Cost-effectiveness of botulinum toxin type a in the treatment of post-stroke spasticity

Stretching exercises in managing spasticity: effectiveness, risks, and adjunct therapies

Spasticity is a component of upper motor neuron disorders and can be seen in neurological conditions like stroke and multiple sclerosis. Although the incidence rate of spasticity is unknown, it can put pressure on the health condition of those with spasticity, and there is no absolute effective way to control it. In the past, stretching exercises were an accessible tool for physical therapists to manage and control spasticity, but opinions on the optimal dose, aftereffects, and mechanism of effects were controversial. Therefore, this article tries to provide an overview of the effectiveness and risks of stretching exercises. Furthermore, there are several adjunct therapies, such as brain stimulation and botulinum injection, that can increase the effectiveness of a simple stretch by increasing cortical excitability and reducing muscle tone and their role is evaluated in this regard. The results of this study propose that several prospective and case studies have demonstrated the benefits of stretching to control spasticity, but it seems that other methods such as casting can be more effective than a simple stretch. Therefore, it is better to use stretching in combination with other therapeutic regimes to increase its effectivity of it.

Cost-effectiveness of abobotulinumtoxinA plus best supportive care compared with best supportive care alone for early treatment of adult lower limb spasticity following an acute event

OBJECTIVES

Spasticity is an incurable chronic condition, and patients with spasticity frequently experience symptoms such as muscle stiffness, restricted mobility, fatigue, spasms, and pain. The study objective was to assess the cost-effectiveness of abobotulinumtoxinA plus best supportive care compared with best supportive care alone for the early treatment of adult lower limb spasticity following an acute event (e.g. stroke or traumatic brain injury), from an Australian payer perspective.

METHODS

Using clinical data from published pivotal trials, an economic model based on a Markov model was developed to capture changes in treatment costs, healthcare resource use costs, functional outcomes, and health-related quality of life over a lifetime horizon. Scenario analyses and a probabilistic sensitivity analysis were conducted to explore the uncertainty in the model parameters and assumptions used in the base case.

RESULTS

AbobotulinumtoxinA plus best supportive care was cost-effective versus best supportive care, yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $35,721 per quality-adjusted life year gained. Sensitivity analyses confirm the robustness of the base case, with most results remaining below the commonly acceptable cost-effectiveness willingness-to-pay threshold of $75,000 per quality-adjusted life year for cost-effectiveness in Australia. Inputs and assumptions that produced the top four highest incremental cost-effectiveness ratios include the application of different health resource utilisation source, short time horizon, unweighted regression analyses to determine regression probabilities, and no stopping rule. AbobotulinumtoxinA plus best supportive care has a 74% probability of being cost-effective compared with best supportive care alone at the willingness to pay threshold.

CONCLUSION

AbobotulinumtoxinA plus best supportive care treatment is cost-effective in Australia for the management of adult lower limb spasticity in patients treated within 2 years of an acute event.

Healthcare resource utilization and costs among patients with post-stroke spasticity before and after spasticity management including onabotulinumtoxina

BACKGROUND

Real-world data regarding the impact of onabotulinumtoxinA on healthcare resource utilization and costs for post-stroke spasticity are scarce.

OBJECTIVE

To compare differences in 12-month healthcare resource utilization and costs before and after post-stroke spasticity management including onabotulinumtoxinA.

METHODS

This retrospective claims analysis of IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases included adults with ≥ 1 onabotulinumtoxinA claim for post-stroke spasticity (1 January 2010 to 30 June 2018) and continuous enrolment for ≥ 12 months pre- and post-index (first onabotulinumtoxinA claim date). All-cause and spasticity-related healthcare resource utilization and costs were compared 12 months pre- and post-index (McNemar's χ2 test or paired t-test). A subgroup analysis assessed effect of stroke-to-index interval on costs.

RESULTS

Among 735 patients, mean (standard deviation) stroke-date-to-index-date interval was 284.5 (198.8) days. Decreases were observed post-index for mean all-cause outpatient (62.9 vs 60.5; p ≤ 0.05) and emergency department visits (1.1 vs 0.8; p ≤ 0.0001), and hospital admissions (1.5 vs 0.4; p ≤ 0.0001). Increase in prescription fills (43.0 vs 53.7) was seen post-index. Post-index decreases in all-cause (-66%) and spasticity-related (-51%) costs were driven by reduced inpatient care costs. Findings were consistent regardless of stroke-date-to-index-date interval.

CONCLUSION

Significant reductions in healthcare resource utilization and costs were observed after 1 year of post-stroke spasticity management including onabotulinumtoxinA. Long-term studies are needed to establish causality.

Systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis of the treatment of post-stroke spasticity with abobotulinumtoxinA compared to physiotherapy

OBJECTIVE

Post-stroke spasticity (PSS) is a common complication in stroke survivors, causing severe burden to patients living with it. The aim of this review was to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of the treatment of post-stroke spasticity, in adults, with abobotulinumtoxinA compared to the best supportive care, based on results from a systematic literature review. Given that abobotulinumtoxinA (aboBoNT-A) is always accompanied by the best supportive care treatment, the CEA compared aboBoNT-A plus the best supportive care with the best supportive care alone.

METHODS

A systematic literature review in EMBASE (including Medline and PubMed), Scopus, and other sources (Google Scholar) was conducted. Articles of all types, providing information on the costs and/or effectiveness measures for the current treatments of PSS in adults were included. The synthesis of information from the review provided the parameters for the design of a cost-effectiveness analysis of the mentioned treatment of interest. The societal perspective was compared to a perspective where only direct costs were observed.

RESULTS

In total, 532 abstracts were screened. Full information was revised from 40 papers and 13 of these were selected as core papers for full data extraction. Data from the core publications formed the basis for the development of a cost-effectiveness model. In all the included papers physiotherapy was the best supportive care treatment (SoC). The cost-effectiveness analysis showed that even in the most conservative scenario, assuming the worst case scenario, the probability of a cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained below €40,000, for aboBoNT-A together with physiotherapy is above 0.8, and with certainty below €50,000/QALY when either a direct costs, or a societal perspective was taken. On average, the probabilistic model obtains a negative mean incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of around -15,000 €/QALY.

CONCLUSION

The cost-effectiveness analyses show that aboBoNT-A together with physiotherapy would be a cost-effective treatment compared with physiotherapy alone, independently of the perspective considered.

Systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis of the treatment of post-stroke spasticity with abobotulinumtoxinA compared to physiotherapy

OBJECTIVE

Post-stroke spasticity is a common complication in stroke survivors, causing severe burden to patients living with it. The aim of this review was to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of the treatment of post-stroke spasticity, in adults, with abobotulinumtoxinA compared to the best supportive care, based on results from a systematic literature review. Given that abobotulinumtoxinA (aboBoNT-A) is always accompanied by the best supportive care treatment, the CEA compared aboBoNT-A plus the best supportive care with the best supportive care alone.

METHODS

A systematic literature review in EMBASE (including Medline and PubMed), Scopus, and other sources (Google Scholar) was conducted. Articles of all types, providing information on the costs and/or effectiveness measures for the current treatments of post-stroke spasticity in adults were included. The synthesis of information from the review provided the parameters for the design of a CEA of the mentioned treatment of interest. The societal perspective was compared to a perspective where only direct costs were observed.

RESULTS

In total, 532 abstracts were screened. Full information was revised from 40 papers and 13 of these were selected as core papers for full data extraction. Data from the core publications formed the basis for the development of a cost-effectiveness model. In all the included papers physiotherapy was the best supportive care treatment. The cost-effectiveness analysis showed that even in the most conservative scenario, assuming the worst case scenario, the probability of a cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained below €40,000, for aboBoNT-A together with physiotherapy is above 0.8, and with certainty below €50,000/QALY when either a direct costs, or a societal perspective was taken. On average, the probabilistic model obtains a negative mean incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of around -15,000 €/QALY.

CONCLUSION

The cost-effectiveness analyses show that aboBoNT-A together with physiotherapy would be a cost-effective treatment compared with physiotherapy alone, independently of the perspective considered.

Descriptive analysis of the annual cost of treating spasticity with different types of botulinum toxin A

INTRODUCTION

Botulinum toxin A is the first-line treatment for localised spasticity. However, the economic impact of this treatment is not fully known. This study aimed to describe the real costs of botulinum toxin A for the treatment of adult patients with spasticity at a spasticity clinic pertaining to a rehabilitation service, over a period of one year.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all medical procedures carried out during the year 2017. We collected data on the type of toxin used (incobotulinumtoxin A, onabotulinumtoxin A, or AAbobotulinumtoxin A), the number of units injected, the anatomical region, and the time elapsed between infiltrations. The costs of medication and indirect costs, such as staff and consumables, were also calculated.

RESULTS

This is the first study to describe the real costs of botulinum toxin treatment of spasticity in adult patients in Spain. In 2017, 510 infiltration procedures were performed in 164 patients. The total cost of treating spasticity in our service was €116 789.70. The mean annual cost per patient was €603.64 for onabotulinumtoxin A, €642.69 for abobotulinumtoxin A, and €707.59 for incobotulinumtoxin A.

CONCLUSIONS

Our economic study of real clinical practice is consistent with the theoretical models published in the literature. The different characteristics of each toxin and the inability to establish an equivalence between the units of each drug prevents us from directly comparing these costs.

The cost-effectiveness of abobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport) and onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox) for managing spasticity of the upper and lower limbs, and cervical dystonia

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the costs and benefits associated with the use of abobotulinumtoxinA (aboBoNT-A) and onabotulinumtoxinA (onaBoNT-A) for lower limb spasticity in children, upper and lower limb spasticity in adults, and cervical dystonia in adults.

METHODS

This pharmacoeconomic analysis compared aboBoNT-A with onaBoNT-A. A decision tree model with a 1-year time horizon was conducted from a UK National Health Service (NHS) perspective using data from a variety of sources: randomized controlled trials (RCTs), network meta-analyses (NMAs), observational studies, and a physician survey investigating treatment patterns and resource utilization. Four patient populations were included: pediatric patients with lower limb spasticity (PLL), and adults with upper limb spasticity (AUL), lower limb spasticity (ALL), and cervical dystonia (CD). Outcomes included costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained, cost per responder, and incremental cost per QALY gained. The effectiveness of each treatment was evaluated as a response to treatment. The base case assumption was that all patients in the model continued to receive botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) treatments at regular intervals regardless of treatment response status. Scenario analysis evaluated the impact of discontinuing BoNT-A for patients without a response to the first injection.

RESULTS

The model found that aboBoNT-A resulted in greater quality-of-life and lower costs compared with onaBoNT-A for the management of spasticity and CD in all included indications. Across populations, cost savings ranged from £304 to £3,963 and QALYs gained ranged from 0.010 to 0.02 over a 1-year time horizon. Results were robust to scenario analyses and were driven by the impact of treatment response on health-related quality-of-life.

CONCLUSIONS

AboBoNT-A was associated with higher treatment response, improved quality-of-life, and reduced costs in spasticity and CD versus onaBoNT-A. These findings could help deliver more effective and efficient healthcare in the NHS.

Descriptive analysis of the annual cost of treating spasticity with different types of botulinum toxin A

INTRODUCTION

Botulinum toxin A is the first-line treatment for localised spasticity. However, the economic impact of this treatment is not fully known. This study aimed to describe the real costs of botulinum toxin A for the treatment of adult patients with spasticity at a spasticity clinic pertaining to a rehabilitation service, over a period of one year.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all medical procedures carried out during the year 2017. We collected data on the type of toxin used (incobotulinumtoxin A, onabotulinumtoxin A, or Abobotulinumtoxin A), the number of units injected, the anatomical region, and the time elapsed between infiltrations. The costs of medication and indirect costs, such as staff and consumables, were also calculated.

RESULTS

This is the first study to describe the real costs of botulinum toxin treatment of spasticity in adult patients in Spain. In 2017, 510 infiltration procedures were performed in 164 patients. The total cost of treating spasticity in our service was €116 789.70. The mean annual cost per patient was €603.64 for onabotulinumtoxin A, €642.69 for abobotulinumtoxin A, and €707.59 for incobotulinumtoxin A.

CONCLUSIONS

Our economic study of real clinical practice is consistent with the theoretical models published in the literature. The different characteristics of each toxin and the inability to establish an equivalence between the units of each drug prevents us from directly comparing these costs.

Comparative efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of abobotulinumtoxinA and onabotulinumtoxinA in children with upper limb spasticity: a systematic literature review, indirect treatment comparison, and economic evaluation

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare clinical- and cost-effectiveness of type A botulinum toxin (BoNT-A) therapies for management of pediatric upper limb spasticity, including AbobotulinumtoxinA (aboBoNT-A) and Onabotulinumtoxin A (onaBoNT-A).

METHODS

Systematic literature review and indirect treatment comparisons were conducted of randomized controlled trials reporting efficacy and safety outcomes. Efficacy was characterized by Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) and Ashworth Scale (AS) up to 16-weeks post-injection. Results were used to inform a cost-effectiveness model with a 1-year time horizon, linking response rates with health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) outcomes and costs from a UK perspective. Other data sources included in the cost-effectiveness model were drug unit costs, health care resource utilization based on UK physician survey, and HRQoL impacts of adverse events associated with oral anti-spasticity therapies. Results were characterized as cost per quality-adjusted life year and cost per responder.

RESULTS

Six studies were included in evidence syntheses. There was a trend towards greater response rate for aboBoNT-A which resulted in improved HRQoL and lower annual costs compared with onaBoNT-A. Safety outcomes were similar across BoNT-A therapies. In cost-effectiveness analysis, aboBoNT-A was an economically dominant therapy with respect to cost per quality-adjusted life year. The cost per responder at 1 year was estimated to be £39,056 for aboBoNT-A vs. £54,831 for onaBoNT-A.

LIMITATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS

Based on observed safety and efficacy data, aboBoNT-A is estimated to result in higher treatment response and consequently increased quality-of-life and reduced costs, vs. onaBoNT-A in children with upper limb spasticity. Limitations to the study include study heterogeneity limited details available for onaBoNT-A studies (e.g. use of physical therapy), and limited availability of responder data. Where assumptions were required, they were made to be conservative towards aboBoN-A.

Youssef A, Dayoub L, Chen H. Comparison of the effects of modified constraint-induced movement therapy and intensive conventional therapy with a botulinum-a toxin injection on upper limb motor function recovery in patients with stroke

Stroke is the second leading cause of mortality worldwide and one of the main causes of adult disability. Many studies have suggested that combination therapies provide better outcomes in patients with stroke than monotherapies. The combination of botulinum-A toxin (BTX) injection with rehabilitation methods, such as modified constraint-induced movement therapy (BTX-mCIMT), has emerged as a highly promising intervention for promoting motor recovery after stroke. Thus, the present study compared the effectiveness of the combination of BTX with high-dose conventional therapy (BTX-ICT) and BTX-mCIMT for improving motor recovery and reducing spasticity of the upper limb in patients with stroke. This study recruited 64 patients with stroke. The patients were randomly allocated to two groups, namely, BTX-ICT and BTX-mCIMT. Modified Ashworth scale (MAS), Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA), and Barthel index (BI) assessment scores were determined for the patients in both the groups before and at 4 weeks after the BTX injection. After four weeks of treatment, the MAS, FMA, and BI assessment scores of the patients in both groups were significantly higher than the scores before the treatments (P < 0.05). At the end of 4 weeks, the patients in the BTX-mCIMT group showed significantly higher mean FMA and BI assessment scores than the patients in the BTX-ICT group (P < 0.05). However, no significant statistical difference was observed in the MAS score of the patients in the two groups (P > 0.05). Our results indicated that while both BTX-mCIMT and BTX-ICT promoted motor function recovery in patients with stroke, BTX-mCIMT exerted higher therapeutic effects than BTX-ICT on motor function recovery and in the activities of daily living of patients with stroke.

Budget impact of botulinum toxin treatment for spasticity after stroke — a German perspective

Aim

Botulinum toxin agents can improve the quality of life of patients with post-stroke upper limb spasticity (ULS) and are recommended by international and German guidelines. However, health-services research indicates an underuse of botulinum toxin agents in this patient group. The study aims to clarify the budget impact of treatment with botulinum toxin agents according to the guidelines for all eligible patients with ULS in Germany compared to usual care.

Methods

The budgetary impact for the statutory health insurance system was estimated by calculating a Markov cohort model with a timeframe of 5 years comparing three treatment options. Four health states were included. The base-case analysis compares standard doses of two botulinum toxin agents to usual care. The model accounts for direct medical costs. Sensitivity analyses vary doses of botulinum toxin agents and prevalence of spasticity after stroke.

Results

In the base case, both botulinum toxin agents lead to increased costs compared to usual care. Treatment with Dysport® (cumulative costs for the 5-year period: €280,321,317) is less expensive than the treatment with Xeomin® (€377,511,529). Cumulative costs over 5 years in usual care are €61,306,062.

Conclusion

The botulinum toxin therapy is associated with additional costs, but an increased use of botulinum toxin would be consistent with guideline-based therapy. In particular, it has to be considered that spasticity as a chronic condition is accompanied by a relevant loss of quality of life. Thus, considering only the therapy costs may not be sufficient for making final therapeutic decisions.

Disappearance of Biased Visual Attention in Infants: Remediated Tonic Neck Reflex or Maturating Visual Asymmetry?

Typically, infants younger than four months fail to attend to the left side of their spatial field, most likely due to an innate asymmetrical tonic neck reflex (ATNR). In a critical transition, by four months of age, infants begin to reach and develop depth perception; and, by five months, they tend to monitor the entire spatial field. However, this developmental transition can be delayed. Moreover, there is always a residual right-sided spatial bias under cognitive load, a phenomenon that may also occur among adult stroke patients. While causative factors of biased visual attention in both infants and brain-injured adults may vary, mechanisms of remediation may be similar. This literature review addresses whether the infant's emergence of attention toward a full visual spatial field and the associated shift from monocular to binocular vision occurs because of (a) increased left side reaching, loosening the rarely mentioned high muscle tension ATNR or (b) maturational resolution of visual asymmetry in motion perception. More research is needed to investigate the origins of the infants' visual control system and factors involved in its development, especially because Alzheimer and dementia patients may also show primitive two-dimensional vision and deficits in perceiving objects-in-motion that seem to mirror infant visual perception.

A retrospective study to assess resource utilization and costs in patients with post-stroke spasticity in the United Kingdom

OBJECTIVE

Post-stroke spasticity (PSS) is a common complication following stroke. This study describes the differences in healthcare resource utilization between patients who do and do not develop PSS in the UK.

METHODS

Adults registered in The Health Improvement Network database with a recorded stroke between 2007 and 2011 were included. PSS was identified through Read codes; machine learning was used to retrospectively identify unrecorded PSS events. Patients with diagnosed or predicted PSS in the 12 months after stroke were matched to those with no PSS on age, sex, number of strokes, socioeconomic status, and comorbidities using the nearest neighbor algorithm. Utilization and costs associated with general practitioner visits, nurse visits, hospitalizations, referrals to specialists, laboratory tests, and medications in the 12 months after stroke were compared.

RESULTS

Overall, 2,951 PSS cases were matched to 37,753 controls. During the first year, more PSS cases visited a physiotherapist (19% vs 7%) and occupational therapist (12% vs 5%) compared to controls. A greater proportion of cases were also referred to specialists (76% vs 64%) and hospitalized (33% vs 9%) compared to controls. Medication for spasticity was, on average, 14.68 prescriptions for cases and 5.64 for controls. Total mean costs per patient were £1,270 (standard deviation [SD] = 772) and £635 (SD = 273) for cases and controls, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Costs after stroke for patients developing PSS are twice as high compared to patients who do not develop it, with the major driver being the number of hospital admissions. This highlights the need for better recording and closer management of PSS.

Conversion Ratio between Botox®, Dysport®, and Xeomin® in Clinical Practice

Botulinum neurotoxin has revolutionized the treatment of spasticity and is now administered worldwide. There are currently three leading botulinum neurotoxin type A products available in the Western Hemisphere: onabotulinum toxin-A (ONA) Botox(®), abobotulinum toxin-A (ABO), Dysport(®), and incobotulinum toxin A (INCO, Xeomin(®)). Although the efficacies are similar, there is an intense debate regarding the comparability of various preparations. Here we will address the clinical issues of potency and conversion ratios, as well as safety issues such as toxin spread and immunogenicity, to provide guidance for BoNT-A use in clinical practice. INCO was shown to be as effective as ONA with a comparable adverse event profile when a clinical conversion ratio of 1:1 was used. The available clinical and preclinical data suggest that a conversion ratio ABO:ONA of 3:1-or even lower-could be appropriate for treating spasticity, cervical dystonia, and blepharospasm or hemifacial spasm. A higher conversion ratio may lead to an overdosing of ABO. While uncommon, distant spread may occur; however, several factors other than the pharmaceutical preparation are thought to affect spread. Finally, whereas the three products have similar efficacy when properly dosed, ABO has a better cost-efficacy profile.

Budget impact analysis of botulinum toxin A therapy for upper limb spasticity in the United Kingdom

Background

Botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) is an effective treatment for patients with upper limb spasticity (ULS), which is a debilitating feature of upper motor neuron lesions. BoNT-A preparations available in the UK are associated with different costs.

Methods

We developed a budget impact model to assess the effect of changing market shares of different BoNT-A formulations – abobotulinumtoxinA, onabotulinumtoxinA, and incobotulinumtoxinA – and best supportive care, from the UK payer perspective, over a 5-year time horizon. Epidemiological and resource use data were derived from published literature and clinical expert opinion. One-way sensitivity analyses were performed to determine parameters most influential on budget impact.

Results

Base-case assumptions showed that an increased uptake of abobotulinumtoxinA resulted in a 5-year savings of £6,283,829. Treatment with BoNT-A costs less than best supportive care per patient per year, although treating a patient with onabotulinumtoxinA (£20,861) and incobotulinumtoxinA (£20,717) cost more per patient annually than with abobotulinumtoxinA (£19,800). Sensitivity analyses showed that the most influential parameters on budget were percentage of cerebral palsy and stroke patients developing ULS, and the prevalence of stroke.

Conclusion

Study findings suggest that increased use of abobotulinumtoxinA for ULS in the UK could potentially reduce total ULS cost for the health system and society.

Employment of higher doses of botulinum toxin type A to reduce spasticity after stroke

Spasticity is a common disabling symptom for several neurological conditions. Botulinum toxin type A injection represents the gold standard treatment for focal spasticity with efficacy, reversibility, and low prevalence of complications. Current guidelines suggest a dose up to 600 units (U) of onabotulinumtoxinA/incobotulinumtoxinA or up to 1,500 U of abobotulinumtoxinA to treat post-stroke spasticity to avoid important adverse effects. However, recently, higher doses of botulinum toxin type A were employed, especially in case of upper and lower limb severe spasticity. With searches of US National Library of Medicine databases, we identified all studies published from December 1989 to July 2014 concerning the use of higher doses of this neurotoxin for spasticity treatment with at least a dose of 600 U of onabotulinumtoxinA and incobotulinumtoxinA or 1,800 U of abobotulinumtoxinA. The cumulative body of evidence coming from the eight studies selected suggested that higher doses of botulinum toxin type A appeared to be efficacious in reducing spasticity of the upper and lower limbs after stroke, with adverse effects generally mild. However, further investigations are needed to determine the safety and reproducibility in larger case series or randomized clinical trials of higher doses of botulinum toxin type A also after repeated injections.

Effect of botulinum toxin type-A in patients with focal spasticity

OBJECTIVE:

To investigate the effect of botulinum toxin type-A (BTX-A) on spasticity and function in patients with focal spasticity.

METHODS:

Patients attended to the outpatient clinic of physical medicine and rehabilitation department with a diagnosis of focal spasticity and had BTX-A injections because of spasticty were evaluated for the study. Demographic data, exercise status, orthoses, drugs used for spasticity, functional status, stages of spasticity of muscles before and after 1^st and 3^rd months of BTX-A injection according to Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) were evaluated retrospectively. MedCalc 11.6 statistical program was used for statistical analyses. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05.

RESULTS:

Forty-nine patients with focal spasticity were recruited for the study (35 men, 14 women). Mean age of the patients was 21.59±20.09 years. The patients had cerebral palsy (CP, n=28), 19 had hemiplegia (n=19) and paraplegia (n=2). Forty-three patients were using orthoses and exercising regularly. Mean Pediatric Functional Independence Measurement (WeeFIM) scores of the patients with CP was 54.82±28.91 and according to the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) the patients were in stages 2 (14%), 3 (46%), 4 (11%) and 5 (29%). Mean Functional Independence Measure (FIM) of hemiplegic and paraplegic patients was 80.80±20.88. Brunnstrom staging scores for upper extremity (3.52±0.96), hands (2.68±0.82), lower extremity (4.57±1.01) were calculated. MAS muscles demonstrated statistically significant decrease in spasticity at the end of first and third months (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION:

We saw a significant decrease in the spasticity of upper and lower extremities in patients with focal spasiticity who received BTX-A injections. We suggest that if BTX-A injections are supported with orthoses and exercise programs, then functional status of the patients would be better.

Managing upper extremity clonus with intramuscular botulinum toxin-A injections in a patient poststroke

Spasticity and clonus are common clinical signs of upper motor neuron lesions poststroke. Intramuscular botulinum toxin-A injections have been shown to reduce spasticity and to improve quality of life. Upper extremity clonus can have a significant impact upon activities of daily living and can pose challenges to comfort, self-care, hygiene, and appearance. Although less common than in the ankle, it is important to understand how upper extremity clonus management may be beneficial to patients presenting with this finding. The majority of previous reports have focused on management of clonus in the lower extremity, but very few have addressed the management of upper extremity clonus. We present a case of poststroke upper extremity clonus with marked improvements following intramuscular botulinum toxin-A injections.

Controlled nerve ablation with direct current: parameters and mechanisms

Spastic hypertonus (muscle over-activity) often develops after spinal cord injury or stroke. Chemodenervating agents such as Botulinum toxin A (BtA) and phenol are often used to treat this condition. We have previously shown that the use of direct current (DC) to create controlled lesions of peripheral nerves may provide a means of reducing spastic hypertonus. Here, we explored a range of stimulation parameters that could be used clinically. Nerves were lesioned with DC in chronically implanted animals and the outcome was tracked over many months. In addition, we used DC to ablate nerves in animals with decerebrate rigidity (an animal model of spastic hypertonus) and we explored the possible mechanisms of DC nerve ablation. We found that nerve ablation with DC was effective in reducing hypertonus. Some stimulation paradigms were more likely to be clinically acceptable than others. Furthermore we showed that nerve regeneration occurs in the months following DC nerve ablation and we demonstrated that the ablation procedure is repeatable, much like BtA treatment. Regarding mechanism, our results did not support the hypothesis that DC caused nerve damage by overactivating sodium channels. Rather, the mechanism of damage seems to be related to changes in pH.

Cost-effectiveness of treating upper limb spasticity due to stroke with botulinum toxin type A: results from the botulinum toxin for the upper limb after stroke (BoTULS) trial

Stroke imposes significant burdens on health services and society, and as such there is a growing need to assess the cost-effectiveness of stroke treatment to ensure maximum benefit is derived from limited resources. This study compared the cost-effectiveness of treating post-stroke upper limb spasticity with botulinum toxin type A plus an upper limb therapy programme against the therapy programme alone. Data on resource use and health outcomes were prospectively collected for 333 patients with post-stroke upper limb spasticity taking part in a randomized trial and combined to estimate the incremental cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained of botulinum toxin type A plus therapy relative to therapy alone. The base case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of botulinum toxin type A plus therapy was £93,500 per QALY gained. The probability of botulinum toxin type A plus therapy being cost-effective at the England and Wales cost-effectiveness threshold value of £20,000 per QALY was 0.36. The point estimates of the ICER remained above £20,000 per QALY for a range of sensitivity analyses, and the probability of botulinum toxin type A plus therapy being cost-effective at the threshold value did not exceed 0.39, regardless of the assumptions made.

Feasibility of video clip analysis on effect of botulinum toxin-A injection for post-stroke upper limb spasticity

Existing functional evaluation tools do not accurately reveal the improved function following botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) injection for post-stroke upper limb spasticity. With the aim of developing an alternate method of measuring functional improvement following BTX-A injection, this study tested the feasibility, validity and reliability of video clip analysis performed by the clinicians. Seventy-nine patients administered BTX-A due to post-stroke upper limb spasticity, were retrospectively evaluated using video clip analysis. Pre- and post-injection video clips recorded at 1-month intervals were randomly allocated and sent to three blinded physician evaluators who were asked to choose the one that seemed more improved in terms of hand motion and associated upper limb reaction during gait. The three physicians chose the post-injection video clip as depicting improved hand motion (82.3%, 79.7%, and 72.2%) and associated upper limb reaction during gait (73.4%, 70.9%, and 70.9%). Kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of interrater reliability among the three physicians was 0.86 and 0.79 for the hand, and 0.92 and 0.92 for associated upper limb reaction during gait, respectively. The percent overall agreement of the physicians was 78.1% and 71.7% for hand function and associated upper limb reaction, respectively. Retrospective pre- and post-BTX-A injection video clip analyses is a clinically feasible alternative method to evaluate the improvement following BTX-A injection for post-stroke upper limb spasticity, especially in busy clinical practice setting.

Obturator nerve block with botulinum toxin type B for patient with adductor thigh muscle spasm -a case report-

Obturator nerve block has been commonly used for pain management to prevent involuntary reflex of the adductor thigh muscles. One of several options for this block is chemical neurolysis. Neurolysis is done with chemical agents. Chemical agents used in the neurolysis of the obturator nerve have been alcohol, phenol, and botulinum toxin. In the current case, a patient with spasticity of the adductor thigh muscle due to cervical cord injury had obturator nerve neurolysis done with botulinum toxin type B (BoNT-B). Most of the previous studies have used BoNT-A with only a few reports that have used BoNT-B. BoNT-B has several advantages and disadvantages over BoNT-A. Thus, we report herein a patient who successfully received obturator nerve neurolysis using BoNT-B to treat adductor thigh muscle spasm.

[Botulinum toxin in the treatment of adult spasticity. An interdisciplinary German 10-point consensus 2010]

Spasticity is one of the major causes of functional impairment in adults with lesions of the central nervous system. For instance, approximately 30% of post-stroke patients suffer from different degrees of spasticity with possible consecutive impairments. Numerous studies or meta-analyses showed that local injections of botulinum toxin in spastic muscles lead to dose-dependent reduction in muscle tone and improvement of passive movements (e. g. facilitated care), especially following repeated injections.However, country-specific regulations and patient-remote administration in German health care often do not allow adequate provision of this therapy. Thus, the present consensus statement based on the EBM analyses of the published international literature tries to highlight recent advances and the standard in the field of local spasticity treatment, aiming to facilitate communication between the decision makers and German reimbursement institutions in health care. Prior to initiation of BoNT-A injections, patient-oriented goals should be identified in a multiprofessional context to assure realistic goals for this specific treatment and patient expectations. In Germany for the treatment of focal spasticity following stroke three products have been approved: Botox® (Pharm Allergan, Ettlingen), Dysport® (Ipsen Pharma, Ettlingen) and Xeomin® (Merz Pharma, Frankfurt/Main). For all preparations safety has been repeatedly shown. Functional improvements have also been illustrated for selected patients concerning hand/arm function and gait. The dose per muscle and the selection of muscles to be injected have to be individualized according to the patient's symptoms and should be accompanied by modern neurorehabilitative therapies such as redression or repetitive activation of the injected and antagonistic muscles.

Long-term treatment of spasticity with botulinum toxin type A: an analysis of 1221 treatments in 137 patients

OBJECTIVES

Spasticity is a complex disorder that causes significant disability in affected patients. We here present long-term results of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) treatment in spasticity of various etiologies in the upper and lower limbs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We evaluated long-term results of BoNT-A treatment with Dysport and Botox for up to 12 years in 137 patients with spasticity of various etiologies. The focus was laid on efficacy, dosage, safety and side effects over time in a retrospective analysis of the database of our movement disorder clinic.

RESULTS

The mean clinical benefit, latency and duration of response were comparable for both products. Side effects were generally mild and comparable for the two products. We found a significant negative correlation between time from onset of spasticity to start of BoNT-A treatment and degree of improvement after treatment.

CONCLUSION

Our data confirm the safety and efficacy of BoNT-A treatment of spasticity of different etiologies over a long period of time. Furthermore, the data imply that BoNT-A treatment should be started early after appearance of spasticity to obtain better treatment response.

Long-term outcome of superficialis-to-profundus tendon transfer in patients with clenched fist due to spastic hemiplegia

BACKGROUND

Spastic hemiplegia is a common feature after stroke, which can result in a clenched fist deformity with secondary hygienic problems and pain. Operative treatment can improve these problems, although literature about its long-term effects is lacking.

PURPOSE

To determine whether Superficialis-to-Profundus tendon (StP-) transfer procedure leads to permanent improvement of hygiene and reduction of pain in patients with clenched fist due to spastic hemiplegia following stroke.

METHOD

Patients who underwent a StP-transfer in 2003-2005 were evaluated on skin condition, upper extremity joint mobility, resting position and muscle tone and with VAS scores on hygiene maintenance and pain in the hand.

RESULTS

Six patients (mean age 54 years; duration after stroke 10 years) were included. Indications to operate were hygienic problems only (3) or combined with pain (3). The average follow-up period was 19 months. After 6 weeks of post-operative splinting, no standard follow-up was applied. Serious post-operative complications were not reported. At follow-up no hygienic problems were present and pain was decreased in all except one patient. All hands could passively be fully opened. In resting position, flexion was seen in the MCP-joints (60-90 degrees). Muscle tone was raised in flexors of the wrist and fingers and m. adductor pollicis (Ashworth 1-2). Given the same pre- and post-operative circumstances, all patients would agree to have the surgery over again.

CONCLUSION

Even 19 months after the StP-transfer for clenched fist, all operated hands could still be fully opened and there was a permanent improvement of hygiene and pain reduction.

Health economics and intradetrusor injections of botulinum for the treatment of detrusor overactivity

Health economic aspects are crucial in arguing the feasibility of setting up a new service using an unlicensed treatment. Overall, the costs of intradetrusor botulinum neurotoxin-A treatment appear to be modest relative to the improvement in quality of life. However, in managing the overactive bladder, there is a need for a widely accepted definition of 'clinical improvement' or a common outcome measure to direct future clinical and health economic research.

Botulinum toxin: description of injection techniques and examination of controversies surrounding toxin diffusion

The benefits derived from botulinum toxin (BTX) injections may be negated by unintentional weakness of adjacent uninjected muscles. Such weakness may be the result of inaccurate targeting, or diffusion of BTX to surrounding muscles. Several techniques, using electromyographic, endoscopic or imaging guidance are purported to increase the accuracy of targeting. Diffusion of BTX is thought to be influenced by factors such as dose, concentration, injectate volume, number of injections, site and rate of injection, needle gauge, muscle size, muscular fascia, distance of needle tip from the neuromuscular junction, and protein content of the BTX formulation. This article describes techniques that aim to increase the accuracy of BTX injections and examines the controversies surrounding diffusion of BTX following injection.

Botulinum toxin in poststroke spasticity

Poststroke hemiparesis, together with abnormal muscle tone, is a major cause of morbidity and disability. Although most hemiparetic patients are able to reach different ambulatory levels with rehabilitation efforts, upper and lower limb spasticity can impede activities of daily living, personal hygiene, ambulation and, in some cases, functional improvement. The goals of spasticity management include increasing mobility and range of motion, attaining better hygiene, improving splint wear and other functional activities. Conservative measures, such as positioning, stretching and exercise are essential in spasticity management, but alone often are inadequate to effectively control it. Oral antispastic medications often provide limited effects with short duration and frequent unwanted systemic side effects, such as weakness, sedation and dry mouth. Therefore, neuromuscular blockade by local injections have become the first choice for the treatment of focal spasticity, particularly in stroke patients. Botulinum toxin (BTX), being one of the most potent biological toxins, acts by blocking neuromuscular transmission via inhibiting acetylcholine release. Currently, focal spasticity is being treated successfully with BTX via injecting in the spastic muscles. Two antigenically distinct serotypes of BTX are available on the market as type A and B. Clinical studies of BTX used for spastic hemiplegic patients are reviewed in this article in two major categories, upper and lower limb applications. This review addresses efficacy in terms of outcome measures, such as muscle tone reduction and functional outcome, as well as safety issues. Application modifications of dose, dilutions, site of injections and combination therapies with BTX injections are also discussed.

Improvements in healthcare and cost benefits associated with botulinum toxin treatment of spasticity and muscle overactivity

Spasticity is a widespread, disabling form of muscle overactivity affecting patients with central nervous system damage resulting in upper motor neurone syndrome. There is a range of effective therapies for the treatment of spasticity (e.g. physical, anaesthetic, chemodenervation and neurolytic injections, systemic medication and surgery), but all therapies must be based on an individualized, multidisciplinary programme targeted to achieve patient goals. Appropriate therapy should be based on the extent and severity of spasticity, but spasticity and its consequences, regardless of presentation or cause, are commonly treated with systemic agents. This may be ill-advised as systemic treatment is associated with many undesirable effects. In particular, elderly patients with post-stroke spasticity are at risk from the central adverse effects of systemic medication (e.g. sedation and gait disturbance), which make them more susceptible to falling, with an associated increased risk of fracture. The rising costs of fracture care and its sequelae are fast becoming an international problem contributing to high healthcare expenditure. Botulinum toxin type-A (BoNT-A) treatment is highly effective for some of the more common forms of spasticity and muscle overactivity, and has a favourable profile when compared with systemic agents and other focal treatments. Therefore, the clinical benefits of BoNT-A treatment outweigh the apparent high costs of this intervention, showing it to be a cost-effective treatment.

Botulinum toxin: Clinical use

Since its development for the use of blepharospasm and strabismus more than 2.5 decades ago, botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) has become a versatile drug in various fields of medicine. It is the standard of care in different disorders such as cervical dystonia, hemifacial spasm, focal spasticity, hyperhidrosis, ophthalmological and otolaryngeal disorders. It has also found widespread use in cosmetic applications. Many other indications are currently under investigation, including gastroenterologic and urologic indications, analgesic management and migraine. This paper is an extensive review of the spectrum of BoNT clinical applications.