Reliability for detecting oropharyngeal aspiration in children using cervical auscultation

Evaluation Methods of Dysphagia in Adults With Intellectual Disability: A Scoping Review

Dysphagia is a serious but underdiagnosed health-related condition in people with intellectual disability (ID). In this scoping review, we provide an overview of dysphagia evaluation methods used in adults with ID. The data from 31 studies were analyzed qualitatively by identifying the evaluation methods and the validity and reliability of the methods. To summarize, dysphagia has been evaluated in many ways and for different purposes. The most common evaluation method was a videofluorographic swallowing study (VFSS). Four of the reviewed methods were found to be valid and reliable in detecting swallowing problems in adults with ID.

Acoustic and Perceptual Profiles of Swallowing Sounds in Preterm Neonates: A Cross-Sectional Study Cohort

Cervical auscultation, commonly used by speech-language pathologists in some countries as an adjuvant to the clinical feeding evaluation, requires data on acoustic and perceptual profiles of swallowing sounds. Whilst these exists in adults and children, none currently exist for preterm neonates. Our study aims to establish the acoustic and perceptual parameters of swallowing sounds in preterm neonates. Swallowing sounds were recorded on a digital microphone during oral feeding observations. Acoustic parameters of duration, peak frequency, peak power and peak intensity were determined. Perceptual parameters heard pre, during and post-swallows were rated as 'present', 'absent', or 'cannot be determined'. Eighty preterm neonates (43 males; mean age = 33.4 weeks [SD 2.6]) from three Australian special care nurseries demonstrated mean swallow durations of < 1 s. The peak amplitude correlated with the number of medical co-morbidities (r = 0.24; 95%CI 0.03-0.45). Most preterm neonates have coordinated swallows that are loud, quick and completed in < 1 s. The perceptual parameters of a bolus transit sound was consistently present in all preterm neonates. One in five pre-term neonates have an uncoordinated swallow where wheeze, stridor or wet breath sounds were present post-swallow. Our study provides clinicians with acoustic and perceptual parameters to guide use of cervical auscultation in special care nurseries. Future studies should consider simultaneous instrumental assessment to ensure validity when using cervical auscultation to support diagnostic decision-making on swallowing coordination.

Cervical Auscultation for Detecting Oropharyngeal Aspiration in Paediatric and Adult Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Cervical auscultation (CA) involves listening to swallowing and respiratory sounds and/or vibrations to detect oropharyngeal aspiration (OPA). CA has shown promising diagnostic test accuracy when used with the clinical swallowing examination and is gaining popularity in clinical practise. There has not been a review to date analysing the accuracy of CA in paediatric and adult populations with meta-analyses.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the accuracy of CA in detecting OPA in paediatric and adult populations, when compared to instrumental assessments.

SEARCH METHODS

Databases searched included MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, AustHealth, Cochrane and Web of Science. The search was restricted between 01 October 2012 and 01 October 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Inclusion criteria included (a) all clinical populations of all ages, (b) who have had an instrumental assessment and (c) CA. All study types were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Studies were reviewed independently by two authors. The methodological quality of the studies was analysed using the QUADAS-2.

MAIN RESULTS

Ten studies met the inclusion criteria for this review and meta-analyses. The pooled diagnostic performance of CA in detecting OPA was 0.91 for sensitivity and 0.79 for specificity. The area under the curve summary receiver operating curve (sROC) was estimated to be 0.86, thereby indicating good discrimination of OPA. Most studies scored high for risk of bias in at least one domain in the QUADAS-2, likely attributed to a lack of high-quality prospectively designed studies.

CONCLUSIONS

There are promising diagnostic test accuracies for the use of CA in detection of OPA. Future research could include using CA in specific clinical populations and settings, and identifying standardised criteria for CA.

Dysphagia Management and Cervical Auscultation: Reliability and Validity Against FEES

This study investigated the reliability and validity (sensitivity and specificity) of cervical auscultation (CA) using both swallow and pre-post swallow-respiratory sounds, as compared with Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES). With 103 swallow-respiratory sequences from 23 heterogenic patients, these swallows sounds were rated by eight CA-trained Speech-Language Pathologists (SLPs) to investigate: (1) if the swallow was safe (primary outcome); (2) patient dysphagia status; (3) the influence of liquid viscosity on CA accuracy (secondary outcomes). Primary outcome data showed high CA sensitivity (85.4%), and specificity (80.3%) with all consistencies for the safe measurement, with CA predictive values of [Formula: see text] 90% to accurately detect unsafe swallows. Intra-rater reliability was good (Kappa [Formula: see text] 0.65), inter rater reliability moderate (Kappa [Formula: see text] 0.58). Secondary outcome measures showed high sensitivity (80.1%) to identify if a patient was dysphagic, low specificity (22.9%), and moderate correlation (rs [Formula: see text] 0.62) with FEES. A difference across bolus viscosities identified that CA sensitivities (90.1%) and specificities ([Formula: see text] 84.7%) for thin liquids were greater than for thick liquids (71.0-77.4% sensitivities, 74.0-81.3% specificities). Results demonstrate high validity and moderate-good reliability of CA-trained SLPs to determine swallow safety when compared with FEES. Data support the use of CA as an adjunct to the clinical swallow examination. CA should include pre-post respiratory sounds and requires specific training. Clinical implications: The authors advocate for holistic dysphagia management including instrumental assessment and ongoing CSE/review [Formula: see text] CA. Adding CA to the CSE/review does not replace instrumental assessment, nor should CA be used as a stand-alone tool.

Using an Automated Speech Recognition Approach to Differentiate Between Normal and Aspirating Swallowing Sounds Recorded from Digital Cervical Auscultation in Children

Use of machine learning to accurately detect aspirating swallowing sounds in children is an evolving field. Previously reported classifiers for the detection of aspirating swallowing sounds in children have reported sensitivities between 79 and 89%. This study aimed to investigate the accuracy of using an automatic speaker recognition approach to differentiate between normal and aspirating swallowing sounds recorded from digital cervical auscultation in children. We analysed 106 normal swallows from 23 healthy children (median 13 months; 52.1% male) and 18 aspirating swallows from 18 children (median 10.5 months; 61.1% male) who underwent concurrent videofluoroscopic swallow studies with digital cervical auscultation. All swallowing sounds were on thin fluids. A support vector machine classifier with a polynomial kernel was trained on feature vectors that comprised the mean and standard deviation of spectral subband centroids extracted from each swallowing sound in the training set. The trained support vector machine was then used to classify swallowing sounds in the test set. We found high accuracy in the differentiation of aspirating and normal swallowing sounds with 98% overall accuracy. Sensitivity for the detection of aspiration and normal swallowing sounds were 89% and 100%, respectively. There were consistent differences in time, power spectral density and spectral subband centroid features between aspirating and normal swallowing sounds in children. This study provides preliminary research evidence that aspirating and normal swallowing sounds in children can be differentiated accurately using machine learning techniques.

Acoustic characteristics associated with liquid swallowing sounds of different bolus consistencies in young healthy adults

BACKGROUND

Cervical auscultation has been used clinically as an augmentative procedure for swallow examination. Despite its frequent use for screening and preliminary assessment of swallowing, the usefulness of cervical auscultation is controversial due to a lack of sufficient research, particularly in quantifying swallowing sounds.

AIMS

To document the acoustic characteristics of normal swallowing sound associated with swallowing bolus of different consistencies among younger healthy adults.

METHODS & PROCEDURES

A total of 30 healthy young adult participants swallowed 5 ml thickened liquids of four different consistencies (slightly thick, mildly thick, moderately thick and extremely thick) prepared using a starch-based commercial thickener, and the corresponding swallowing sounds were recorded using a wireless accelerometric stethoscope. An array of acoustic measures including duration of swallowing sound (DSS), duration to peak intensity (DPI), frequency at peak intensity (FPI), peak intensity (PI), average intensity (AI), and difference between peak and average intensity (DPAI) values associated with the swallowing signals were obtained.

OUTCOMES & RESULTS

In general, increased durational measures of the swallowing sounds were associated with an increase in bolus consistency. Intensity measures including PI, AI and DPAI were found to be stable across different consistencies. The change in FPI did not appear to be particularly meaningful due to its high variability. In addition, no significant differences were observed between men and women.

CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS

Swallow sounds associated with different bolus consistencies could be quantified and used to differentiate consistencies. The present findings could serve as a reference for future swallowing research of normal and dysphagic population.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

What is already known on the subject Cervical auscultation using traditional stethoscope has been used as part of an informal clinical swallow examination by practitioners. Validity of cervical auscultation is controversial, possibly due to the lack of normative data on swallow sounds. What this paper adds to existing knowledge The present study explored the possibility of using wireless accelerometric stethoscopy for cervical auscultation for dysphagia screening. Acoustic profiles of swallow sounds associated with boluses of different consistencies in healthy individuals were examined. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? Findings contribute to our knowledge about the acoustic characteristics of swallow sounds of boluses of different consistencies in healthy young individuals. The study provides normative clinical data on cervical auscultation using wireless accelerometric stethoscope for normal swallow.

Dysphagia management: Does structured training improve the validity and reliability of cervical auscultation?

Purpose: Cervical auscultation (CA) uses a stethoscope or microphone to complement the clinical swallow examination by interpreting swallowing sounds and swallow-respiratory coordination. This study investigated the effects of structured CA training on CA-rating agreement with Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) and CA rater reliability.Method: Thirty-nine speech-language pathologists participated in a structured CA training course at Gothenburg University. They rated nine swallow-respiratory sound recordings which were simultaneously recorded during FEES. Swallow sounds were rated six weeks prior to the CA-workshop using two binary yes/no questions, (1) Safe, (2) Dysphagia, and a third Dysphagia Severity rating. Swallow sounds were rated again (re-randomised) one month post CA-workshop.Result: Agreement with FEES (validity) improved significantly (p < 0.05) pre-post training for the Safe and Dysphagia questions, with post training sensitivities >90% and specificities at 76% and 85% respectively. Dysphagia severity rating improved non-significantly. Intra-rater reliability improved significantly with kappa statistics >0.90 post training. Improvements for inter-rater reliability were noted, though non-significant.Conclusion: Results demonstrate that with structured training, the validity of CA (to detect a Safe/Dysphagic swallow) significantly improves, as does intra-rater reliability. This is congruent with literature identifying the positive effects of structured training improving instrumental dysphagia assessment.

A study of acoustic characteristics of voluntary expiratory sounds produced before and immediately after swallowing

To evaluate the expiratory sounds produced during swallowing recorded simultaneously with videofluorographic examination of swallowing (VF) using fast Fourier transform (FFT), and to examine the relationship between dysphagia and its acoustic characteristics. A total of 348 samples of expiratory sounds were collected from 61 patients with dysphagia whose expiratory sounds were recorded during VF. The VF results were evaluated by one dentist and categorized into three groups: safe group (SG), penetration group (PG), and aspiration group (AG). The duration and maximum amplitude of expiratory sounds produced were measured as the domain characteristics on the time waveform of these sounds and compared among the groups. Time window-length appropriate for FFT and acoustic discriminate values (AD values) of SG, PG, and AG were also investigated. The groups were analyzed using analysis of variance and Scheffé's multiple comparison method. The maximum amplitude of SG was significantly smaller than those of PG and AG. The mean duration in SG (2.05 s) was significantly longer than those in PG (0.84 s) and AG (0.96 s). The AD value in SG was significantly lower than those in PG and AG. AD value detects penetration or aspiration, and can be useful in screening for dysphagia.

Assessing the Breastfeeding Dyad: A Guide for Speech-Language Pathologists

Purpose

More than 80% of U.S. mothers initiate breastfeeding; for many of them, direct breastfeeding is an important goal. Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) who assess infants with feeding concerns, however, are generally much more familiar with assessing bottle-feeding. The purpose of this tutorial is to assist SLPs in building on their existing assessment skills in order to provide effective, evidence-based options for mothers who wish to breastfeed their infants.

Conclusion

SLPs can assist families in meeting their breastfeeding goals through effective assessment of breastfeeding dyads.

Endotracheal Aerosolization Device for Laboratory Investigation of Pulmonary Delivery of Nanoparticle Suspensions: In Vitro and in Vivo Validation

The objective of this study was to perform the in vitro and in vivo validation of an endotracheal aerosolization (ETA) device (HRH MAG-4, HM). Solid lipid nanoparticle suspension (SLNS) formulations with particle sizes of approximately 120, 240, 360, and 480 nm were selected as model nanoparticle suspensions for the validation. The emission rate (ER) of the in vitro aerosolization and the influence of aerosolization on the physicochemical properties were investigated. A high ER of up to 90% was obtained, and no significant alterations in physicochemical properties were observed after the aerosolization. The pulmonary deposition of model drug budesonide in Sprague-Dawley rats was determined to be approximately 80%, which was satisfactory for pulmonary delivery. Additionally, a fluorescent probe with aggregation-caused quenching property was encapsulated in SLNS formulations for in vivo bioimaging, after excluding the effect of aerosolization on its fluorescence spectrum. It was verified that SLNS formulations were deposited in the lung region. The results demonstrated the feasibility and reliability of the HM device for ETA in laboratory investigation.