Information communication technology-enabled instrumental activities of daily living: a paradigm shift in functional assessment

Not daily, sometimes not ever - mixed methods exploration of the contemporary relevance of tasks contained in extended activities of daily living scales

BACKGROUND

Assessment of functional status is an integral part of older adult healthcare and research. Therefore, it is essential that tools to capture function are contextually appropriate. Many tools designed to evaluate extended Activities of Daily Living (eADLs) were developed decades ago.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to explore which eADL tasks are commonly performed by older adults and map these tasks to popular eADL scales, seeking stakeholder perspectives to inform recommendations on scale content.

DESIGN

Online survey with quantitative questions and free text followed-by semi-structured interviews.

SUBJECTS

Older adults (≥60-years), carers and health, social care and voluntary/community professionals.

METHODS

We extracted eADL tasks from existing scales to develop a survey on frequency of performance, with space for additional comment. The survey was disseminated via Join Dementia Research and other clinical and professional networks. Online semi-structured interviews were undertaken with thematic analysis of verbatim transcripts.

RESULTS

From 2244 online survey responses, 87% came from older people and two-thirds of respondents were female. Some eADL tasks were never performed by many participants. Tasks not part of existing tools included online banking and mobile phone use. From fifteen interviews, a recurring theme was that technological and societal changes have altered daily tasks.

CONCLUSIONS

Commonly used eADL scales contain obsolete tasks and omit tasks older people consider part of their everyday lives. There is a need to work collaboratively to update eADL tools to reflect the priorities and activities of older people to ensure these remain valid measures for use in practice and research. To complement this abstract, a video abstract is available online. A more detailed video-based summary of the content is also available as supplemental material.

Fear of falling, quality of life, and daily functional activity of elderly women with and without a history of falling: a cross-sectional study

Background

This study aimed to evaluate the fear of falling, quality of life, and daily functional activity of older women aged 60 years or older with or without a history of falling.

Materials and methods

Two hundred older adult women were recruited for the cross-sectional study in Iran. This cross-sectional study collected data from July to August 2023 through convenience sampling. The researchers collected data using a five-part questionnaire, that collected information that included demographic characteristics, the Fall Efficacy Scale in the Elderly-International Version (FES-I), 12-item Quality of Life assessment (SF-12), Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) and Activities of Daily Living (ADL).

Results

FES-I score in older women with a history of falls was significantly higher than those without a history of falls [median: 38.0, interquartile range (IQR): 31.5-44.0 versus median: 22.0, IQR: 20.0-30.0; P<0.001]. The median quality-of-life score using the SF-12 was significantly lower in women with a history of falls than in those without a history of falls (median: 25.0, IQR: 21.0-30.0 versus median: 35.0, IQR: 31.0-39.0; P<0.001). The ADL scores were significantly lower among women with a history of falls than those without (P<0.001). A similar result was obtained for IADL scores (P<0.001).

Conclusion

Overall, this study's findings highlight the adverse impact of a history of falls on three key factors: fear of falling, quality of life, and daily functional activity (including both basic and instrumental activities). The findings delineate that, ultimately, the history of falls can serve as a valuable indicator for better understanding trends in elderly care and addressing the associated challenges.

Diagnosing homo digitalis: towards a standardized assessment for digital tool competencies

Introduction

In the 21st century, digital devices have become integral to our daily lives. Still, practical assessments designed to evaluate an individual's digital tool competencies are absent. The present study introduces the "Digital Tools Test" ("DIGI"), specifically designed for the evaluation of one's proficiency in handling common applications and functions of smartphones and tablets. The DIGI assessment has been primarily tailored for prospective use among older adults and neurological patients with the latter frequently suffering from so-called apraxia, which potentially also affects the handling of digital tools. Similar to traditional tool use tests that assess tool-selection and tool-action processes, the DIGI assessment evaluates an individual's ability to select an appropriate application for a given task (e.g., creating a new contact), their capacity to navigate within the chosen application and their competence in executing precise and accurate movements, such as swiping.

Methods

We tested the implementation of the DIGI in a group of 16 healthy adults aged 18 to 28 years and 16 healthy adults aged 60 to 74 years. All participants were able to withstand the assessment and reported good acceptance.

Results

The results revealed a significant performance disparity, with older adults displaying notably lower proficiency in the DIGI. The DIGI performance of older adults exhibited a correlation with their ability to employ a set of novel mechanical tools, but not with their ability to handle a set of familiar common tools. There was no such correlation for the younger group.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study introduces an innovative assessment tool aimed at evaluating common digital tool competencies. Our preliminary results demonstrate good acceptance and reveal expected group differences. For current cohorts of older adults, the results seem to indicate that the ability to use novel tools may aid digital tool use. In the next step, the psychometric properties of the DIGI assessment should be evaluated in larger and more diverse samples. The advancement of digital tool competency assessments and rehabilitation strategies is essential when we aim at facilitating societal inclusion and participation for individuals in affected populations.

The use of everyday and assistive technology in the lives of older autistic adults

LAY ABSTRACT

Technology has the potential to help people with various support needs live more autonomous lives. This includes autistic individuals. In this article, we look at how older autistic adults use technology in their daily lives. Past research examining technology use and autism has mainly focused on helping children to learn new skills. To date, very little research has been conducted looking at how to create and design technology for use by older autistic adults. This is concerning because older autistic adults will likely have supports needs that match or exceed those of similarly aged non-autistic individuals. In this article, we spoke to autistic adults over 50 years about their daily experiences and how they use technology. We identified some important ways that older autistic adults use technology in their daily lives, as well as a number of support needs and barriers to technology use. Based on the findings, we were able to provide some guidelines and recommendations for technology developers and service providers to assist with designing, creating and using technology with older autistic adults.

Developing strategies to improve the community readiness level to prevent drug abuse in adolescents: Based on the community readiness model, Eghlid City, Iran, 2019

The aim of this study was to investigate the level of readiness of Eghlid city community for adolescents' substance abuse prevention programs, and to develop strategies to improve community readiness levels based on the community readiness model (CRM). In this two-stage qualitative study, a 36-item semi-structured CRM questionnaire, was used to interview 11 key informants in Eghlid city, Iran, 2019. The interviews were analyzed and scored by two independent researchers. Strategies for increasing the level of readiness were developed and prioritized by participants using the nominal group method. The readiness levels to prevent substance abuse in community efforts and leadership dimensions were at stabilization and preparation stage. In terms of community awareness of efforts, community space, and public awareness of the issue, the readiness level was at the pre-planning stage, and in the resources for prevention efforts dimension, it was at the vague awareness level. In the strategy development section, the key participants focused on using traditional methods such as holding face-to-face training programs and festivals, using IRIB platform, local media, and lectures. The general level of readiness is at a moderate level. It seems necessary to focus on resources and areas related to public information.