Cochlear implantation in children under 12 months: Prevalence and implications of 'hidden' disabilities

Clinical Portrait of Cochlear Implantation in Patients With CHARGE Syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To examine the clinical characteristics and auditory performance of patients with CHARGE syndrome following cochlear implantation (CI), as well as the prognostic factors affecting auditory outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

Tertiary academic center.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed in patients with CHARGE syndrome who underwent CI from 2007 to 2022. The category of auditory performance (CAP) score was used to assess the CI outcomes, and factors that may affect the speech outcomes were also evaluated.

RESULTS

In 14 children with CHARGE syndrome, 22 CIs were performed, 6 unilaterally and 8 bilaterally. The mean age at CI was 25.9 months (range: 10-62). All patients had ear abnormalities and developmental delays, and cochlear nerve deficiency (CND) was present in all ears. At the last follow-up (mean: 49.6 months), the mean CAP score improved significantly compared to the preoperative measure (from 0.36 ± 0.81 to 3.21 ± 1.70, P = .001), with 6 patients (42.9%) achieving a CAP score of 4 points or higher. However, between the unilateral and bilateral CI groups, the final CAP score or change in CAP score was similar. Factors including age, coloboma, and CND did not significantly affect speech outcomes (all P > .05).

CONCLUSION

Even though CHARGE syndrome features challenging anomalies, CI can be conducted safely and can offer effective contribution to significant speech improvement. Patients with CHARGE syndrome should be given the opportunity to undergo CI to maximize their audiological progress.

Cochlear Implantation in Children Under 9 Months of Age: Safety and Efficacy

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety of cochlear implants (CIs) in children under 9 months of age to better understand expected postoperative complication rates, and to provide a preliminary look at efficacy.

STUDY DESIGN

Single-center retrospective review.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Children 5 to 8 months of age who received a CI between 2011 and 2021.

INTERVENTIONS

Therapeutic-CI.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was 6-month postoperative complication rate. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, device explantation/reimplantation, rehabilitation supports, and hearing and language outcomes. Complications of children implanted under than 9 months of age was compared with a cohort of children implanted 9 to 18 months of age between the years 2011 and 2016 using a chi-squared test ( p < 0.05).

RESULTS

One hundred six children under 9 months of age were implanted (204 CIs) at a mean age of 6.6 months (range: 5-8). Postoperative complications occurred in 28 patients (26%) and were often minor. There were no mortalities. There was no statistically significant difference in complications, including reimplantation rates, between patients implanted under 9 months of age and those implanted 9 to 18 months of age. Speech discrimination outcomes were excellent, and mean spoken language outcomes were near normative for typically developing children.

CONCLUSIONS

Cochlear implantation can be a safe and effective treatment option for children 5 to 8 months of age. Early hearing screening and referral for infants to receive appropriate intervention will continue to play a critical role in optimizing speech and language outcomes.

Cochlear Implantation in Children with Additional Disabilities: A Systematic Review

This study examines the last 10 years of medical literature on the benefits of cochlear implantation in children who are deaf or hard of hearing (DHH) with additional disabilities. The most recent literature concerning cochlear implants (CIs) in DHH children with additional disabilities was systematically explored through PubMed, Embase, Scopus, PsycINFO, and Web of Science from January 2012 to July 2023. Our two-stage search strategy selected a total of 61 articles concerning CI implantation in children with several forms of additional disabilities: autism spectrum disorder, cerebral palsy, visual impairment, motor disorders, developmental delay, genetic syndromes, and intellectual disability. Overall, many children with additional disabilities benefit from CIs by acquiring greater environmental sound awareness. This, in turn, improves non-verbal communication and adaptive skills, with greater possibilities to relate to others and to be connected with the environment. Instead, despite some improvement, expressive language tends to develop more slowly and to a lesser extent compared to children affected by hearing loss only. Further studies are needed to better appreciate the specificities of each single disability and to personalize interventions, not restricting the analysis to auditory and language skills, but rather applying or developing cross-culturally validated instruments able to reliably assess the developmental trajectory and the quality of life of DHH children with additional disabilities before and after CI.

Analysis of specific risk factors of neurodevelopmental disorder in hearing-impaired infants under ten months of age: "EnTNDre" an opening research stemming from a transdisciplinary partnership

INTRODUCTION

Approximately 20% of children born with severe to profound hearing loss (HL) have an associated disorder that poses a neurodevelopmental risk [1]. The objective of this study is to identify the criteria and profiles of deaf infants at risk of neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD) to provide early intervention.

METHODS

Twenty-two infants aged three to ten months with bilateral congenital deafness were included. Each child attended a consultation with a psychiatrist specializing in the development of hearing-impaired infants as part of their ENT follow-up. The quality of their early development was analyzed using the Olliac grid and well-known postural and sensorimotor criteria. The children were then classified into three groups: normal examination (Group 1), evident NDD (Group 2), and intermediate examination (Group 3). Early medical history, the etiology of deafness, cerebral imaging, and vestibular test results were collected and compared in the different groups.

RESULTS

The average age of the children at the time of observation was seven months (3-10 months). All had sensorineural HL, with identified causes in 13 out of 22 cases: five cases of connexin 26 gene mutation, three cases of CHARGE syndrome, two CMV infections, one Usher syndrome, one GATA3 mutation, and one LHPL5 mutation. The average score on the Olliac grid was nine (0-15), and abnormal postural and sensorimotor behaviors were found in 15 cases out of 22 (68%). 27% of the children were classified in Group 1, 45% in Group 2, and 27% in Group 3. Children with non-isolated HL, abnormal brain MRI (8/22), malformations outside the auditory system (10/22), vestibular impairments (9/22), and/or CMV infections (2/22) were distributed as follows: 2/6 in Group 1, 9/10 in Group 2, and 3/6 in Group 3. 8/22 children had suffered perinatal complications (0/6 in Group 1, 6/10 in Group 2, and 2/5 in Group 3). Only one child had a first-degree relative with NDD. He belonged to Group 2.

DISCUSSION

To our knowledge, this paper is the first to describe the development of infants with congenital deafness. It is based on an observation time that had been included in the procedure of multidisciplinary evaluations prior to cochlear implantation (CI), thanks to the partnership between a psychiatric center for deaf children and an ENT-pediatric implantology service. This consultation was aimed at assessing the quality of neurodevelopment and identifying NDD without a specific referral, with good acceptability for families. Using the Olliac grid and postural and sensorimotor criteria developed to be assessed in the routine care consultation, we identified evident early signs of NDD in 45% of infants. This group (Group 2) requires early, targeted, developmental support. Some children in an intermediate zone (Group 3) require further observation and support.

CONCLUSION

The very early identification of NDD seems to be relevant in the care of hearing-impaired infants. The use of the Olliac grid and developmental scales seems relevant to identifying infants at risk for NDD.

Cochlear Implant Outcomes in CHARGE Syndrome: Updated Perspectives

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate outcomes of auditory implants in children with CHARGE syndrome and describe the evolution in management of hearing loss in this complex population.

METHODS

A retrospective case review was performed at a tertiary referral center. Children with CHARGE syndrome who received either a cochlear implant (CI) or auditory brainstem implant (ABI) were included. Clinical records, demographic information, CHARGE features, neuroimaging, audiology, hearing rehabilitation interventions, operative notes, and outcomes were reviewed.

RESULTS

Thirteen children with CHARGE syndrome underwent a total of 19 cochlear implants between 2008 and 2020. Among the congenitally deafened children (n = 9), six underwent bilateral implantation (five simultaneous and one sequential). Bilateral implantation was performed even in the presence of diminutive-appearing cochlear nerves. The average age of implantation was 1.1 years, and the mean device use time was 9.4 hours per day. Patients showed improvements in subjective family assessment related to hearing. In this group, two patients use oral communication, five use total communication, and two use sign language exclusively. Among the children with progressive hearing loss, the mean age of hearing deterioration was 4.4 years of age, and the device use time on average was 9.8 hours per day. The highest performer in the cohort was a child who lost hearing in their only hearing ear at age 4 and had normal cochleovestibular anatomy on that side. One child received an auditory brainstem implant at age two after deriving no benefit from a CI and can detect environmental sounds but is currently a nonuser. Over time, we noted that implantation occurred earlier in life and that practice has shifted toward bilateral implantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to a previous institutional cohort, children evaluated in this study were often implanted at a younger age and bilaterally with significantly improved outcomes. A CI evaluation should be considered in children with CHARGE syndrome to maximize sensory input and auditory ability.

Listening and spoken language outcomes after 5 years of cochlear implant use for children born preterm and at term

AIM

To compare listening and spoken language outcomes after cochlear implantation for children born preterm and at term, and to examine patterns associated with additional disabilities or gestational age.

METHOD

Children were included if they underwent cochlear implantation in 2013 or 2014 and had complete 5-year follow-up data available. An analysis of assessment data recorded annually was conducted, including outcomes as measured by the Category of Auditory Performance (CAP), the Speech Intelligibility Rating, Second Edition (SIR 2) scale, and the British Picture Vocabulary Scales, Third Edition (BPVS-3). Analyses were conducted to measure the impact of preterm birth and of additional causes of disability on these outcomes.

RESULTS

Eighty-two children (39 males, 43 females; median corrected age at first cochlear implantation 28.5mo [interquartile range 16.3-48.5]) were included in the study. Children who underwent cochlear implantation experienced significant improvements as measured by the CAP, SIR 2, and BPVS-3. Comparable improvements were seen in the groups born at term and preterm. Children with additional disabilities experienced significant improvement in all measures but performed less well than children without additional disabilities.

INTERPRETATION

Infants born preterm benefit from cochlear implantation to a degree comparable to their peers born at term. Additional disabilities may limit improvements in speech intelligibility, listening performance, and receptive vocabulary. Children with additional disabilities, nonetheless, derived significant benefit from cochlear implantation; additional benefits of cochlear implantation for this subgroup may go unmeasured by the outcome tools used in this study.

American Cochlear Implant Alliance Task Force Guidelines for Determining Cochlear Implant Candidacy in Children

This article summarizes the available evidence on pediatric cochlear implantation to provide current guidelines for clinical protocols and candidacy recommendations in the United States. Candidacy determination involves specification of audiologic and medical criteria per guidelines of the Food and Drug Administration. However, recommendations for a cochlear implant evaluation also should maintain flexibility and consider a child’s skill progression (i.e., month-for-month progress in speech, language, and auditory development) and quality of life with appropriately fit hearing aids. Moreover, evidence supports medical and clinical decisions based on other factors, including (a) ear-specific performance, which affords inclusion of children with asymmetric hearing loss and single-sided deafness as implant candidates; (b) ear-specific residual hearing, which influences surgical technique and device selection to optimize hearing; and (c) early intervention to minimize negative long-term effects on communication and quality of life related to delayed identification of implant candidacy, later age at implantation, and/or limited commitment to an audiologic rehabilitation program. These evidence-based guidelines for current clinical protocols in determining pediatric cochlear implant candidacy encourage a team-based approach focused on the whole child and the family system.