Diabetic ketoacidosis among pregnant and non-pregnant women: a comparison of morbidity and mortality

Trends and Outcomes among Pregnancy and Nonpregnancy-Related Hospitalizations with Diabetic Ketoacidosis

OBJECTIVE

 The study's primary objective was to evaluate adverse outcomes among reproductive-age hospitalizations with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), comparing those that are pregnancy-related versus nonpregnancy-related and evaluating temporal trends.

STUDY DESIGN

 We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study using the National Inpatient Sample to identify hospitalizations with DKA among reproductive-age women (15-49 years) in the United States (2016-2020). DKA in pregnancy hospitalizations was compared with DKA in nonpregnant hospitalizations. Adverse outcomes evaluated included mechanical ventilation, coma, seizures, renal failure, prolonged hospital stay, and in-hospital death. Multivariable Poisson regression models with robust error variance were used to estimate adjusted relative risk (aRR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Annual percent change (APC) was used to calculate the change in DKA rate over time.

RESULTS

 Among 35,210,711 hospitalizations of reproductive-age women, 447,600 (1.2%) were hospitalized with DKA, and among them, 13,390 (3%) hospitalizations were pregnancy-related. The rate of nonpregnancy-related DKA hospitalizations increased over time (APC = 3.8%, 95% CI = 1.5-6.1). After multivariable adjustment, compared with pregnancy-related hospitalizations with DKA, the rates of mechanical ventilation (aRR = 1.56, 95% CI = 1.18-2.06), seizures (aRR = 2.26, 95% CI = 1.72-2.97), renal failure (aRR = 2.26, 95% CI = 2.05-2.50), coma (aRR = 2.53, 95% CI = 1.68-3.83), and in-hospital death (aRR = 2.38, 95% CI = 1.06-5.36) were higher among nonpregnancy-related hospitalizations with DKA.

CONCLUSION

 A nationally representative sample of hospitalizations indicates that over the 5-year period, the rate of nonpregnancy-related DKA hospitalizations increased among reproductive age women, and a higher risk of adverse outcomes was observed when compared with pregnancy-related DKA hospitalizations.

KEY POINTS

· Over 5 years, the rate of pregnancy-related DKA hospitalizations was stable.. · Over 5 years, the rate of nonpregnancy-related DKA hospitalizations increased.. · There is a higher risk of adverse outcomes with DKA outside of pregnancy..

Clinical Presentation and Outcomes of Diabetic Ketoacidosis in Pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

To examine the presentation, management, and outcomes of pregnancies complicated by diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) in a contemporary obstetric population.

METHODS

This is a case series of all admissions for DKA during pregnancy at a single Midwestern academic medical center over a 10-year period. Diabetic ketoacidosis was defined per the following diagnostic criteria: anion gap more than 12 mEq/L, pH less than 7.30 or bicarbonate less than 15 mEq/L, and elevated serum or urine ketones. Demographic information, clinical characteristics, and maternal and neonatal outcomes were assessed. Patient characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared between individuals with type 1 and those with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

RESULTS

Between 2012 and 2021, there were 129 admissions for DKA in 103 pregnancies in 97 individuals. Most individuals (n=75, 77.3%) admitted for DKA during pregnancy had type 1 diabetes. The majority of admissions occurred in the third trimester (median gestational age 29 3/7 weeks). The most common precipitating factors were vomiting or gastrointestinal illness (38.0%), infection (25.6%), and insulin nonadherence (20.9%). Median glucose on admission was 252 mg/dL (interquartile range 181-343 mg/dL), and 21 patients (17.6%) were admitted with euglycemic DKA. Fifteen admissions (11.6%) were to the intensive care unit. Pregnancy loss was diagnosed during admission in six individuals (6.3%, 95% CI, 2.3-13.7%). Among pregnant individuals with at least one admission for DKA, the median gestational age at delivery was 34 6/7 weeks (interquartile range 33 2/7-36 3/7 weeks). Most neonates (85.7%, 95% CI, 76.8-92.2%) were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit and required treatment for hypoglycemia. The cesarean delivery rate was 71.9%. Despite similar hemoglobin A 1C values before pregnancy and at admission, individuals with type 1 diabetes had higher serum glucose (median [interquartile range], 256 mg/dL [181-353 mg/dL] vs 216 mg/dL [136-258 mg/dL], P =.04) and higher serum ketones (3.78 mg/dL [2.13-5.50 mg/dL] vs 2.56 mg/dL [0.81-4.69 mg/dL] mg/dL, P =.03) on admission compared with those with type 2 diabetes. Individuals with type 2 diabetes required intravenous insulin therapy for a longer duration (55 hours [29.5-91.5 hours] vs 27 hours [19-38 hours], P =.004) and were hospitalized longer (5 days [4-9 days] vs 4 days [3-6 days], P =.004).

CONCLUSION

Diabetic ketoacidosis occurred predominantly in pregnancies affected by type 1 diabetes. Individuals with type 1 diabetes presented with greater DKA severity but achieved clinical resolution more rapidly than those with type 2 diabetes. These results may provide a starting point for the development of interventions to decrease maternal and neonatal morbidity related to DKA in the modern obstetric population.

Pregnancy-associated fulminant type 1 diabetes: a case report and review of the literature

Pregnancy-associated fulminant type 1 diabetes (PF) has received high clinical attention because of its low incidence and poor prognosis. It poses a great threat to the lives of mothers and infants; therefore, it is imperative to understand its characteristics and approach methods. However, no studies have described whether a cesarean section or conservative treatment should be considered at the onset of PF. We report a case of PF, review the published literature and consider a cesarean section at the onset of PF. A 39-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital with dyspnea and nausea. The patient was diagnosed with PF. Insulin Lispro and Glargine were administered to control the blood glucose levels. Six hours later, the fetus died. The fetal status due to PF probably worsened during the conservative treatment. No perioperative complications have been reported for cesarean sections under diabetic ketoacidosis due to PF and there have been cases of live birth by emergency cesarean section. Identifying the features of PF and considering and performing cesarean sections early after diagnosis is essential to save fetal life.

Temporal Trends in Pregnancy-Associated Stroke and Its Outcomes Among Women With Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy

Background

Stroke is a serious complication of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), with potentially severe and long‐term sequelae. However, the temporal trends, predictors, and outcomes of stroke in women with HDP at delivery remain unknown.

Methods and Results

All HDP delivery hospitalizations with or without stroke event (ischemic, hemorrhagic, or unspecified) between 2004 and 2014 in the United States National Inpatient Sample were analyzed to examine incidence, predictors, and prognostic impact of stroke. Of 4 240 284 HDP delivery hospitalizations, 3391 (0.08%) women had stroke. While the prevalence of HDP increased over time, incident stroke rates decreased from 10 to 6 per 10 000 HDP delivery hospitalizations between 2004 and 2014. Women with stroke were increasingly multimorbid, with some risk factors being more strongly associated with ischemic strokes, including congenital heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, dyslipidemia, and sickle cell disease. Delivery complications were also associated with stroke, including cesarean section (odds ratio [OR], 1.58; 95% CI, 1.33–1.86), postpartum hemorrhage (OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.33–1.86), and maternal mortality (OR, 99.78; 95% CI, 59.15–168.31), independently of potential confounders. Women with stroke had longer hospital stays (median, 6 versus 3 days), higher hospital charges (median, $14 655 versus $4762), and a higher proportion of nonroutine discharge locations (38% versus 4%).

Conclusions

The incidence of stroke in women with HDP has declined over time. While a relatively rare event, identification of women at highest risk of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke on admission for delivery is important to reduce long‐term sequelae.

Temporal Changes in Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy and Impact on Cardiovascular and Obstetric Outcomes

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are a major cause of maternal morbidity. However, short-term outcomes of HDP subgroups remain unknown. Using National Inpatient Sample database, all delivery hospitalizations between 2004 and 2014 with or without HDP (preeclampsia/eclampsia, chronic hypertension, superimposed preeclampsia on chronic hypertension, and gestational hypertension) were analyzed to examine the association between HDP and adverse in-hospital outcomes. We identified >44 million delivery hospitalizations, within which the prevalence of HDP increased from 8% to 11% over a decade with increasing comorbidity burden. Women with chronic hypertension have higher risks of myocardial infarction, peripartum cardiomyopathy, arrhythmia, and stillbirth compared to women with preeclampsia. Out of all HDP subgroups, the superimposed preeclampsia population had the highest risk of stroke (odds ratio [OR] 7.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.25 to 9.80), myocardial infarction (OR 5.20, 95% CI 3.11 to 8.69), peripartum cardiomyopathy (OR 4.37, 95% CI 3.64 to 5.26), preterm birth (OR 4.65, 95% CI 4.48 to 4.83), placental abruption (OR 2.22, 95% CI 2.09 to 2.36), and stillbirth (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.66 to 1.92) compared to women without HDP. In conclusion, we are the first to evaluate chronic systemic hypertension without superimposed preeclampsia as a distinct subgroup in HDP and show that women with chronic systemic hypertension are at even higher risk of some adverse outcomes compared to women with preeclampsia. In conclusion, the chronic hypertension population, with and without superimposed preeclampsia, is a particularly high-risk group and may benefit from increased antenatal surveillance and the use of a prognostic risk assessment model incorporating HDP to stratify intrapartum care.