pharmacokinetic profiles, and complex delivery methods. In the present review, we discuss the role of periprocedural glucocorticoid therapy to decrease cochlear implantation-related injury, thus preserving inner ear function after surgery. Moreover, we highlight the pharmacokinetic evidence and clinical outcomes which would sustain further interventions.

Comparison of Hearing Preservation Outcomes Using Extended Versus Single-Dose Steroid Therapy in Cochlear Implantation

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to compare the hearing preservation outcomes of patients who received extended versus single-dose steroid therapy in cochlear implant surgery.

DESIGN

Case-control.

SETTING

Tertiary referral centers in Taiwan from April 2017 to 2019.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 70 patients aged 1 to 78 years old (mean = 18.04, standard deviation [SD] = 21.51) who received cochlear implantation via the round window approach were included in the study. Prospectively, 35 cases were enrolled for cochlear implantation with single-dose therapy. Thirty-five controls who underwent cochlear implantation with extended therapy were retrospectively enrolled after frequency matching.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcome measure was the rate of hearing preservation. This was calculated based on the HEARRING Network formula and results were categorized as complete, partial, and minimal. Impedances served as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the complete hearing preservation rates between the extended and single-dose groups at 6 months postoperatively. Impedances were significantly lower in the extended group after 1 month and 6 months of follow up. When the complete and partial hearing preservation groups were compared, the size of round window opening and speed of insertion were found to be statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Both extended and single-dose therapies result in good hearing preservation in patients who undergo cochlear implantation. However, better impedances can be expected from patients who received extended therapy. A slower speed of insertion and a widely opened round window play a role in hearing preservation.

Nanocarriers for drug delivery to the inner ear: Physicochemical key parameters, biodistribution, safety and efficacy

Despite the high incidence of inner ear disorders, there are still no dedicated medications on the market. Drugs are currently administered by the intratympanic route, the safest way to maximize drug concentration in the inner ear. Nevertheless, therapeutic doses are ensured for only a few minutes/hours using drug solutions or suspensions. The passage through the middle ear barrier strongly depends on drug physicochemical characteristics. For the past 15 years, drug encapsulation into nanocarriers has been developed to overcome this drawback. Nanocarriers are well known to sustain drug release and protect it from degradation. In this review, in vivo studies are detailed concerning nanocarrier biodistribution, their pathway mechanisms in the inner ear and the resulting drug pharmacokinetics. Key parameters influencing nanocarrier biodistribution are identified and discussed: nanocarrier size, concentration, surface composition and shape. Recent advanced strategies that combine nanocarriers with hydrogels, specific tissue targeting or modification of the round window permeability (cell-penetrating peptide, magnetic delivery) are explored. Most of the nanocarriers appear to be safe for the inner ear and provide a significant efficacy over classic formulations in animal models. However, many challenges remain to be overcome for future clinical applications.

Impedance Values Do Not Correlate With Speech Understanding in Cochlear Implant Recipients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a possible correlation between impedance values and speech perception after cochlear implantation.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION

All patients implanted with a MedEl Flex28 device in our department with complete audiometric data (Freiburger monosyllabic testing at 65 dB, Hochmaier-Schulz-Moser testing in quiet and in 10 dB noise) and impedance measurements at the 1-year refitting appointment were enrolled in this study. Further inclusion criteria were age > 17 years, native speakers, and no use of electric-acoustic-stimulation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mean values for impedances were calculated over all electrode contacts and separately for basal, medial, and apical regions. These data were correlated statistically (Pearson's correlation) with speech testing results. Furthermore, groups of patients with extreme values were built and compared against each other and against the rest of the collective.

RESULTS

Impedance values did not correlate significantly with speech performance in any of the audiometric tests neither for all electrode contacts nor for specific clusters of contacts. Patients with the lowest impedances did not perform statistically different than patients with the highest impedances in any condition.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the first data on a possible correlation between impedances and speech perception. The extent of the impedances as a benchmark for a good performance in speech discrimination tests could not be verified. Further prospective studies, possibly with more precise diagnostic tools, should be carried out to define the value of impedance measurements for cochlear implantation provision.

Dose-Dependent Transient Decrease of Impedances by Deep Intracochlear Injection of Triamcinolone With a Cochlear Catheter Prior to Cochlear Implantation-1 Year Data

Administration of low-dose steroids via a catheter inserted into the cochlea to apply pharmaceuticals to more apical regions was previously shown not to be sufficient for long-term reduction of electrode impedances. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of intra-cochlear high-dose triamcinolone application on impedances in cochlear implant recipients. Patients received low-dose (4 mg/ml; n = 5) or high-dose (20 mg/ml; n = 5) triamcinolone via a cochlear catheter just prior to the insertion of a Med-El Flex28 electrode. Impedances were measured at defined time points from intra-operatively up to 12 months after first fitting and retrospectively compared with a control group (no steroid application). Patients who received a high-dose application of crystalloid triamcinolone showed significantly reduced impedances in the first fitting measurements compared to the control group. This effect was no longer detectable in patients of the low-dose group at that time. Looking at the different regions of the electrode, the impedance values were lowered significantly only at the basal and medial contacts. At later time points, there were no significant differences between any of the groups. This is the first study to demonstrate a dose-dependent reduction of impedances by deep intra-cochlear injection of triamcinolone in cochlear implant patients. With a high-dose, single application of triamcinolone using a cochlear catheter prior to insertion of a Flex28 electrode, the impedances can be significantly reduced up to and including the first fitting. Although the effect was longer lasting than when compared to low-dose triamcinolone, it was also not permanent.

Development of a rapidly made, easily personalized drug-eluting polymer film on the electrode array of a cochlear implant during surgery

OBJECTIVE

To develop a drug-eluting polymer film which can be easily personalized and rapidly made on the electrode array of a cochlear implant during surgery.

METHODS

A precursor solution was prepared with poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) and trichloromethane. Using a dip-coating method, the silicone electrode array (HiFocus 1J, Advanced Bionics) was coated in polymer film produced from the precursor solution containing one of three drugs: dexamethasone sodium phosphate (DSP), cytosine arabinoside hydrochloride (Ara-C), or nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD), and the release of these drugs from the polymer film was studied. The drug-eluting film on the electrode array was analyzed by environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM). The water contact angle and the impedance of the electrode array were measured before and after coating. Drug release kinetics was evaluated in a quasi-stationary release model, using high performance liquid chromatography every 24 h for 15 days.

RESULTS

Five electrode arrays were tested with each of the three drugs in the polymer film coating. Before and after coating, ESEM studies revealed that the drug-loaded PLGA coating yielded a smooth covering with an average thickness of 1.02 ± 0.05 μm. The mass of the coated electrode increased by 1.00 ± 0.03 mg. The water contact angle decreased after coating (102 ± 0.6° vs 77 ± 1.6°, p < 0.01) but there was no significant change in the average impedance of the electrodes after coating (0.9 ± 0.22 kΩ vs 1.0 ± 0.18 kΩ, p > 0.05). An in vitro drug kinetics study revealed a faster release in the first 24 h (63.4 ± 0.6%) and a sustained release over the following 15 days (78.3 ± 1.7% in 2 days, 95.6 ± 1.0% in 7 days and 99.1 ± 0.4% in 14 days). The release rate was not affected by the drug, dose or the thickness of the coating.

CONCLUSION

The dip-coating method is feasible for rapid casting of a drug-eluting PLGA film on an electrode array during CI surgery. The coated electrode array maintained its original morphology and became more hydrophilic. The loaded drug is released in a sustained manner and is easily regulated, and so the method might represent a potential application for clinical use in cochlear implantation.

Long-term effects and potential limits of intratympanic dexamethasone-loaded hydrogels combined with dexamethasone-eluting cochlear electrodes in a low-insertion trauma Guinea pig model

Cochlear implantation has become the most effective hearing restoration method and is one of the great advances in modern medicine. Early implants have been continuously developed into more efficient devices, and electro-acoustic stimulation is increasingly expanding the indication criteria for cochlear implants to patients with more residual hearing. Therefore, protecting the cochlear structures and maintaining its intrinsic capacities like residual hearing has become more important than ever before. In the present study, we aimed to assess the long-term protective effects of a dexamethasone-eluting electrode combined with the preoperative intratympanic application of a dexamethasone-loaded thermoreversible hydrogel in a cochlear implant guinea pig model. 40 normal-hearing animals were equally randomized into a control group receiving an unloaded hydrogel and a non-eluting electrode, a group receiving a dexamethasone-loaded hydrogel and a non-eluting electrode, a group receiving an unloaded hydrogel and a dexamethasone-eluting electrode and a group receiving both a dexamethasone-loaded hydrogel and a dexamethasone-eluting electrode. Residual hearing and impedances were investigated during a period of 120 days. Tissue response and histological changes of cochlear structures were analyzed at the end of the experiments. Treatment with dexamethasone did not show a significant protective effect on residual hearing independent of treatment group. Although the majority of the cochleae didn't exhibit any signs of electrode insertion trauma, a small degree of tissue response could be observed in all animals without a significant difference between the groups. Foreign body giant cells and osteogenesis were significantly associated with tissue response. Hair cells, synapsin-1-positive cells and spiral ganglion cells were preserved in all study groups. Cochlear implantation using a dexamethasone-eluting electrode alone and in combination with a dexamethasone-loaded hydrogel significantly protected auditory nerve fibers on day 120. Post-implantation impedances were equal across study groups and remained stable over the duration of the experiment. In this study we were able to show that use of a dexamethasone-eluting electrode alone and in combination with preoperative application of dexamethasone-loaded hydrogel significantly protects auditory nerve fibers. Furthermore, we have shown that a cochlear implantation-associated hearing threshold shift and tissue response may not be completely prevented by the sole application of dexamethasone.

Intracochlear administration of steroids with a catheter during human cochlear implantation: a safety and feasibility study

Suppression of foreign body reaction, improvement of electrode-nerve interaction, and preservation of residual hearing are essential research topics in cochlear implantation. Intracochlear pharmaco- or cell-based therapies can open new horizons in this field. Local drug delivery strategies are desirable as higher local concentrations of agents can be realized and side effects can be minimized compared to systemic administrations. When administered locally at accessible, basal parts of the cochlea, drugs reach apical regions later and in much lower concentrations due to poor diffusion patterns in cochlear fluids. Therefore, new devices are needed to warrant rapid distribution of agents into all parts of the cochlea. Five patients received a deep intracochlear injection of triamcinolone with a specifically designed cochlear catheter during cochlear implantation right before inserting a cochlear implant electrode. As a measure for formation of fibrous tissue around the electrode, electrical impedances were measured in the operation room and over 4 months thereafter. No adverse events were observed peri- and postoperatively. The handling of the device was easy. Severe damage to the microstructure of the cochlea was excluded as far as possible by cone beam computed tomography and vestibular testing. A delayed rise of the impedances was seen in the catheter group compared to controls over all regions of the cochlea. A statistical significance, however, was only obtained at the midregion of the cochlea. Consequently, the cochlear catheter is a safe and feasible device for local drug delivery of pharmaceutical agents into deeper regions of the cochlea.

Evaluating inter-aural hearing preservation in bilateral paediatric cochlear implantation

OBJECTIVE

To examine inter-aural hearing preservation results in children undergoing simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation (CI).

METHODS

Retrospective case review in tertiary referral centre. All children undergoing simultaneous bilateral CI between January 2013 and June 2014 (18 months). Patients eligible for inclusion in the study had pre-operative hearing thresholds of <90 dB at 250 Hz and ≥100 dB at 500 Hz. Patients with anatomical cochlear anomalies or missing data were excluded. Seven patients were included, 1 male, 6 female, mean age of 12 years 11 months at the time of surgery. All patients had simultaneous bilateral cochlear implant surgery, using the same implant and technique. All patients had pre- and post-operative unaided pure tone audiometry. Inter-aural hearing preservation results were compared in each patient.

RESULTS

The achieved hearing preservation for 14 ears was complete in 5, partial in 7, and minimal in 2. Measurable hearing preservation was achieved in 86% overall. Inter-aural analysis revealed that only 2 (subjects 1 and 4) of the 7 patients had preservation results within the same preservation group (complete/partial/minimal). The mean inter-aural preservation difference was 30.7% with a range from 12.4% to 65.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

Several factors and techniques have already been identified in the wider literature to explain differences in hearing preservation results in CI. However, despite controlling for known factors, we demonstrate variable inter-aural results. This suggests that there may be more factors beyond the surgeon's control influencing our ability to provide consistent results.

Intracochlear drug delivery in combination with cochlear implants : Current aspects

Local drug application to the inner ear offers a number of advantages over systemic delivery. Local drug therapy currently encompasses extracochlear administration (i. e., through intratympanic injection), intracochlear administration (particularly for gene and stem cell therapy), as well as various combinations with auditory neurosensory prostheses, either evaluated in preclinical or clinical studies, or off-label. To improve rehabilitation with cochlear implants (CI), one focus is the development of drug-releasing electrode carriers, e. g., for delivery of glucocorticosteroids, antiapoptotic substances, or neurotrophins to the inner ear. The performance of cochlear implants may thus be improved by protecting neuronal structures from insertion trauma, reducing fibrosis in the inner ear, and by stimulating growth of neuronal structures in the direction of the electrodes. Controlled drug release after extracochlear or intracochlear application in conjunction with a CI can also be achieved by use of a biocompatible, resorbable controlled-release drug-delivery system. Two case reports for intracochlear controlled release drug delivery in combination with cochlear implants are presented. In order to treat progressive reduction in speech discrimination and increased impedance, two cochlear implant patients successfully underwent intracochlear placement of a biocompatible, resorbable drug-delivery system for controlled release of dexamethasone. The drug levels reached in inner ear fluids after different types of local drug application strategies can be calculated using a computer model. The intracochlear drug concentrations calculated in this way were compared for different dexamethasone application strategies.