1
|
Foran PL, Benjamin WJ, Sperry ED, Best SR, Boisen SE, Bosworth B, Brodsky MB, Shaye D, Brenner MJ, Pandian V. Tracheostomy-related durable medical equipment: Insurance coverage, gaps, and barriers. Am J Otolaryngol 2024; 45:104179. [PMID: 38118384 PMCID: PMC10939813 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2023.104179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Tracheostomy care is supply- and resource-intensive, and airway-related adverse events in community settings have high rates of readmission and mortality. Devices are often implicated in harm, but little is known about insurance coverage, gaps, and barriers to obtaining tracheostomy-related medically necessary durable medical equipment. We aimed to identify barriers patients may encounter in procuring tracheostomy-related durable medical equipment through insurance plan coverage. MATERIALS AND METHODS Tracheostomy-related durable medical equipment provisions were evaluated across insurers, extracting data via structured telephone interviews and web-based searches. Each insurance company was contacted four times and queried iteratively regarding the range of coverage and co-pay policies. Outcome measures include call duration, consistency of explanation of benefits, and the number of transfers and disconnects. We also identified six qualitative themes from patient interviews. RESULTS Tracheostomy-related durable medical equipment coverage was offered in some form by 98.1 % (53/54) of plans across 11 insurers studied. Co-pays or deductibles were required in 42.6 % (23/54). There was significant variability in out-of-pocket expenditures. Fixed co-pays ranged from $0-30, and floating co-pays ranged from 0 to 40 %. During phone interviews, mean call duration was 19 ± 10 min, with an average of 2 ± 1 transfers between agents. Repeated calls revealed high information variability (mean score 2.4 ± 1.5). Insurance sites proved challenging to navigate, scoring poorly on usability, literacy, and information quality. CONCLUSIONS Several factors may limit access to potentially life-saving durable medical equipment for patients with tracheostomy. Barriers include out-of-pocket expenditures, lack of transparency on coverage, and low-quality information. Further research is necessary to evaluate patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Palmer L Foran
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | | | | | - Simon R Best
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Sarah E Boisen
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA, United States
| | | | - Martin B Brodsky
- Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery (OACIS) Research Group, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States; Department of Physical and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - David Shaye
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School Massachusetts Eye and Ear, United States
| | - Michael J Brenner
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States; Global Tracheostomy Collaborative, Raleigh, NC, United States; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Vinciya Pandian
- Center for Immersive Learning and Digital Innovation Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, United States; Global Tracheostomy Collaborative, Raleigh, NC, United States; Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery (OACIS) Research Group, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Freudenreich O, Kontos N. "Professionalism, Physicianhood, and Psychiatric Practice": Conceptualizing and Implementing a Senior Psychiatry Resident Seminar in Reflective and Inspired Doctoring. PSYCHOSOMATICS 2019; 60:246-254. [PMID: 30626491 DOI: 10.1016/j.psym.2018.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2018] [Revised: 12/14/2018] [Accepted: 12/17/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Professionalism, although broadly acknowledged to be an important goal of medical education, needs to be taught well. OBJECTIVE We describe the content selection and structure of an elective professionalism seminar for advanced trainees in psychiatry at the Massachusetts General Hospital. METHOD We critically evaluate the curriculum content based on participant feedback. RESULTS We successfully implemented and sustained for 8 years a monthly, 10-session professionalism seminar for advanced trainees in psychiatry. The average number of participants was 4-8 residents or fellows out of a possible 12-16. The curriculum covers 3 broad domains: physicianhood, bioethics, and medical/psychiatric practice. Participants felt that they were more reflective of their practice and that were given a vocabulary to do so. Physician burnout emerged as a key professional concern. CONCLUSION Professionalism can be taught in a seminar but requires reaching to other disciplines (history of medicine, philosophy, and sociology) to make it meaningful and utile. Consultation-liaison psychiatrists through their interdisciplinary and team-based work are ideally situated to teach professionalism that emphasizes commonalities of psychiatry with the other medical specialties and fosters leadership.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Freudenreich
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| | - Nicholas Kontos
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|