1
|
Bohle LF, Abdallah AK, Galli F, Canavan R, Molesworth K. Knowledge, attitudes and practices towards malaria diagnostics among healthcare providers and healthcare-seekers in Kondoa district, Tanzania: a multi-methodological situation analysis. Malar J 2022; 21:224. [PMID: 35864543 PMCID: PMC9306200 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-022-04244-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite the large-scale rollout of malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) in Tanzania, many healthcare providers (HCPs) continue using blood film microscopy (BFM) and clinical examination to diagnose malaria, which can increase the risk of mal-diagnosis and over-prescribing of anti-malarials. Patients disregarding negative test results and self-treating exacerbate the problem. This study explored the knowledge, attitudes and practices of HCPs and healthcare-seekers regarding RDTs in comparison to BFM testing. Methods A situational analysis was, therefore, conducted in Kondoa District, Dodoma Region, Tanzania. A multi-methodological approach was adopted including (i) a health facility inventory and screening of logbooks from May 2013 to April 2014 with 77,126 patient entries from 33 health facilities; (ii) a survey of 40 HCPs offering malaria services; and iii) a survey of 309 randomly selected household members from the facilities’ catchment area. Surveys took place in April and May 2014. Results Health facility records revealed that out of 77,126 patient entries, 22% (n = 17,235) obtained a malaria diagnosis. Of those, 45% were made with BFM, 33% with RDT and 22% with clinical diagnosis. A higher rate of positive diagnoses was observed with BFM compared with RDT (71% vs 14%). In the HCP survey, 48% preferred using BFM for malaria testing, while 52% preferred RDT. Faced with a negative RDT result for a patient presenting with symptoms typical for malaria, 25% of HCPs stated they would confirm the result with a microscopy test, 70% would advise or perform a clinical diagnosis and 18% would prescribe anti-malarials. Interviews with household members revealed a preference for microscopy testing (58%) over RDT (23%), if presented with malaria symptoms. For participants familiar with both tests, a second opinion was desired in 45% after a negative microscopy result and in 90% after an RDT. Conclusions Non-adherence to negative diagnostics by HCPs and patients continues to be a concern. Frequent training and supportive supervision for HCPs diagnosing and treating malaria and non-malaria febrile illnesses is essential to offer quality services that can instil confidence in HCPs and patients alike. The introduction of new diagnostic devices should be paired with context-specific behaviour change interventions targeting healthcare-seekers and healthcare providers. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12936-022-04244-0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leah F Bohle
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland. .,University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Ally-Kebby Abdallah
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.,University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Health Promotion and System Strengthening Project (HPSS), Dodoma, Tanzania
| | - Francesco Galli
- Veterinary Public Health Institute, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Robert Canavan
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.,University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Kate Molesworth
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.,University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Engel N, Ghergu C, Matin MA, Kibria MG, Thriemer K, Price RN, Ding XC, Howes RE, Ley B, Incardona S, Alam MS. Implementing radical cure diagnostics for malaria: user perspectives on G6PD testing in Bangladesh. Malar J 2021; 20:217. [PMID: 33980257 PMCID: PMC8114691 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-021-03743-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 04/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The radical cure of Plasmodium vivax requires treatment with an 8-aminoquinoline drug, such as primaquine and tafenoquine, to eradicate liver hypnozoite stages, which can reactivate to cause relapsing infections. Safe treatment regimens require prior screening of patients for glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency to avoid potential life-threatening drug induced haemolysis. Testing is rarely available in malaria endemic countries, but will be needed to support routine use of radical cure. This study investigates end-user perspectives in Bangladesh on the introduction of a quantitative G6PD test (SD Biosensor STANDARD™ G6PD analyser) to support malaria elimination. METHODS The perspectives of users on the SD Biosensor test were analysed using semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions with health care providers and malaria programme officers in Bangladesh. Key emerging themes regarding the feasibility of introducing this test into routine practice, including perceived barriers, were analysed. RESULTS In total 63 participants were interviewed. Participants emphasized the life-saving potential of the biosensor, but raised concerns including the impact of limited staff time, high workload and some technical aspects of the device. Participants highlighted that there are both too few and too many P. vivax patients to implement G6PD testing owing to challenges of funding, workload and complex testing infrastructure. Implementing the biosensor would require flexibility and improvisation to deal with remote sites, overcoming a low index of suspicion and mutual interplay of declining patient numbers and reluctance to test. This approach would generate new forms of evidence to justify introduction in policy and carefully consider questions of deployment given declining patient numbers. CONCLUSIONS The results of the study show that, in an elimination context, the importance of malaria needs to be maintained for both policy makers and the affected communities, in this case by ensuring P. vivax, PQ treatment, and G6PD deficiency remain visible. Availability of new technologies, such as the biosensor, will fuel ongoing debates about priorities for allocating resources that must be adapted to a constantly evolving target. Technical and logistical concerns regarding the biosensor should be addressed by future product designs, adequate training, strengthened supply chains, and careful planning of communication, advocacy and staff interactions at all health system levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nora Engel
- Department of Health, Ethics & Society, Research School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine & Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
| | - Cristian Ghergu
- Department of Health, Ethics & Society, Research School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine & Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Mohammad Abdul Matin
- Infectious Diseases Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Mohammad Golam Kibria
- Infectious Diseases Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Kamala Thriemer
- Global and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia
| | - Ric N Price
- Global and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Xavier C Ding
- Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND), Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Rosalind E Howes
- Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND), Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Benedikt Ley
- Global and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia
| | - Sandra Incardona
- Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND), Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Mohammad Shafiul Alam
- Infectious Diseases Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka, Bangladesh
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Odendaal WA, Anstey Watkins J, Leon N, Goudge J, Griffiths F, Tomlinson M, Daniels K. Health workers' perceptions and experiences of using mHealth technologies to deliver primary healthcare services: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 3:CD011942. [PMID: 32216074 PMCID: PMC7098082 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011942.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mobile health (mHealth), refers to healthcare practices supported by mobile devices, such as mobile phones and tablets. Within primary care, health workers often use mobile devices to register clients, track their health, and make decisions about care, as well as to communicate with clients and other health workers. An understanding of how health workers relate to, and experience mHealth, can help in its implementation. OBJECTIVES To synthesise qualitative research evidence on health workers' perceptions and experiences of using mHealth technologies to deliver primary healthcare services, and to develop hypotheses about why some technologies are more effective than others. SEARCH METHODS We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Science Citation Index and Social Sciences Citation Index in January 2018. We searched Global Health in December 2015. We screened the reference lists of included studies and key references and searched seven sources for grey literature (16 February to 5 March 2018). We re-ran the search strategies in February 2020. We screened these records and any studies that we identified as potentially relevant are awaiting classification. SELECTION CRITERIA We included studies that used qualitative data collection and analysis methods. We included studies of mHealth programmes that were part of primary healthcare services. These services could be implemented in public or private primary healthcare facilities, community and workplace, or the homes of clients. We included all categories of health workers, as well as those persons who supported the delivery and management of the mHealth programmes. We excluded participants identified as technical staff who developed and maintained the mHealth technology, without otherwise being involved in the programme delivery. We included studies conducted in any country. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We assessed abstracts, titles and full-text papers according to the inclusion criteria. We found 53 studies that met the inclusion criteria and sampled 43 of these for our analysis. For the 43 sampled studies, we extracted information, such as country, health worker category, and the mHealth technology. We used a thematic analysis process. We used GRADE-CERQual to assess our confidence in the findings. MAIN RESULTS Most of the 43 included sample studies were from low- or middle-income countries. In many of the studies, the mobile devices had decision support software loaded onto them, which showed the steps the health workers had to follow when they provided health care. Other uses included in-person and/or text message communication, and recording clients' health information. Almost half of the studies looked at health workers' use of mobile devices for mother, child, and newborn health. We have moderate or high confidence in the following findings. mHealth changed how health workers worked with each other: health workers appreciated being more connected to colleagues, and thought that this improved co-ordination and quality of care. However, some described problems when senior colleagues did not respond or responded in anger. Some preferred face-to-face connection with colleagues. Some believed that mHealth improved their reporting, while others compared it to "big brother watching". mHealth changed how health workers delivered care: health workers appreciated how mHealth let them take on new tasks, work flexibly, and reach clients in difficult-to-reach areas. They appreciated mHealth when it improved feedback, speed and workflow, but not when it was slow or time consuming. Some health workers found decision support software useful; others thought it threatened their clinical skills. Most health workers saw mHealth as better than paper, but some preferred paper. Some health workers saw mHealth as creating more work. mHealth led to new forms of engagement and relationships with clients and communities: health workers felt that communicating with clients by mobile phone improved care and their relationships with clients, but felt that some clients needed face-to-face contact. Health workers were aware of the importance of protecting confidential client information when using mobile devices. Some health workers did not mind being contacted by clients outside working hours, while others wanted boundaries. Health workers described how some community members trusted health workers that used mHealth while others were sceptical. Health workers pointed to problems when clients needed to own their own phones. Health workers' use and perceptions of mHealth could be influenced by factors tied to costs, the health worker, the technology, the health system and society, poor network access, and poor access to electricity: some health workers did not mind covering extra costs. Others complained that phone credit was not delivered on time. Health workers who were accustomed to using mobile phones were sometimes more positive towards mHealth. Others with less experience, were sometimes embarrassed about making mistakes in front of clients or worried about job security. Health workers wanted training, technical support, user-friendly devices, and systems that were integrated into existing electronic health systems. The main challenges health workers experienced were poor network connections, access to electricity, and the cost of recharging phones. Other problems included damaged phones. Factors outside the health system also influenced how health workers experienced mHealth, including language, gender, and poverty issues. Health workers felt that their commitment to clients helped them cope with these challenges. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Our findings propose a nuanced view about mHealth programmes. The complexities of healthcare delivery and human interactions defy simplistic conclusions on how health workers will perceive and experience their use of mHealth. Perceptions reflect the interplay between the technology, contexts, and human attributes. Detailed descriptions of the programme, implementation processes and contexts, alongside effectiveness studies, will help to unravel this interplay to formulate hypotheses regarding the effectiveness of mHealth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Willem A Odendaal
- South African Medical Research CouncilHealth Systems Research UnitCape TownWestern CapeSouth Africa
- Stellenbosch UniversityDepartment of PsychiatryCape TownSouth Africa
| | | | - Natalie Leon
- South African Medical Research CouncilHealth Systems Research UnitCape TownWestern CapeSouth Africa
- Brown UniversitySchool of Public HealthProvidenceRhode IslandUSA
| | - Jane Goudge
- University of the WitwatersrandCentre for Health Policy, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health SciencesJohannesburgSouth Africa
| | - Frances Griffiths
- University of WarwickWarwick Medical SchoolCoventryUK
- University of the WitwatersrandCentre for Health Policy, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health SciencesJohannesburgSouth Africa
| | - Mark Tomlinson
- Stellenbosch UniversityInstitute for Life Course Health Research, Department of Global HealthCape TownSouth Africa
- Queens UniversitySchool of Nursing and MidwiferyBelfastUK
| | - Karen Daniels
- South African Medical Research CouncilHealth Systems Research UnitCape TownWestern CapeSouth Africa
- University of Cape TownHealth Policy and Systems Division, School of Public Health and Family MedicineCape TownWestern CapeSouth Africa7925
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Engel N. Aligning in the dark: Variable and shifting (user-) settings in developing point-of-care diagnostics for tuberculosis and HIV. SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE 2020; 50:50-75. [PMID: 31928147 DOI: 10.1177/0306312719900545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
To be effective, healthcare technologies should be attuned to particular contexts of use. This article examines how such attuning is articulated in global innovation practices for tuberculosis and HIV diagnostics, and to what effect. It examines the development of point-of-care (POC) diagnostics - promised to be designed for users outside laboratories or in resource constrained settings - to study what developers and implementers do to align diagnostic technologies to the POC. Fieldwork among global health actors involved in diagnostic development, including manufacturers, donors, industry consultants, international organizations, policymakers, regulators and researchers, is combined with fieldwork among users of diagnostics in India, including decision-makers, NGOs, program officers, laboratory technicians and nurses. The article adds to STS's theory of alignment and user interaction, where the setting and user to which developers and implementers of global health diagnostics align are multiple, varied, emerging and keep shifting. The characteristics of a local user setting include multiple engaged and imagined user settings, but also the settings of developers, of global intermediaries, competitors and diseases. As such, alignment is happening across multiple dimensions and scales and has an important temporal dimension. The results reveal how alignment happens to some extent in the dark, characterized by uncertainty about the elements that should align. Standardizing elements, politics and scarce resources cause frictions in the temporalities of aligning and over what constitutes a well-aligned diagnostic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nora Engel
- Department of Health, Ethics & Society and Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Denyer Willis L, Chandler C. Quick fix for care, productivity, hygiene and inequality: reframing the entrenched problem of antibiotic overuse. BMJ Glob Health 2019; 4:e001590. [PMID: 31497315 PMCID: PMC6703303 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2019] [Revised: 07/05/2019] [Accepted: 07/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major challenge of our time. A key global objective is to reduce antibiotic use (ABU), in order to reduce resistance caused by antimicrobial pressure. This is often set as a 'behaviour change' issue, locating intervention efforts in the knowledge and attitudes of individual prescribers and users of medicines. Such approaches have had limited impact and fall short of addressing wider drivers of antibiotic use. To address the magnitude of antibiotic overuse requires a wider lens to view our relationships with these medicines. This article draws on ethnographic research from East Africa to answer the question of what roles antibiotics play beyond their immediate curative effects. We carried out interviews, participant observation and documentary analysis over a decade in northeast Tanzania and eastern and central Uganda. Our findings suggest that antibiotics have become a 'quick fix' in our modern societies. They are a quick fix for care in fractured health systems; a quick fix for productivity at local and global scales, for humans, animals and crops; a quick fix for hygiene in settings of minimised resources; and a quick fix for inequality in landscapes scarred by political and economic violence. Conceptualising antibiotic use as a 'quick fix' infrastructure shifts attention to the structural dimensions of AMR and antimicrobial use (AMU) and raises our line of sight into the longer term, generating more systemic solutions that have greater chance of achieving equitable impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurie Denyer Willis
- Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Clare Chandler
- Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chandler CIR. Current accounts of antimicrobial resistance: stabilisation, individualisation and antibiotics as infrastructure. PALGRAVE COMMUNICATIONS 2019; 5:53. [PMID: 31157116 PMCID: PMC6542671 DOI: 10.1057/s41599-019-0263-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 108] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2018] [Accepted: 04/29/2019] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is one of the latest issues to galvanise political and financial investment as an emerging global health threat. This paper explores the construction of AMR as a problem, following three lines of analysis. First, an examination of some of the ways in which AMR has become an object for action-through defining, counting and projecting it. Following Lakoff's work on emerging infectious diseases, the paper illustrates that while an 'actuarial' approach to AMR may be challenging to stabilise due to definitional and logistical issues, it has been successfully stabilised through a 'sentinel' approach that emphasises the threat of AMR. Second, the paper draws out a contrast between the way AMR is formulated in terms of a problem of connectedness-a 'One Health' issue-and the frequent solutions to AMR being focused on individual behaviour. The paper suggests that AMR presents an opportunity to take seriously connections, scale and systems but that this effort is undermined by the prevailing tendency to reduce health issues to matters for individual responsibility. Third, the paper takes AMR as a moment of infrastructural inversion (Bowker and Star) when antimicrobials and the work they do are rendered more visible. This leads to the proposal of antibiotics as infrastructure-part of the woodwork that we take for granted, and entangled with our ways of doing life, in particular modern life. These explorations render visible the ways social, economic and political frames continue to define AMR and how it may be acted upon, which opens up possibilities for reconfiguring AMR research and action.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clare I. R. Chandler
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
King C, Boyd N, Walker I, Zadutsa B, Baqui AH, Ahmed S, Islam M, Kainja E, Nambiar B, Wilson I, McCollum ED. Opportunities and barriers in paediatric pulse oximetry for pneumonia in low-resource clinical settings: a qualitative evaluation from Malawi and Bangladesh. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e019177. [PMID: 29382679 PMCID: PMC5829842 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To gain an understanding of what challenges pulse oximetry for paediatric pneumonia management poses, how it has changed service provision and what would improve this device for use across paediatric clinical settings in low-income countries. DESIGN Focus group discussions (FGDs), with purposive sampling and thematic analysis using a framework approach. SETTING Community, front-line outpatient, and hospital outpatient and inpatient settings in Malawi and Bangladesh, which provide paediatric pneumonia care. PARTICIPANTS Healthcare providers (HCPs) from Malawi and Bangladesh who had received training in pulse oximetry and had been using oximeters in routine paediatric care, including community healthcare workers, non-physician clinicians or medical assistants, and hospital-based nurses and doctors. RESULTS We conducted six FGDs, with 23 participants from Bangladesh and 26 from Malawi. We identified five emergent themes: trust, value, user-related experience, sustainability and design. HCPs discussed the confidence gained through the use of oximeters, resulting in improved trust from caregivers and valuing the device, although there were conflicts between the weight given to clinical judgement versus oximeter results. HCPs reported the ease of using oximeters, but identified movement and physically smaller children as measurement challenges. Challenges in sustainability related to battery durability and replacement parts, however many HCPs had used the same device longer than 4 years, demonstrating robustness within these settings. Desirable features included back-up power banks and integrated respiratory rate and thermometer capability. CONCLUSIONS Pulse oximetry was generally deemed valuable by HCPs for use as a spot-check device in a range of paediatric low-income clinical settings. Areas highlighted as challenges by HCPs, and therefore opportunities for redesign, included battery charging and durability, probe fit and sensitivity in paediatric populations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02941237.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carina King
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nicholas Boyd
- UCL Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Isabeau Walker
- UCL Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Abdullah H Baqui
- International Center for Maternal and Newborn Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Salahuddin Ahmed
- International Center for Maternal and Newborn Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Mazharul Islam
- Department of Anthropology, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Sylhet, Bangladesh
| | - Esther Kainja
- Parent and Child Health Initiative, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Bejoy Nambiar
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Eric D McCollum
- Eudowood Division of Pediatric Respiratory Diseases, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Affiliation(s)
- Clare I. R. Chandler
- Department of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Uli Beisel
- Department of Anthropology, Faculty for Cultural Studies, Bayreuth University, Bayreuth, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ducrotoy MJ, Bardosh KL. How do you get the Rose Bengal Test at the point-of-care to diagnose brucellosis in Africa? The importance of a systems approach. Acta Trop 2017; 165:33-39. [PMID: 27725154 DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2016.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2015] [Revised: 10/04/2016] [Accepted: 10/06/2016] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Brucellosis is a major neglected zoonotic disease, whose burden both in animals and humans is severely under-reported. Diagnosis in humans identifies cases in order to treat the disease at the individual level. In animals diagnosis is implemented at the population level in the context of appropriate control or eradication strategies. Molecular and bacteriological diagnosis are rarely undertaken in sub-Saharan Africa, at least outside research projects, due to cost, skills and laboratory infrastructure issues. The brucellosis toolbox contains a wide range of serological tests, but the perfect test for use in animals and humans respectively does not exist. Drug and diagnostic discovery for the neglected zoonoses are notoriously poor, and there is limited investment interest in developing new tools for brucellosis diagnosis. But are current tools being used to their full capacity? The rose Bengal test (RBT) stands out as an efficient, practical and very cheap test adapted for use in the resource-poor context. In this paper, we argue that a social science or system's approach to explore the practicality of improving diagnostic capacity at the point-of care in high-risk brucellosis areas of rural Africa may be a step towards solving the issue of under-diagnosis, but this must go hand-in-hand with implementation of control measures at source in the animal reservoir and capacity to treat human cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie J Ducrotoy
- Division of Infection and Pathway Medicine, School of Biomedical Sciences, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, The University of Edinburgh, Chancellor's Building, 49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4SB, UK.
| | - Kevin L Bardosh
- Division of Infection and Pathway Medicine, School of Biomedical Sciences, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, The University of Edinburgh, Chancellor's Building, 49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4SB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Okeke IN. Laboratory systems as an antibacterial resistance containment tool in Africa. Afr J Lab Med 2016; 5:497. [PMID: 28879140 PMCID: PMC5433813 DOI: 10.4102/ajlm.v5i3.497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2016] [Accepted: 08/05/2016] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION As crucial as clinical laboratories are to preventing, identifying and managing resistance problems, laboratory scientists are among the most overlooked stakeholders. This review outlines the contributions that diagnostic laboratory systems should make toward all five of the World Health Organization's 2015 strategic objectives for antimicrobial resistance containment. LABORATORY SYSTEMS IN RESISTANCE CONTAINMENT Antimicrobial susceptibility testing and surveillance are central to antibacterial resistance management and control and need to be implemented more commonly and closer to sick patients. However, the scope of tests that promote judicious antimicrobial use extend beyond susceptibility testing. Laboratory tests for pathogens or their associated biomarkers confirm or rule out specific causes of signs and symptoms associated with infection. Laboratory systems also provide critical support to infection control programmes. All of these functions promote rational antimicrobial use and contain the spread of resistance. Routine laboratory data supports the development of vaccines and other technologies that could ease the pressure placed by antimicrobials. Laboratories are also a rich source of information for health professionals, policymakers and the general public about the urgency of the resistance problem and progress in containing it. CONCLUSION Laboratory systems are integral to antimicrobial resistance containment and contributions from African laboratories to addressing resistance need to be enhanced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iruka N Okeke
- Department of Pharmaceutical Microbiology, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chandler CIR, Burchett H, Boyle L, Achonduh O, Mbonye A, DiLiberto D, Reyburn H, Onwujekwe O, Haaland A, Roca-Feltrer A, Baiden F, Mbacham WF, Ndyomugyenyi R, Nankya F, Mangham-Jefferies L, Clarke S, Mbakilwa H, Reynolds J, Lal S, Leslie T, Maiteki-Sebuguzi C, Webster J, Magnussen P, Ansah E, Hansen KS, Hutchinson E, Cundill B, Yeung S, Schellenberg D, Staedke SG, Wiseman V, Lalloo DG, Whitty CJM. Examining Intervention Design: Lessons from the Development of Eight Related Malaria Health Care Intervention Studies. Health Syst Reform 2016; 2:373-388. [PMID: 31514719 PMCID: PMC6176770 DOI: 10.1080/23288604.2016.1179086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract—Rigorous evidence of “what works” to improve health care is in demand, but methods for the development of interventions have not been scrutinized in the same ways as methods for evaluation. This article presents and examines intervention development processes of eight malaria health care interventions in East and West Africa. A case study approach was used to draw out experiences and insights from multidisciplinary teams who undertook to design and evaluate these studies. Four steps appeared necessary for intervention design: (1) definition of scope, with reference to evaluation possibilities; (2) research to inform design, including evidence and theory reviews and empirical formative research; (3) intervention design, including consideration and selection of approaches and development of activities and materials; and (4) refining and finalizing the intervention, incorporating piloting and pretesting. Alongside these steps, projects produced theories, explicitly or implicitly, about (1) intended pathways of change and (2) how their intervention would be implemented.The work required to design interventions that meet and contribute to current standards of evidence should not be underestimated. Furthermore, the process should be recognized not only as technical but as the result of micro and macro social, political, and economic contexts, which should be acknowledged and documented in order to infer generalizability. Reporting of interventions should go beyond descriptions of final intervention components or techniques to encompass the development process. The role that evaluation possibilities play in intervention design should be brought to the fore in debates over health care improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clare I R Chandler
- Department of Global Health and Development , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - Helen Burchett
- Department of Global Health and Development , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - Louise Boyle
- Department of Global Health and Development , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - Olivia Achonduh
- Laboratory for Public Health Research Biotechnologies, The Biotechnology Center, University of Yaoundé I , Yaoundé , Cameroon
| | - Anthony Mbonye
- School of Public Health-Makerere University & Commissioner Health Services, Ministry of Health , Kampala , Uganda
| | - Deborah DiLiberto
- Clinical Research Department , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - Hugh Reyburn
- Disease Control Department , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - Obinna Onwujekwe
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics , University of Nigeria Enugu-Campus , Enugu , Nigeria
| | - Ane Haaland
- Institute of Health and Society , Department of Community Medicine , Blindern , Oslo , Norway
| | | | - Frank Baiden
- Malaria Group, Kintampo Health Research Centre , Kintampo , Ghana
| | - Wilfred F Mbacham
- Laboratory for Public Health Research Biotechnologies, The Biotechnology Center, University of Yaoundé I , Yaoundé , Cameroon
| | | | - Florence Nankya
- Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration , Kampala , Uganda
| | - Lindsay Mangham-Jefferies
- Department of Global Health and Development , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - Sian Clarke
- Disease Control Department , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - Hilda Mbakilwa
- Joint Malaria Programme, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre , Moshi , Tanzania
| | - Joanna Reynolds
- Department of Global Health and Development , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - Sham Lal
- Disease Control Department , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - Toby Leslie
- Disease Control Department , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | | | - Jayne Webster
- Disease Control Department , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - Pascal Magnussen
- Centre for Medical Parasitology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen , Denmark
| | - Evelyn Ansah
- Dangme West District Health Directorate, Ghana Health Service , Dodowa , Ghana
| | - Kristian S Hansen
- Department of Global Health and Development , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - Eleanor Hutchinson
- Department of Global Health and Development , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - Bonnie Cundill
- Disease Control Department , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - Shunmay Yeung
- Department of Global Health and Development , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - David Schellenberg
- Disease Control Department , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - Sarah G Staedke
- Disease Control Department , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - Virginia Wiseman
- Department of Global Health and Development , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK.,School of Public Health and Community Medicine , Kensington , New South Wales , Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Beisel U, Umlauf R, Hutchinson E, Chandler CIR. The complexities of simple technologies: re-imagining the role of rapid diagnostic tests in malaria control efforts. Malar J 2016; 15:64. [PMID: 26850000 PMCID: PMC4743404 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-016-1083-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2015] [Accepted: 01/04/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are assumed to be simple-to-use and mobile technologies that have the capacity to standardize parasitological diagnosis for malaria across a variety of clinical settings. In order to evaluate these tests, it is important to consider how such assumptions play out in practice, in everyday settings of clinics, health centres, drug stores and for community health volunteers. Methods This paper draws on qualitative research on RDTs conducted over the last nine years. In particular the study reports on four qualitative case studies on the use of RDTs from Uganda, Tanzania and Sierra Leone, including qualitative interviews, focus group discussions and participant observation. Results Results suggest that while RDTs may be simple to use as stand-alone technological tools, it is not trivial to make them work effectively in a variety of economically pressured health care settings. The studies show that to perform RDTs effectively might very well need exactly the infrastructure they were designed to substitute: the medical expertise, organizational capacity and diagnostic and treatment options of well-funded and functioning health systems. Conclusions These results underline that successful malaria diagnosis and treatment requires as much investment in general health infrastructure as it does in new technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uli Beisel
- Department of Anthropology, Bayreuth University, Universitätsstraße 30, 95440, Bayreuth, Germany.
| | - René Umlauf
- Department of Sociology, Bayreuth University, Universitätsstraße 30, 95440, Bayreuth, Germany.
| | - Eleanor Hutchinson
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK.
| | - Clare I R Chandler
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK.
| |
Collapse
|