Switching patients in the age of long-acting recombinant products?

Etranacogene dezaparvovec for the treatment of adult patients with severe and moderately severe hemophilia B

INTRODUCTION

Etranacogene dezaparvovec is the first gene therapy approved for treatment of adults with severe and moderately severe hemophilia B.

AREAS COVERED

This review describes the results of the clinical trial program of AMT-060 and etranacogene dezaparvovec, outlining the pharmacokinetic, clinical efficacy and safety data. With the entry of etranacogene dezaparvovec into the market, this review summarizes the treatment landscape in hemophilia B and discusses the current unknowns in the field.

EXPERT OPINION

Gene therapy appears to be a feasible option for adults with severe and moderately severe hemophilia B. Etranacogene dezaparvovec enables most patients to reach stable factor IX (FIX) levels after a single intravenous infusion, eliminating the need for regular prophylaxis; thus, drastically reducing treatment burden and avoiding variable bleeding risk owing to fluctuating FIX activity levels. Efficacy of etranacogene dezaparvovec has been demonstrated even in the presence of preexisting neutralizing antibodies (up to a titer of 1:678), with a relative low risk of transaminitis and its associated potential loss of transgene expression. However, long-term data are required to ascertain the durability of FIX levels achieved and safety. The cost-effectiveness and adoption of innovative payment models for reimbursement are key in choosing gene therapy over existing treatments.

Clinical experience of switching patients with severe hemophilia to rVIII-SingleChain or rIX-FP

OBJECTIVE

Prophylaxis treatment is the current standard of care for patients with severe hemophilia. Factor concentrates with improved pharmacokinetics have offered more options for individualizing treatment. The treatment focus may be on increased protection, aiming for higher trough factor levels or longer dosing intervals to reduce the burden of hemophilia. Both aspects can have long-term effects on joint health. Products, such as rVIII‑SingleChain and rIX-FP have been developed to reduce the treatment burden for patients with hemophilia and optimize prophylactic efficacy. The objective of this report is to provide a summary of the clinical experience of different Hemophilia Treatment Centers in managing the switch to rVIII-SingleChain or rIX-FP in patients with hemophilia.

METHODS

This report summarizes a selection of patient cases presented at the 3rd Alliance for Coagulation Academy Meeting in October 2020. The cases from the participating centers provide examples of the clinical experience in managing patients' switch to rVIII-SingleChain and rIX‑FP, including which types of patients are suitable for switching, and practical steps in managing a switch.

RESULTS

It is important to take into consideration the physical and social fulfillment of the patient when deciding to switch to rVIII-SingleChain or rIX-FP. The physician plays an important role in the motivation of patients as they understand not only the patient's needs but the potential benefits of the new treatment.

CONCLUSION

The selected patient cases reported here demonstrate that patients may wish to switch factor products for a variety of reasons; therefore, it is critical to understand why patients switch and what they expect from switching.

Efficacy and Safety of Weekly Somatrogon vs Daily Somatropin in Children With Growth Hormone Deficiency: A Phase 3 Study

CONTEXT

Somatrogon is a long-acting recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) in development for once-weekly treatment of children with growth hormone deficiency (GHD).

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of once-weekly somatrogon with once-daily somatropin in prepubertal children with GHD.

METHODS

In this 12-month, open-label, randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 study, participants were randomized 1:1 to receive once-weekly somatrogon (0.66 mg/kg/week) or once-daily somatropin (0.24 mg/kg/week) for 12 months. A total of 228 prepubertal children (boys aged 3-11 years, girls aged 3-10 years) with GHD, impaired height and height velocity (HV), and no prior rhGH treatment were randomized and 224 received ≥1 dose of study treatment (somatrogon: 109; somatropin: 115). The primary endpoint was annualized HV at month 12.

RESULTS

HV at month 12 was 10.10 cm/year for somatrogon-treated subjects and 9.78 cm/year for somatropin-treated subjects, with a treatment difference (somatrogon-somatropin) of 0.33 (95% CI: -0.24, 0.89). The lower bound of the 2-sided 95% CI was higher than the prespecified noninferiority margin (-1.8 cm/year), demonstrating noninferiority of once-weekly somatrogon vs daily somatropin. HV at month 6 and change in height standard deviation score at months 6 and 12 were similar between both treatment groups. Both treatments were well tolerated, with a similar percentage of subjects experiencing mild to moderate treatment-emergent adverse events in both groups (somatrogon: 78.9%, somatropin: 79.1%).

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of once-weekly somatrogon was noninferior to once-daily somatropin, with similar safety and tolerability profiles. (ClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT02968004).

IDELVION: A Comprehensive Review of Clinical Trial and Real-World Data

Hemophilia B is a bleeding disorder caused by a deficiency of coagulation factor IX (FIX). Treatment with FIX replacement products can increase FIX activity levels to minimize or prevent bleeding events. However, frequent dosing with standard-acting FIX products can create a high treatment burden. Long-acting products have been developed to maintain bleed protection with extended dosing intervals. Recombinant factor IX–albumin fusion protein (rIX-FP) is a long-acting product indicated for the treatment and prophylaxis of bleeding events and perioperative management in adult and pediatric patients. This review outlines data from all previously treated patients in the Prophylaxis and On-Demand Treatment using Longer Half-Life rIX-FP (PROLONG-9FP) clinical trial program and summarizes real-world data evaluating the use of rIX-FP in routine clinical practice. In the PROLONG-9FP program, rIX-FP demonstrated effective hemostasis in all patients at dose regimens of up to 21 days in patients aged ≥ 18 years and up to 14 days in patients aged < 12 years. rIX-FP has a favorable pharmacokinetic profile and an excellent safety and tolerability profile. Extended dosing intervals with rIX-FP led to high levels of adherence and reduced consumption compared with other FIX therapies. Data from real-world practice are encouraging and reflect the results of the clinical trials.

Current Choices and Management of Treatment in Persons with Severe Hemophilia A without Inhibitors: A Mini-Delphi Consensus

BACKGROUND

Regular treatment to prevent bleeding and consequent joint deterioration (prophylaxis) is the standard of care for persons with severe hemophilia A, traditionally based on intravenous infusions of the deficient clotting FVIII concentrates (CFCs). In recent years, extended half-life (EHL) CFCs and the non-replacement agent emicizumab, subcutaneously administered, have reduced the treatment burden.

METHODS

To compare and integrate the opinions on the different therapies available, eight hemophilia specialists were involved in drafting items of interest and relative statements through the Estimate-Talk-Estimate (ETE) method ("mini-Delphi"), in this way reaching consensus.

RESULTS

Eighteen items were identified, then harmonized to 10, and a statement was generated for each. These statements highlight the importance of personalized prophylaxis regimens. CFCs, particularly EHL products, seem more suitable for this, despite the challenging intravenous (i.v.) administration. Limited real-world experience, particularly in some clinical settings, and the lack of evidence on long-term safety and efficacy of non-replacement agents, require careful individual risk/benefit assessment and multidisciplinary data collection.

CONCLUSIONS

The increased treatment options extend the opportunities of personalized prophylaxis, the mainstay of modern management of hemophilia. Close, long-term clinical and laboratory follow-up of patients using newer therapeutic approaches by specialized hemophilia treatment centers is needed.

Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison of Efficacy and Consumption of rVIII-SingleChain Versus Two Recombinant FVIII Products Used for Prophylactic Treatment of Adults/Adolescents with Severe Haemophilia A

Introduction

Given the relatively small number of patients with haemophilia A, head-to-head comparisons between recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) products are difficult to conduct. This study compared the efficacy and consumption of rVIII-SingleChain (lonoctocog alfa, AFSTYLA^®) with rAHF-PFM (octocog alfa, Advate^®) and rFVIIIFc (efmoroctocog alfa, Elocta^®), for the prophylaxis and treatment of bleeding episodes in previously treated adolescents/adults with severe haemophilia A, through a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC).

Methods

A systematic literature review identified published clinical trials for rAHF-PFM and rFVIIIFc. Individual patient data for rVIII-SingleChain were used to match baseline patient characteristics to those from published trials, using an approach similar to propensity score weighting. After matching, annualized bleeding rates (ABR), percentage of patients with zero bleeds, and rFVIII consumption were compared across trial populations.

Results

Published data were identified from two rAHF-PFM trials and one rFVIIIFc trial. rVIII-SingleChain had similar ABR (risk ratio [RR]: 0.74 [0.16; 3.48]; RR: 1.18 [0.85; 1.65]) and percentage of patients with zero bleeds (odds ratio [OR]: 1.34 [0.56; 3.22]; OR: 0.78 [0.47; 1.31]) versus rAHF-PFM and rFVIIIFc, respectively. Annual rVIII-SingleChain consumption was significantly lower than rAHF-PFM (mean difference: − 1507.66 IU/kg/year [− 2011.71; − 1003.61]) and equivalent to rFVIIIFc (RR: 0.96 [0.62; 1.49]).

Conclusion

Although limited to published information for comparator trials, these results suggest that with an annualized rFVIII consumption comparable to rFVIIIFc, but significantly lower than rAHF-PFM, routine prophylaxis with rVIII-SingleChain is able to maintain a similar ABR and percentage of patients with zero bleeds, attesting to the long-acting nature of rVIII-SingleChain.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-021-01853-0.

It is difficult to directly compare different recombinant FVIII products in head-to-head studies because there are few patients with haemophilia A. This study aimed to indirectly compare the efficacy and consumption of different recombinant FVIII products in the prophylactic treatment of haemophilia A using published clinical data. A proven method for performing indirect comparisons of products is referred to as a matching-adjusted indirect comparison. Using this approach, we were able to compare rVIII-SingleChain with two other recombinant FVIII products (rAHF-PFM and rFVIIIFc). Our results suggest that annual FVIII consumption with rVIII-SingleChain is comparable to rFVIIIFc, but is significantly lower than rAHF-PFM, while maintaining a similar bleeding rate. These results highlight the long-acting nature of the product.

Clinical, humanistic, and economic burden of severe hemophilia B in the United States: Results from the CHESS US and CHESS US+ population surveys

BACKGROUND

Hemophilia B is a rare congenital bleeding disorder that has a significant negative impact on patients' functionality and health-related quality of life. The standard of care for severe hemophilia B in the United States is prophylactic factor IX replacement therapy, which incurs substantial costs for this lifelong condition. Accurate estimates of the burden of hemophilia B are important for population health management and policy decisions, but have only recently accounted for current management strategies. The 'Cost of Severe Hemophilia across the US: a Socioeconomic Survey' (CHESS US) is a cross-sectional database of medical record abstractions and physician-reported information, completed by hematologists and care providers. CHESS US+ is a complementary database of completed questionnaires from patients with hemophilia. Together, CHESS US and CHESS US+ provide contemporary, comprehensive information on the burden of severe hemophilia from the provider and patient perspectives. We used the CHESS US and CHESS US+ data to analyze the clinical, humanistic, and economic burden of hemophilia B for patients treated with factor IX prophylaxis between 2017 and 2019 in the US.

RESULTS

We conducted analysis to assess clinical burden and direct medical costs from 44 patient records in CHESS US, and of direct non-medical costs, indirect costs, and humanistic burden (using the EQ-5D-5L) from 57 patients in CHESS US+. The mean annual bleed rate was 1.73 (standard deviation, 1.39); approximately 9% of patients experienced a bleed-related hospitalization during the 12-month study period. Nearly all patients (85%) reported chronic pain, and the mean EQ-5D-5L utility value was 0.76 (0.24). The mean annual direct medical cost was $614,886, driven by factor IX treatment (mean annual cost, $611,971). Subgroup analyses showed mean annual costs of $397,491 and $788,491 for standard and extended half-life factor IX treatment, respectively. The mean annual non-medical direct costs and indirect costs of hemophilia B were $2,371 and $6,931.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis of patient records and patient-reported outcomes from CHESS US and CHESS US+ provides updated information on the considerable clinical, humanistic, and economic burden of hemophilia B in the US. Substantial unmet needs remain to improve patient care with sustainable population health strategies.

Translating the success of prophylaxis in haemophilia to von Willebrand disease

INTRODUCTION

There is limited awareness of von Willebrand disease (VWD), leading to challenges in both diagnosis and defining the optimal treatment approach for these patients. Patients with VWD are typically treated on-demand, with short-term prophylaxis used during surgery. In contrast, early initiation, and long-term use of prophylaxis is the standard of care in patients with severe haemophilia and can be successfully used to prevent joint bleeding and reduce chronic arthropathy.

AIM

To provide an understanding of the current evidence for the prophylactic treatment of patients with VWD and compare this to the management of patients with haemophilia.

METHODS

Review of published literature using a non-systematic search of PubMed and reference lists of sourced articles.

RESULTS

The successes seen with prophylaxis in haemophilia provide the rationale for long-term prophylaxis in patients with severe forms of VWD; preventing spontaneous, excessive and sometimes life-threatening bleeding, and reducing chronic joint disease. Currently, there are a few clinical trials assessing the long-term benefits of prophylaxis in VWD, and guidelines for the optimal prophylaxis treatment approach are lacking. Greater attempts to provide comprehensive, long-term care for patients with VWD are needed but still lacking within the community. This review highlights the success of prophylaxis in haemophilia and how this knowledge might be applied and translated to patients with VWD.

CONCLUSIONS

Lessons can be learned from the use of prophylaxis in haemophilia and prophylaxis should be considered the standard of care for a subgroup of patients with severe VWD.

A systematic review evaluating the efficacy and factor consumption of long-acting recombinant factor VIII products for the prophylactic treatment of hemophilia A

AIMS

Long-acting (LA) recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) products with extended dosing intervals have been developed for the treatment of hemophilia A; however, no direct head-to-head trial has been conducted to compare the efficacy of these products.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted to identify published Phase III clinical trials of prophylactic LA rFVIII treatment in previously treated patients aged ≥12 years, with moderate-to-severe hemophilia A (endogenous FVIII levels ≤2%). Studies that did not meet these criteria, or did not report the included outcomes, were excluded. Bleeding rates and consumption were extracted and summarized; only data for the dosing frequencies indicated in the US product labels (which are similar to those indicated in the European Medicines Agency labels) were included.

RESULTS

Five articles met the inclusion criteria; these studies only included patients with severe hemophilia A. Treatment length, reported outcomes and dose (range: 20-65 IU/kg) varied between studies. Median annualized bleeding rate (ABR) (IQR) reported in the relevant studies was 1.14 (0.00-4.30), rVIII-SingleChain 2 or 3 times weekly; 1.6 (0.0-4.7), rFVIIIFc 2 times weekly followed by every 3-5 days; 1.9 (0.0-5.8), BAX855 2 times weekly; 1.18 (0.00-4.25), N8-GP every 4 days; 1.9 (0.0-5.2) and 4.1 (2.0-10.6), BAY 94-9027 2 times weekly for the cohort who experienced >1 or <1 bleed in the study run-in phase, respectively. Median spontaneous ABR was 0.0 across studies reporting relevant data. Reported consumption was comparable among all LA products.

LIMITATIONS

The primary limitation of this systematic review was the variation in study design and not all studies reported all desired outcomes, which limited the quantity of data available.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review identified pivotal trial data for LA rFVIII products. Real-world evidence is needed to understand how these products perform in clinical practice.

Extended half-life recombinant products in haemophilia clinical practice - Expectations, opportunities and challenges

Extended half-life (EHL) products have shown robust efficacy in clinical trials, whilst allowing for less intense treatment regimens when compared with standard half-life products. Regimen optimisation with EHL products could lead to further improvements in bleeding rates, quality of life and reductions in treatment burden. Patients now expect good efficacy, a lower treatment burden and equivalent safety when compared with standard half-life products. As our knowledge base grows these expectations have evolved and targeting an annualised bleeding rate of zero has become a more realistic clinical goal. Personalised prophylaxis can help patients achieve these goals. However, a number of challenges still remain, including cost, challenges in predicting outcomes for patients and differences in patients' and clinicians' expectations. When switching a patient, comprehensive patient care can reduce the impact of these issues. This review presents in brief the protein therapeutics with an extended half-life, including key trial results, challenges of chronic care that impact on patients' outcomes and how the modified proteins might help address some of these issues. In addition, practical steps for managing the switch to EHL products are presented.