The importance of inhibitor eradication in clinically complicated hemophilia A patients

Acquired hemophilia A as a disease of the elderly: A comprehensive review of epidemiology, pathogenesis, and novel therapy

Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare autoimmune bleeding disorder characterized by the development of neutralizing autoantibodies (inhibitors) against coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). This review provides an in-depth exploration of AHA, covering its epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical presentation, diagnosis, complications, and treatment strategies, focusing on recent advancements. AHA can manifest in both men and women with no prior bleeding history. The annual incidence is estimated to be approximately 1 case per million individuals in the general population. The incidence increases significantly with age: the incidence among individuals aged 60 years or older is approximately 3 to 4 cases per million individuals per year. Typically, patients present with an acquired bleeding disorder that is characterized by an isolated, prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time stemming from FVIII deficiency. Diagnosis relies on the detection of neutralizing antibodies using the Nijmegen-modified Bethesda assay. Hemostatic control strategies involve bypassing agents like recombinant activated factor VII, activated prothrombin complex concentrate, and recombinant porcine FVIII for bleeding patients. Emicizumab, a novel bypassing agent, exhibits several potential advantages. In the realm of immunosuppressive treatment for inhibitor eradication, the CyDRi regimen emerged as a remarkable advancement, significantly enhancing the outlook for the management of AHA even in the elderly frail population.

Recent Advances in Gene Therapy for Hemophilia: Projecting the Perspectives

One of the well-known X-linked genetic disorders is hemophilia, which could be hemophilia A as a result of a mutation in the F8 (factor VIII) gene or hemophilia B as a result of a mutation in the F9 (factor IX) gene, leading to insufficient levels of the proteins essential for blood coagulation cascade. In patients with severe hemophilia, factor VIII or factor IX activities in the blood plasma are considerably low, estimated to be less than 1%. This is responsible for spontaneous or post-traumatic bleeding episodes, or both, leading to disease complications and death. Current treatment of hemophilia relies on the prevention of bleeding, which consists of expensive lifelong replacement infusion therapy of blood plasma clotting factors, their recombinant versions, or therapy with recombinant monoclonal antibodies. Recently emerged gene therapy approaches may be a potential game changer that could reshape the therapeutic outcomes of hemophilia A or B using a one-off vector in vivo delivery and aim to achieve long-term endogenous expression of factor VIII or IX. This review examines both traditional approaches to the treatment of hemophilia and modern methods, primarily focusing on gene therapy, to update knowledge in this area. Recent technological advances and gene therapeutics in the pipeline are critically reviewed and summarized. We consider gene therapy to be the most promising method as it may overcome the problems associated with more traditional treatments, such as the need for constant and expensive infusions and the presence of an immune response to the antibody drugs used to treat hemophilia.

Economic Evaluation of Immune Tolerance Induction in Children With Severe Hemophilia A and High-Responding Inhibitors: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Prophylaxis With Emicizumab

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to measure the cost-effectiveness of prophylaxis with emicizumab in PsHAhri on ITI in Brazil.

METHODS

A cost-effectiveness modeling analysis was used to estimate the costs per PsHAhri on ITI and the number of prevented bleedings from undertaking one intervention (prophylaxis with BpA) over another (prophylaxis with emicizumab), based on the Brazilian Ministry of Health perspective. Costs of ITI with recombinant FVIII, prophylaxis with BpA or emicizumab, and treated bleeding episodes with BpA costs were evaluated for PsHAhri who had ITI success or failure. This study was conducted with the perspective of the Brazilian Ministry of Health (payer).

RESULTS

During ITI, prophylaxis with BpA cost US $924 666/PsHAhri/ITI, whereas prophylaxis with emicizumab cost US $488 785/PsHAhri/ITI. During ITI, there was an average of 9.32 bleeding episodes/PsHAhri/ITI when BpA were used as prophylaxis and 0.67 bleeding/PsHAhri/ITI when emicizumab was used. By univariate deterministic sensitivity analysis, emicizumab remained dominant whichever variable was modified.

CONCLUSION

In this study, prophylaxis with emicizumab during ITI is a dominant option compared with prophylaxis with BpA during ITI.

Immune tolerance induction in the era of emicizumab - still the first choice for patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors?

INTRODUCTION

The development of inhibitory antibodies is a severe complication of clotting factor replacement therapy in patients with severe haemophilia A (HA). Current World Federation of Hemophilia (WFH) guidelines for haemophilia care indicate that eradication of inhibitors is best achieved through immune tolerance induction (ITI) therapy.

AIM

The European Collaborative Haemophilia Network conducted a survey to determine whether ITI is still used in the routine management of patients with HA, and whether the availability of emicizumab prophylaxis has influenced treatment decisions.

METHODS

The survey was conducted in late 2020/early 2021 in 18 centres representing 17 countries in the Europe/Middle East region treating a total of 4955 patients, and included sections specific to patient and centre demographics, treatment protocols (both ITI and prophylactic), inhibitor development and initiation of ITI, treatment success, and the incidence of adverse events.

RESULTS

While our results indicate that ITI can still be considered a mainstay of treatment for patients with HA with inhibitors, less than daily dosing of ITI in combination with emicizumab prophylaxis is becoming commonplace across the spectrum of disease severity, with initiation being guided by bleeding patterns. The most frequently cited reasons for not initiating emicizumab prophylaxis were availability or reimbursement issues.

CONCLUSION

ITI remains a mainstay for haemophilia treatment of patients with HA with inhibitors, but emicizumab has become a preferred first-line approach to protect against bleeds and represents an alternative to burdensome ITI in certain patient groups.

Predictors of inhibitor eradication by primary immune tolerance induction in severe haemophilia A with high responding inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Immune tolerance induction (ITI) is the only proven strategy to eradicate factor VIII inhibitors in patients with haemophilia A (HA).

AIM

To identify patients and treatment options with the highest chance of inhibitor eradication by primary ITI.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In the frame of the Italian ITI Registry, carried out from 1995 to 2015 (last follow-up 2018), 137 primary ITI courses in severe HA patients (90/137 with poor prognosis) were analysed for predictors of outcome (complete/partial response or failure). Sixty-six of them (48%) were prospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

ITI was successful in 91/137 patients (66.4%) and 70 (51.1%) achieved complete response within 11 months (median). Historical peak titres ≤200 BU/ml (P = .033), inhibitor titres ≤5 BU/ml at ITI start (P = .001), peak titres ≤100 BU/ml during ITI (P < .001) and missense mutations and small insertions/deletions of FVIII gene (P = .027) predicted complete inhibitor eradication. A score that considers the cumulative number of these variables predicted complete response with positive predictive values up to .81 at ITI start and .91 during ITI, respectively. Patients who had no bleeding (OR, 3.45, 95% CI: 1.4-8.6) nor other adverse events (OR 2.6, 95%CI: 1.3-5.3) during ITI had higher chances of complete response. During the 120-month follow-up (median), 2/70 patients who had achieved complete response relapsed (2.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

This Registry, with a centralized review of outcomes, homogeneous data collection (half of which prospective) and long-term follow-up, provides insights for optimizing ITI, with a rationale for further studies in the currently evolving scenario of inhibitor management in HA patients.

Design of an international investigator-initiated study on MOdern Treatment of Inhibitor-positiVe pATiEnts with haemophilia A (MOTIVATE)

Background:

Inhibitor development is the most serious treatment-related complication of replacement coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) therapy for patients with haemophilia A. Immune tolerance induction (ITI), which involves intensive and prolonged treatment with plasma-derived or recombinant FVIII, is the only clinically proven strategy for eradication of inhibitors. The bispecific antibody emicizumab is approved for use in patients with and without inhibitors to prevent bleeding but does not eliminate inhibitors. MOTIVATE (www.motivate-study.com) aims to capture different approaches to the treatment and management of patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors, document current ITI approaches from real-world clinical experience, and evaluate the efficacy and safety of ITI, emicizumab prophylaxis and ITI with emicizumab prophylaxis.

Methods:

The investigator-initiated MOTIVATE study [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04023019; EudraCT 2019-003427-38] will investigate in real-life clinical practice the management of patients with haemophilia A of any severity who have developed inhibitors to FVIII. All treatment is at the investigator’s discretion. The following treatment approaches will be evaluated: Group 1 – ITI with Nuwiq^®, octanate^® or wilate^® and aPCC/rFVIIa if needed to treat bleeding episodes (BEs) or during surgery or for prophylaxis; Group 2 – ITI with Nuwiq^®, octanate^® or wilate^® and emicizumab prophylaxis and aPCC/rFVIIa if needed to treat BEs or during surgery; Group 3 – routine prophylaxis with emicizumab, aPCC or rFVIIa without ITI and aPCC/rFVIIa if needed to treat BEs or during surgery. Patients will not be randomised to a treatment group and may change groups during the study.

Conclusions:

It is planned to enrol 120 patients who will be followed for up to 5 years. Optional sub-studies will explore factors that may influence ITI results as well as the impact of different treatment approaches on important aspects of patient health, including joint and bone health and the risk of thrombotic events.

Recombinant VWF fragments improve bioavailability of subcutaneous factor VIII in hemophilia A mice

Conventional treatment of hemophilia A (HA) requires repetitive IV injection of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). Subcutaneous administration of FVIII is inefficient because of binding to the extravascular matrix, in particular to phospholipids (PLs), and subsequent proteolysis. To overcome this, recombinant dimeric fragments of von Willebrand factor (VWF) containing the FVIII-stabilizing D3 domain were engineered. Two fragments, called VWF-12 and VWF-13, demonstrated high binding affinity to recombinant human FVIII (rhFVIII) and suppressed PL binding in a dose-dependent manner. High concentrations of VWF fragments did not interfere with the functional properties of full-length VWF in vitro. The HA mouse model was used to study the effects of VWF-12 or VWF-13 on the in vivo pharmacokinetics of rhFVIII, demonstrating (1) no significant impact on rhFVIII recovery or half-life after a single IV administration; (2) enhanced bioavailability (up to 18.5%) of rhFVIII after subcutaneous administration; and (3) slow absorption (peak concentration, 6 hours) and prolonged half-life (up to 2.5-fold) of rhFVIII after subcutaneous administration. Formation of anti-FVIII antibodies was not increased after administration of rhFVIII/VWF-12 subcutaneously compared with rhFVIII IV. A single subcutaneous dose of rhFVIII/VWF-12 provided protection in the HA tail-bleeding model for up to 24 hours. In summary, recombinant VWF fragments support FVIII delivery through the subcutaneous space into vascular circulation without interfering with VWF or FVIII function. Slow resorption and excretion of FVIII after subcutaneous administration highlight the potential application of VWF fragments for subcutaneous FVIII prophylaxis in HA.

A challenging management of hemophilia B patient with inhibitors undergoing major orthopedic surgeries in a resource-constrained country

In this paper, we report a life-threatening condition and relate our experience in managing a hemophilia B patient who required three surgical procedures, highlighting the difficulties we encountered in our setting and propose some tangible.

The societal burden of haemophilia A. I - A snapshot of haemophilia A in Australia and beyond

INTRODUCTION

Few studies, both in Australia and overseas, have examined the social impacts of living with haemophilia A (HA) or the economic costs associated with the disorder. The purpose of this paper is to examine the epidemiology and societal burden of people with HA (PwHA) in Australia, with a particular focus on men with this disorder.

METHODS

The epidemiology and societal burden of HA in Australia, with a particular focus on men with this disorder, were assessed, using data available in the Australian and international literature and publicly available data.

RESULTS

The mean annual prevalence of HA is approximately 1-2 per 10 000 males. Prophylactic treatment is used in one-quarter (25.1%) of people with moderate HA, and 82.2% of people with severe HA. Within the latter group, 16.1% have inhibitors for Factor VIII, predisposing them to worse morbidity, mortality and quality of life when compared to the non-inhibitor population. Joint pain and joint disease occur commonly in PwHA, with up to 70% of adults with HA experiencing joint problems. HA is associated with poor physical health, and PwHA miss school and work due to bleeding-related events.

CONCLUSION

HA is associated with substantial economic burden; with large differences in costs reported between countries. Overall, HA imposes a significant burden of disease on PwHA, their families and the community at large.

Optimizing the management of patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors in the era of emicizumab: Recommendations from a German expert panel

Standard treatment of haemophilia A is based on replacing the missing coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) to treat and prevent bleeding episodes. The most challenging complication of FVIII therapy is the development of neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors) that can render treatment ineffective. Eradication of the inhibitor through immune tolerance induction (ITI) remains the most effective strategy for managing these patients. Bypassing agents can be used to help restore haemostasis in inhibitor patients. Several novel agents have recently been developed, such as the FVIII mimetic agent emicizumab, which has been effective in reducing the annualized bleeding rate in haemophilia A patients with inhibitors. When coadministered with repetitive high doses of activated prothrombin complex concentrate (ie >100 U/kg/d for ≥24 hours), emicizumab was associated with thrombotic microangiopathy and thrombosis events. As a consequence the United Kingdom Haemophilia Centres Doctors' Organisation (UKHCDO) issued the first guidance on the treatment of bleeding episodes in patients receiving emicizumab. To build on and extend this work, a panel of German haemophilia specialists met to discuss the UK guidance, review current evidence and provide additional guidance for German healthcare professionals on how to optimize the management of patients with haemophilia A receiving emicizumab. Recommendations are provided on the use of bypassing and other agents to manage breakthrough bleeding, ITI in the emicizumab era, haemostatic support during surgery and issues relating to laboratory monitoring.

Practical Guidance of the GTH Haemophilia Board on the Use of Emicizumab in Patients with Haemophilia A

Emicizumab has been approved for bleeding prophylaxis in patients with haemophilia A (PWHAs) with or without inhibitors. Because of substantial differences between factor VIII (FVIII) and Emicizumab, the 'Ständige Kommission Hämophilie' of the German, Austrian, Swiss Society for Thrombosis and Haemostasis Research (GTH) established a practical guidance for the use of Emicizumab in PWHAs. A systematic literature research was conducted in PubMed. Based on this and on personal experience, this practical guidance has been developed. Each single statement has been discussed among members of the 'Ständige Kommission Hämophilie' and revised accordingly. The final set of recommendations has been approved by all authors analogous to the Delphi method. This practical guidance is provided for physicians treating PWHAs with regard to general aspects, patient education, bleeding treatment, surgery, use of Emicizumab in previously untreated patients (PUPs), patients with newly diagnosed inhibitors and elderly patients. Patients should be treated in expert centres and adequate laboratory tests to monitor Emicizumab levels, FVIII replacement and inhibitors should be available. Early experience of immune tolerance induction protocols integrating Emicizumab is reviewed, and the limited experience in PUPs and very young children is described. So far, no thromboembolic complications have been reported with the concomitant use of FVIII or recombinant activated FVII for bleeding treatment or surgery. Activated prothrombin complex concentrate doses of >100 U/kg for >24 hours should be avoided whenever possible because of the high risk of thrombosis and/or thrombotic microangiopathy. In conclusion, this study is designed to support haemophilia physicians using Emicizumab in physicians treating hemophilia and using (PWHAs). With further post-marketing experience and trials, regular updates are necessary.

Bispecific Antibodies and Advances in Non-Gene Therapy Options in Hemophilia

Regular prophylaxis has markedly improved the treatment for patients with hemophilia A, especially after the introduction of highly purified factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates. However, frequent intravenous infusions and the development of FVIII inhibitors remain as unsolved difficulties. To overcome these unmet needs, a bispecific antibody mimicking activated FVIII has been developed in Japan. This bispecific antibody, emicizumab, recognizes activated factor IX (FIXa) and activated factor X (FXa), and promotes FIXa-catalyzed activation of FX in the absence of FVIII. Emicizumab initially reacts with FIXa generated by the action of factor VIIa/tissue factor complexes. Subsequently, thrombin generation is enhanced in the presence of higher amounts of FIXa derived from FXIa-dependent mechanisms. Hence, emicizumab-driven FXa and thrombin generation is maintained by a FXI activation loop in the intrinsic coagulation pathway. Reactions downstream of emicizumab are regulated by natural anticoagulants including activated protein C, antithrombin, and tissue factor pathway inhibitor. Phase 3 studies (HAVEN 1-4 and HOHOEMI studies) demonstrated a remarkable reduction in bleeding rates together with a high percentage of patients with zero treated bleeds irrespective of the presence of inhibitors. In general, emicizumab proved to be well tolerated, although isolated thromboembolic and thrombotic microangiopathic complications were observed in the HAVEN 1 studies, and 3 out of a total of 400 patients developed neutralizing antidrug antibodies. In addition, several questions remain to be discussed with respect to open-use clinical practice, including when to start treatment, how to monitor therapy, and optimum dosage for surgical procedures and immune tolerance induction.