Redefining the strategy for the use of COMT inhibitors in Parkinson's disease: the role of opicapone

Tyrosine Hydroxylase Inhibitors and Dopamine Receptor Agonists Combination Therapy for Parkinson's Disease

There are currently no disease-modifying therapies for Parkinson's disease (PD), a progressive neurodegenerative disorder associated with dopaminergic neuronal loss. There is increasing evidence that endogenous dopamine (DA) can be a pathological factor in neurodegeneration in PD. Tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) is the key rate-limiting enzyme for DA generation. Drugs that inhibit TH, such as alpha-methyltyrosine (α-MT), have recently been shown to protect against neurodegeneration in various PD models. DA receptor agonists can activate post-synaptic DA receptors to alleviate DA-deficiency-induced PD symptoms. However, DA receptor agonists have no therapeutic effects against neurodegeneration. Thus, a combination therapy with DA receptor agonists plus TH inhibitors may be an attractive therapeutic approach. TH inhibitors can protect and promote the survival of remaining dopaminergic neurons in PD patients' brains, whereas DA receptor agonists activate post-synaptic DA receptors to alleviate PD symptoms. Additionally, other PD drugs, such as N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and anticholinergic drugs, may be used as adjunctive medications to improve therapeutic effects. This multi-drug cocktail may represent a novel strategy to protect against progressive dopaminergic neurodegeneration and alleviate PD disease progression.

Neuroinflammation in Neurodegenerative Disorders: Current Knowledge and Therapeutic Implications

Neurodegenerative disorders (NDs) have become increasingly common during the past three decades. Approximately 15% of the total population of the world is affected by some form of NDs, resulting in physical and cognitive disability. The most common NDs include Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and Huntington's disease. Although NDs are caused by a complex interaction of genetic, environmental, and lifestyle variables, neuroinflammation is known to be associated with all NDs, often leading to permanent damage to neurons of the central nervous system. Furthermore, numerous emerging pieces of evidence have demonstrated that inflammation not only supports the progression of NDs but can also serve as an initiator. Hence, various medicines capable of preventing or reducing neuroinflammation have been investigated as ND treatments. While anti-inflammatory medicine has shown promising benefits in several preclinical models, clinical outcomes are often questionable. In this review, we discuss various NDs with their current treatment strategies, the role of neuroinflammation in the pathophysiology of NDs, and the use of anti-inflammatory agents as a potential therapeutic option.

Effectiveness and safety of different catechol-o-methyl transferase inhibitors for patients with parkinson's disease: Systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Levodopa treatment requires the addition of other drugs, such as catechol-O-methyl transferase (COMT) inhibitors, to alleviate motor fluctuations in advanced parkinson's disease (PD). However, the optimal strategy, including the type and dose of COMT inhibitors remains unknown. This systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of different COMT inhibitors and for treating PD patients.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were screened up to November 20, 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of COMT inhibitors (entacapone, opicapone, tolcapone) for PD patients were included. Eligible outcomes were total ON-time, rate of ON-time >1 h, total daily dose of levodopa therapy, mean change from baseline to final follow up in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part III scores, adverse events and dyskinesia. Network meta-analyses integrated direct and indirect evidence with placebo as a common comparator.

RESULTS

We identified 18 studies with 7564 patients. Opicapone, entacapone, and tolcapone could increase total ON-time when compared with placebo. However, opicapone (25 mg, MD 4.0, 95%CrI: 1.1-7.5) and opicapone (50 mg, MD 5.1, 95%CrI: 2.2-8.7) statistically significant increase the total ON-time. opicapone and entacapone could increase the rate of ON-time >1 h when compared with placebo. Only opicapone (5 mg) showed no statistically significant with placebo (OR 1.4, 95%CrI: 0.74-2.4). We found that opicapone (50 mg, SURCA, 0.796) is the best option compared with other treatments. TOL (200 mg) was ranked highest in the rank probability test for total daily dose of levodopa therapy, followed by OPI (50 mg), TOL (400 mg) and TOL (100 mg) in order. SUCRA rankings identified TOL (200 mg) as the most likely therapy for increasing adverse events (SUCRA 27.19%), followed by TOL (400 mg, SUCRA 27.20%) and OPI (5 mg, SUCRA 30.81%). The SUCRA probabilities were 91.6%, 75.2%, 67.9%, 59.3%, 45.6%, 41.1%, 35.1%, 24.6% and 9.4% for PLA, TOL (400 mg), ENT (100 mg), ENT (200 mg), OPI (5 mg), TOL (100 mg), OPI (25 mg), OPI (50 mg), and TOL (200 mg) respectively.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, opicapone (50 mg) may be a better choice for treatment PD when compared with other COMT inhibitors.

Patients' Preferences for Adjunctive Parkinson's Disease Treatments: A Discrete-Choice Experiment

Background

Several adjunctive medications are available to reduce OFF time between levodopa/carbidopa (LD/CD) doses for people with Parkinson's disease (PD).

Objective

To explore how individuals with PD balance benefits and burdens when considering adjunctive medications.

Methods

US adults (30-83 years) with self-reported PD, currently treated with LD/CD, who experienced OFF episodes were recruited through the Fox Insight study to complete a discrete-choice experiment survey. Respondents selected among experimentally designed profiles for hypothetical adjunctive PD treatments that varied in efficacy (additional ON time), potential adverse effects (troublesome dyskinesia, risk of diarrhea, risk of change in bodily fluid color), and dosing frequency or the option "No additional medicine". Data were analyzed with random-parameters logit models.

Results

Respondents (N=480) would require ≥60 additional minutes of daily ON time to accept either a 40% risk of change in bodily fluid color or 10 additional minutes with troublesome dyskinesia daily. Respondents would require 40 additional minutes of daily ON time to accept a 10% risk of diarrhea and 22 additional minutes of daily ON time to switch from 1 additional pill each day to 1 pill with each LD/CD dose. On average, respondents preferred adjunctive PD medication over no additional medication. Results predicted that 59.1% of respondents would select a hypothetical treatment profile similar to opicapone, followed by no additional medication (27.5%) and a hypothetical treatment profile similar to entacapone (13.4%).

Limitations

The data collected were based on responses to hypothetical choice profiles in the survey questions. The attributes and levels selected for this study were intended to reflect the characteristics of opicapone and entacapone; attributes associated with other adjunctive therapies were not evaluated.

Conclusion

Patients with PD expressed interest in adjunctive treatment to increase ON time and would accept reduced ON time to avoid adverse effects.

Clinical benefit of MAO-B and COMT inhibition in Parkinson's disease: practical considerations

Inhibitors of monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) and catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) are major strategies to reduce levodopa degradation and thus to increase and prolong its effect in striatal dopaminergic neurotransmission in Parkinson's disease patients. While selegiline/rasagiline and tolcapone/entacapone have been available on the market for more than one decade, safinamide and opicapone have been approved in 2015 and 2016, respectively. Meanwhile, comprehensive data from several post-authorization studies have described the use and specific characteristics of the individual substances in clinical practice under real-life conditions. Here, we summarize current knowledge on both medication classes, with a focus on the added clinical value in Parkinson's disease. Furthermore, we outline practical considerations in the treatment of motor fluctuations and provide an outlook on ongoing studies with MAO-B and COMT inhibitors.

Recent updates on structural insights of MAO-B inhibitors: a review on target-based approach

Parkinson's disease is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by slow movement, tremors, and stiffness caused due to loss of dopaminergic neurons caused in the brain's substantia nigra. The concentration of dopamine is decreased in the brain. Parkinson's disease may be happened because of various genetic and environmental factors. Parkinson's disease is related to the irregular expression of the monoamine oxidase (MAO) enzyme, precisely type B, which causes the oxidative deamination of biogenic amines such as dopamine. MAO-B inhibitors, available currently in the market, carry various adverse effects such as dizziness, nausea, vomiting, lightheadedness, fainting, etc. So, there is an urgent need to develop new MAO-B inhibitors with minimum side effects. In this review, we have included recently studied compounds (2018 onwards). Agrawal et al. reported MAO-B inhibitors with IC₅₀ 0.0051 µM and showed good binding affinity. Enriquez et al. reported a compound with IC₅₀ 144 nM and bind with some critical amino acid residue Tyr60, Ile198, and Ile199. This article also describes the structure-activity relationship of the compounds and clinical trial studies of related derivatives. These compounds may be used as lead compounds to develop potent compounds as MAO-B inhibitors.

DESI-MSI-based technique to unravel spatial distribution of COMT inhibitor Tolcapone

Ascertaining compound exposure and its spatial distribution are essential steps in the drug development process. Desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (DESI-MSI) is a label-free imaging technique capable of simultaneously identify and visualize the distribution of a diverse range of biomolecules. In this study, DESI-MSI was employed to investigate spatial distribution of tolcapone in rat liver and brain coronal - frontal and striatal -sections after a single oral administration of 100 mg/Kg of tolcapone, brain-penetrant compound. Tolcapone was evenly distributed in liver tissue sections whereas in the brain it showed differential distribution across brain regions analyzed, being mainly located in the olfactory bulb, basal forebrain region, striatum, and pre-frontal cortex (PFC; cingulate, prelimbic and infralimbic area). Tolcapone concentration in tissues was compared using DESI-MSI and liquid-chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). DESI-MSI technique showed a higher specificity on detecting tolcapone in liver sections while in the brain samples DESI-MSI did not allow a feasible quantification. Indeed, DESI-MSI is a qualitative technique that allows to observe heterogeneity on distribution but more challenging regarding accurate measurements. Overall, tolcapone was successfully localized in liver and brain tissue sections using DESI-MSI, highlighting the added value that this technique could provide in assisting tissue-specific drug distribution studies.

Optimizing levodopa therapy, when and how? Perspectives on the importance of delivery and the potential for an early combination approach

INTRODUCTION

There is currently a resurgence of levodopa as the initial treatment of choice for most patients with Parkinson's disease, albeit at lower doses than previously used. The addition of adjuvant treatments (including MAO-B inhibitors, COMT inhibitors and dopamine agonists) is an established strategy to reduce motor complications that develop with sustained levodopa therapy.

AREAS COVERED

In this narrative review, the authors discuss the evidence underpinning current levodopa optimization strategies, during early disease and once motor complications occur. To support the discussion, the authors performed a broad PubMed search with the terms 'levodopa/L-dopa/L-Dopa, and Parkinson's disease,' restricted to clinical trials. There is now a wealth of evidence that improving levodopa delivery to the brain improves outcomes and we discuss how agents can be combined earlier in the course of disease to leverage the full potential of this strategy.

EXPERT OPINION

Levodopa remains the cornerstone of antiparkinsonian therapy. Several promising advances in formulation have been made and include novel extended-release oral drugs as well as non-oral delivery systems. However, evidence has long suggested that anti-parkinsonian medications may be better used in combination earlier in the disease, and consequently patients will benefit from low doses of several agents rather than ever larger levodopa doses.

Tailoring Motor Fluctuation Treatment: Beyond Levodopa Dose Adjustment

Susan Fox opened this satellite symposium at the 8th European Academy of Neurology (EAN) Congress with an overview of the concept of motor fluctuations (MF) in Parkinson’s disease (PD). She emphasised that levodopa remains the gold standard therapy for PD. However, MFs are one of the critical complications of levodopa therapy that affect many patients with advancing PD and, when diagnosed, represent a challenge in patient management. Alternative options are, therefore, needed to provide continuous dopaminergic stimulation while maximising the levodopa benefit. Despite different options, Angelo Antonini showed that neurologists often prefer to adjust levodopa dose rather than add an adjunctive agent. Market research confirms that, in patients with PD, the levodopa dose is adjusted in around 80% of patients, while only 20% have adjunct therapy as a first-line option. Adjusting the levodopa dose, either by increasing or fractionating the dose, or both, remains a valid, tried-and-tested option, although it has limitations. Joaquim Ferreira presented emerging evidence from a Phase II clinical trial, suggesting a potential benefit of adding opicapone 50 mg compared with 100 mg levodopa to treat patients with PD and end-of-dose fluctuations. This symposium aimed to present the effect of opicapone with relatively low total daily doses of levodopa; an option that may not have been traditionally considered by neurologists who are used to adjusting levodopa as a first-line response.

Adverse event profiles of adjuvant treatment with opicapone in Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Opicapone, a novel third-generation catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in Parkinson's Disease (PD) patients with end-of-dose motor fluctuations. Objective: This study aimed to compare the short-term (<6 months) and long-term (≥6 months) tolerability of opicapone adjuvant treatment in PD patients. Method: Electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane library were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. The end points included any treatment-related adverse events (TEAEs), serious TEAEs (SAEs) and treatment discontinuation. A random-effects model was used to generate overall incidences of TEAE. Results: Three RCTs, three RCT extension studies and three open-label studies involving 2177 PD patients were evaluated. In the short-term studies, there were reports of TEAEs with an incidence of ≥5% in individuals treated with opicapone 50 mg, including dyskinesia (14.1%), elevated blood creatine phosphokinase levels (8.0%) and urinary tract infection (6.0%). Any TEAEs, SAEs and treatment discontinuation all occurred at rates of 62.9%, 4.8% and 9.3%, respectively. TEAEs with opicapone 50 mg that were reported by more than 5% of patients in long-term studies included dyskinesia (16.1%), dry mouth (12.1%), medication effect decreased (12.1%), PD exacerbated (7.8%), blood creatine phosphokinase level raised (7.4%), nausea (6.1%) and insomnia (5.1%). The incidence of any TEAEs, SAEs and treatment discontinuation were, correspondingly, 73.2%, 8.7% and 8.4%. Conclusion: These studies demonstrated that opicapone was generally well-tolerated and had a low risk of adverse events, suggesting that it could be a valuable therapeutic choice for people with PD.

Effect of Opicapone on Levodopa Pharmacokinetics in Patients with Fluctuating Parkinson's Disease

BACKGROUND

Inhibiting catechol-O-methyltransferase extends the plasma half-life of levodopa, potentially allowing physicians to optimize the levodopa regimen in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) experiencing motor fluctuations.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of once-daily opicapone on levodopa plasma pharmacokinetics and motor response when added to two different levodopa dosing regimens.

METHODS

A total of 24 patients with PD and motor fluctuations were enrolled in an exploratory, open-label, modified cross-over trial. Participants first received levodopa/carbidopa 500/125 mg (five intakes) for 2 weeks and were then randomly assigned (1:1) to levodopa/carbidopa 400/100 mg given over either four or five daily intakes plus opicapone 50 mg for an additional 2 weeks. Levodopa 12-hour pharmacokinetics was the primary outcome (ie, excluding the effect of last/evening levodopa/carbidopa intake), with motor complications evaluated as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

Over 12-hour pharmacokinetics and compared with five-intake levodopa/carbidopa 500/125 mg without opicapone, maximal levodopa concentrations were similar or nonsignificantly higher on both levodopa/carbidopa 400/100 mg regimens plus opicapone. Despite a 100 mg lower total levodopa/carbidopa daily dose, adding opicapone 50 mg at least doubled the levodopa plasma half-life and minimal concentrations, with a significant ≈30% increase in total exposure. The levodopa fluctuation index was only significantly lower for the five intakes plus opicapone regimen (difference of -71.8%; P &lt; 0.0001). Modifications to levodopa pharmacokinetics were associated with decreased off time and increased on time.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining opicapone 50 mg with a 100 mg lower daily dose of levodopa provides higher levodopa bioavailability with avoidance of trough levels. Despite the lower levodopa dose, modifying the levodopa pharmacokinetic profile with opicapone was associated with decreased off time and increased on time. © 2022 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Absorption, metabolism and excretion of opicapone in human healthy volunteers

Aims

The absorption, metabolism and excretion of opicapone (2,5‐dichloro‐3‐(5‐[3,4‐dihydroxy‐5‐nitrophenyl]‐1,2,4‐oxadiazol‐3‐yl)‐4,6‐dimethylpyridine 1‐oxide), a selective catechol‐O‐methyltransferase inhibitor, were investigated.

Methods

Plasma, urine and faeces were collected from healthy male subjects following a single oral dose of 100 mg [¹⁴C]‐opicapone. The mass balance of [¹⁴C]‐opicapone and metabolic profile were evaluated.

Results

The recovery of total administered radioactivity averaged >90% after 144 hours. Faeces were the major route of elimination, representing 70% of the administered dose; 5% and 20% were excreted in urine and expired air, respectively. The C_max of total radioactivity matched that of unchanged opicapone, whereas the total radioactivity remained quantifiable for a longer period, attributed to the contribution of opicapone metabolites, involving primarily 3‐O‐sulfate conjugation (58.6% of total circulating radioactivity) at the nitrocatechol ring. Other circulating metabolites, accounting for <10% of the radioactivity exposure, were formed by glucuronidation, methylation, N‐oxide reduction and gluthatione conjugation. Additionally, various other metabolites resulting from combinations with the opicapone N‐oxide reduced form at the 2,5‐dichloro‐4,6‐dimethylpyridine 1‐oxide moiety, including nitro reduction and N‐acetylation, reductive opening and cleavage of the 1,2,4‐oxadiazole ring and the subsequent hydrolysis products were identified, but only in faeces, suggesting the involvement of gut bacteria.

Conclusion

[¹⁴C]‐opicapone was fully excreted through multiple metabolic pathways. The main route of excretion was in faeces, where opicapone may be further metabolized via reductive metabolism involving the 1,2,4‐oxadiazole ring‐opening and subsequent hydrolysis.

Opicapone Improves Global Non-Motor Symptoms Burden in Parkinson's Disease: An Open-Label Prospective Study

Patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) can improve some non-motor symptoms (NMS) after starting treatment with opicapone. The aim of this study was to analyze the effectiveness of opicapone on global NMS burden in PD. OPEN-PD (Opicapone Effectiveness on Non-motor symptoms in Parkinson’s Disease) is a prospective open-label single-arm study conducted in 5 centers from Spain. The primary efficacy outcome was the change from baseline (V0) to the end of the observational period (6 months ± 30 days) (V2) in the Non-Motor Symptoms Scale (NMSS) total score. Different scales were used for analyzing the change in motor, NMS, quality of life (QoL), and disability. Thirty-three patients were included between JUL/2019 and JUN/2021 (age 63.3 ± 7.91; 60.6% males; 7.48 ± 4.22 years from symptoms onset). At 6 months, 30 patients completed the follow-up (90.9%). The NMSS total score was reduced by 27.3% (from 71.67 ± 37.12 at V0 to 52.1 ± 34.76 at V2; Cohen’s effect size = −0.97; p = 0.002). By domains, improvement was observed in sleep/fatigue (−40.1%; p < 0.0001), mood/apathy (−46.6%; p = 0.001), gastrointestinal symptoms (−20.7%; p = 0.029), and miscellaneous (−44.94%; p = 0.021). QoL also improved with a 18.4% reduction in the 39-item Parkinson’s Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire Summary Index (from 26.67 ± 17.61 at V0 to 21.75 ± 14.9 at V2; p = 0.001). A total of 13 adverse events in 11 patients (33.3%) were reported, 1 of which was severe (not related to opicapone). Dyskinesias and nausea were the most frequent (6.1%). Opicapone is well tolerated and improves global NMS burden and QoL in PD patients at 6 months.

COMT Inhibitors in the Management of Parkinson's Disease

Levodopa treatment remains the gold standard for Parkinson's disease, but shortcomings related to the pharmacological profile, notably, oral administration and the consequent occurrence of motor complications, have led to the development of several add-on levodopa treatments or to research to improve the method of delivery. Motor fluctuations, and to a lesser extent non-motor fluctuations, concern half of the patients with Parkinson's disease after 5 years of disease and patients identified them as one of their most bothersome symptoms. Catechol-O-methyl transferase inhibitors (COMT-Is) are one of the recommended first-line levodopa add-on therapies for the amelioration of end-of dose motor fluctuations in patient with advanced Parkinson's disease. Currently, two peripheral COMT-Is are considered as first-line choices - entacapone (ENT), which was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 1999 and the European Committee in 1998; and opicapone (OPC), which was approved by the European Committee in 2016. A second-line COMT-I that requires regular hepatic monitoring, tolcapone (TOL), was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 1998 and the European Committee in 1997. Of note, OPC also received Food and Drug Administration approval in 2021, but it is still only marketed in a few countries, including Germany, UK, Spain, Portugal, Italy, Japan, and USA, while ENT and TOL have a wider market. Our narrative review summarizes the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties, clinical efficacy in terms of motor fluctuations, motor/non-motor symptoms, quality of life, and safety data of these three COMT-Is, as evidenced by randomized clinical trials, as well as by real-life observational studies. Overall, a phase III non-inferiority trial showed a similar effect between ENT and OPC on off-time (-60.8 min/day and -40.3 min/day, vs placebo, respectively), with a possible additional off-time reduction of 39 min/day, obtained when there is a switch from ENT to OPC. Concomitantly, TOL can reduce off-time by an average of 98 min/day. A significant though discrete concomitant reduction on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor section (2-3 points) is obtained with all three drugs vs placebo. Data on quality of life are fewer and more heterogeneous, with positive results obtained especially in open-label studies. Effects on non-motor symptoms were investigated as secondary outcome only in a few studies, frequently by means of non-specific scales and a benefit was observed in open-label studies. Dopaminergic adverse effects were the most frequent, dyskinesia being the most common for the three drugs eventually requiring levodopa dose reductions. No urine discoloration and a very low incidence of diarrhea were found with OPC compared with ENT and TOL. Regular hepatic monitoring is needed only for TOL. A combination of COMT-Is with new formulations of levodopa, including the subcutaneous, intrajejunal, or new extended-release formulation, merits further exploration to improve the management of both mild and severe motor fluctuations.

[Relevance of COMT inhibitors in the treatment of motor fluctuations]

Catechol O‑methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitors have been established in the treatment of Parkinson's disease for more than 20 years. They are considered the medication of choice for treating motor fluctuations. The available COMT inhibitors, entacapone, opicapone and tolcapone, differ pharmacokinetically in terms of their half-lives with implications for the dose frequency, in their indication requirements and in their spectrum of side effects, including diarrhea and yellow discoloration of urine. Many patients with motor fluctuations are currently not treated with COMT inhibitors and are, therefore, unlikely to receive individually optimized drug treatment. This manuscript summarizes the results of a working group including several Parkinson's disease experts, in which the value of COMT inhibitors was critically discussed.