Role of rivaroxaban in the prevention of atherosclerotic events

Comparative Cardioprotective Effectiveness: NOACs vs. Nattokinase-Bridging Basic Research to Clinical Findings

The use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) has brought a significant progress in the management of cardiovascular diseases, considered clinically superior to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) particularly in the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic events. In addition, numerous advantages such as fixed dosing, lack of laboratory monitoring, and fewer food and drug-to-drug interactions make the use of NOACs superior to VKAs. While NOACs are synthetic drugs prescribed for specific conditions, nattokinase (NK) is a natural enzyme derived from food that has potential health benefits. Various experimental and clinical studies reported the positive effects of NK on the circulatory system, including the thinning of blood and the dissolution of blood clots. This enzyme showed not only fibrinolytic activity due to its ability to degrade fibrin, but also an affinity as a substrate for plasmin. Recent studies have shown that NK has additional cardioprotective effects, such as antihypertensive and anti-atherosclerotic effects. In this narrative review, we presented the cardioprotective properties of two different approaches that go beyond anticoagulation: NOACs and NK. By combining evidence from basic research with clinical findings, we aim to elucidate the comparative cardioprotective efficacy of these interventions and highlight their respective roles in modern cardiovascular care.

Pleiotropic effects of NOACs with focus on edoxaban: scientific findings and potential clinical implications

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are well-established as inhibitors of factor Xa (FXa) and thrombin in the treatment and prevention of thrombosis. However, there is growing evidence that beneficial outcomes might be based on additional pleiotropic effects beyond anticoagulation. FXa and thrombin are also known to activate protease-activated receptors (PARs), which can mediate pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic effects. Since PAR‑1 and PAR‑2 play an important role in the development of atherosclerosis, the inhibition of this pathway represents an interesting potential target for preventing the progression of atherosclerosis and fibrosis. This review focuses on potential pleiotropic effects of FXa inhibition with edoxaban seen in a variety of studies in different in vitro and in vivo test systems. As common findings from these experiments, edoxaban was able to attenuate FXa- and thrombin-induced pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic effects and decrease pro-inflammatory cytokine expression. In some, but not all experiments edoxaban was also shown to decrease the levels of PAR‑1 and PAR‑2 expression. Further studies are required to clarify the clinical implications of the pleiotropic effects mediated by NOACs.

The protective effect of rivaroxaban with or without aspirin on inflammation, oxidative stress, and platelet reactivity in isoproterenol-induced cardiac injury in rats

Coronary artery diseases are principal sources of mortality and disability in global human population. Progressively, rivaroxaban is being evaluated for the prevention of atherosclerotic thrombi, particularly with anti-platelet agents. Hence, the current report aimed to investigate the cardioprotective effect of rivaroxaban on isoproterenol (ISO)-induced cardiac injury model in rats and the possible synergistic effect when combined with aspirin. Male Wistar rats were randomly assigned into five different groups. Cardiac injury was induced by subcutaneous injection of ISO (85 mg/kg) for 2 consecutive days. Rat tail bleeding time was performed prior to sacrifice. Cardiac enzymes, platelet activity, inflammatory, and oxidative stress biomarkers levels were measured using enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA). Pre-administration of rivaroxaban alone and on combination with aspirin prevented ISO-induced increase in cardiac thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), interleukin 6 (IL-6), and thromboxane B2 (TXB2) levels. Moreover, a significant prolongation of bleeding time was demonstrated among aspirin, rivaroxaban, and aspirin plus rivaroxaban treated groups. On the other hand, the combination treatment of aspirin plus rivaroxaban showed no marked difference in these biomarkers and bleeding time relative to either drug administered separately. However, a prominent decrease of cardiac 6-keto prostaglandin F1α (6-Keto-PGF1α) level was displayed in the combination treatment when compared with ISO and rivaroxaban-treated groups, whereas no significant improvement was seen in cardiac glycoprotein V (GPV) levels except in aspirin-treated group. The study results demonstrated that rivaroxaban decreases cardiac oxidative stress, inflammation, and platelets reactivity. However, the addition of rivaroxaban to aspirin did not seem to show synergistic antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, or antiplatelet effect.

Comparison of Aspirin and Rivaroxaban Plus Aspirin in the Management of Stable Coronary Artery Disease or Peripheral Artery Disease: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Introduction

Low-dose aspirin or clopidogrel, statins, renin–angiotensin system inhibitors, and beta blockers are the cornerstone therapy for cardiovascular prevention in patients with coronary heart disease. Using only single-antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention in patients with stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) and/or peripheral artery disease (PAD) has a significant risk of recurrent thrombotic complications.

Objective

This systematic review aimed to compare aspirin alone and its combination with rivaroxaban for secondary cardiovascular prevention in patients with SCAD and/or PAD.

Methods

The literature search was conducted on PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar for articles published from November 2011 to September 2021. An advanced search strategy was used to retrieve relevant studies related to aspirin and/or rivaroxaban use for secondary cardiovascular prevention in patients with SCAD and/or PAD. Records identified from the databases were extracted using a data-abstraction format prepared in Microsoft Excel. Studies’ methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. This systematic review is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022306598) and was prepared based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines.

Results

A total of five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 33,959 participants were included for final analysis. These studies showed that rivaroxaban with aspirin was more effective than the standard therapy of aspirin alone in the prevention of secondary cardiovascular events (major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and/or major adverse limb events (MALEs), but the combination increased major bleeding.

Conclusion

The combination of rivaroxaban with aspirin is more effective than aspirin alone in the prevention of both MACEs and MALEs in patients with stable CAD and/or PAD. However, the combination treatment is associated with increased of major bleeding. Therefore, the combination of rivaroxaban and aspirin is superior to monotherapy in the management of patients with a high risk of developing MACEs and MALEs.

Rivaroxaban protects from the oxysterol-induced damage and inflammatory activation of the vascular endothelium

BACKGROUND

Rivaroxaban is one of the direct factor Xa inhibitors. Its function in the inactivated coagulation cascade is unclear. The aim of the study was to assess the effect of rivaroxaban on the endothelial integrity and inflammatory properties of endothelial cells stimulated by 25-hydroxycholesterol (25-OHC).

METHODS

HUVECs were stimulated with 25-OHC, rivaroxaban and 25-OHC+ rivaroxaban. HUVEC integrity and permeability were measured using the xCELLigence system and paracellular flux assay. The mRNA expression of tissue factor, ICAM-1, VEGF, IL-33, MCP-1, TNF-α was analyzed in the real-time PCR. Apoptosis and viability were measured by flow cytometry. The VEGF protein concentration was assessed by ELISA. The confocal microscope was used to evaluate the expression of VE-cadherin in endothelial cells.

RESULTS

25-OHC decreased endothelial cell integrity and increased the mRNA expression of IL-33, tissue factor, ICAM-1, MCP-1, VEGF, TNF-α as compared to unstimulated controls. Following the stimulation with rivaroxaban, HUVEC restored integrity disrupted by 25-OHC (p < .01). In HUVECs pre-stimulated with oxysterol, rivaroxaban decreased mRNA expression of IL-33, TNF-α, chemokines MCP-1, ICAM-1, VEGF and tissue factor (p < .01). Rivaroxaban 100 mg/ml+25-OHC increased the VE-cadherin expression in endothelium as compared to 25-OHC (p < .05).

CONCLUSION

Our finding suggests that rivaroxaban may restore the endothelial barrier and inhibit the inflammatory activation caused by oxysterol in vitro.

Residual risk reduction opportunities in patients with chronic coronary syndrome. Role of dual pathway inhibition

INTRODUCTION

In this review, the role of the rivaroxaban-plus-aspirin approach (dual pathway inhibition - DPI) in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) and to perform practical recommendations about its use was updated.

AREAS COVERED

The contents of this review were proposed in an expert meeting. To identify relevant articles, a systematic search of Medline/Embase was performed (to July 2019), using the key words 'rivaroxaban', 'vascular dose', 'COMPASS' and 'coronary artery disease' in the search strategy.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite current antithrombotic strategies (single/dual antiplatelet therapy) have decreased rates of recurrent cardiovascular events among patients with CCS, residual risk remains unacceptably high. The COMPASS trial showed in CCS patients that compared with aspirin 100 mg rivaroxaban 2.5 mg bid plus aspirin 100 mg reduced the risk of major cardiac events, cardiovascular hospitalization and mortality, without an increase of intracranial or fatal bleedings. Importantly, residual risk with the rivaroxaban plus aspirin approach was lower than with different dual antiplatelet therapy regimens. The rivaroxaban plus aspirin strategy is of particular benefit in patients with CCS and high-risk cardiovascular feature (i.e. ≥2 vascular beds, heart failure, renal insufficiency, peripheral artery disease, previous stroke or diabetes) and should be considered in these populations.

Rivaroxaban improves vascular response in LPS-induced acute inflammation in experimental models

Rivaroxaban (RVX) was suggested to possess anti-inflammatory and vascular tone modulatory effects. The goal of this study was to investigate whether RVX impacts lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced acute vascular inflammatory response. Male rats were treated with 5 mg/kg RVX (oral gavage) followed by 10 mg/kg LPS i.p injection. Circulating levels of IL-6, MCP-1, VCAM-1, and ICAM-1 were measured in plasma 6 and 24 hours after LPS injection, while isolated aorta was used for gene expression analysis, immunohistochemistry, and vascular tone evaluation. RVX pre-treatment significantly reduced LPS mediated increase after 6h and 24h for IL-6 (4.4±2.2 and 2.8±1.7 fold), MCP-1 (1.4±1.5 and 1.3±1.4 fold) VCAM-1 (1.8±2.0 and 1.7±2.1 fold). A similar trend was observed in the aorta for iNOS (5.5±3.3 and 3.3±1.9 folds reduction, P<0.01 and P<0.001, respectively), VCAM-1 (1.3±1.2 and 1.4±1.3 fold reduction, P<0.05), and MCP-1 (3.9±2.2 and 1.9±1.6 fold reduction, P<0.01). Moreover, RVX pre-treatment, improved LPS-induced PE contractile dysfunction in aortic rings (Control vs LPS, Emax reduction = 35.4 and 31.19%, P<0.001; Control vs LPS+RVX, Emax reduction = 10.83 and 11.48%, P>0.05, respectively), resulting in 24.5% and 19.7% change in maximal constriction in LPS and LPS+RVX respectively. These data indicate that RVX pre-treatment attenuates LPS-induced acute vascular inflammation and contractile dysfunction.

Reducing residual thrombotic risk in patients with peripheral artery disease: impact of the COMPASS trial

Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) are at a high risk not only for the classical cardiovascular (CV) outcomes (major adverse cardiovascular events; MACE) but also for vascular limb events (major adverse limb events; MALE). Therefore, a comprehensive approach for these patients should include both goals. However, the traditional antithrombotic approach with only antiplatelet agents (single or dual antiplatelet therapy) does not sufficiently reduce the risk of recurrent thrombotic events. Importantly, the underlying cause of atherosclerosis in patients with PAD implies both platelet activation and the initiation and promotion of coagulation cascade, in which Factor Xa plays a key role. Therefore, to reduce residual vascular risk, it is necessary to address both targets. In the Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies (COMPASS) trial that included patients with stable atherosclerotic vascular disease, the rivaroxaban plus aspirin strategy (versus aspirin) markedly reduced the risk of both CV and limb outcomes, and related complications, with a good safety profile. In fact, the net clinical benefit outcome composed of MACE; MALE, including major amputation, and fatal or critical organ bleeding was significantly reduced by 28% with the COMPASS strategy, (hazard ratio: 0.72; 95% confidence interval: 0.59-0.87). Therefore, the rivaroxaban plus aspirin approach provides comprehensive protection and should be considered for most patients with PAD at high risk of such events.

[Combined Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients with a Stable Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases: What Direction did COMPASS Show?]

In patients with stable ischemic heart disease (IHD) and/or peripheral artery disease (PAD), current secondary prevention, including the antiplatelet monotherapy, is associated with a significant residual risk of recurrent cardiovascular complications (CVC). Practical application of results from many modern studies evaluating the effect of secondary prevention of atherothrombosis is complicated. An additional influence on coagulation may play a key role in prevention of atherothrombosis. In the COMPASS study, adding rivaroxaban 2.5 mg, b.i.d., to the acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) monotherapy significantly reduced the risk of death from cardiovascular complications, myocardial infarction or stroke, or all-cause death compared to the ASA monotherapy, in patients with IHD or PAD. The combination antithrombotic therapy was associated with an increased risk of major, but not fatal, or intracranial bleeding. In addition, PAD patients had a reduced risk of severe ischemic lower limb complications, including amputations. According to the subgroup analysis in the COMPASS study, supplementing ASA with rivaroxaban 2.5 mg, b.i.d., may appear most beneficial for patients with stable atherosclerotic disease and with a high risk of severe CVC without causing an increased risk of bleeding.

Effects of edoxaban and warfarin on vascular remodeling: Atherosclerotic plaque progression and collateral artery growth

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Oral anticoagulation prevents thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation. Factor Xa inhibitors, like edoxaban, are known to reduce inflammation and proliferation of smooth muscle cells, while vitamin K antagonism can cause vascular calcific damage. The influence of edoxaban compared to warfarin on vascular remodeling, atherosclerosis and arteriogenesis is unknown.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Apolipoprotein E knockout (ApoE ^-/-) mice were fed cholesterol-rich diet alone (control, co), with warfarin+vitamin K1 (warf) or with edoxaban (Edo) for 8 weeks. After 6 weeks, femoral artery ligation was performed.

KEY RESULTS

There was no difference in hind-limb perfusion restoration between the three groups after 14 days (Co 0.36 ± 0.05 vs. Warf 0.39 ± 0.09 (p = .39), Co vs. Edo 0.51 ± 0.06 (p = .089), Warf vs. Edo (p = .83)) after ligation. Immuno-histologically, there was no difference in smooth muscle cell count in both hindlimbs between the three groups or in the amount of perivascular macrophages in collateral-bearing hindlimb tissue. Edoxaban showed the lowest amount of plaque tissue in the aortic sinus tissue (Co 74 ± 11% vs. Edo 62 ± 12% (p = .024), Co vs. Warf 69 ± 14% (p = .30), Edo vs. Warf (p = .14)) as well as the least amount of fibrosis (Co 3.1 ± 0.9% vs. Edo 1.7 ± 0.6% (p = .027), Co vs. Warf 4.1 ± 0.7% (p = .081), Edo vs. Warf (p < .001)). No difference in mRNA content of inflammatory cytokines in muscle tissue or spleen was detected between the three groups.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

These data suggest that treatment with edoxaban unlike warfarin prevents vascular maladaptive remodeling, which may be clinically important.