Platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: an expert opinion and proposal for a novel classification and coding system

Optimal frequency of platelet-rich plasma injections for managing osteoarthritis: A longitudinal study

Introduction

Recent reviews suggest that PRP injections can improve pain and function more effectively than other treatments; however, consensus on the optimal number of injections is lacking. We aimed to determine the optimal administration frequency and number of PRP injections for management of osteoarthritis (OA) symptoms, to examine long-term effects and structural improvements with PRP, and to determine correlations between clinical outcomes and imaging findings.

Methods

This longitudinal study included 167 patients with knee OA, categorized using the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grading system. Participants received up to six PRP injections and were followed-up for 24 months. Pain levels were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS); functional recovery was measured using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). To determine whether PRP can induce sustained structural improvements, we used the MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS) to monitor changes in bone-marrow lesions (BMLs). Data were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance to identify significant changes in pain and functional outcomes.

Results

VAS and KOOS scores significantly improved after PRP treatment. Patients with KL grades 1 and 2 exhibited maximum pain relief after the fourth injection; those with KL grades 3 and 4 showed optimal results after the fifth injection. Improvements were maintained or enhanced at the 24-month follow-up. The effect size increased as the number of treatments progressed, and especially after the fourth treatment, with a Cohen's d values of -1.22, -1.28, and -0.99 (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

PRP injections administered at specific intervals can significantly reduce pain and improve function in patients with OA, with the required frequency depending on disease severity. These findings support the customization of PRP-treatment protocols based on individual patient profiles to maximize therapeutic benefits.

Trial registration

This study has been registered with the clinical trial register of the Japan Medical Association Center for Clinical Trials (JMA-IIA00351).

Unblinded study registration

This study has been registered with the clinical trial register of the Japan Medical Association Center for Clinical Trials (JMA-IIA00351).

Level of evidence

II.

PRP or not PRP: Is the debate surrounding platelets-based blood-derived products evolving?

The increasing interest in biologic treatments for musculoskeletal disorders has led to the advancement of orthobiologics, particularly in non-operative care through injectable therapies. However, defining these treatments clearly is crucial for proper clinical application. Orthobiologics include biologic substances that enhance healing, such as cell-based therapies and blood-derived products. Among these, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is widely used, but its classification remains complex due to variations in preparation methods, platelet concentration, leucocyte content, and activation techniques. Strictly, the term 'PRP' refers to plasma enriched in platelets relative to baseline blood levels. Yet, scientific debate persists regarding whether platelet count or enrichment is more significant in clinical outcomes. Additionally, leucocyte-rich and leucocyte-poor PRPs offer different therapeutic advantages depending on the target tissue, complicating standardization. Similarly, the presence of red blood cells is generally discouraged, given their association with joint inflammation. Beyond the classical 'PRP' formulations, alternative blood-derived products offer distinct biological effects. A standardized classification system is therefore essential for research and clinical application, emphasizing precise documentation of products' characteristics, including platelet count, activation state and bioactive molecule interactions. Understanding these variables and their impact on patient-specific conditions will refine orthopaedic regenerative strategies and optimize treatment efficacy.

From spin wizardry to regenerative alchemy: a philosophical inquiry into healing and standardization

In Regenerative Medicine, the quest to harness the body's own healing potential is as much a philosophical journey as it is a clinical challenge. Promising interventions-from platelet-rich plasma injections to stem cell therapies-often differ in subtle yet critical ways, leading to variable outcomes. One method might modestly enrich bioactive components, while another yields a preparation bursting with regenerative signals. This variability compels us to ask: should we focus on merely categorizing these diverse approaches, or instead strive to define the fundamental nature of the therapeutic agents we deploy?This Daring Discourse explores the tension between the intricate diversity of human biology and our need for consistency and reproducibility in treatment. Drawing on the parable of the blind men and the elephant, it illustrates how isolated perspectives reveal only fragments of the truth; only by integrating these views can we grasp the full regenerative potential. It further cautions against the rise of "spin wizards"-clinicians who, relying solely on centrifugation without understanding underlying biological determinants, claim a universal cure for degenerative conditions.This narrative advocates for a unified framework that marries innovative techniques with rigorous standardization. Such an approach promises to transform Regenerative Medicine from a field of hopeful experiments into one where treatments are reliably safe and effective, ultimately fulfilling its transformative potential.

Corticosteroids versus platelet-rich plasma injections for knee osteoarthritis: Where is there more evidence? A systematic review of 60 years of literature

BACKGROUND

Corticosteroid (CS) injections are often recommended by international societies for knee osteoarthritis (OA) treatment, but platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has shown higher safety and efficacy in comparative analyses. Despite this, PRP use is often not endorsed by scientific societies due to perceived insufficient body of evidence. This study aims to quantify clinical data documenting CS and PRP intra-articular injections for knee OA.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was conducted on CS and PRP injections for knee OA. The search, performed in March 2024, used PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases, following PRISMA and Cochrane guidelines. Data collected included publication trends, number of articles, patients evaluated, and study designs documenting CS or PRP injections.

RESULTS

Of 16,979 records, 356 studies were analyzed, covering 24,435 knee OA patients. Both treatments showed an increasing publication trend, with PRP surpassing CS in 2020. The analysis included 9,322 CS patients and 15,113 PRP patients. Among CS studies, there were 103 RCTs with 5,478 patients, 18 comparative studies with 1,095 patients, and 31 case series with 2,749 patients. Among PRP studies, there were 119 RCTs with 6,028 patients, 33 comparative studies with 2,011 patients, and 72 case series with 7,074 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

PRP injections for knee OA have been documented in more studies and in larger patient numbers compared with CS injections. The higher number of high-level trials for PRP, combined with the lower safety and efficacy documented for CS by previous meta-analyses directly comparing the two products, strongly suggests reconsidering current guidelines that favor CS, highlighting PRP's body of evidence and the potential role in the effective and safe treatment of knee OA.

Platelet-rich plasma treatment for large joint osteoarthritis: retrospective study highlighting a possible treatment protocol with long-lasting stimulation of the joint with an adequate dose of platelets

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy has emerged as a potential treatment option for osteoarthritis (OA) due to its ability to promote tissue healing and anti-inflammatory effects. More evidences are needed to establish the optimal therapy protocol. We present here a retrospective analysis of 252 patients treated with PRP for big joints OA between 2020 and 2022. We aimed to evaluate the benefits of PRP combined with rehabilitation on pain and function as well as the potential prognosis factors. We observed clinically significant improvements in pain (VAS improvement 49% at 6 months, 45% at 12 months) and function (Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation i.e. SANE score improvement 44% at 6 months, 39% at 12 months). Multiple PRP shoots and high sports activity, especially competition level, were found as favorable prognosis factors. The authors would suggest offering systematically PRP therapy for competition sports practitioners. Moreover, authors suggest that multiple PRP shoots, spaced from 3 to 4 weeks, could be a viable treatment option for OA.

Does intra-articular injection of PRP help patients with temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis after joint puncture? a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to conduct a systematic review to evaluate whether intra-articular injection of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) after joint puncture can aid in the recovery of patients with temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis (TMJOA).

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase and Web of Science as of March 3, 2024. Retrieved a total of 392 articles. We included all published randomized controlled trials (RCTs). All RCTs, including studies on PRP injection after joint puncture in patients with TMJOA. The primary outcome was pain reduction, and the secondary outcome was the improvement of maximal mouth opening (MMO) and joint sounds. All outcome measures were analyzed by calculating the standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

A total of 392 articles were retrieved, and ultimately, 6 articles met the inclusion criteria. The study involved 199 TMJOA patients. The results indicated that compared to the control group, PRP injection after joint puncture showed significant improvements in alleviating pain (SMD =-0.99; 95% CI =-1.35 ~-0.63; P <0.00001, I2 = 59%) and MMO (SMD = 0.63; 95% CI = 0.30 ~ 0.95; P <0.0002, I2 = 54%) among TMJOA patients. However, there was no significant improvement observed in terms of joint sounds (SMD =-0.34; 95% CI = -0.71 ~ 0.02; P = 0.06, I2 = 0%) with the PRP.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to joint puncture alone, the intra-articular injection of PRP after joint puncture was more effective in relieving pain. At 1-month and 6-month follow-ups, patients in the PRP group showed significant improvements in MMO compared to the control group. However, after 12 months of follow-up, limited evidence indicated significant improvements in MMO and joint sounds.

A Long-Term Retrospective Observational Clinical Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Plasma Rich in Growth Factors (PRGF) in the Treatment of Back Pain

INTRODUCTION

Chronic back pain is a long-lasting disorder that is significantly associated with a reduction in the quality of life. Previously, the efficacy of intradiscal and epidural injections of plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) was demonstrated at 6 months. The objective of this study was to retrospectively examine the medical records of these patients in order to determine whether the observed improvement at the 6-month follow-up was sustained over time.

METHODS

PRGF efficacy was evaluated using validated questionnaires: Core Outcome Measure Index (COMI) Pain score, COMI Disability score, COMI total score, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Furthermore, an evaluation was conducted to determine whether the patients had undergone additional treatments.

RESULTS

the results demonstrated that 85.2% of the 27 patients who were enrolled exhibited sustained improvement across all scales over a median follow-up period of 24 months. The results of all questionnaires administered at 24 months exhibited statistically significant differences when compared to the baseline data (p < 0.01). Furthermore, there were no statistically significant differences between the results reported at 6 months and those at 24 months (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

the results of this retrospective study demonstrate that treatment of chronic back pain with PRGF was effective in maintaining pain reduction and improving function for at least 24 months after the end of treatment.

Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials Evaluating the Use of Platelet-Rich Plasma for Knee Osteoarthritis: Adherence to Minimum Information for Studies Evaluating Biologics in Orthopaedics

BACKGROUND

The Minimum Information for Studies Evaluating Biologics in Orthopedics (MIBO) guidelines were developed in May 2017 to encourage improved reporting standards, promote increased transparency and reproducibility, and enhance clinical evaluation capabilities. The MIBO guidelines consist of 23 checklist items considered necessary to critically appraise clinical studies evaluating platelet-rich plasma (PRP).

PURPOSE

To assess randomized controlled trials that evaluated PRP for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis in order to systematically review their adherence to the MIBO guidelines.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review. Level 1a.

METHODS

A search was performed following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials reporting on knee osteoarthritis treated with intra-articular PRP. The studies were categorized into pre-, peri-, and post-MIBO groups based on the start date of data collection. The overall MIBO scores, defined as percentage of checklist items out of the 23 checklist items reported in 1 study, individual item scores, defined as percentage of studies reporting the checklist item within a specified group, and overall item score defined as the average of the individual item scores from all the included studies were calculated.

RESULTS

The review included 87 studies (7925 patients; 8118 knees). Of these, 51 studies were assigned to the pre-MIBO group, 19 studies to the peri-MIBO group, and 17 studies to the post-MIBO group. The overall MIBO score was 72%. No statistically significant differences in MIBO scores were found among the 3 MIBO groups (P = .345). The majority of the studies (62 studies; 71%) had MIBO scores <80%. MIBO items with particularly low item scores included reporting of whole-blood characteristics (20%), platelet recovery rate (22%), PRP analysis (30%), and PRP activation (47%). No significant difference among the 3 MIBO groups was found for the item scores except for the reporting of the recipient details (P = .012).

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the deficiencies in adherence to the MIBO guidelines, particularly in reporting key variables such as whole-blood characteristics, platelet recovery rate, PRP analysis, and PRP activation. These findings suggest that the publication of the MIBO guidelines has not resulted in improved reporting practices in studies investigating intra-articular PRP for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis.

Most Publications Regarding Platelet-Rich Plasma Use in the Knee Are From Asia, Investigate Injection for Osteoarthritis, and Show Outcome Improvement: A Scoping Review

PURPOSE

To evaluate and synthesize the available literature related to platelet-rich plasma (PRP) treatment of knee pathologies and to provide recommendations to inform future research in the field.

METHODS

PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus databases were queried on October 6, 2023. All identified citations were collated and uploaded into Covidence for screening and data extraction. Studies were included if they were human studies published in English with adult cohorts that received PRP as a procedural injection or surgical augmentation for knee pathologies with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and level of evidence Levels I-IV.

RESULTS

Our search yielded 2,615 studies, of which 155 studies from 2006 to 2023 met the inclusion criteria. Median follow-up was 9 months (±11.2 months). Most studies (75.5%) characterized the leukocyte content of PRP, although most studies (86%) did not use a comprehensive classification scheme. In addition, most studies were from Asia (50%) and Europe (32%) and were from a single center (96%). In terms of treatment, 74% of studies examined PRP as a procedural injection, whereas 26% examined PRP as an augmentation. Most studies (68%) examined treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Many studies (83%) documented significant improvements in PROMs, including 93% of Level III/IV evidence studies and 72% of Level I/II evidence studies, although most studies (70%) failed to include minimal clinically important difference values. The visual analog scale was the most-used PROM (58% of studies), whereas the Short Form Health Survey 36-item was the least-used PROM (5% of studies).

CONCLUSIONS

Most published investigations of knee PRP are performed in Asia, investigate procedural injection for osteoarthritis, and show significant outcome improvements. In addition, this review highlights the need for better classification of PRP formulations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, scoping review of Level I-IV studies.

Most Orthopaedic Platelet-Rich Plasma Investigations Don't Report Protocols and Composition: An Updated Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To systematically review the literature to assess the heterogeneity of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) preparation and composition reporting for the treatment of musculoskeletal/orthopaedic pathologies.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed by searching PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase to identify Level I and Level II studies from 2016 to 2022 that evaluated the use of PRP therapy for musculoskeletal pathologies. The search phrase used was "platelet-rich plasma clinical studies." Studies were assessed based on their reporting of the PRP preparation methods and reporting of PRP composition.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-four studies (in 120 articles) met inclusion criteria for analysis. Of these studies, 15 (12.1%) provided comprehensive reporting, including a clear, well-described, and reproducible preparation protocol that future investigators can follow. Thirty-three studies (26.6%) quantitatively reported the final PRP product composition.

CONCLUSIONS

Among the studies using PRP for the treatment of musculoskeletal/orthopaedic pathologies, less than 20% provided a clear, well-described, and reproducible PRP preparation protocol, and only one-fourth of studies reported on the final PRP product composition.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

A diverse current reporting of PRP composition between studies provides a high heterogeneity of the term "PRP," which becomes a limitation for a comparison of studies using PRP.

PRP Injections for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: The Improvement Is Clinically Significant and Influenced by Platelet Concentration: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has emerged as a promising therapeutic intervention for knee osteoarthritis (OA), attracting substantial clinical and research attention. However, the clinical relevance of the treatment benefit remains controversial.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness of PRP compared with placebo in patients with knee OA in terms of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and to investigate the possible influence of platelet concentration on the clinical outcome.

STUDY DESIGN

Meta-analysis. Level of evidence 1.

METHODS

The search was conducted on 5 databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science) using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials comparing PRP and placebo injections to treat knee OA, written in the English language, with no time limitation. The effects were quantified at 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up points. Visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores were used, with subanalyses based on platelet concentration performed using a 1,000,000 ± 20% platelets/µL cutoff. The MCID values (VAS, 1.37; WOMAC, 6.4) were used to interpret clinical improvement. The articles' quality was assessed using the Revised Tool for Risk of Bias in Randomized Trials and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation guidelines.

RESULTS

Among the 5499 articles retrieved, 18 randomized controlled trials (1995 patients) were included. PRP presented statistically superior improvements in VAS and WOMAC scores compared with placebo at all follow-up points, exceeding the MCID at 3- and 6-month follow-up points for VAS and at all follow-up points for WOMAC. The subanalysis based on platelet concentration showed that high-platelet PRP provided clinically significant pain relief with the improvement exceeding the MCID compared with placebo at 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up points. In contrast, low-platelet PRP failed to offer a clinically perceivable benefit in terms of VAS score. WOMAC results showed that both products provided a clinically significant improvement at 3 and 6 months of follow-up. This benefit was maintained up to the 12-month follow-up in the high-platelet group but not in the low-platelet group, where the improvement compared with placebo did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis showed that PRP offered clinically relevant functional improvement at 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up points and pain relief at 3- and 6-month follow-up points compared with placebo for the treatment of knee OA. Platelet concentration was found to influence treatment efficacy, with high-platelet PRP providing superior pain relief and more durable functional improvement compared with low-platelet PRP.

Effect of platelet-rich plasma on angiogenic and regenerative properties in patients with critical limb ischemia

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a promising regenerative therapy due to its simplicity, clinical application, safety, and ability to promote angiogenesis. It utilizes various angiogenic growth factors in platelets, including platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and epidermal growth factor (EGF), which are integral to the tissue repair. Critical limb ischemia (CLI) is a major symptom of peripheral arterial disease (PAD), and PRP therapy aims to improve blood circulation to the distal limb through the development of blood vessels. This review focuses on the extensive research on the molecular mechanisms of PRPs in treating CLI. A comprehensive search was conducted on Web of Science, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus to find studies published during PRP therapy in critical limb ischemia up to June 2024. Current studies reveal that PRP composition varies by case, affecting preparation methods, storage duration, storage methods, and interaction with other materials. PRP-derived growth factors have shown promising results in treating CLI, but well-controlled human research is scarce despite positive animal studies.

The Regenerative Marriage Between High-Density Platelet-Rich Plasma and Adipose Tissue

The use of autologous biological preparations (ABPs) and their combinations fills the void in healthcare treatment options that exists between surgical procedures, like plastic reconstructive, cosmetic, and orthopedic surgeries; non-surgical musculoskeletal biological procedures; and current pharmaceutical treatments. ABPs, including high-density platelet-rich plasma (HD-PRP), bone marrow aspirate concentrates (BMACs), and adipose tissue preparations, with their unique stromal vascular fractions (SVFs), can play important roles in tissue regeneration and repair processes. They can be easily and safely prepared at the point of care. Healthcare professionals can employ ABPs to mimic the classical wound healing cascade, initiate the angiogenesis cascade, and induce tissue regenerative pathways, aiming to restore the integrity and function of damaged tissues. In this review, we will address combining autologous HD-PRP with adipose tissue, in particular the tissue stromal vascular fraction (t-SVF), as we believe that this biocellular combination demonstrates a synergistic effect, where the HD-PRP constituents enhance the regenerative potential of t-SVF and its adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AD-MSCs) and pericytes, leading to improved functional tissue repair, tissue regeneration, and wound healing in variety of clinical applications. We will address some relevant platelet bio-physiological aspects, since these properties contribute to the synergistic effects of combining HD-PRP with t-SVF, promoting overall better outcomes in chronic inflammatory conditions, soft tissue repair, and tissue rejuvenation.

Minimum reporting guidelines for platelet-rich plasma in veterinary regenerative medicine

Platelet concentrates such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP) are widely used in veterinary regenerative medicine and transfusion therapy. However, the therapeutic efficacy of PRP is highly dependent on its precise characterization, cellular composition, and preparation methods. Without proper standardization, PRP treatments can yield inconsistent results, undermining their clinical utility. A recent study in Veterinary Research Communications underscores the importance of pH measurement as a key quality control parameter for platelet concentrates, including PRP, in veterinary blood banks. Building on these findings and our own recent experience, we propose revised minimum reporting guidelines for the use of PRP in veterinary regenerative medicine. Adherence to minimum reporting guidelines is essential to ensure reproducibility and reduce heterogeneity in PRP therapies. Future research should focus on species-specific protocols and advanced characterization techniques to enhance the therapeutic potential of PRP. By addressing these challenges, PRP can become a cornerstone of regenerative therapies in veterinary medicine, offering safe and effective treatment options for various diseases and disorders.

Increasing the concentration of plasma molecules improves the biological activity of platelet-rich plasma for tissue regeneration

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has emerged as a promising therapy in a variety of medical fields. However, it is crucial to go beyond simple platelet concentration and examine the complex molecular composition both inside and outside platelets. The present work studies the effectiveness of a novel type of PRP named 'balanced protein-concentrate plasma' (BPCP). Different growth factor (GF) levels were measured using Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA), and in addition to the increase in intra-platelet GFs found in standard PRP (sPRP), BPCP also showed a higher concentration of plasmatic protein. Furthermore, extracellular vesicle (EV) concentration was significantly higher in BPCP. Cell proliferation was higher in cells incubated with lysates derived from BPCP compared to those cultured with sPRP. Regarding cell migration capacity, it was found that the process is platelet-dependent. Finally, the anti-inflammatory effect of BPCP was evaluated by inducing an inflammatory environment in M1-type macrophages. Cytokine levels were measured by ELISA following BPCP administration, showing a significant decrease in pro-inflammatory IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α. In summary, although further preclinical and clinical studies are needed in order to determine the therapeutic potential of BPCP, this PRP with unique characteristics demonstrates encouraging in vitro results that could potentially enhance tissue regeneration capacity.

Evaluation of storage parameters of platelet-rich plasma in functional assay of epithelial gap repair

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP), produced from autologous blood and containing growth factors, has shown promise in treating various conditions, including diabetic wounds. However, as expected, patient compliance is low in the context of repeated treatments as required for hard-to-heal wounds. This study investigates the efficacy of PRP stored under refrigeration for up to 2 weeks in promoting in-vitro human epithelial cell gap closure. PRP was prepared from six healthy individuals and immediately split into sterile test tubes for storage at 4 °C; the impact of fresh PRP on epithelial gap closure was compared to paired PRP samples stored for one and two weeks. According to gap closure analysis, 5 out of 6 individuals depicted accelerated epithelial gap closure compared to control conditions. There was no significant difference between fresh and refrigerated samples. An overall benefit was observed for using 1-week old samples over 2-week-old samples. Interestingly, according to a 6-hr epithelial gap analysis, significantly accelerated cell migration was obtained by 1-week-old refrigerated samples compared to their corresponding fresh PRP samples. The current study provides data in support of increasing the accessibility of PRP treatment for patients with hard-to-heal wounds. Patients can potentially self-treat between wound clinic appointments by using refrigerated sterile aliquots of their fresh PRP. Notably, by the end of two weeks, refrigerated PRP will not act as fresh PRP. More research is needed to fully investigate the effect of refrigeration on PRP sample efficacy, including larger cohorts, clinical wounds, and an evaluation of the molecular fingerprint of refrigerated PRP samples.

Intra-articular injection of orthobiologics for temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) osteoarthritis (OA) leads to pain, limited jaw function, and bite changes. When non-invasive treatments fail, minimally invasive procedures like TMJ arthrocentesis with saline and hyaluronic acid (HA) injections are commonly used. Orthobiologics, including platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and cell-derived products, have gained attention for their potential to enhance tissue healing. This review aimed to compare the outcomes of orthobiologic injections with HA injections following arthrocentesis in TMJ-OA treatment. A systematic search, following PRISMA guidelines, identified nine studies (403 patients). Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. PRP and cell-derived products showed potential benefits in reducing TMJ pain and improving maximum mouth opening (MMO). However, three of four studies comparing PRP with HA found no significant difference between the two. In contrast, cell-derived orthobiologics demonstrated significantly greater improvements in TMJ pain and MMO compared to HA. Risk of bias varied, with some studies showing moderate to high levels. This review highlights the potential but inconsistent benefits of orthobiologics in treating TMJ-OA. While cell-derived orthobiologics appear promising, PRP did not demonstrate superiority over HA. Further high-quality studies are needed to validate these findings.

The Effect of Long-Term Cryopreservation on the Properties and Functionality of Platelet-Rich Plasma

Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) is a biological treatment widely used in regenerative medicine for its restorative capacity. Although PRP is typically applied at the time of obtention, long-term storage and preservation could enhance its versatility and clinical applications. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of long-term freezing on PRP. For that, PRP and Platelet Lysates (PL) were collected and preserved at -20 °C and -80 °C for 6 and 12 months. The parameters analyzed included platelet count and size, fibrinogen levels, platelet activation percentage, growth factor (GF) levels, and bioactivity on cultured dermal fibroblasts. No significant changes in platelet count were found; however, variations in platelet size were observed. Platelets stored at -20 °C and -80 °C showed structural changes and increased activation over time, including membrane roughness and possible aggregation. GF analysis revealed a reduction in platelet-derived growth factors (PDGF-AB and VEGF), while extraplatelet factors like IGF-1 remained stable. Fibroblast cultures showed comparable cell viability when exposed to fresh and cryopreserved PRP and PL samples. These findings suggest that cryopreserving PRP at -20 °C or -80 °C for up to 12 months is a feasible approach for retaining its therapeutic potential, supporting its use in biobanking, and expanding clinical accessibility.

Demographic, anthropometric and intrasubject variations affect platelet-rich plasma formulation

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to describe the inter- and intra-individual differences in the platelet concentration between blood and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) preparation, assess intersubject differences considering demographic and anthropometric variables, describe PRP code distribution and analyse intrasubject variability.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted using a single-centre patient database from November 2021 to November 2023. It included patients with musculoskeletal pathologies treated with PRP injections. Primary variables were demographic characteristics (sex, age, body mass index [BMI]) and platelet concentrations in blood and PRP during treatments. Secondary analysis focused on PRP code frequency distribution and intrasubject variability according to different coding systems.

Results

Here, 686 patients met the inclusion criteria. PRP exhibited significantly higher platelet concentrations compared to blood (378.01 ± 136.25 × 103 platelets/µL vs. 221.97 ± 58.21 × 103 platelets/µL, p < 0.001). Younger patients had higher platelet concentrations in both blood (p = 0.004) and PRP (p = 0.003), whereas female patients showed higher platelet concentrations only in blood (p < 0.001). The platelet concentration ratio was higher in males (p < 0.001) and those with higher BMI (p = 0.023). Significant differences were found between the existing and modified PRP coding systems (p < 0.001). Intrasubject variability was higher in PRP than in blood (coefficient of variance: 21.32 ± 17.36 in blood vs. 27.85 ± 19.10 in PRP, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Age, gender, BMI and intrasubject variations significantly affect PRP formulation, emphasizing the importance of addressing these variables for a more predictable, personalized and effective therapeutic approach.

Level of Evidence

This is a retrospective study. Level IV.

Effects of intramuscular administration of Platelet-Rich Plasma on denervated muscle after peripheral nerve injury

PURPOSE

After peripheral nerve injury (PNI), prolonged denervation of the target muscle prevents adequate reinnervation even if the nerve is repaired. The aim of this work is to analyze the effect of intramuscular Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) in a denervated muscle due to PNI.Materials and.

METHODS

An irreversible PNI was generated in the common peroneal nerve of 80 Wistar rats by nerve resection. Animals were divided into groups: non-treatment (NT), saline (S) and PRP (PRP). 200 uL of saline (S group) and PRP (PRP group) were infiltrated intramuscularly into the tibialis anterior muscle on a weekly basis, from surgery to sacrifice (at 2, 4 and 7 weeks). Muscles were histologically processed for immunofluorescence and Western blotting. Effects on nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR), satellite cells (SC) and myogenin expression were analyzed. Comparisons were performed by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).

RESULTS

PRP had a platelet concentration 1.5-fold higher than blood, without erythrocytes and leukocytes. The PRP group had a higher percentage weight than the S and NT groups (p < 0.05). The levels of nAChRα1 and nAChRε subunit were lower in the PRP group relative to the NT and S (p < 0.05), while the nAChRγ subunit showed an increase in the PRP group (p < 0.05). The activation of SCs was higher in the PRP group compared to NT and S groups (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

PRP treatment can modulate NMJ configuration as well as key myogenic regulatory factors in denervated muscle, enhancing SC activation while mitigating muscle atrophy.

Genetics, sex and the use of platelet-rich plasma influence the development of arthrofibrosis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Purpose

To identify genes and patient factors that are related to the development of arthrofibrosis in patients after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and to develop a prognostic model.

Methods

The study included patients diagnosed with ACL injury who underwent ACL reconstruction. Patients were enroled consecutively and divided into non-fibrotic (controls) and fibrotic (cases) groups until a balanced sample of matched case-control was achieved. Arthrofibrosis was considered pathological if the range of motion achieved 3 months after surgery decreased by at least 25% compared to its initial full range of motion. Patient variables and saliva samples were collected from each patient to perform a genetic approach by screening a set of candidate genes implicated in arthrofibrosis. Chi-squared was used to analyze the association between the development of arthrofibrosis and different independent variables. Binary logistic regression was used to develop a prognostic algorithm.

Results

A total of 45 controls (non-fibrotic patients) (50.1%) and 44 cases (fibrotic patients) (49.9%) were included for analysis. The median age was 34.0 years (95% confidence interval = 29.0-38.0) and the number of women was 32 (35.9%). Seven genetic polymorphisms showed significant association with the development of arthrofibrosis (p < 0.05). After binary regression analysis, the regression model included the polymorphisms rs4343 (ACE), rs1800947 (CRP), rs8032158 (NEDD4) and rs679620 (MMP3). This analysis also indicated that female gender was a risk factor while the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) during surgery was a preventive factor (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Genetic alterations involved in inflammation and extracellular matrix turnover predispose to the development of arthrofibrosis after ACL reconstruction. Female sex was a risk factor in the development of this condition, while the application of PRP provided a preventive effect. The combination of patient and genetic variants of a patient allows the development of a prognostic algorithm for the risk of post-surgical arthrofibrosis.

Level of Evidence

level III.

Posterior iliac crest vs. proximal tibia: distinct sources of anti-inflammatory and regenerative cells with comparable 6-month clinical outcomes in treatment of osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

Human bone marrow is a source of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), other progenitor cells, and factors with anti-inflammatory and regenerative capacity. Though the fraction of MSCs out of the nucleated cells is very small, bone marrow aspirate (BMA) for osteoarthritis (OA) has noteworthy effects. BMA is usually collected from the posterior or anterior iliac crest, and rarely from the proximal tibia. We investigated the clinically beneficial concentration of ex vivo MSCs, derived from BM harvested from the posterior iliac crest and proximal tibia by Marrow Cellution™ Aspiration System, and their phenotypic differences, in comparison to autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) treatment prepared with a manual, closed system.

METHODS

A single-center, parallel, randomized controlled study was designed to investigate the efficacy of BMA from the posterior iliac crest compared to BMA from the proximal tibia, against a control group treated with PRP, in knee OA. Thirty patients with knee OA grade I-IV, according to Kellgren-Lawrence (KL), were distributed into each group. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Western Ontario & McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) score were used for clinical outcome evaluation.

RESULTS

Data from an intermediate analysis of 6-months follow-up, involving 15 patients in each arm, showed that the posterior iliac crest was significantly more densely populated with mononuclear cells, than the proximal tibia (p = 0.005). Flow cytometric analysis on ex vivo BMA showed a significantly greater number of MSCs in the BM-derived from the posterior iliac crest when compared with the proximal tibia (p < 0.001), together with a significantly higher number of platelets (PLTs) (p < 0.001). Surprisingly, despite these differences in cells number, the improvement in early pain and function scores, after each treatment, were statistically significant within each of the three arms. BM from the proximal tibia showed the highest ΔWOMAC, while BM from the posterior iliac crest showed the highest ΔVAS; however, these differences were not statistically significant across the three arms (p > 0.05). A better outcome, in terms of ΔVAS, was observed in patients classified as KL I-II, when treated with BMA from crest (p < 0.001) and PRP (p = 0.004). Moreover, the effect of BMA treatment on ΔVAS depends on MSCs % only in the Tibia Arm (r = -0.59, p = 0.021), where we also found a correlation between ΔWOMAC and monocytes (r = 0.75, p = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that the iliac crest yields a higher concentration of MSCs compared to the proximal tibia, however both BM, independently of the MSCs concentration, show a beneficial clinical outcome in the treatment of knee OA. Furthermore, BMA is not superior to PRP treatment.

Leukocyte-Rich Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection in an Acute-on-Chronic Rectus Femoris Injury of a Professional Soccer Player: A Case Report

This is the case of an 18-year-old male professional soccer player, an attacking midfielder, who presented acute-onset pain in his right thigh during a training match but continued playing and training until the end of the session. Two weeks after the initial symptoms, the athlete's pain increased after kicking the ball and stopping training. He came for consultation a week later with tenderness in his right thigh and impaired gait. A 3 ​cm gap in his right mid-quadriceps muscle and tenderness during resisted knee extension and leg raises with no hip or knee range of motion limitations were observed on physical examination. He was scheduled for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after the consultation, revealing an acute-on-chronic type 2A lateral muscle tear of the distal rectus femoris. A 2 ​ml seroma aspiration was performed five weeks after the initial injury with a subsequent intra-lesional 1 ​ml liquid leukocyte-rich platelet-rich plasma (LR-PRP) injection using intermittent ultrasound guidance within 5 ​min after preparation. The LR-PRP preparation was classified as 3 14-1 3-0 0 according to the Universal Coding System (UCS) by Kon et al. Nine physiotherapy sessions, including an initial assessment, were conducted over five weeks. The rehabilitation started with pulley exercises with hip flexion, tension arch, leg extension, and squatting with supporting exercises for core and hip strength, with a gradual increase in loading. As the player's symptoms improved, he started doing eccentric exercises such as the reverse Nordics and leg extension. He also followed a running program, gradually increasing speed to a full sprint without pain or irritation. The return-to-sports clearance consultation was conducted seven weeks after the injury, previously confirming satisfactory healing on an MRI. The patient was cleared after passing the Rehabilitation Department battery tests and physical examination. The patient was asymptomatic and had no complaints despite his right quadriceps gap, returning to competition nine weeks after injury. After a one-year follow-up, the patient remains playing at a competitive level, asymptomatic, with no reported reinjury. Adequate reporting of rehabilitation programs and PRP injection characterization is crucial for future research quality improvement and reproducibility.

Impact of inflammatory skin conditions on the biological profile of plasma rich in growth factor

Plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) can be used over patients suffering from dermatoses due to its anti-inflammatory effect. However, this population group might present soluble autoimmune components and there is limited information about the effect of chronic skin inflammation on PRGF bioactive properties. With the aim of characterizing PRGF composition, PRGF from healthy (H) donors and patients with atopic dermatitis (AD), psoriasis (PS), or lichen sclerosus (LS) was obtained. In order to reduce the inflammatory component, leukocyte exclusion and heat-inactivation (Immunosafe) were tested. Haematological-serological parameters, platelet functionality, clot microstructure, protein content and bioactivity were determined. Mean values and 95 % confidence intervals (mean[95 % CI]) were computed for key haematological parameters, such as platelet (410×103/mm3[371-449]) and leukocyte content (205×103/mm3[148-262]), platelet activation (resting: 4.3 %[3.1-5.5] and activated: 97.4 %[96.7-98.0]), the concentration of plasma proteins and morphogens, including immunoglobulins A (210.7 mg/dL[191.8-229.6]), G (933.1 mg/dL[887.2-978.9]), E (783.5 mg/dL[54.4-1512.6]), and M (115.0 mg/dL[97.1-133.0]), Complement Protein (31.6 mg/mL[26.6-36.6]), C-Reactive protein (3.1 mg/L[2.0-4.1]), TGF-β1 (35975.6 pg/mL[34221.3-37729.8]), fibronectin (146410.0 ng/mL[136518.3-156301.7]), PDGF-AB (13308.5 pg/mL[12401.0-14216.0]), CD40L (2389.3 pg/mL[1887.7-2890.8]), IL-4 (0.12 pg/mL[0.07-0.18]), IL-13 (35.4 pg/mL[21.0-49.7]), IL-1β (0.09 pg/mL[0.06-0.11]) and TNF-α (0.31 pg/mL[0.24-0.38]), and also for cell proliferation (332.9ngDNA/mL[317.4-348.3]), viability (135.6 %[132.0-139.2]) and migration (103.8cells/mm2[98.3-109.3]). Plasma from AD donors presented increased Immunoglobulin E (IgE) that was significantly reduced after Immunosafe along with the complement system and autoantibodies. Platelet functionality was altered for AD, but no microstructure differences were identified. Pathological groups presented reduced concentration of fibronectin (AD/LS) and Platelet-Derived Growth Factor (PDGF-AB) (P). Immunosafe treatment reduced Cluster of Differentiation 40 Protein (CD40L), interleukin 1β (IL-1β), and Tumor Necrosis Factor α (TNF-α) concentrations. Fibroblasts supplemented with PRGF obtained from pathological patients (PS/AD) showed reduced viability but Immunosafe increased cell proliferation and migration in SP (LS) and L-SP samples (PS/AD). In conclusion, PRGF derived from pathological patients present autoimmune components, but heat-inactivation or leukocyte exclusion could minimize local side effects.

Influence of Platelet Concentration on the Clinical Outcome of Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections in Knee Osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is one of the most frequently used orthobiologic products for the injection treatment of patients affected by knee osteoarthritis (OA). Some preliminary evidence supports the influence of platelet concentration on patients' clinical outcomes.

PURPOSE

To analyze if platelet concentration can influence the safety and clinical efficacy of PRP injections for the treatment of patients with knee OA.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

This study consisted of 253 patients with knee OA (142 men, 111 women; mean ± SD age, 54.8 ± 11.4 years; Kellgren-Lawrence grades 1-3) who were treated with 3 intra-articular injections of 5 mL of autologous leukocyte-rich or leukocyte-poor PRP. All patients were prospectively evaluated at baseline and at 2, 6, and 12 months. Patients were clinically assessed thorough the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective score. Platelet concentration was correlated with clinical outcome. Further analysis was performed by stratifying patients into 3 groups (homogeneous for OA severity) based on platelet concentration (high, medium, and low). All complications and adverse events were reported, as well as failures.

RESULTS

An overall statistically significant improvement in all clinical scores was documented from baseline to each follow-up evaluation. Platelet concentration positively correlated with clinical outcome. KOOS Pain improved more with higher platelet concentration at 2 months (P = .036; rho = 0.132), 6 months (P = .009; rho = 0.165), and 12 months (P = .014; rho = 0.155). The same trend was shown by the other KOOS subscales and by the IKDC Subjective score, as well as by the comparison of the groups of high-, medium-, and low-platelet PRP. The highest failure rate (15.0%) was found in the low-platelet group as compared with the medium-platelet group (3.3%) and the high-platelet group (3.3%). No differences were observed among the 3 groups in terms of adverse events.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that platelet concentration influences the clinical outcome of PRP injections in knee OA treatment. PRP with a higher platelet concentration provides a lower failure rate and higher clinical improvement as compared with PRP with a lower platelet concentration, with overall better results up to 12 months of follow-up in patients with knee OA.

Effectiveness of platelet derivatives in neuropathic pain management: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Neuropathic pain (NP) has a considerable impact on the global economic burden and seriously impairs patients' quality of life. Currently there is no evidence-based "effective" treatment and new treatments are needed. Recently, platelet rich plasma (PRP) has emerged as an alternative treatment. Therefore, a systematic review has been conducted to present an evidence-based assessment of the use of PRP in the treatment of NP.

METHODS

Randomized studies that investigated the effect of PRP injection on patients with NP compared to alternative treatments or placebo were included. An encompassing search of specific databases, from their inception to April 2024, was performed. The databases were as follows: PubMed, Web of Sciences (MEDLINE) and Cochrane Library. The Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2 tool was used to assess study methodological quality.

RESULTS

A total of 12 randomized studies with 754 patients with different NP conditions were included in this systematic review. According to the results from the qualitative analysis, PRP injection exerted a positive effect on improving pain intensity on most of the trials (8 out of 12). In the remaining studies, no differences were found. A high safety profile was reported with no serious adverse effects in the analysed patients.

CONCLUSION

PRP treatment might be an effective therapeutic approach for patients with different neuropathic pain conditions. The efficacy of PRP was not dependant on the aetiology of the underlying disorder; nevertheless, interpretations of the results should be performed cautiously, as for the under-representation of NP conditions.

Women show a positive response to platelet-rich plasma despite presenting more painful knee osteoarthritis than men

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of gender on the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA), comparing their short-term response between men and women.

METHODS

Four hundred-eighteen patients (529 knees) were included. Patients were treated with three injections of PRP on a weekly basis. Blood and PRP samples were randomly tested. Patients were asked to complete the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) and 12-item short form survey (SF-12), at baseline and 6 months. Success rates were calculated according to a reduction in the pain score of at least 9.3 points [minimal clinically important improvement (MCII)]. Comparative tests and multivariate regression were performed.

RESULTS

The PRP had a platelet concentration factor of 2.0X compared to blood levels, with no leucocytes or erythrocytes. KOOS scores showed an increase from baseline to 6 months (p < 0.0001). There was an increase in the physical component summary (PCS) (p < 0.0001) and mental component summary (MCS) (p < 0.01) of the SF-12. The number of knees of women with MCII was 156 out of 262 (59.6%), whereas the number of knees of men was 136 out of 267 (50.9%) (p = 0.0468). Women had worse baseline scores on pain (p = 0.009), PCS (p < 0.0001) and MCS (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Although the symptomatology generated by KOA was worse in women when compared to men, treatment with repeated injections of PRP was effective, ultimately achieving a higher improvement in women providing comparable final follow-up outcomes between men and women.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Current Challenges in the Development of Platelet-Rich Plasma-Based Therapies

Nowadays, biological therapies are booming and more of these formulations are coming to the market. Platelet-rich plasma, or PRP, is one of the most widely used biological therapies due to its ease of obtention and autologous character. Most of the techniques to obtain PRP are focusing on new processes and methods of optimization. However, not enough consideration is being given to modify the molecular components of PRP to generate more effective formulations with the aim of improving PRP treatments. Therefore, this review covers different novel PRP-obtaining methods that attempt to modify the molecular composition of the plasma.

The chimera of reaching a universal consensus on platelet-rich plasma treatment for knee osteoarthritis: a review of recent consensus statements and expert opinion

INTRODUCTION

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent cause of disability worldwide, affecting millions and posing significant socioeconomic burdens. Various conservative measures like hyaluronic acid (HA) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections aim to manage OA symptoms and delay surgical interventions. Despite the increasing utilization of PRP, consensus on its efficacy remains elusive, reflecting the evolving landscape of OA management.

AREAS COVERED

This study reviews guidelines and recommendations on intra-articular PRP injections for OA globally, highlighting divergent perspectives among different medical societies. A comprehensive literature search identified 19 relevant guidelines, indicating a temporal and geographic evolution in attitudes toward PRP use. While some guidelines endorse PRP for mild-to-moderate OA, others express caution due to concerns about product standardization and clinical evidence heterogeneity.

EXPERT OPINION

The lack of universal consensus on PRP for OA underscores the complex interplay between clinical evidence, practice patterns, and evolving perspectives. Recent shifts toward endorsing PRP may reflect advancements in preparation techniques and personalized medicine approaches. However, challenges persist, including patient selection and product standardization. Efforts to develop consensus and refine PRP classification systems are essential for guiding clinical practice and advancing OA management.

Effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma in partial-thickness rotator cuff tears: a systematic review

IMPORTANCE

Partial-thickness rotator cuff tears (PTRCTs) commonly affect overhead athletes, leading to a decline in sports performance. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is being explored as an alternative treatment modality for individuals with PTRCTs to reduce discomfort and enhance functional recovery. We conducted a systematic review study of randomized controlled clinical trials to determine the effectiveness of PRP in treating PTRCTs.

AIM

To determine the effectiveness of PRP in treating PTRCTs.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

We conducted a comprehensive literature search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the effectiveness of PRP with eccentric exercise and placebo injections as treatments for PTRCTs. We searched databases such as the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, and EMBASE. The visual analog scale (VAS) score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES) score, and Constant-Murley Score (CMS) was utilized as an outcome measure. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software.

FINDINGS

Our meta-analysis included 12 studies involving 762 patients. At six weeks post-treatment, the PRP group had significantly higher VAS scores compared to the control group, indicating improvement (standard mean difference (SMD): -2.04 [95% confidence interval (CI): -4.00 to -0.08], I2 ​= ​97%, P-value ​= ​0.04). Patients who received PRP showed statistically significant improvements in VAS scores at 3 months and 6 months follow-up (SMD, -1.78 [95% CI: -3.03 to -0.52], I2 ​= ​96%, P-value ​= ​0.005) (SMD: -2.26 [95% CI: -3.77 to -0.76], I2 ​= ​97%, P-value ​= ​0.003). A statistically significant difference was also observed in VAS scores at the long-term 1-year follow-up (SMD: -2.27 [95% CI: -4.07 to -0.47]; I2 ​= ​98%; P-value ​= ​0.031). There were statistically significant differences in ASES scores and CMS scores in the short-term (SMD: 1.21 [95% CI: 0.19 to 2.24], I2 ​= ​96%, P-value ​= ​0.02) (SMD, 2.01 [95% CI: 0.14 to 3.88], I2 ​= ​97%, P-value ​= ​0.04). However, in the long-term ASES and CMS scores did not show any statistical significance (SMD: 2.06 [95% CI: -0.54 to 4.65], I2 ​= ​99%, P-value ​= ​0.12) (SMD: 4.36 [95% CI: -5.48 to 14.21], I2 ​= ​99%, P-value ​= ​0.39).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Our findings suggest that PRP treatment is effective in reducing pain for individuals with PTRCTs, providing benefits in the short and long term. However, its impact on functional recovery appears somewhat constrained and doesn't endure over time. Additionally, significant heterogeneity exists among studies, encompassing variations in PRP composition and control group treatments. Consequently, we conclude that compelling evidence for symptom improvement in PTRCT patients following PRP treatment remains elusive.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I.

Platelet-rich plasma for nonoperative management of degenerative meniscal tears: A systematic review

Background

Meniscus tears are a common cause of knee pain encountered in orthopedics and sports medicine. There are numerous management strategies, from physical therapy and oral medications to surgery. Recent evidence is more favorable for conservative management, as operative treatment has limited clinical benefits and is associated with an accelerated progression toward osteoarthritis. Injections with orthobiologic therapies, such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP), are emerging as an alternative therapeutic tool for degenerative tears. This study aims to evaluate the latest evidence regarding the efficacy of PRP injections for the nonoperative management of degenerative meniscal pathology.

Data sources

Articles were obtained from Embase, PubMed, World of Science, Cochrane, and Galileo databases after searching "Platelet-rich plasma" AND "Meniscus." Inclusion criteria consisted of original, human studies evaluating the use of platelet-rich plasma for nonoperative management of meniscus tears.

Main results

A total of 384 articles were screened, with ten studies selected for final inclusion. The pooled study population comprised 686 patients, with an average age ranging from 33 to 53 years, and a 38% female population. Three different injection approaches were utilized, categorized as intra-articular alone (IA), intra-meniscal alone (IM), or a combination of both. Most studies demonstrated improved pain and functionality by 3 months that persisted for at least one year. Within the IA and IM groups, the majority of patients were either radiographically stable (30-70%) or demonstrated interval healing (40-60%). Several studies within IM and combined treatment groups evaluated rates and time to arthroscopy, and found lower failure rates and greater arthroscopy-free survival time than control comparison groups.

Conclusion

PRP appears to be a safe and efficacious treatment strategy for degenerative meniscal pathology. However, due to diverse periprocedural techniques, PRP injectate characteristics, and a lack of high-quality studies, additional trials are needed to provide greater a degree of confidence in PRP's clinical impact on patients with meniscus tears.

Level of evidence

Systematic Review.

Promoting Articular Cartilage Regeneration through Microenvironmental Regulation

In recent years, as the aging population continues to grow, osteoarthritis (OA) has emerged as a leading cause of disability, with its incidence rising annually. Current treatments of OA include exercise and medications in the early stages and total joint replacement in the late stages. These approaches only relieve pain and reduce inflammation; however, they have significant side effects and high costs. Therefore, there is an urgent need to identify effective treatment methods that can delay the pathological progression of this condition. The changes in the articular cartilage microenvironment, which are complex and diverse, can aggravate the pathological progression into a vicious cycle, inhibiting the repair and regeneration of articular cartilage. Understanding these intricate changes in the microenvironment is crucial for devising effective treatment modalities. By searching relevant research articles and clinical trials in PubMed according to the keywords of articular cartilage, microenvironment, OA, mechanical force, hypoxia, cytokine, and cell senescence. This study first summarizes the factors affecting articular cartilage regeneration, then proposes corresponding treatment strategies, and finally points out the future research direction. We find that regulating the opening of mechanosensitive ion channels, regulating the expression of HIF-1, delivering growth factors, and clearing senescent cells can promote the formation of articular cartilage regeneration microenvironment. This study provides a new idea for the treatment of OA in the future, which can promote the regeneration of articular cartilage through the regulation of the microenvironment so as to achieve the purpose of treating OA.

Profound Properties of Protein-Rich, Platelet-Rich Plasma Matrices as Novel, Multi-Purpose Biological Platforms in Tissue Repair, Regeneration, and Wound Healing

Autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) preparations are prepared at the point of care. Centrifugation cellular density separation sequesters a fresh unit of blood into three main fractions: a platelet-poor plasma (PPP) fraction, a stratum rich in platelets (platelet concentrate), and variable leukocyte bioformulation and erythrocyte fractions. The employment of autologous platelet concentrates facilitates the biological potential to accelerate and support numerous cellular activities that can lead to tissue repair, tissue regeneration, wound healing, and, ultimately, functional and structural repair. Normally, after PRP preparation, the PPP fraction is discarded. One of the less well-known but equally important features of PPP is that particular growth factors (GFs) are not abundantly present in PRP, as they reside outside of the platelet alpha granules. Precisely, insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) are mainly present in the PPP fraction. In addition to their roles as angiogenesis activators, these plasma-based GFs are also known to inhibit inflammation and fibrosis, and they promote keratinocyte migration and support tissue repair and wound healing. Additionally, PPP is known for the presence of exosomes and other macrovesicles, exerting cell-cell communication and cell signaling. Newly developed ultrafiltration technologies incorporate PPP processing methods by eliminating, in a fast and efficient manner, plasma water, cytokines, molecules, and plasma proteins with a molecular mass (weight) less than the pore size of the fibers. Consequently, a viable and viscous protein concentrate of functional total proteins, like fibrinogen, albumin, and alpha-2-macroglobulin is created. Consolidating a small volume of high platelet concentrate with a small volume of highly concentrated protein-rich PPP creates a protein-rich, platelet-rich plasma (PR-PRP) biological preparation. After the activation of proteins, mainly fibrinogen, the PR-PRP matrix retains and facilitates interactions between invading resident cells, like macrophages, fibroblast, and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), as well as the embedded concentrated PRP cells and molecules. The administered PR-PRP biologic will ultimately undergo fibrinolysis, leading to a sustained release of concentrated cells and molecules that have been retained in the PR-PRP matrix until the matrix is dissolved. We will discuss the unique biological and tissue reparative and regenerative properties of the PR-PRP matrix.

Efficacy of Intraoperative Platelet-Rich Plasma After Meniscal Repair: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

Meniscal injuries frequently require surgical intervention to restore knee joint function and stability. Intraoperative platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection has emerged as a potential adjunctive therapy to enhance tissue healing post-meniscal repair. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of PRP in terms of pain relief, functional recovery, and overall success rates in patients undergoing meniscal repair procedures.

Methods

A comprehensive search strategy was employed to identify relevant studies across Scopus, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases. The inclusion criteria encompassed human studies, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohorts, and case-control studies, focusing on intraoperative platelet-rich plasma (PRP) use post-meniscal repair and reporting outcomes related to pain, functionality, and cure rates. Exclusion criteria comprised animal studies, non-English publications, studies lacking relevant outcome measures, and those with insufficient data. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts, resolving disagreements through consensus or consultation with a third reviewer, followed by a full-text assessment for potentially eligible studies. Data extraction was conducted independently by two reviewers using a standardized form. The reliability of observational studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Subgroup analyses and pooled effect estimates for main outcomes were computed using RevMan 5.3, a meta-analysis tool.

Results

The demographic analysis revealed that the PRP group had an average age of 41.39 years, while the control group had an average age of 42.1 years. In terms of gender distribution, the PRP group consisted of 61 men and 29 women, while the control group had 62 men and 34 women. Pain ratings showed a preference for PRP with a mean difference of 4.83 (p = 0.13). However, there was no significant difference in Lysholm scores (mean difference: - 0.44, p = 0.91) or IKDC scores (mean difference: 2.80, p = 0.14) between the PRP and control groups. Similarly, ROM measures did not show a statistically significant difference, with a mean difference of 2.80 (p = 0.18). Additionally, there was no significant distinction in failure rates between the PRP and control groups, as indicated by a weighted mean difference of 0.71 (p = 0.52). These findings suggest that while PRP may offer some benefits in pain relief, its impact on functional recovery, range of motion, and failure rates following meniscal repair procedures is inconclusive.

Conclusion

The current evidence regarding the effect of intraoperative platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection on patients undergoing meniscal repair remains inconclusive. While some studies suggest potential benefits in terms of pain relief and functional recovery, others show no significant differences compared to control groups. The impact of PRP therapy on overall success rates, including rates of re-tear and revision surgery, is also uncertain. Further well-designed randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes are needed to provide more robust evidence and guide clinical practice in orthopedic surgery.

Platelet-rich plasma intra-articular knee injections from open preparation techniques do not pose a higher risk of joint infection: A systematic review of 91 randomized controlled trials and 5914 injections

Purpose

To compare the infection rate of intraarticular platelet-rich plasma (PRP) knee injections between open and closed techniques in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in the last decade.

Methods

Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, PubMed, Scopus and Virtual Health Library were accessed in October 2022 using the terms 'platelet-rich plasma', 'PRP', 'knee' and 'tibiofemoral' alone and in combination with Boolean operators AND/OR. RCTs published during the last 10 years evaluating PRP intra-articular knee injections were considered eligible. Studies were excluded if the kit/preparation technique was not described. Data were presented using individual studies' absolute values, totals, and pooled percentages. Publication bias was assessed using the ROBIS tool.

Results

Ninety-one studies met the predetermined eligibility criteria. Forty-one implemented a closed technique, while 50 were open. All studies implementing a closed technique disclosed their commercial kits. Only 16 studies (17.58%) failed to report joint infections. Among the studies reporting joint infections as outcomes, 30 implemented a closed technique with 1195 patients, 1921 intra-articular knee injections and 95.44% of patient follow-up. On the other hand, 45 of them implemented an open technique with 2290 patients, 3993 intra-articular knee injections and 97.07% of patient follow-up. No patient had a joint infection among the included studies. Thirty-three studies prepared their PRP in controlled environments (36.26%). Most studies did not report where the preparation occurred (48.35%). Only twelve studies disclosed using laminar flow during preparation (13.19%). The infection rate for both techniques was 0 per 1000 knee injections.

Conclusion

Open PRP preparation techniques do not pose a higher risk of joint infection and can lower manufacturing costs when appropriate facilities are available. However, PRP preparation setting and laminar flow implementation data are deficient, and minimal requirements for good manufacturing practices demand further studies while adhering to local and regional regulations.

Level of Evidence

Level I, systematic review of RCTs.

Immunoregulatory role of platelet derivatives in the macrophage-mediated immune response

Background

Macrophages are innate immune cells that display remarkable phenotypic heterogeneity and functional plasticity. Due to their involvement in the pathogenesis of several human conditions, macrophages are considered to be an attractive therapeutic target. In line with this, platelet derivatives have been successfully applied in many medical fields and as active participants in innate immunity, cooperation between platelets and macrophages is essential. In this context, the aim of this review is to compile the current evidence regarding the effects of platelet derivatives on the phenotype and functions of macrophages to identify the advantages and shortcomings for feasible future clinical applications.

Methods

A total of 669 articles were identified during the systematic literature search performed in PubMed and Web of Science databases.

Results

A total of 27 articles met the inclusion criteria. Based on published findings, platelet derivatives may play an important role in inducing a dynamic M1/M2 balance and promoting a timely M1-M2 shift. However, the differences in procedures regarding platelet derivatives and macrophages polarization and the occasional lack of information, makes reproducibility and comparison of results extremely challenging. Furthermore, understanding the differences between human macrophages and those derived from animal models, and taking into account the peculiarities of tissue resident macrophages and their ontogeny seem essential for the design of new therapeutic strategies.

Conclusion

Research on the combination of macrophages and platelet derivatives provides relevant information on the function and mechanisms of the immune response.

Does the Combination of Platelet-rich Plasma and Supervised Exercise Yield Better Pain Relief and Enhanced Function in Knee Osteoarthritis? A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Knee osteoarthritis is a leading cause of disability with substantial healthcare costs, and efficient nonsurgical treatment methods are still needed. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections and exercise therapy are used frequently in clinical practice. Whether PRP or PRP combined with exercise is more effective than exercise alone is unclear.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Which treatment relieves knee osteoarthritis pain better: PRP alone, exercise, or PRP combined with exercise? (2) Does PRP alone, exercise, or PRP combined with exercise yield better results in terms of the WOMAC score, performance on the 40-m fast-paced walk test and stair climbing test, and the SF-12 health-related quality of life score?

METHODS

In this randomized, controlled, three-arm clinical trial, we recruited patients with mild-to-moderate (Kellgren-Lawrence Grade II or III) knee osteoarthritis with a minimum of 3 points on the 11-point numeric rating scale for pain. During the study period, 157 patients with a diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis were screened and 84 eligible volunteers were enrolled in the study. Patients were randomly allocated (1:1:1) into either the exercise group (28), PRP group (28), or PRP + exercise group (28). Follow-up proportions were similar between the groups (exercise: 89% [25], PRP: 86% [24], PRP + exercise: 89% [25]; p = 0.79). All patients were analyzed in an intention-to-treat manner. There were no between-group differences in age, gender, arthritis severity, and baseline clinical scores (pain, WOMAC, functional performance tests, and health-related quality of life). The exercise group underwent a 6-week structured program consisting of 12 supervised individual sessions focused on strengthening and functional exercises. Meanwhile, the PRP group received three weekly injections of fresh, leukocyte-poor PRP. The PRP + exercise group received a combined treatment with both interventions. The primary outcome was knee pain over 24 weeks, measured on an 11-point numeric rating scale for pain (ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst pain, with a minimum clinically important difference [MCID] of 2). The secondary outcome measures included the WOMAC index (ranging from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating a lower level of disability and an MCID of 12), the durations of the 40-meter fast-paced walk test and stair climbing test, and the SF-12 health-related quality of life score. For the a priori sample size calculation, we used the numeric rating scale score for pain at 24 weeks as the primary outcome variable. The MCID for the numeric rating scale was deemed to be 2 points, with an estimated standard deviation of 2.4. Based on sample size calculations, a sample of 24 patients per group would provide 80% power to detect an effect of this size between the groups at the significance level of p = 0.05.

RESULTS

We found no clinically important differences in improvements in pain-defined as ≥ 2 points of 10-at 24 weeks when comparing exercise alone to PRP alone to PRP + exercise (1.9 ± 0.7 versus 3.8 ± 1.8 versus 1.4 ± 0.6; mean difference between PRP + exercise group and exercise group -0.5 [95% confidence interval -1.2 to 0.4]; p = 0.69). Likewise, we found no differences in WOMAC scores at 24 weeks of follow-up when comparing exercise alone to PRP alone to PRP + exercise (10 ± 9 versus 26 ± 20 versus 7 ± 6; mean difference between PRP + exercise group and exercise group -3 [95% CI -12 to -5]; p = 0.97). There were no differences in any of the other secondary outcome metrics among the PRP + exercise and exercise groups.

CONCLUSION

PRP did not improve pain at 24 weeks of follow-up in patients with mild-to-moderate knee osteoarthritis compared with exercise alone. Moreover, exercise alone was clinically superior to PRP alone, considering function and the physical component of health-related quality of life. Despite the additional costs and endeavors related to PRP products, the combination of PRP and exercise did not differ from exercise alone. The results of this randomized controlled trial do not support the use of PRP injections in the treatment of patients diagnosed with mild-to-moderate knee osteoarthritis. Consequently, exercise alone is the recommended treatment for reducing pain and enhancing function throughout this timeframe.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, therapeutic study.

Not all platelet-rich plasma are created equal

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to elucidate potential variations in clinical outcomes resulting from the use of different types of platelet-rich plasma (PRPs) in reproductive medicine. It seeks to explore the reasons behind the diverse results reported in various studies and assess the general features distinguishing different PRP formulations.

RECENT FINDINGS

PRPs have found applications across diverse medical fields, generating controversy due to the variability in outcomes. The field of reproductive medicine, despite its limited published studies, is encountering a similar challenge as it integrates these treatments.

SUMMARY

The multitude of PRP product brands in the market, coupled with 'home-made' PRPs, poses a significant barrier to establishing a common protocol for the preparation of standardized PRP products. This impediment hinders widespread adoption by clinicians, particularly in endometrial or ovarian treatments. Drawing from evidence in other medical disciplines, this review endeavors to compile essential characteristics that PRPs must possess, aiming to mitigate the impact of variables affecting results in forthcoming studies.

The Nrf2/HO-1 pathway participates in the antiapoptotic and anti-inflammatory effects of platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of osteoarthritis

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to explore the molecular mechanisms through which platelet-rich plasma (PRP) attenuates osteoarthritis (OA)-induced pain, apoptosis, and inflammation.

METHODS

An in vivo model of OA was established by injuring rats using the anterior cruciate ligament transection method, whereas an in vitro model was generated by exposing chondrocytes to interleukin (IL)-1β. Both models were then treated with PRP.

RESULTS

In both the in vivo and in vitro models, OA led to the suppression of the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2)/heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) pathway, whereas treatment with PRP reactivated this molecular axis. Inhibition of the Nrf2/HO-1 pathway using the Nrf2 inhibitor brusatol or through Nrf2 gene silencing counteracted the effects of PRP in reducing the tenderness and thermal pain thresholds of OA rats. Additionally, PRP reduced the mRNA expression of IL-1β, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and matrix metallopeptidase 13 (MMP-13) and the protein expression of B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2), Bcl-2 associated X-protein (Bax), and caspase-3. Furthermore, inflammation and apoptosis were induced by brusatol treatment or Nrf2 silencing. Additionally, in the in vitro model, PRP treatment increased the proliferation of chondrocytes and attenuated their inflammatory response and apoptosis, effects that were abrogated by Nrf2 depletion.

CONCLUSIONS

The Nrf2/HO-1 pathway participates in the PRP-mediated attenuation of OA development by suppressing inflammation and apoptosis.

Conservative Treatment for Ankle Cartilage: Cellular and Acellular Therapies: A Systematic Review

Biological agents like growth factors (ie, platelet rich plasma) and mesenchymal stem cells are rising in popularity among orthopedics. Orthobiologics therapy aims to fill the gap between conventional conservative therapies like hyaluronic acid and surgery, especially for cartilage disease. Ankle cartilage defects are very symptomatic and could lead to a severe decrease of quality of life in patients, because of pain, swelling, and inability to walk without pain. In this scenario, this paper aims to systematically review the current literature available about biological therapies for ankle cartilage.

Allogeneic platelet-rich plasma for knee osteoarthritis in patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia: A randomized clinical trial

The treatment of painful KOA in adult patients with ITP has not been well studied yet. We conducted a prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of intra-articular allogeneic PRP injections on symptoms and joint structure in patients with KOA and ITP. 80 participants were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to allogeneic PRP group or saline group. The primary outcome was the WOMAC total score at 12 months post-injection. The number of patients in each group who achieved MCID of primary outcome showed a statistically significant difference only at 3-month (27/39 vs. 5/39, p = 0.001) and 6-month (15/39 vs. 3/38, p = 0.032). The difference in WOMAC total score exceeded the MCID only at 3 month (mean difference of -15.1 [95% CI -20.7 to -9.5], p < 0.001). Results suggest that allogeneic PRP was superior to placebo only with respect to symptoms at 3-month of follow-up.

The varying clinical effectiveness of single, three and five intraarticular injections of platelet-rich plasma in knee osteoarthritis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the variations in clinical effectiveness among patients diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis who underwent intra-articular administration of platelet-rich plasma using single, triple, or quintuple injections.

METHODS

One hundred twenty patients with grade I-III knee osteoarthritis were randomly assigned to three groups: PRP1 group, who received a single injection of platelet-rich plasma; PRP3 group, who received three PRP injections one week apart; PRP5 group, who received five PRP injections one week apart. The patients' conditions were evaluated using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index-VA3.1 version (WOMAC-VA3.1) at baseline and 6, 12, 24, and 52 weeks 52 weeks follow up.

RESULTS

Out of the total participants, 106 patients (30 males and 76 females) completed the study. The primary outcome measure, WOMAC pain score, registered significant improvements across all groups when compared to pre-treatment levels. However, the application of 3 and 5 injections of platelet-rich plasma was substantially more effective than that of a single injection in reducing knee pain and stiffness, as well as enhancing physical function in patients with knee osteoarthritis. No statistically discernable difference was observed between PRP3 and PRP5 at all follow-up intervals, and there was no discernable difference between 3 and 5 PRP injections either. Mild side effects occurred in all three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The administration of three or five injections of platelet-rich plasma is safe, substantially more effective than single injections, and leads to remarkable clinical improvement by significantly reducing knee pain, improving joint stiffness, and enhancing physical function in patients with grade I-III knee osteoarthritis. Furthermore, no significant difference was observed in the efficacy of three or five injections. Therefore, we recommend using three injections of PRP in the treatment of patients with knee osteoarthritis of grade I-III.

Platelet-rich plasma augmentation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Evidence is still too scattered. A scoping review of randomised controlled trials

PURPOSE

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) augmentation has been proposed to improve the results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The present study aims to quantify the available evidence to support the use of PRP as biological augmentation in ACLR surgery.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted on the PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science and Embase databases on 10 March 2023. Inclusion criteria were randomised controlled trials (RCTs), written in English, addressing PRP augmentation in ACLR surgery, with no time limitation. A scoping review was performed to map the body of literature by examining the evidence related to specific aspects of patients' treatment and evaluation. Risk of bias evaluation was performed with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials Version 2 (RoB 2), while the quality assessment was performed with the use of the Coleman Score.

RESULTS

Out of 983 articles retrieved, 23 RCTs on 943 knees were included in this scoping review. PRP was administered in a liquid form in nine studies and clotted in 11 studies, while in three studies both liquid and clotted PRP were used. Hamstring auto/allografts were used in 14 studies, patellar tendon auto/allografts were used in eight studies and one study described ACLR with peroneus longus allografts. The map of the evidence documented high heterogeneity also in terms of surgical technique, objective and subjective outcome measures and radiological assessment, as well as follow-up times ranging from 1 day to 2 years, with virtually no overlapping data among studies neither in terms of treatments nor evaluations. Risk of bias evaluation showed an overall low quality of the included studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The available literature addressing PRP augmentation in ACLR is largely scattered. PRP was produced and applied following different procedures, and high variability was detected across the included studies for every aspect of ACLR surgery and evaluation. Currently, a meaningful comparison of the available studies is not possible as the quantification of the literature results is biased by their heterogeneity. Future studies should provide more standardisation to investigate the benefits of biological augmentation in ACL surgery and confirm the promising yet weak evidence of PRP potential as well as the most suitable application modality, before routine use in clinical practice.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Levels I and II, scoping review.

Degenerative Meniscus Tears Treated Nonoperatively With Platelet-Rich Plasma Yield Variable Clinical and Imaging Outcomes: A Systematic Review

Purpose

To perform a systematic review on clinical and radiologic outcomes for meniscus tears treated nonoperatively with platelet-rich plasma (PRP).

Methods

A literature search was performed according to the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines using keywords and Boolean operators in SCOPUS, PubMed, Medline, and the Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials in April 2023. Inclusion criteria were limited to Level I to IV human studies reporting on outcomes of meniscus tears treated nonoperatively with PRP.

Results

A total of 6 studies, consisting of 184 patients, were identified. There was 1 Level I study and 5 Level IV studies. Mean patient age was 47.8 ± 7.9 years, with 62% (n = 114/184) being female. The medial meniscus was treated in 95.7% (n = 157/164) of patients. Mean follow-up ranged from 75.9 days to 31.9 months. Meniscus tears were generally described as chronic, degenerative, or intrasubstance. In 4 studies, magnetic resonance imaging revealed variable improvement in meniscus grade with complete healing in 0% to 44% of patients and partial healing in 0% to 40% of patients. Four of 5 studies reported significant statistical improvement in pain from baseline to final follow-up. Studies reporting on clinical outcomes showed significant improvements Lysholm score (2 studies), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score total score (2 studies), and Tegner score (1 study). Successful return to sport occurred in 60% to 100% of patients. Two studies reported that most patients were either very satisfied or satisfied following treatment.

Conclusions

The use of PRP injections for the treatment of meniscus tears led to variable results based on postoperative magnetic resonance evaluation and improvements in clinical outcomes, although the clinical significance remains unclear. The heterogeneity of PRP protocols, short-term follow-up, and lack of comparative studies limit findings.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, systematic review of Level I to IV studies.

Method to obtain a plasma rich in platelet- and plasma-growth factors based on water evaporation

Platelet-Rich Plasma, also known as PRP, is an autologous biologic product used in medicine as a treatment for tissue repair. Nowadays, the majority of PRP obtention methods enrich only platelets, not considering extraplatelet biomolecules, which take part in several cell processes. In the present work, a novel PRP preparation method was developed to obtain a PRP rich in both platelet and plasma extraplatelet molecules. The method is based on the evaporation of the water of the plasma using a rotary evaporator. With this new methodology an increase in plasmatic growth factors and, as a consequence, a better dermal fibroblast cell viability was achieved, compared to a standard PRP formulation. This novel PRP product obtained with this new methodology showed promising results in vitro as an improved PRP treatment in future application.

Platelet-Rich Plasma in Dermatology: New Insights on the Cellular Mechanism of Skin Repair and Regeneration

The skin's recognised functions may undergo physiological alterations due to ageing, manifesting as varying degrees of facial wrinkles, diminished tautness, density, and volume. Additionally, these functions can be disrupted (patho)physiologically through various physical and chemical injuries, including surgical trauma, accidents, or chronic conditions like ulcers associated with diabetes mellitus, venous insufficiency, or obesity. Advancements in therapeutic interventions that boost the skin's innate regenerative abilities could significantly enhance patient care protocols. The application of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) is widely recognized for its aesthetic and functional benefits to the skin. Yet, the endorsement of PRP's advantages often borders on the dogmatic, with its efficacy commonly ascribed solely to the activation of fibroblasts by the factors contained within platelet granules. PRP therapy is a cornerstone of regenerative medicine which involves the autologous delivery of conditioned plasma enriched by platelets. This is achieved by centrifugation, removing erythrocytes while retaining platelets and their granules. Despite its widespread use, the precise sequences of cellular activation, the specific cellular players, and the molecular machinery that drive PRP-facilitated healing are still enigmatic. There is still a paucity of definitive and robust studies elucidating these mechanisms. In recent years, telocytes (TCs)-a unique dermal cell population-have shown promising potential for tissue regeneration in various organs, including the dermis. TCs' participation in neo-angiogenesis, akin to that attributed to PRP, and their role in tissue remodelling and repair processes within the interstitia of several organs (including the dermis), offer intriguing insights. Their potential to contribute to, or possibly orchestrate, the skin regeneration process following PRP treatment has elicited considerable interest. Therefore, pursuing a comprehensive understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms at work, particularly those involving TCs, their temporal involvement in structural recovery following injury, and the interconnected biological events in skin wound healing and regeneration represents a compelling field of study.