Lenvatinib dose, efficacy, and safety in the treatment of multiple malignancies

RARRES1 inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma progression and increases its sensitivity to lenvatinib through interaction with SPINK2

BACKGROUND

Lenvatinib is an oral small molecule inhibitor approved for treating patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) worldwide. Increasing cell sensitivity to lenvatinib would be an effective method of improving therapeutic efficacy.

METHODS

High throughput methods was used to scan the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) related to lenvatinib sensitivity in HCC cells. Gain- and loss-function experiments were used to explore the functions of these DEGs in HCC and lenvatinib sensitivity. CO-IP assay and rescue experiments were utilized to investigate the mechanism.

RESULTS

We identified that RAR responder protein 1 (RARRES1), a podocyte-specific growth arrest gene, was among significantly upregulated DEGs in HCC cells following lenvatinib treatment. Functional analysis showed that ectopic RARRES1 expression decreased HCC progression in vitro and in vivo, as well as improving tumor sensitivity to lenvatinib, while RARRES1 silencing increased HCC cell proliferation and migration. Mechanistically, co-immunoprecipitation assays demonstrated that RARRES1 interacted with serine protease inhibitor Kazal-type 2 (SPINK2) in HCC cells. Further, SPINK2 overexpression suppressed HCC cell proliferation and migration, as well as increasing sensitivity to lenvatinib whereas SPINK2 knockdown promoted cell progression and decreased lenvatinib sensitivity. The mRNA and protein levels of RARRES1 and SPINK2 were low in HCC tissue samples, relative to those in normal liver tissue.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings highlighted that RARRES1 can inhibit HCC progression and regulate HCC sensitivity to lenvatinib by interacting SPINK2, representing a new tumor suppressor RARRES1/SPINK2 axis in HCC that modulates sensitivity to lenvatinib.

Real-world utilization of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab combination therapy for the treatment of endometrial cancer in the USA

Aim: Describe treatment and dosing patterns of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab combination therapy (lenva+pembro) among endometrial cancer (EC) patients in US clinical practice. Materials & methods: Retrospective cohort study among adults with EC initiating lenva+pembro in second line (2L) or third line and later (≥3L) between 17 September 2019 and 30 June 2021. Results: 110 patients initiated lenva+pembro in 2L and 135 patients in ≥3L. Majority of patients initiated lenva+pembro at label-recommended starting doses/interval. Less than half changed lenvatinib dose over time. At median follow-up of 7.3 and 8.7 months, median (95% CI) duration of therapy was 5.1 (4.7-6.1) and 5.8 (4.2-7.3) months for patients in 2L and ≥3L, respectively. Conclusion: Lenva+pembro was mostly initiated at label-recommended dose.

Exploring the Spectrum of VEGF Inhibitors' Toxicities from Systemic to Intra-Vitreal Usage in Medical Practice

The use of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor inhibitors (VEGFi) has become prevalent in the field of medicine, given the high incidence of various pathological conditions necessitating VEGF inhibition within the general population. These conditions encompass a range of advanced neoplasms, such as colorectal cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, renal cancer, ovarian cancer, and others, along with ocular diseases. The utilization of VEGFi is not without potential risks and adverse effects, requiring healthcare providers to be well-prepared for identification and management. VEGFi can be broadly categorized into two groups: antibodies or chimeric proteins that specifically target VEGF (bevacizumab, ramucirumab, aflibercept, ranibizumab, and brolucizumab) and non-selective and selective small molecules (sunitinib, sorafenib, cabozantinib, lenvatinib, regorafenib, etc.) designed to impede intracellular signaling of the VEGF receptor (RTKi, receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors). The presentation and mechanisms of adverse effects resulting from VEGFi depend primarily on this distinction and the route of drug administration (systemic or intra-vitreal). This review provides a thorough examination of the causes, recognition, management, and preventive strategies for VEGFi toxicities with the goal of offering support to oncologists in both clinical practice and the design of clinical trials.

Characterization and Management of Adverse Reactions in Patients With Advanced Endometrial Cancer Receiving Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab

BACKGROUND

Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab significantly improved efficacy compared with chemotherapy in patients with advanced endometrial cancer (aEC) regardless of microsatellite instability status or histologic subtype, who had disease progression following prior platinum-based therapy, in Study-309/KEYNOTE-775. The safety profile of the combination was generally consistent with that of each monotherapy drug and of the combination in patients with endometrial cancer and other solid tumors. Given the medical complexity of patients with aEC, this paper aims to characterize key adverse reactions (ARs) of the combination treatment and review management strategies, providing a guide for AR management to maximize anticancer benefits and minimize treatment discontinuation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In Study-309/KEYNOTE-775, patients received lenvatinib (20 mg orally once daily) plus pembrolizumab (200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks) or chemotherapy (doxorubicin or paclitaxel). The incidence and median time to the first onset of ARs, dose modifications, and concomitant medications are described. Key ARs characterized include hypothyroidism, hypertension, fatigue, diarrhea, musculoskeletal disorders, nausea, decreased appetite, vomiting, stomatitis, weight decreased, proteinuria, and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome.

RESULTS

As expected, the most common any-grade key ARs included: hypothyroidism, hypertension, fatigue, diarrhea, and musculoskeletal disorders. Grades 3-4 key ARs with incidence ≥10% included: hypertension, fatigue, and weight decreased. Key ARs first occurred within approximately 3 months of treatment initiation. AR management strategies consistent with the prescribing information and the study protocol are discussed.

CONCLUSION

Successful AR management strategies for lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab include education of the patient and entire treatment team, preventative measures and close monitoring, and judicious use of dose modifications and concomitant medications.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV ID

NCT03517449.

Rectal ulcer associated with lenvatinib 15 years after definitive radiotherapy for prostate cancer: A case report

Lenvatinib is a multi-kinase inhibitor that blocks vascular endothelial growth factor, fibroblast growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor receptors. The present study describes a case of rectal ulceration triggered by lenvatinib treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma 15 years after definitive radiotherapy for prostate cancer. A 58-year-old man underwent definitive external beam radiotherapy and high-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer. A total of 15 years after radiotherapy for prostate cancer, the patient was diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma with multiple metastases. Treatment with 12 mg/day lenvatinib was commenced. A total of 4 months after starting lenvatinib therapy, the patient experienced persistent anal pain with a deep ulceration of the anterior wall of the lower rectum. As the pain did not improve, the patient chose to undergo a colostomy, resulting in the resolution of the anorectal pain. To the best of our knowledge, the present case report is the first to report on lenvatinib-induced rectal ulcers after radiotherapy.

Impact of telephone follow-up on hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving oral chemotherapy from an ambulatory-care setting

INTRODUCTION

In recent years, most molecular target drugs have been administered orally, as prescribed at ambulatory services in hospitals and at patients' homes. Telephone follow-up is increasingly being used in clinical practice for patients needing additional support post-discharge and for the prevention of hospital readmissions. The purpose of this study was to clarify the clinical benefits of telephone follow-up while administering oral anticancer drugs.

METHODS

This was a single-center, observational, retrospective study. We evaluated hepatocellular carcinoma patients who received sorafenib or lenvatinib between March 2010 and February 2018. The primary endpoint was the incidence of adverse events.

RESULTS

From the total of 130 patients, 83 patients received telephone follow-up and 47 did not. The incidence of hand-foot skin reactions significantly reduced in patients with telephone follow-up (odds ratio (OR) 3.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.16-11.8, p = 0.020). The median durations (ranges) of adherence to oral chemotherapy were 259 days (15-1730) for the telephone follow-up group and 121 days (14-1105) for the no-telephone follow-up group (p < 0.001). Moreover, the disease control rate was significantly higher in the telephone follow-up group (OR 2.52, 95% CI 1.15-5.53, p = 0.020).

CONCLUSIONS

Remote interventions, such as telephone follow-up, are useful means of managing adverse events in patients receiving oral anticancer drugs and can lead to improved treatment results.

Pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib in second-line and third-line patients with pleural mesothelioma (PEMMELA): a single-arm phase 2 study

BACKGROUND

The combination of pembrolizumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, and lenvatinib, an antiangiogenic multikinase inhibitor, shows synergistic activity in preclinical and clinical studies in solid tumours. We assessed the clinical activity of this combination therapy in patients with pleural mesothelioma who progressed after platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy.

METHODS

In this single-arm, single-centre, phase 2 study, done at the Netherlands Cancer Institute in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, eligible patients (aged ≥18 years) with pleural mesothelioma with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, progression after chemotherapy (no previous immunotherapy), and measurable disease according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (mRECIST) for mesothelioma version 1.1. Patients received 200 mg intravenous pembrolizumab once every 3 weeks plus 20 mg oral lenvatinib once per day for up to 2 years or until disease progression, development of unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was objective response rate identified by a local investigator according to mRECIST version 1.1. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04287829, and is recruiting for the second cohort.

FINDINGS

Between March 5, 2021, and Jan 31, 2022, 42 patients were screened, of whom 38 were included in the primary endpoint and safety analyses (median age 71 years [IQR 65-75], 33 [87%] male and five [13%] female) . At data cutoff (Jan 31, 2023), with a median follow-up of 17·7 months (IQR 13·8-19·4), 22 (58%; 95% CI 41-74) of 38 patients had an objective response. The independent review showed an objective response in 17 (45%; 95% CI 29-62) of 38 patients. Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in ten (26%) patients, including one treatment-related death due to myocardial infarction. The most common treatment-related grade 3 or worse adverse events were hypertension (eight patients [21%]) and anorexia and lymphopenia (both four patients [11%]). In 29 (76%) of 38 patients, at least one dose reduction or discontinuation of lenvatinib was required.

INTERPRETATION

Pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib showed promising anti-tumour activity in patients with pleural mesothelioma with considerable toxicity, similar to that in previous studies. Available evidence from the literature suggests a high starting dose of lenvatinib for optimal anti-tumour activity. This, however, demands a high standard of supportive care. The combination therapy of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib warrants further investigation in pleural mesothelioma.

FUNDING

Merck Sharp & Dohme.

Dose Consideration of Lenvatinib's Anti-Cancer Effect on Hepatocellular Carcinoma and the Potential Benefit of Combined Colchicine Therapy

PURPOSE

The dose-dependent anti-cancer effect of lenvatinib on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells and the potential benefit of combined colchicine therapy were investigated.

METHODS

Four primary cultured HCC (S103, S143, S160, S176) cell lines were investigated by differential expressions of genes (11 lenvatinib target genes and NANOG) and anti-proliferative effect using clinically achievable plasma lenvatinib (250, 350 ng/mL) and colchicine (4 ng/mL) concentrations.

RESULTS

Colchicine showed an anti-proliferative effect on all cell lines. Lenvatinib at 250 ng/mL inhibited proliferation in all cell lines, but 350 ng/mL inhibited only three cell lines. For lenvatinib target genes, colchicine down-regulated more genes and up-regulated less genes than lenvatinib did in three cell lines. Lenvatinib up-regulated NANOG in all cell lines. Colchicine down-regulated NANOG in three cell lines but up-regulated NANOG with less magnitude than lenvatinib did in S103. Overall, combined colchicine and 250 ng/mL lenvatinib had the best anti-cancer effects in S143, with similar effects with combined colchicine and 350 ng/mL lenvatinib in S176 but less effects than combined colchicine and 350 ng/mL lenvatinib in S103 and S160.

CONCLUSIONS

Lenvatinib does not show a dose-dependent anti-cancer effect on HCC. Combined colchicine and lenvatinib can promote the total anti-cancer effects on HCC.

Use of lenvatinib in the treatment of radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer: a multidisciplinary perspective for daily practice

Background

Most thyroid cancers of follicular origin have a favorable outcome. Only a small percentage of patients will develop metastatic disease, some of which will become radioiodine refractory (RAI-R). Important challenges to ensure the best therapeutic outcomes include proper, timely, and appropriate diagnosis; decisions on local, systemic treatments; management of side effects of therapies; and a good relationship between the specialist, patients, and caregivers.

Methods

With the aim of providing suggestions that can be useful in everyday practice, a multidisciplinary group of experts organized the following document, based on their shared clinical experience with patients with RAI-R differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) undergoing treatment with lenvatinib. The main areas covered are patient selection, initiation of therapy, follow-up, and management of adverse events.

Conclusions

It is essential to provide guidance for the management of RAI-R DTC patients with systemic therapies, and especially lenvatinib, since compliance and adherence to treatment are fundamental to achieve the best outcomes. While the therapeutic landscape in RAI-R DTC is evolving, with new targeted therapies, immunotherapy, etc., lenvatinib is expected to remain a first-line treatment and mainstay of therapy for several years in the vast majority of patients and settings. The guidance herein covers baseline work-up and initiation of systemic therapy, relevance of symptoms, multidisciplinary assessment, and patient education. Practical information based on expert experience is also given for the starting dose of lenvatinib, follow-up and monitoring, as well as the management of adverse events and discontinuation and reinitiating of therapy. The importance of patient engagement is also stressed.

Production of a biosimilar version of aflibercept to improve VEGF blocker cytotoxicity on endothelial cells

This project aimed to produce a biosimilar version of aflibercept (AFL) and evaluate the effect of the co-treatment of AFL with other vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) blocker drugs. For this purpose, the optimized gene was inserted into the pCHO1.0 plasmid and transfected into the CHO-S cell line. The final concentration of biosimilar-AFL for the selected clone was 782 mg/L. Results revealed that the inhibition potential of the biosimilar-AFL on HUVEC cells was significant at 10 and 100 nM concentrations and in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, co-treatment of biosimilar-AFL with Everolimus (EVR), Lenvatinib (LEN), and Sorafenib (SOR) could reduce HUVEC cell viability/proliferation, more than when used alone. When LEN and SOR were co-treated with biosimilar-AFL, their cytotoxicity increased 10-fold. The most and least efficient combination was seen when biosimilar-AFL combined with LEN and EVR, respectively. Finally, biosimilar-AFL may improve the efficiency of LEN, EVR, and SOR in reducing the VEGF effect on endothelial cells.

Tumour associated endothelial cells: origin, characteristics and role in metastasis and anti-angiogenic resistance

Tumour progression and metastasis remain the leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Tumour angiogenesis is essential for tumour progression. The vasculature surrounding tumours is not only a transport channel for nutrients, oxygen, and metabolites, but also a pathway for metastasis. There is a close interaction between tumour cells and endothelial cells in the tumour microenvironment. Recent studies have shown that tumour-associated endothelial cells have different characteristics from normal vascular endothelial cells, play an important role in tumour progression and metastasis, and are expected to be a key target for cancer therapy. This article reviews the tissue and cellular origin of tumour-associated endothelial cells and analyses the characteristics of tumour-associated endothelial cells. Finally, it summarises the role of tumour-associated endothelial cells in tumour progression and metastasis and the prospects for their use in clinical anti-angiogenic therapy.

Characterization and Management of Adverse Reactions From the CLEAR Study in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab

BACKGROUND

Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab showed significantly improved progression-free and overall survival outcomes compared with sunitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma in the CLEAR study (NCT02811861). Here, we used CLEAR data to characterize common adverse reactions (ARs; adverse-event preferred terms grouped in accordance with regulatory authority review) associated with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab and review management strategies for select ARs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Safety data from the 352 patients who received lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in the CLEAR study were analyzed. Key ARs were chosen based on frequency of occurrence (≥30%). Time to first onset and management strategies for key ARs were detailed.

RESULTS

The most frequent ARs were fatigue (63.1%), diarrhea (61.9%), musculoskeletal pain (58.0%), hypothyroidism (56.8%), and hypertension (56.3%); grade ≥3 severity ARs that occurred in ≥5% of patients were hypertension (28.7%), diarrhea (9.9%), fatigue (9.4%), weight decreased (8.0%), and proteinuria (7.7%). Median times to first onset of all key ARs were within approximately 5 months (approximately 20 weeks) of starting treatment. Strategies for effectively managing ARs included baseline monitoring, drug-dose modifications, and/or concomitant medications.

CONCLUSION

The safety profile of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab was consistent with the known profile of each monotherapy; ARs were considered manageable with strategies including monitoring, dose modifications, and supportive medications. Proactive and prompt identification and management of ARs are important for patient safety and to support continued treatment.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV ID

NCT02811861.

The past, present, and future of immunotherapy for endometrial adenocarcinoma

Incidences of endometrial adenocarcinoma are increasing in the USA with poor prognosis for patients with advanced disease. The current treatment standard is surgery including total hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy with surgical staging and adjunct treatment, such as chemotherapy or radiation. However, these methods do not present as an effective treatment option for poorly differentiated advanced cancers. Advancements in immunotherapy now offer a new approach for various types of cancer and specifically show promise in the treatment of endometrial adenocarcinoma. This review summarizes immunotherapeutic treatment options relevant to endometrial adenocarcinoma, such as immune checkpoint blockades, bispecific T-cell engager antibodies, vaccinations, and adoptive cell transfer. This study could be helpful for clinicians to identify treatment options more suitable for women with late-stage endometrial adenocarcinoma.

L-carnitine prevents lenvatinib-induced muscle toxicity without impairment of the anti-angiogenic efficacy

Lenvatinib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor that acts on multiple receptors involved in angiogenesis. Lenvatinib is a standard agent for the treatment of several types of advanced cancers; however, it frequently causes muscle-related adverse reactions. Our previous study revealed that lenvatinib treatment reduced carnitine content and the expression of carnitine-related and oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) proteins in the skeletal muscle of rats. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of L-carnitine on myotoxic and anti-angiogenic actions of lenvatinib. Co-administration of L-carnitine in rats treated with lenvatinib for 2 weeks completely prevented the decrease in carnitine content and expression levels of carnitine-related and OXPHOS proteins, including carnitine/organic cation transporter 2, in the skeletal muscle. Moreover, L-carnitine counteracted lenvatinib-induced protein synthesis inhibition, mitochondrial dysfunction, and cell toxicity in C2C12 myocytes. In contrast, L-carnitine had no influence on either lenvatinib-induced inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 phosphorylation in human umbilical vein endothelial cells or angiogenesis in endothelial tube formation and mouse aortic ring assays. These results suggest that L-carnitine supplementation could prevent lenvatinib-induced muscle toxicity without diminishing its antineoplastic activity, although further clinical studies are needed to validate these findings.

Sustained antitumor response to lenvatinib with weekend-off and alternate-day administration in chemotherapy-refractory thymic carcinoma: a case report

Lenvatinib is a multitargeted kinase inhibitor and maintaining its dose intensity has been shown to be beneficial in patients with thyroid and hepatocellular carcinomas. However, most patients require lenvatinib interruption and dose reduction due to the high incidence of adverse events (AEs). Lenvatinib was recently approved in Japan for patients with unresectable thymic carcinoma; however, real-world evidence of its clinical benefit is limited. Here, we report the case of chemotherapy-refractory thymic carcinoma in a patient who was administered a starting dose of lenvatinib using a 5-day on/2-day off (weekend-off) protocol, followed by alternate-day administration after fatigue onset derived from overt or subclinical hypothyroidism. Consequently, the patient exhibited a durable response to lenvatinib, with a 17-month progression-free survival without any severe or intolerable AEs. The present case suggests that maintaining lenvatinib dose intensity using such alternative administration regimens contributes to favorable clinical outcomes in thymic carcinoma.

Pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib combination therapy for advanced endometrial carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Advanced and recurrent endometrial carcinoma remains a difficult diagnosis to treat due to the limited and ineffective available treatment options following platinum and taxane chemotherapy. Patients who are microsatellite stable (MSS) or mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) have even poorer outcomes with fewer effective therapies. Fortunately, recent Phase Ib/II and Phase III trials have demonstrated that combination pembrolizumab and lenvatinib resulted in improved ORR, PFS and OS than currently used therapies in this setting.

AREAS COVERED

In this article, we review the history and notable clinical trials responsible for the advancement and status of treatment options available for advanced endometrial cancer. Most importantly, we review the recently published data on the efficacy, safety and tolerability of the combination pembrolizumab and lenvatinib in advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer.

EXPERT OPINION

The combination pembrolizumab and lenvatinib is an effective treatment regimen for patients with advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer who are MSS or pMMR who have failed prior platinum-based treatment. This combination should be routinely offered to patients following progression or recurrence of systemic platinum and taxane chemotherapy. Although this regimen is safe and effective, clinicians should be aware of the known toxicities and assess patients regularly to determine if dose modifications or interruptions are indicated.

Rationale Efficacy and Safety Evidence of Lenvatinib and Pembrolizumab Association in Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma

Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) are highly aggressive malignant tumors with poor overall prognosis despite multimodal therapy. As ATC are extremely rare, no randomized controlled study has been published for metastatic disease. Thyrosine kinase inhibitors, especially lenvatinib and immune checkpoint inhibitors such as pembrolizumab, are emerging drugs for ATC. Few studies have reported the efficacity of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib association, resulting in its frequent off-label use. In this review, we discuss rationale efficacy and safety evidence for the association of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab in ATC. First, we discuss preclinical rationale for pembrolizumab monotherapy, lenvatinib monotherapy and synergistic action of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib in the metastatic setting. We also discuss clinical evidence for immunotherapy and pembrolizumab in ATC through the analysis of studies evaluating immunotherapy, lenvatinib and pembrolizumab lenvatinib association in ATC. In addition, we discuss the safety of this association and potential predictive biomarkers of efficiency.