Manifestations of Insomnia in Sleep Apnea: Implications for Screening and Treatment

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on obstructive sleep apnea: recommendations for symptom management

STUDY OBJECTIVES

In the context of the current COVID-19 pandemic situation, we address the following important questions: (1) How can patients be identified for possible OSA while sleep clinic testing is temporarily unavailable or limited? and (2) What measures can be suggested to improve sleep health until proper diagnosis and treatment become safe and available again?

METHODS

As a proxy for home or in-laboratory testing, validation of a symptom-based measure of OSA risk is presented, based on an ongoing larger prospective study of 156 family medicine patients with OSA (88 women, 68 men; mean age, 57 years) and 60 control participants (36 women, 24 men; mean age, 54 years) recruited from the community. Participants completed the Sleep Symptom Checklist (SSC) and a range of other self-report measures; primary care patients also underwent a polysomnographic sleep study.

RESULTS

Results showed that (1) individuals with OSA reported more symptoms on the SSC related to insomnia, daytime symptoms, sleep disorders, and psychological maladjustment than did the control group (all P < .001), and (2) their sleep-related symptoms were significantly more severe than those of the control patients. In addition, several polysomnographic indices in recently diagnosed untreated individuals with OSA were significantly correlated with SSC measured sleep disorder symptoms, and SSC scores significantly distinguished participants with OSA from control participants.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that family practitioners can effectively prescreen patients for possible OSA by inquiring about 5 items that form the SSC sleep disorders subscale. If OSA is suspected, then we can recommend a range of behavioral techniques to improve symptoms. The current pandemic causes us to reflect that the provisional targeting of symptoms and guidance regarding mitigation strategies while waiting for specialist care could serve patients well at any time.

Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial on the Efficacy of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and Adaptive Servo-Ventilation in the Treatment of Chronic Complex Insomnia

BACKGROUND

Complex insomnia, the comorbidity of chronic insomnia and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), is a common sleep disorder, but the OSA component, whether presenting overtly or covertly, often goes unsuspected and undiagnosed due to a low index of suspicion. Among complex insomniacs, preliminary evidence demonstrates standard CPAP decreases insomnia severity. However, CPAP causes expiratory pressure intolerance or iatrogenic central apneas that may diminish its use. An advanced PAP mode-adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV)-may alleviate CPAP side-effects and yield superior outcomes.

METHODS

In a single-site protocol investigating covert complex insomnia (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02365064), a low index of suspicion for this comorbidity was confirmed by exclusion of 455 of 660 eligible patients who presented during the study period with overt OSA signs and symptoms. Ultimately, stringent inclusion/exclusion criteria to test efficacy yielded 40 adult, covert complex insomnia patients [average Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) moderate-severe 19.30 (95% CI 18.42-20.17)] who reported no definitive OSA symptoms or risks and who failed behavioral or drug therapy for an average of one decade. All 40 were diagnosed with OSA and randomized (using block randomization) to a single-blind, prospective protocol, comparing CPAP (n = 21) and ASV (n = 19). Three successive PAP titrations fine-tuned pressure settings, facilitated greater PAP use, and collected objective sleep and breathing data. Patients received 14 weeks of treatment including intensive biweekly coaching and follow-up to foster regular PAP use in order to accurately measure efficaciousness. Primary outcomes measured insomnia severity and sleep quality. Secondary outcomes measured daytime impact: OSA-induced impairment, fatigue severity, insomnia impairment, and quality of life. Performance on these seven variables was assessed using repeated measures ANCOVA to account for the multiple biweekly time points.

FINDINGS

At intake, OSA diagnosis and OSA as a cause for insomnia were denied by all 40 patients, yet PAP significantly decreased insomnia severity scores (p = 0.021 in the primary ANCOVA analysis). To quantify effect sizes, mean intake vs endpoint analysis was conducted with ASV yielding nearly twice the effects of CPAP [- 13.2 (10.7-15.7), Hedges' g = 2.50 vs - 9.3 (6.3-12.3), g = 1.39], and between mode effect size was in the medium-large range 0.65. Clinically, ASV led to remission (ISI < 8) in 68% of cases compared to 24% on CPAP [Fisher's exact p = 0.010]. Two sleep quality measures in the ANCOVA analysis again demonstrated superior significant effects for ASV compared to CPAP (both p < 0.03), and pre- and post-analysis demonstrated substantial effects for both scales [ASV (g = 1.42; g = 1.81) over CPAP (g = 1.04; g = 0.75)] with medium size effects between modes (0.54, 0.51). Measures of impairment, residual objective sleep breathing events, and normalized breathing periods consistently demonstrated larger beneficial effects for ASV over CPAP.

INTERPRETATION

PAP therapy was highly efficacious in decreasing insomnia severity in chronic insomnia patients with previously undiagnosed co-morbid OSA. ASV proved superior to CPAP in this first efficacy trial to compare advanced to traditional PAP modes in complex insomnia. Future research must determine the following: pathophysiological mechanisms to explain how OSA causes chronic insomnia; general population prevalence of this comorbidity; and, cost-effectiveness of ASV therapy in complex insomnia. Last, efforts to raise awareness of complex insomnia are urgently needed as patients and providers appear to disregard both overt and covert signs and symptoms of OSA in the assessment of chronic insomnia.

Sleep disturbance as a predictor of time to drug and alcohol use treatment in primary care

BACKGROUND

Sleep Disturbances (SDs) are a symptom common to mental health disorders (MHD) and substance use disorders (SUD). We aimed to identify the value of SD as a predictor for subsequent treatment of illicit drug and alcohol use disorders (SUDs) in primary care and relative to the predictive value of mental health disorders (MHDs).

METHODS

We used electronic health records data from ambulatory primary care in a safety net Boston area healthcare system from 2013 to 2015 (n = 83,920). SUD (separated into illicit drug use disorder and alcohol use disorder) and MHD were identified through ICD-9 codes and medical record documentation. We estimated Cox proportional hazard models to examine the risk of SUD across four comparison groups (SD only, SD and MHD, MHD only, and neither SD nor MHD).

RESULTS

Compared to patients with no sleep or MHD, patients with SD had a greater risk for subsequent SUD treatment. Approximately one-fifth of patients with SD were treated for an illicit drug use disorder and approximately 12% were treated for alcohol use disorder. Risk for SUD treatment, estimated at over 30% by the end of the study, was greatest for patients with a MHD, either alone or comorbid with SD. Risk was greater for older patients and men, and lower for minority patients.

CONCLUSIONS

SD and MHD, individually and comorbid, significantly predict subsequent treatment of illicit drug and alcohol use disorder in primary care. Screening and evaluation for SD should be a routine practice in primary care to help with identifying potential SUD risk.

The challenge of identifying family medicine patients with obstructive sleep apnea: addressing the question of gender inequality

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to examine the sleep characteristics, metabolic syndrome disease and likelihood of obstructive sleep apnea in a sample of older, family medicine patients previously unsuspected for sleep apnea.

METHODS

A total of 295 participants, minimum age 45, 58.7% women, were recruited from two family medicine clinics. None previously had been referred for sleep apnea testing. All participants completed a sleep symptom questionnaire and were offered an overnight polysomnography study, regardless of questionnaire results. 171 followed through with the sleep laboratory component of the study. Health data regarding metabolic syndrome disease (hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes and obesity) were gathered by chart review.

RESULTS

Overall, more women than men enrolled in the study and pursued laboratory testing. Of those who underwent polysomnography testing, 75% of the women and 85% of the men were diagnosed with sleep apnea based on an apnea/hypopnea index of 10 or greater. Women and men had similar polysomnography indices, the majority being in the moderate to severe ranges. In those with OSA diagnosis, gender differences in sleep symptom severity were not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that greater gender equality in sleep apnea rates can be achieved in family practice if sleep apnea assessments are widely offered to older patients.

CPAP Treatment Adherence in Women with Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Untreated obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) has numerous negative health-related consequences. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is generally considered the treatment of choice for OSA, but rates of nonadherence are high. It is believed that OSA is more prevalent among men; therefore understanding how OSA presents among women is limited and treatment adherence has received little research attention. For this study, 29 women were recruited from primary care offices. They completed a questionnaire battery and underwent a night of nocturnal polysomnography (PSG) followed by a visit with a sleep specialist. Women diagnosed with OSA were prescribed CPAP; 2 years later CPAP adherence was evaluated. Results show that approximately half the sample was adherent. There were no significant differences between adherent and nonadherent women on OSA severity; however CPAP adherent women had worse nocturnal and daytime functioning scores at the time of diagnosis. Moreover, when the seven nocturnal and daytime variables were used as predictors in a discriminant analysis, they could predict 87% of adherent and 93% of the nonadherent women. The single most important predictor was nonrefreshing sleep. We discuss the implications of the findings for identifying women in primary care with potential OSA and offer suggestions for enhancing treatment adherence.