HSPA8 regulates anti-bacterial autophagy through liquid-liquid phase separation

Phase separation in DNA double-strand break response

DNA double-strand break (DSB) is the most dangerous type of DNA damage, which may lead to cell death or oncogenic mutations. Homologous recombination (HR) and nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) are two typical DSB repair mechanisms. Recently, many studies have revealed that liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) plays a pivotal role in DSB repair and response. Through LLPS, the crucial biomolecules are quickly recruited to damaged sites with a high concentration to ensure DNA repair is conducted quickly and efficiently, which facilitates DSB repair factors activating downstream proteins or transmitting signals. In addition, the dysregulation of the DSB repair factor's phase separation has been reported to promote the development of a variety of diseases. This review not only provides a comprehensive overview of the emerging roles of LLPS in the repair of DSB but also sheds light on the regulatory patterns of phase separation in relation to the DNA damage response (DDR).

The liquid-liquid phase separation in programmed cell death

In recent years, the physical phenomenon of liquid-liquid phase separation has been widely introduced into biological research. Membrane-free organelles have been found to exist in cells that were driven by liquid-liquid phase separation. Intermolecular multivalent interactions can drive liquid-liquid phase separation to form condensates that are independent of other substances in the environment and thus can play an effective role in regulating multiple biological processes in the cell. The way of cell death has also long been a focus in multiple research. In the face of various stresses, cell death-related mechanisms are crucial for maintaining cellular homeostasis and regulating cell fate. With the in-depth study of cell death pathways, it has been found that the process of cell death was also accompanied by the regulation of liquid-liquid phase separation and played a key role. Therefore, this review summarized the roles of liquid-liquid phase separation in various cell death pathways, and explored the regulation of cell fate by liquid-liquid phase separation, with the expectation that the exploration of the mechanism of liquid-liquid phase separation would provide new insights into the treatment of diseases caused by regulated cell death.

SP1 undergoes phase separation and activates RGS20 expression through super-enhancers to promote lung adenocarcinoma progression

Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, but the underlying molecular mechanisms remain largely unclear. The transcription factor (TF) specificity protein 1 (SP1) plays a crucial role in the development of various cancers, including LUAD. Recent studies have indicated that master TFs may form phase-separated macromolecular condensates to promote super-enhancer (SE) assembly and oncogene expression. In this study, we demonstrated that SP1 undergoes phase separation and that its zinc finger 3 in the DNA-binding domain is essential for this process. Through Cleavage Under Targets & Release Using Nuclease (CUT&RUN) using antibodies against SP1 and H3K27ac, we found a significant correlation between SP1 enrichment and SE elements, identified the regulator of the G protein signaling 20 (RGS20) gene as the most likely target regulated by SP1 through SE mechanisms, and verified this finding using different approaches. The oncogenic activity of SP1 relies on its phase separation ability and RGS20 gene activation, which can be abolished by glycogen synthase kinase J4 (GSK-J4), a demethylase inhibitor. Together, our findings provide evidence that SP1 regulates its target oncogene expression through phase separation and SE mechanisms, thereby promoting LUAD cell progression. This study also revealed an innovative target for LUAD therapies through intervening in SP1-mediated SE formation.

Identification and validation of cuproptosis and disulfidptosis related genes in colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer, the third most prevalent malignant cancer, is associated with poor prognosis. Recent studies have investigated the mechanisms underlying cuproptosis and disulfidptosis in colorectal cancer. However, whether genes linked to these processes impact the prognosis of colorectal cancer patients through analogous mechanisms remains unclear. In this study, we developed a model of cuproptosis and disulfidptosis in colorectal cancer and concurrently explored the role of the pivotal model gene HSPA8 in colorectal cancer cell lines. Our results revealed a positive correlation between cuproptosis and disulfidptosis, both of which are emerging as protective factors for the prognosis of CRC patients. Consequently, a prognostic model encompassing HSPA8, PDCL3, CBX3, ATP6V1G1, TAF1D, RPL4, and RPL14 was constructed. Notably, the key gene in our model, HSPA8, exhibited heightened expression and was validated as a protective prognostic factor in colorectal cancer, exerting inhibitory effects on colorectal cancer cell proliferation. This study offers novel insights into the interplay between cuproptosis and disulfidptosis. The application of the prognostic model holds promise for more effectively predicting the overall survival of colorectal cancer patients.

Liquid-liquid phase separation in innate immunity

Intrinsic and innate immune responses are essential lines of defense in the body's constant surveillance of pathogens. The discovery of liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) as a key regulator of this primal response to infection brings an updated perspective to our understanding of cellular defense mechanisms. Here, we review the emerging multifaceted role of LLPS in diverse aspects of mammalian innate immunity, including DNA and RNA sensing and inflammasome activity. We discuss the intricate regulation of LLPS by post-translational modifications (PTMs), and the subversive tactics used by viruses to antagonize LLPS. This Review, therefore, underscores the significance of LLPS as a regulatory node that offers rapid and plastic control over host immune signaling, representing a promising target for future therapeutic strategies.

miR-124-3p regulates the involvement of Ptpn1 in testicular development and spermatogenesis in mouse

Testicular development and spermatogenesis in mouse are a complex process in which phosphorylation modifications and regulation of genes by non-coding RNAs play an important role. However, protein tyrosine phosphatase, non-receptor type 1 (Ptpn1) is widely expressed in mammalian tissues. In this study, we analyzed the expression of Ptpn1 mRNA and its encoded proteins in testicular tissues of juvenile and adult mice by using experimental techniques such as biological information, real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR), western blot (WB), immunofluorescence (IF) and transfection, and further analyzed the possible target-regulatory relationship and regulatory mechanisms of miR-124-3p and Ptpn1. We found that Ptpn1 mRNA and its encoded protein were up-regulated in adult mouse testis compared to juvenile mouse testis. The expression trend of miR-124-3p was opposite to that of Ptpn1. In other cell types, Ptpn1 protein is localized in cell membrane, cytoplasm, endoplasmic reticulum and cytoplasmic vesicles. Immunofluorescence showed that Ptpn1 protein was mainly localized in the cytoplasm of male germ cells and was expressed at a high level in early-stage cells (spermatogonia) and at a low level in late-stage cells (sperm). Transfection results showed that the expression levels of Ptpn1 mRNA and its protein were significantly down-regulated after miR-124-3p overexpression in mouse spermatogonia. Bioinformatics analysis showed that Ptpn1 can involved in biological processes such as protein kinase inactivation through peptidyl tyrosine dephosphorylation. The reduction of miR-124-3p may be a key factor in promoting the high expression of Ptpn1 in testicular tissues of adult mice. Increased miR-124-3p may be a key factor in suppressing Ptpn1 expression in the mouse spermatogonia mimics group. The differential expression results from the negative regulation of miR-124-3p.