• Reference Citation Analysis
  • v
  • v
  • Find an Article
Find an Article PDF (4598977)   Today's Articles (799)   Subscriber (49356)
For: Kosaner J, Spitzer P, Bayguzina S, Gultekin M, Behar LA. Comparing eSRT and eCAP measurements in pediatric MED-EL cochlear implant users. Cochlear Implants Int 2018;19:153-161. [DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2017.1416759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Number Cited by Other Article(s)
1
Franke-Trieger A, Mattheus W, Seebacher J, Zelger P, Zahnert T, Neudert M. Stapedius reflex thresholds obtained in a free sound field as an indicator for over- and understimulation in cochlear implant listeners. Int J Audiol 2023:1-8. [PMID: 37656611 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2023.2245141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Revised: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 09/03/2023]
2
Thangaraj M, Arunachalam R, Gore M, AjithKumar U. Prediction of behavioral MCL using electrophysiological responses in children using MED-EL implant. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2023;172:111696. [PMID: 37563011 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2023.111696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Revised: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023]
3
Yiannos JM, Bester CW, Zhao C, Gell B, Jayakody DMP. Speech-in-noise performance in objectively determined cochlear implant maps, including the effect of cognitive state. PLoS One 2023;18:e0286986. [PMID: 37315077 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]  Open
4
Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials Recorded Directly Through the Cochlear Implant in Cochlear Implant Recipients: a Feasibility Study. Ear Hear 2022;43:1426-1436. [DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000001212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
5
Callejón-Leblic MA, Barrios-Romero MM, Kontides A, Sánchez-Gómez S, Beynon AJ. Electrically evoked auditory cortical responses elicited from individually fitted stimulation parameters in cochlear implant users. Int J Audiol 2022:1-9. [PMID: 35477333 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2022.2062578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
6
Di Berardino F, Cavicchiolo S, Del Carmen Fuentes M, Kontides A, Lauss K, Zanetti D. Maximum acceptable level for the determination of ECAP and ESRT in a paediatric population. Cochlear Implants Int 2022;23:214-224. [PMID: 35380097 DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2022.2054097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
7
Deniz R, Kara E, Deniz B, Kara HÇ, Yener HM, Ataş A. Electrically Evoked Auditory Late Responses as a Novel Method for Cochlear Implant Programming. Otol Neurotol 2022;43:e414-e420. [PMID: 35085111 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
8
ARTFit—A Quick and Reliable Tool for Performing Initial Fittings in Users of MED-EL Cochlear Implants. Life (Basel) 2022;12:life12020269. [PMID: 35207556 PMCID: PMC8879980 DOI: 10.3390/life12020269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2022] [Revised: 02/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]  Open
9
Guo H, Lin B, Chen T, Li Y, Guo M. The optimal probe tone frequency for eSRT measurements at individual electrodes in children with cochlear implants. Acta Otolaryngol 2021;141:1055-1062. [PMID: 34802365 DOI: 10.1080/00016489.2021.1998614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
10
Zarowski A, Fuentes MC, Schaudel D, Leblans M, De Coninck L, Theunen T, Vermeiren A, Verschoren L, van Dinther J, Offeciers EF. Intraoperative recordings of electromyogenic responses from the human stapedius muscle. Hear Res 2021;408:108290. [PMID: 34233241 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2021.108290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2021] [Revised: 04/16/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
11
Franke-Trieger A, Mattheus W, Seebacher J, Zahnert T, Neudert M. Stapedius reflex evoked in free sound field in cochlear implant users compared to normal-hearing listeners. Int J Audiol 2021;60:695-703. [PMID: 33426977 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2020.1866780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
12
Dziemba OC, Aristeidou A, Brill S. Slope of electrically evoked compound action potential amplitude growth function is site-dependent. Cochlear Implants Int 2020;22:136-147. [PMID: 33297870 DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2020.1853956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
13
Browning LM, Nie Y, Rout A, Heiner M. Audiologists' preferences in programming cochlear implants: A preliminary report. Cochlear Implants Int 2020;21:179-191. [PMID: 31900086 DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2019.1708553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
14
Gärtner L, Lenarz T, Büchner A. Fine-grain recordings of the electrically evoked compound action potential amplitude growth function in cochlear implant recipients. Biomed Eng Online 2018;17:140. [PMID: 30340590 PMCID: PMC6195717 DOI: 10.1186/s12938-018-0588-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2018] [Accepted: 10/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]  Open
PrevPage 1 of 1 1Next
© 2004-2024 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA