1
|
Chandler CIR, Burchett H, Boyle L, Achonduh O, Mbonye A, DiLiberto D, Reyburn H, Onwujekwe O, Haaland A, Roca-Feltrer A, Baiden F, Mbacham WF, Ndyomugyenyi R, Nankya F, Mangham-Jefferies L, Clarke S, Mbakilwa H, Reynolds J, Lal S, Leslie T, Maiteki-Sebuguzi C, Webster J, Magnussen P, Ansah E, Hansen KS, Hutchinson E, Cundill B, Yeung S, Schellenberg D, Staedke SG, Wiseman V, Lalloo DG, Whitty CJM. Examining Intervention Design: Lessons from the Development of Eight Related Malaria Health Care Intervention Studies. Health Syst Reform 2016; 2:373-388. [PMID: 31514719 PMCID: PMC6176770 DOI: 10.1080/23288604.2016.1179086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract—Rigorous evidence of “what works” to improve health care is in demand, but methods for the development of interventions have not been scrutinized in the same ways as methods for evaluation. This article presents and examines intervention development processes of eight malaria health care interventions in East and West Africa. A case study approach was used to draw out experiences and insights from multidisciplinary teams who undertook to design and evaluate these studies. Four steps appeared necessary for intervention design: (1) definition of scope, with reference to evaluation possibilities; (2) research to inform design, including evidence and theory reviews and empirical formative research; (3) intervention design, including consideration and selection of approaches and development of activities and materials; and (4) refining and finalizing the intervention, incorporating piloting and pretesting. Alongside these steps, projects produced theories, explicitly or implicitly, about (1) intended pathways of change and (2) how their intervention would be implemented.The work required to design interventions that meet and contribute to current standards of evidence should not be underestimated. Furthermore, the process should be recognized not only as technical but as the result of micro and macro social, political, and economic contexts, which should be acknowledged and documented in order to infer generalizability. Reporting of interventions should go beyond descriptions of final intervention components or techniques to encompass the development process. The role that evaluation possibilities play in intervention design should be brought to the fore in debates over health care improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clare I R Chandler
- Department of Global Health and Development , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - Helen Burchett
- Department of Global Health and Development , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - Louise Boyle
- Department of Global Health and Development , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - Olivia Achonduh
- Laboratory for Public Health Research Biotechnologies, The Biotechnology Center, University of Yaoundé I , Yaoundé , Cameroon
| | - Anthony Mbonye
- School of Public Health-Makerere University & Commissioner Health Services, Ministry of Health , Kampala , Uganda
| | - Deborah DiLiberto
- Clinical Research Department , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - Hugh Reyburn
- Disease Control Department , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - Obinna Onwujekwe
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics , University of Nigeria Enugu-Campus , Enugu , Nigeria
| | - Ane Haaland
- Institute of Health and Society , Department of Community Medicine , Blindern , Oslo , Norway
| | | | - Frank Baiden
- Malaria Group, Kintampo Health Research Centre , Kintampo , Ghana
| | - Wilfred F Mbacham
- Laboratory for Public Health Research Biotechnologies, The Biotechnology Center, University of Yaoundé I , Yaoundé , Cameroon
| | | | - Florence Nankya
- Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration , Kampala , Uganda
| | - Lindsay Mangham-Jefferies
- Department of Global Health and Development , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - Sian Clarke
- Disease Control Department , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - Hilda Mbakilwa
- Joint Malaria Programme, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre , Moshi , Tanzania
| | - Joanna Reynolds
- Department of Global Health and Development , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - Sham Lal
- Disease Control Department , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - Toby Leslie
- Disease Control Department , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | | | - Jayne Webster
- Disease Control Department , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - Pascal Magnussen
- Centre for Medical Parasitology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen , Denmark
| | - Evelyn Ansah
- Dangme West District Health Directorate, Ghana Health Service , Dodowa , Ghana
| | - Kristian S Hansen
- Department of Global Health and Development , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - Eleanor Hutchinson
- Department of Global Health and Development , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - Bonnie Cundill
- Disease Control Department , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - Shunmay Yeung
- Department of Global Health and Development , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - David Schellenberg
- Disease Control Department , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - Sarah G Staedke
- Disease Control Department , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - Virginia Wiseman
- Department of Global Health and Development , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK.,School of Public Health and Community Medicine , Kensington , New South Wales , Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
DiLiberto DD, Staedke SG, Nankya F, Maiteki-Sebuguzi C, Taaka L, Nayiga S, Kamya MR, Haaland A, Chandler CIR. Behind the scenes of the PRIME intervention: designing a complex intervention to improve malaria care at public health centres in Uganda. Glob Health Action 2015; 8:29067. [PMID: 26498744 PMCID: PMC4620687 DOI: 10.3402/gha.v8.29067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2015] [Revised: 09/20/2015] [Accepted: 09/22/2015] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In Uganda, health system challenges limit access to good quality healthcare and contribute to slow progress on malaria control. We developed a complex intervention (PRIME), which was designed to improve quality of care for malaria at public health centres. Objective Responding to calls for increased transparency, we describe the PRIME intervention's design process, rationale, and final content and reflect on the choices and challenges encountered during the design of this complex intervention. Design To develop the intervention, we followed a multistep approach, including the following: 1) formative research to identify intervention target areas and objectives; 2) prioritization of intervention components; 3) review of relevant evidence; 4) development of intervention components; 5) piloting and refinement of workshop modules; and 6) consolidation of the PRIME intervention theories of change to articulate why and how the intervention was hypothesized to produce desired outcomes. We aimed to develop an intervention that was evidence-based, grounded in theory, and appropriate for the study context; could be evaluated within a randomized controlled trial; and had the potential to be scaled up sustainably. Results The process of developing the PRIME intervention package was lengthy and dynamic. The final intervention package consisted of four components: 1) training in fever case management and use of rapid diagnostic tests for malaria (mRDTs); 2) workshops in health centre management; 3) workshops in patient-centred services; and 4) provision of mRDTs and antimalarials when stocks ran low. Conclusions The slow and iterative process of intervention design contrasted with the continually shifting study context. We highlight the considerations and choices made at each design stage, discussing elements we included and why, as well as those that were ultimately excluded. Reflection on and reporting of ‘behind the scenes’ accounts of intervention design may improve the design, assessment, and generalizability of complex interventions and their evaluations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah D DiLiberto
- Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK;
| | - Sarah G Staedke
- Department of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.,Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda
| | | | | | - Lilian Taaka
- Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Susan Nayiga
- Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Moses R Kamya
- Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.,School of Medicine, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Ane Haaland
- Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Clare I R Chandler
- Department of Global Health & Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Staedke SG, Chandler CIR, DiLiberto D, Maiteki-Sebuguzi C, Nankya F, Webb E, Dorsey G, Kamya MR. The PRIME trial protocol: evaluating the impact of an intervention implemented in public health centres on management of malaria and health outcomes of children using a cluster-randomised design in Tororo, Uganda. Implement Sci 2013; 8:114. [PMID: 24079295 PMCID: PMC3851935 DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2013] [Accepted: 09/19/2013] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In Africa, inadequate health services contribute to the lack of progress on malaria control. Evidence of the impact of interventions to improve health services on population-level malaria indicators is needed. We are conducting a cluster-randomised trial to assess whether a complex intervention delivered at public health centres in Uganda improves health outcomes of children and treatment of malaria, as compared to the current standard of care. Methods/Design Twenty public health centres (level II and III) in Tororo district will be included; 10 will be randomly assigned to the intervention and 10 to control. Clusters will include households located within 2 km of health centres. The trial statistician will generate the random allocation sequence and assign clusters. Health centres will be stratified by level, and restricted randomisation will be employed to ensure balance on cluster location and size. Allocation will not be blinded. The intervention includes training in health centre management, fever case management with use of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for malaria, and patient-centered services, and provision of artemether-lumefantrine (AL) and RDTs when stocks run low. The impact of the intervention on population-level health indicators will be assessed through community surveys conducted at baseline in randomly selected children from each cluster, and repeated annually for two years. The impact on individuals over time will be assessed in a cohort study of children recruited from households randomly selected per cluster. The impact on health centres will be assessed using patient exit interviews, monthly surveillance, and assessment of health worker knowledge and skills. The primary outcome is the prevalence of anaemia (haemoglobin <11.0 g/dL) in individual children under five measured in the annual community surveys. The primary analysis will be based on the cluster-level results. Discussion The PRIME trial findings will be supplemented by the PROCESS study, an evaluation of the process, context, and wider impact of the PRIME intervention which will be conducted alongside the main trial, together providing evidence of the health impact of a public sector intervention in Uganda. Trial registration and funding This trial is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01024426) and is supported by the ACT Consortium.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah G Staedke
- Department of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cattamanchi A, Davis JL, Worodria W, den Boon S, Yoo S, Matovu J, Kiidha J, Nankya F, Kyeyune R, Byanyima P, Andama A, Joloba M, Osmond DH, Hopewell PC, Huang L. Sensitivity and specificity of fluorescence microscopy for diagnosing pulmonary tuberculosis in a high HIV prevalence setting. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2009; 13:1130-1136. [PMID: 19723403 PMCID: PMC2754584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
SETTING Mulago Hospital, Kampala, Uganda. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the diagnostic performance of fluorescence microscopy (FM) for diagnosing pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) in a high human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevalence setting. DESIGN Consecutive in-patients with cough for >2 weeks submitted two sputum specimens for smear microscopy. Smears were examined by conventional light microscopy (CM) and FM. The performance of the two methods was compared using mycobacterial culture as a reference standard. RESULTS A total of 426 patients (82% HIV-infected) were evaluated. FM identified 11% more smear-positive patients than CM (49% vs. 38%, P < 0.001). However, positive FM results were less likely than positive CM results to be confirmed by culture when smears were read as either 'scanty' (54% vs. 90%, P < 0.001) or 1+ (82% vs. 91%, P = 0.02). Compared to CM, the sensitivity of FM was higher (72% vs. 64%, P = 0.005), and the specificity lower (81% vs. 96%, P < 0.001). In receiver operating characteristic analysis, maximum area under the curve for FM was obtained at a threshold of >4 acid-fast bacilli/100 fields (sensitivity 68%, specificity 90%). CONCLUSION Although FM increases the sensitivity of sputum smear microscopy, additional data on FM specificity and on the clinical consequences associated with false-positive FM results are needed to guide implementation of this technology in high HIV prevalence settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Cattamanchi
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|