Assessment of rationality of available fixed dose combinations of antibiotics in India

Diethylene glycol: Unnoticed threat in the landscape of fixed-dose combination medications

Diethylene glycol (DEG) and ethylene glycol (EG) are organic compounds often found in various consumer products, including antifreeze and industrial solvents used in pharmaceutical preparations, as well as serving as raw materials for polymer manufacturing. Since September 2022, seven consecutive episodes of DEG and EG contamination have been reported across at least nine countries. A notable commonality among the affected products is that at least 14 of them are fixed-dose combinations (FDCs). However, the evidence supporting the efficacy of most of these combinations is insufficient, which renders their prescription, dispensing, and use irrational. Moreover, these products are not without risk, as they can cause adverse reactions. Several factors contribute to the prevalence of these irrational FDCs, including low production costs, consumer popularity, and a tendency to authorise locally manufactured products. As a result, many countries' pharmaceutical markets keep marketing authorisation for irrational FDCs. The persistent reports of DEG or EG contamination - especially those involving irrational fixed-dose combinations - present a crucial opportunity to enhance quality control measures. In addition, it is imperative to reevaluate the marketing authorisations of these products that lack evidence of safety and efficacy, adapting the national medicines lists and clinical guidelines to WHO recommendations. Strengthening regulatory frameworks and implementing stringent manufacturing and quality assurance standards are essential to prevent contamination incidents and ensure the safety of pharmaceutical products.

Prescribing Trends of Fixed-Dose Combination Antibiotics Not Recommended by the WHO (FNRs) for ICU Patients in Six Major Areas of China During a Seven-Year Period

Objective

To evaluate the prescribing trends of fixed-dose combination antibiotics not recommended by the WHO (FNRs) for intensive care unit (ICU) patients in six major areas of China from 2013 to 2019.

Methods

A descriptive analysis was conducted using the pharmacy prescription data. Prescription data for patients admitted to the ICU were extracted from the Hospital Prescription Analysis Cooperative Project. Trends in FNR use were analyzed over a seven-year period, and the trends were further analyzed at the specific drug and hospital levels.

Results

A total of 15,596,620 prescriptions were eligible for analysis, and 1,492,793 patients were included. Among these patients, 91,515 (6.13%) received FNRs. The annual number of ICU patients who received FNR showed an increasing trend (P=0.007), but the percentage per year did not (P=0.764). The FNR use was usually higher in male patients than in female patients (P<0.001). Patients aged > 60 years had the highest percentage of patients who received FNRs (P<0.001). Among the eight FNRs identified in this study, cefoperazone/sulbactam was the most commonly used FNR in both patient numbers and prescribed hospitals, followed by piperacillin/sulbactam. The use of cefotaxime/sulbactam was less common but showed an increasing trend. There were significant differences among the regions.

Conclusion

This study investigated the national landscape of FNR use among ICU patients. Attention should be given to the frequent use of FNRs in these patients. Data on the real-world effectiveness and safety of FNRs are urgently required.

Assessment of knowledge, attitude and practice of fixed-dose combinations amongst attending physicians and residents: a cross-sectional evaluation

Background

Fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) were brought into the market with the intent of providing benefits primarily to patients and physicians. Nevertheless, despite their multiple advantages, they have their own set of drawbacks, especially regarding irrational FDCs. If physicians continue to prescribe them, prohibiting their sale would become all the more challenging. This cross-sectional survey study was planned to comprehend the level of knowledge, attitude and practice of physicians regarding such FDCs at a tertiary care teaching institute of western Uttar Pradesh, India.

Methodology

A pre-validated questionnaire was communicated electronically to all the attending physicians. For data analysis, descriptive statistics were applied and a χ2 test was performed for inter-group comparison.

Results

Amongst the 108 respondents, participation was almost comparable from both medical and surgical branches, with most participants being junior residents (58%). Even with sound knowledge of FDCs, only 46.30% of them were aware of banned FDCs. Similarly, only 6.48% could correctly identify the disadvantages associated with the use of FDCs, and 33.18% could correctly recognize irrational FDCs. This finding was consistently reflected in their attitude and practice and only 15.74% of respondents cross-referenced FDCs with the available literature. Furthermore, despite 88.89% of respondents checking for rationality of FDCs before prescribing them, a compendium of irrational FDCs is routinely prescribed.

Conclusion

To amend these shortcomings in prescribing of irrational FDCs, some recommendations are proposed by the authors herein.

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing (AST) Practices in India: Need for a National AST Forum

Background Accurate interpretation of antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) is one of the most crucial functions of the microbiology laboratory. However, its performance depends on a number of critical factors. We conducted a status survey to understand the existing practices in Indian laboratories that have a potential to influence performance of AST. Method We developed a 22-point online survey questionnaire on information about respondent's specifications, use of AST consumables, existing quality control protocols, and matters of contention in AST practices, and sent it by Google forms to 362 clinical microbiologists (holding MD or DNB certification). Participation was voluntary. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results Among 362, a total of 103 returned the questionnaire. The first 100 responses that were complete (all 22 questions answered) were analyzed. Respondents were from medical colleges (61%), private hospitals (26%), and stand-alone laboratories (13%). Analysis revealed that the Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines were followed by all. Overall, 54% used disc diffusion as the primary method for performing AST. For the internal quality control testing of media and AST, 24% and 16% had adequate testing components and frequency, respectively. For performing AST of colistin, broth microdilution was used by 19%. Also, 86% participated in external quality control programs, and 54% respondents were dissatisfied or unsure about the development of competencies in AST methodology during their postgraduate training. Conclusion This survey reveals that potential gaps exist in the performance parameters and internal quality control of AST. There is an urgent need for harmonization in AST performance and postgraduate training in clinical microbiology in India.

Trends of Fixed-Dose Combination Antibiotic Consumption in Hospitals in China: Analysis of Data from the Center for Antibacterial Surveillance, 2013-2019

Background: Fixed-dose combination (FDC) antibiotics can be clinically inappropriate and are concerning with regards to antimicrobial resistance, with little usage data available in low- and middle-income countries. Methods: Based on retrospective data from the Center for Antibacterial Surveillance, we investigated the consumption of FDC antibiotics in hospital inpatient settings in China from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2019. The metric for assessing antibiotic consumption was the number of daily defined doses per 100 bed days (DDD/100BDs). FDC antibiotics were classified according to their composition and the Access, Watch, Reserve (AWaRe) classification of the World Health Organization. Results: A total of 24 FDC antibiotics were identified, the consumption of which increased sharply from 8.5 DDD/100BDs in 2013 to 10.2 DDD/100BDs in 2019 (p < 0.05) despite the reduction in the total antibiotic consumption in these hospitals. The increase was mainly driven by FDC antibiotics in the Not Recommended group of the AWaRe classification, whose consumption accounted for 63.0% (6.4 DDD/100BDs) of the overall FDC antibiotic consumption in 2019, while the consumption of FDC antibiotics in the Access group only accounted for 13.5% (1.4 DDD/100BDs). Conclusion: FDC antibiotic consumption significantly increased during the study period and accounted for a substantial proportion of all systemic antibiotic usage in hospitals in China. FDC antibiotics in the Not Recommended group were most frequently consumed, which raises concerns about the appropriateness of FDC antibiotic use.

India's ban on antimicrobial fixed-dose combinations: winning the battle, losing the war?

Background and objectives

India, the country with the largest market availability of antimicrobial fixed-dose combinations (FDCs), banned certain antimicrobial FDCs in September 2018. Our objective was to examine the impact of Government ban on the sales of antimicrobial FDCs.

Methods

The sales patterns of 14 of the 26 banned antimicrobial FDCs were analyzed using monthly private sector drug sales data from IQVIA (a comprehensive and nationally representative drug sales database) between January 2018 and December 2019. We carried out descriptive analyses to evaluate the trend in sales over time for banned and non-banned antimicrobial FDCs using cumulative sales volumes.

Results

Overall, the cumulative sales volume of banned antimicrobial FDCs declined by 75% between January and September 2018 and the same months of 2019, although some banned FDCs continued to be available in significant volumes. The effectiveness of the ban was offset by several pathways. First, the sales of combinations containing moieties belonging to the same drug-classes as the antimicrobials in the banned FDCs increased after the ban. Second, while certain formulations of particular combinations were banned, the sales of other non-banned formulation of these combinations increased. Third, in some cases, products containing new non-antimicrobial components added to the banned combinations remained available.

Interpretation and conclusions

While sales of the banned antimicrobial FDCs decreased in 2019, we identified several mechanisms that counterbalanced the ban, including implementation failure, rising sales of congeners, and products with additional non-antimicrobial components.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40545-022-00428-w.