T-DM1-resistant cells gain high invasive activity via EGFR and integrin cooperated pathways

Navigating the Landscape of Resistance Mechanisms in Antibody-Drug Conjugates for Cancer Treatment

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are an innovative approach in cancer therapy, combining the specificity of monoclonal antibodies (mAb) with the cytotoxic effect of chemotherapy agents. Despite the remarkable efficacy demonstrated in clinical studies, primary and secondary resistance to ADCs represent a concern and a significant challenge. Known resistance mechanisms mainly involve the targeted tumor antigen; the internalization, trafficking, and cleavage processes; the cytotoxic payload; and the intrinsic tumor cell dynamics of cell death and cell signaling. Key strategies to overcome these resistance mechanisms include the use of antibodies targeting the same antigen but with different payloads, developing dual-payload ADCs that target multiple cellular pathways, switching from non-cleavable to cleavable linkers, and combining ADCs with other therapies such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and antiangiogenic agents. By improving our understanding of what underlies the mechanisms of resistance to ADCs and implementing and studying systems to overcome these mechanisms, as well as using innovative therapeutic combinations, ADCs have the potential to continue to play a fundamental role in the treatment of tumors, especially refractory ones, providing patients with more effective and long-lasting therapeutic options, as well as better outcomes.

The DNA repair pathway as a therapeutic target to synergize with trastuzumab deruxtecan in HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugate-resistant HER2-overexpressing breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Anti-HER2 therapies, including the HER2 antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), have led to improved survival outcomes in patients with HER2-overexpressing (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer. However, intrinsic or acquired resistance to anti-HER2-based therapies remains a clinical challenge in these patients, as there is no standard of care following disease progression. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the mechanisms of resistance to T-DM1 and T-DXd in HER2+ BC patients and preclinical models and identify targets whose inhibition enhances the antitumor activity of T-DXd in HER2-directed ADC-resistant HER2+ breast cancer in vitro and in vivo.

METHODS

Targeted DNA and whole transcriptome sequencing were performed in breast cancer patient tissue samples to investigate genetic aberrations that arose after anti-HER2 therapy. We generated T-DM1 and T-DXd-resistant HER2+ breast cancer cell lines. To elucidate their resistance mechanisms and to identify potential synergistic kinase targets for enhancing the efficacy of T-DXd, we used fluorescence in situ hybridization, droplet digital PCR, Western blotting, whole-genome sequencing, cDNA microarray, and synthetic lethal kinome RNA interference screening. In addition, cell viability, colony formation, and xenograft assays were used to determine the synergistic antitumor effect of T-DXd combinations.

RESULTS

We found reduced HER2 expression in patients and amplified DNA repair-related genes in patients after anti-HER2 therapy. Reduced ERBB2 gene amplification in HER2-directed ADC-resistant HER2+ breast cancer cell lines was through DNA damage and epigenetic mechanisms. In HER2-directed ADC-resistant HER2+ breast cancer cell lines, our non-biased RNA interference screening identified the DNA repair pathway as a potential target within the canonical pathways to enhance the efficacy of T-DXd. We validated that the combination of T-DXd with ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related inhibitor, elimusertib, led to significant breast cancer cell death in vitro (P < 0.01) and in vivo (P < 0.01) compared to single agents.

CONCLUSIONS

The DNA repair pathways contribute to HER2-directed ADC resistance. Our data justify exploring the combination treatment of T-DXd with DNA repair-targeting drugs to treat HER2-directed ADC-resistant HER2+ breast cancer in clinical trials.

Novel ADCs and Strategies to Overcome Resistance to Anti-HER2 ADCs

During recent years, a number of new compounds against HER2 have reached clinics, improving the prognosis and quality of life of HER2-positive breast cancer patients. Nonetheless, resistance to standard-of-care drugs has motivated the development of novel agents, such as new antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). The latter are a group of drugs that benefit from the potency of cytotoxic agents whose action is specifically guided to the tumor by the target-specific antibody. Two anti-HER2 ADCs have reached the clinic: trastuzumab-emtansine and, more recently, trastuzumab-deruxtecan. In addition, several other HER2-targeted ADCs are in preclinical or clinical development, some of them with promising signs of activity. In the present review, the structure, mechanism of action, and potential resistance to all these ADCs will be described. Specific attention will be given to discussing novel strategies to circumvent resistance to ADCs.

Heterogeneous delivery across the blood-brain barrier limits the efficacy of an EGFR-targeting antibody drug conjugate in glioblastoma

BACKGROUND

Antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), such as depatuxizumab mafodotin (Depatux-M), is a promising therapeutic strategy for glioblastoma (GBM) but recent clinical trials did not demonstrate a survival benefit. Understanding the mechanisms of failure for this promising strategy is critically important.

METHODS

PDX models were employed to study efficacy of systemic vs intracranial delivery of Depatux-M. Immunofluorescence and MALDI-MSI were performed to detect drug levels in the brain. EGFR levels and compensatory pathways were studied using quantitative flow cytometry, Western blots, RNAseq, FISH, and phosphoproteomics.

RESULTS

Systemic delivery of Depatux-M was highly effective in nine of 10 EGFR-amplified heterotopic PDXs with survival extending beyond one year in eight PDXs. Acquired resistance in two PDXs (GBM12 and GBM46) was driven by suppression of EGFR expression or emergence of a novel short-variant of EGFR lacking the epitope for the Depatux-M antibody. In contrast to the profound benefit observed in heterotopic tumors, only two of seven intrinsically sensitive PDXs were responsive to Depatux-M as intracranial tumors. Poor efficacy in orthotopic PDXs was associated with limited and heterogeneous distribution of Depatux-M into tumor tissues, and artificial disruption of the BBB or bypass of the BBB by direct intracranial injection of Depatux-M into orthotopic tumors markedly enhanced the efficacy of drug treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite profound intrinsic sensitivity to Depatux-M, limited drug delivery into brain tumor may have been a key contributor to lack of efficacy in recently failed clinical trials.

Generation of Antibody-Drug Conjugate Resistant Models

Simple Summary

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) constitute new and effective therapies in cancer. However, resistance is frequently observed in treated patients after a given period of time. That resistance may be present from the beginning of the treatment (primary or de novo resistance) or raise after an initial response to the ADC (secondary resistance). Knowing the causes of those resistances is a necessity in the field as it may help in designing strategies to overcome them. Because of that, it is necessary to develop models that allow the identification of mechanisms of resistance. In this review, we present different approaches that have been used to model ADC resistance in the preclinical setting, and that include the use of established cell lines, patient-derived ex vivo cultures and xenografts primarily or secondarily resistant to the ADC.

Abstract

In the last 20 years, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have been incorporated into the oncology clinic as treatments for several types of cancer. So far, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved 11 ADCs and other ADCs are in the late stages of clinical development. Despite the efficacy of this type of drug, the tumors of some patients may result in resistance to ADCs. Due to this, it is essential not only to comprehend resistance mechanisms but also to develop strategies to overcome resistance to ADCs. To reach these goals, the generation and use of preclinical models to study those mechanisms of resistance are critical. Some cells or patient tumors may result in primary resistance to the action of an ADC, even if they express the antigen against which the ADC is directed. Isolated primary tumoral cells, cell lines, or patient explants (patient-derived xenografts) with these characteristics can be used to study primary resistance. The most common method to generate models of secondary resistance is to treat cancer cell lines or tumors with an ADC. Two strategies, either continuous treatment with the ADC or intermittent treatment, have successfully been used to develop those resistance models.

Tumor Extrinsic Factors Mediate Primary T-DM1 Resistance in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Cells

Simple Summary

In this investigation, we employed an unconventional approach to explore the mechanisms of the primary resistance of human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer cells to ado-trastuzumab emtansine (also known as T-DM1). Specifically, we used Matrigel matrix as a model of the tumor microenvironment and examined its effect on the sensitivity of HER2-positive breast cancer cells to T-DM1. We found that epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is activated in HER2-positive, T-DM1-sensitive JIMT1 and SKBR-3 cells on the Matrigel matrix. This leads to phosphorylation and degradation of HER2 in these cells, resulting in the loss of or reduced sensitivity to T-DM1. The discovery of extrinsic factors contributing to the primary resistance of HER2-positive breast cancer cells to T-DM1 provides an opportunity to develop a novel therapeutic strategy to overcome T-DM1 resistance.

Abstract

To explore if the tumor microenvironment contributes to the primary resistance of HER2-positive breast cancer cells to T-DM1, we examined whether Matrigel, a basement membrane matrix that provides a three-dimensional (3D) cell culture condition, caused the primary resistance of HER2-positive, T-DM1-sensitive breast cancer cells (JIMT1 and SKBR-3 cells) to T-DM1. This is different from the conventional approach such that the cells are exposed with escalated doses of drug to establish a drug-resistant cell line. We found that these cells were able to grow and form spheroids on the Matrigel in the presence of T-DM1. We further explored the molecular mechanisms that enables these cells to be primarily resistant to T-DM1 and found that EGFR was activated in the spheroids, leading to an increased HER2 tyrosine phosphorylation. This in turn enhances cell growth signaling downstream of EGFR/HER2 in the spheroids. HER2 tyrosine phosphorylation promotes receptor internalization and degradation in the spheroids, which limits T-DM1 access to HER2 on the cell surface of spheroids. Blocking EGFR activity by erlotinib reduces HER2 tyrosine phosphorylation and enhances HER2 cell surface expression. This enables T-DM1 to gain access to HER2 on the cell surface, resumes cell sensitivity to T-DM1, and exhibits synergistic activity with T-DM1 to inhibit the formation of spheroids on Matrigel. The discovery described in this manuscript reveals a novel approach to investigate the primary resistance of HER2-positive breast cancer cells and provides an opportunity to develop a therapeutic strategy to overcome primary resistance to T-DM1 by combing T-DM1 therapy with kinase inhibitors of EGFR.

Anti-ErbB2 immunotherapeutics: struggling to make better antibodies for cancer therapy

Over the past 3 decades, monoclonal antibodies and their related derivatives, including recently approved antibody-drug conjugates, conquered a central role in cancer therapy because of their contribution to improve survival, time to progression and quality of life of patients compared to chemotherapy protocols. This review summarizes information on approved original and biosimilar products, as well as investigational antibody-based therapeutics, targeting ErbB2. This target has been selected as a paradigmatic example because of its relevant role in sustaining the malignancy of major cancer diseases including, breast, gastric and other chemotherapy-resistant solid tumors. This work analyzes the drivers affecting research and development of next-generation anti-ErbB2 immunotherapeutics, taking into account unmet medical needs and pharmacoeconomic issues related to sustainability. The analysis may help with the design of future research and development strategies.

Targeting cancer with antibody-drug conjugates: Promises and challenges

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are a rapidly expanding class of biotherapeutics that utilize antibodies to selectively deliver cytotoxic drugs to the tumor site. As of May 2021, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved ten ADCs, namely Adcetris®, Kadcyla®, Besponsa®, Mylotarg®, Polivy®, Padcev®, Enhertu®, Trodelvy®, Blenrep®, and Zynlonta™ as monotherapy or combinational therapy for breast cancer, urothelial cancer, myeloma, acute leukemia, and lymphoma. In addition, over 80 investigational ADCs are currently being evaluated in approximately 150 active clinical trials. Despite the growing interest in ADCs, challenges remain to expand their therapeutic index (with greater efficacy and less toxicity). Recent advances in the manufacturing technology for the antibody, payload, and linker combined with new bioconjugation platforms and state-of-the-art analytical techniques are helping to shape the future development of ADCs. This review highlights the current status of marketed ADCs and those under clinical investigation with a focus on translational strategies to improve product quality, safety, and efficacy.

Combination efficacy of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for trastuzumab emtansine-resistant cells exhibiting attenuated lysosomal trafficking or efflux pumps upregulation

Purpose

Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) is the standard treatment in the current second-line therapy of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer. However, a useful therapy after T-DM1 resistance has not been established. In this study, we established two different HER2-positive T-DM1-resistant cancer cells and evaluated the antitumor effect of trastuzumab in combination with pertuzumab (TRAS + PER).

Methods

Single-cell-cloned OE19 and BT-474 cells were cultured with increasing concentrations of T-DM1 to generate T-DM1-resistant OE19bTDR and BT-474bTDR cells, respectively. HER2 expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry. Multidrug resistance proteins (MDR1 and MRP1) were evaluated by real-time polymerase chain reaction and western blotting. Intracellular trafficking of T-DM1 was examined by flow cytometry and immunofluorescence staining. Efficacy of TRAS + PER was evaluated by cell proliferation assay, HER3 and AKT phosphorylation, caspase 3/7 activity, and antitumor activity.

Results

HER2 expression of both resistant cells was equivalent to that of the parent cells. Overexpression of MDR1 and MRP1 was observed and affected the T-DM1 sensitivity in the OE19bTDR cells. Abnormal localization of T-DM1 into the lysosomes was observed in the BT-474bTDR cells. In BT-474bTDR cells, TRAS + PER inhibited the phosphorylation of AKT involved in HER2–HER3 signaling, and apoptosis induction and cell proliferation inhibition were significantly higher with TRAS + PER than with the individual drugs. TRAS + PER significantly suppressed tumor growth in the OE19bTDR xenograft model compared with each single agent.

Conclusions

The results suggest that the TRAS + PER combination may be effective in T-DM1-resistant cancer cells where HER2 overexpression is maintained.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00280-020-04138-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Dual-Receptor-Targeted (DRT) Radiation Nanomedicine Labeled with 177Lu Is More Potent for Killing Human Breast Cancer Cells That Coexpress HER2 and EGFR Than Single-Receptor-Targeted (SRT) Radiation Nanomedicines

Resistance to HER2-targeted therapies in breast cancer (BC) is associated in some cases with an increased expression of epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFR). We describe a dual-receptor-targeted (DRT) radiation nanomedicine for local intratumoral (i.t.) treatment of BC composed of 15 nm sized gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) modified with trastuzumab (TmAb) to target HER2 and panitumumab (PmAb) to target EGFR. The AuNPs were modified with poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG_3k) linked to 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTA) chelators to complex the β-particle emitter, ¹⁷⁷Lu. Our aim was to compare the properties of these DRT-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu with single-receptor-targeted (SRT)-TmAb-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu or PmAb-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu or nontargeted (NT)-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu using human BC cells that expressed HER2, EGFR, or both receptors. To construct these radiation nanomedicines, PEG_5K was linked to TmAb or PmAb, while PEG_3k was linked to DOTA. These polymers were conjugated to AuNP via two Au-thiol bonds using a terminal lipoic acid (LA) group on the polymers. NT-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu were constructed without modification with TmAb or PmAb. MDA-MB-231-H2N, MDA-MB-468, and BT-474 human BC cells were designated as HER2^mod/EGFR^mod, EGFR^high/HER2^neg, and HER2^high/EGFR^low, respectively, based on the expression of these receptors. Specific binding to HER2 and/or EGFR was assessed by incubating BC cells with DRT-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu or TmAb-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu or PmAb-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu, or NT-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu in the absence or presence of an excess of TmAb or PmAb or both competitors. Binding and internalization of AuNP by BC cells were assessed by dark-field microscopy. Cell fractionation studies were conducted to quantify AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu bound and internalized. The cytotoxicity of DRT-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu was determined in clonogenic survival (CS) assays after an exposure of 5 × 10⁵ BC cells to 3 MBq (1.4 × 10¹² AuNP) for 16 h and then seeding and culturing the cells for 7-15 days. CS was compared to exposure to TmAb-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu and PmAb-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu or NT-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu. The absorbed doses to the nucleus in these CS assays were estimated. DRT-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu were specifically bound by BC cells that expressed HER2 or EGFR or both receptors. In contrast, SRT-TmAb-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu and PmAb-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu were bound and internalized only by BC cells that expressed HER2 or EGFR, respectively. NT-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu exhibited very low binding to BC cells. DRT-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu and SRT-TmAb-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu or PmAb-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu were internalized by BC cells in accordance with the receptor expression. Importantly, DRT-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu were more potent in vitro than PmAb-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu for killing MDA-MB-231-H2N cells that coexpress HER2 and EGFR (CS = 18.8 ± 1.0 vs 51.5 ± 10.4%; P = 0.006). Furthermore, DRT-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu were more potent for killing BT-474 cells with high HER2 but low EGFR expression than TmAb-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu (CS = 8.9 ± 3.3 vs 20.7 ± 2.4%; P = 0.007) or PmAb-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu (CS = 63.9 ± 1.7%; P < 0.0001). Even for MDA-MB-468 cells that overexpress EGFR but have negligible HER2, DRT-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu were more potent for cell killing than PmAb-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu (CS = 3.2 ± 3.0 vs 7.5 ± 1.8%; P = 0.001) or TmAb-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu (63.2 ± 3.2%; P = 0.0002). All targeted forms of AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu were more cytotoxic to BC cells than those of NT-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu. High absorbed doses (36-119 Gy) were deposited in the nucleus of BC cells by DRT-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu. We conclude that a DRT radiation nanomedicine is more potent for killing BC cells that coexpress HER2 and EGFR than SRT radiation nanomedicines. These results are promising for further evaluation of these DRT-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu in vivo for the local radiation treatment of human BC tumors that coexpress HER2 and EGFR in mice following i.t. injection, especially tumors that are resistant to HER2-targeted therapies.

Cell proliferation and invasion are regulated differently by EGFR and MRP1 in T-DM1-resistant breast cancer cells

We recently reported that T-DM1-resistant JIMT1 (T-DM1R-JIMT1) cells exhibited high invasive activity via EGFR and integrin cooperated pathways and gained cross-resistance to doxorubicin. Here, we show that EGFR positively coordinates with MRP1 in T-DM1R-JIMT1 cells to contribute to cross-resistance to doxorubicin. Downregulating EGFR and MRP1 inhibits T-DM1R-JIMT1 cell growth and re-sensitizes T-DM1R cells to doxorubicin, suggesting that dual targeting EGFR and MRP1 could serve as a therapeutic approach to overcome T-DM1 resistance. However, it increases cell invasion activity of T-DM1R-JIMT1 cells with molecular and cellular phenotypes similar to the breast cancer cells that express low levels of HER2 (MDA-MB-231 and BT-549 cells). Importantly, the invasion activity of MDA-MB-231 and BT-549 cells is also significantly increased after chronically exposed to T-DM1 although cell growth of MDA-MB-231 and BT-549 cells is not inhibited by T-DM1. These results highlight the importance of HER2 heterogenicity in HER-positive breast cancers treated with T-DM1. Our study also provides evidence demonstrating that proliferation and invasion activities of T-DM1R-JIMT1, and MDA-MB-231 and BT-549 cells are regulated by different mechanisms and that different aspects of cancer cell behaviors affected by targeted-therapeutics should be fully characterized in order to overcome T-DM1-resistant disease and to prevent cancer metastasis.

Atezolizumab potentiates Tcell-mediated cytotoxicity and coordinates with FAK to suppress cell invasion and motility in PD-L1+ triple negative breast cancer cells

Immune check point inhibitors targeting programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1) have shown clinical success in treatment of human malignancies. Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), which is primarily characterized by high heterogeneity and presence of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, remains therapeutic challenge due to unavailability of approved targeted therapy. Therapeutic potential of immune check point inhibitors for TNBC patients is under active clinical investigation. In this study, we show that FDA-approved anti-PD-L1 antibody, atezolizumab (ATE), potentiates T cell-mediated cytotoxicity and apoptosis of TNBC cells that express higher levels of PD-L1, but does not have significant effect on TNBC cells expressing low levels of PD-L1. PD-L1 knockdown further confirmed that ability of ATE to promote T cell-induced cytotoxicity is PD-L1 expression dependent. Combination of ATE with PD-L1 upregulating agents, such as HDAC, proteasomal, and lysosomal inhibitors, further augmented cytotoxic activity of T cells toward TNBC cells. Based on analysis of breast cancer tissue samples deposited in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), we found a positive correlation between PD-L1 and focal adhesion kinase (FAK) mRNA expression in PD-L1-positive (PD-L1⁺) TNBC, suggesting a functional association of FAK and immune checkpoints. We further demonstrate that ATE dramatically downregulates phosphorylation status of FAK, an important regulator of cell invasion and migration, and significantly enhances FAK inhibitor mediated inhibition of cell motility and invasion of PD-L1⁺ TNBC cells independent of T cells. Taken together, our data suggest that ATE shows promising anti-tumor activity in PD-L1⁺ TNBC via both T cell-dependent and -independent mechanisms.

Role of Integrins in Resistance to Therapies Targeting Growth Factor Receptors in Cancer

Integrins contribute to cancer progression and aggressiveness by activating intracellular signal transduction pathways and transducing mechanical tension forces. Remarkably, these adhesion receptors share common signaling networks with receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) and support their oncogenic activity, thereby promoting cancer cell proliferation, survival and invasion. During the last decade, preclinical studies have revealed that integrins play an important role in resistance to therapies targeting RTKs and their downstream pathways. A remarkable feature of integrins is their wide-ranging interconnection with RTKs, which helps cancer cells to adapt and better survive therapeutic treatments. In this context, we should consider not only the integrins expressed in cancer cells but also those expressed in stromal cells, since these can mechanically increase the rigidity of the tumor microenvironment and confer resistance to treatment. This review presents some of these mechanisms and outlines new treatment options for improving the efficacy of therapies targeting RTK signaling.