Hospital admission for COVID-19 pneumonitis - long-term impairment in quality of life and lung function

The Predictive Role of C-Reactive Protein, Leukocyte Cell Count, and Soluble Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor for Pulmonary Sequelae in Hospitalized COVID-19 Survivors: A Prospective Single-Center Cohort Study

Background: Pulmonary function impairment significantly affects quality of life, work ability, and healthcare utilization. Among patients with COVID-19, respiratory symptoms vary in severity. This study aimed to assess whether biomarkers related to respiratory function and inflammation at emergency department (ED) admittance can predict long-term pulmonary function impairment in COVID-19 survivors. Methods: This prospective single-center study recruited patients 4-5 months post-COVID-19 infection using consecutive sampling. All attendees at the respiratory outpatient clinic were invited to participate. Pulmonary function tests, including diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO), total lung capacity (TLC), forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1), and forced vital capacity (FVC), were performed, with DLCO < 80% as the key indicator of impairment. Baseline biomarkers-C-Reactive Protein (CRP), leukocyte counts, and soluble urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor (suPAR)-were correlated with post-discharge DLCO values. Results: This study enrolled 110 patients with COVID-19; 58.2% were female, the median age was 61.5, and the average BMI was 27.2. Smoking history showed that 53.7% were never smokers, 43.5% were former smokers, and 2.8% were current smokers. A diffusion deficit (DLCO < 80%) was present in 48.6% of patients. Leukocyte counts and suPAR had the highest sensitivity (>0.80) for predicting DLCO impairment but showed low specificity and a positive predictive value (PPV) of around 0.50. However, combining all biomarkers improved prediction accuracy, with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.93. Conclusions: The chosen inflammatory biomarkers by themselves had a limited ability to predict long-term pulmonary function impairment in COVID-19 survivors. However, when combined, they demonstrated a high negative predictive value (NPV) for identifying DLCO impairment. This strategy could help clinicians better tailor follow-up care for patients with COVID-19.

Functional Recovery of Adults Following Acute COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the objective, functional recovery of patients more than 3 months after acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection.

METHODS

Comprehensive database searches of EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register, CINAHL, and Google Scholar in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement were carried out until October 19, 2022. Data were extracted and agreed in duplicate. Data were narratively synthesized, and a series of meta-analyses were performed using the random-effects inverse variance method.

RESULTS

One-hundred six papers covering 20,063 patients, who were either hospitalized or not hospitalized with acute COVID-19 and were followed-up between 3 and 24 months, were included. Percentage predicted 6-minute walk distance at 3 months to <5 months was 84.3% (95% CI = 79.2-89.3; n = 21; I2 = 98.3%) and 92.5% (95% CI = 89.8-95.3; n = 9; I2 = 94.5%) at ≥11 months. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing revealed the percentage predicted peak oxygen consumption rate ($peak\dot{\mathsf{V}}{\mathsf{o}}_{\mathsf{2}}$) at 3 months to <5 months was 77.3% (95% CI = 71.0-83.7; n = 6; I2 = 92.3%) and 95.4% (95% CI = 87.1-103.6; n = 2; I2 = 77.3%) at ≥11 months. Mean handgrip strength was greatest at ≥11 months at 31.16 kg (95% CI = 19.89-42.43; n = 2; I2 = 98.3%) of all time points. All analyses showed marked heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

Patients have reduced physical function more than 3 months after COVID-19 infection. Better physical function in multiple physical domains is found after a longer recovery time.

IMPACT

Physical function as measured by the 6-minute walk test, hand grip strength, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing is reduced at 3 months after COVID-19 infection and can remain over 11 months of follow-up. This protracted recovery following acute COVID-19 infection supports the need to assess physical function at any clinical follow-up, and further research into rehabilitation programs and intervention for patients who have not recovered.

Exercise-Driven Comprehensive Recovery: Pulmonary Rehabilitation's Impact on Lung Function, Mechanics, and Immune Response in Post-COVID-19 Patients

Introduction: We sought to evaluate the effects of a 12-week pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) program on lung function, mechanics, as well as pulmonary and systemic inflammation in a cohort of 33 individuals with moderate to severe post-COVID-19. Material and Methods: The pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) program employed a combination of aerobic and resistance exercises. Thirty minutes of treadmill training at 75% of the maximum heart rate, combined with 30 min resistance training consisting of 75% of one maximum repetition, three times a week throughout 12 weeks. Results: PR improved the lung function, FVC (p < 0.02), FEV1 (p < 0.02), FEV1/FVC (p < 0.01), MEF25% (p < 0.006), MEF50% (p < 0.03), and MEF75% (p < 0.02). PR also positively influenced lung mechanics, reducing respiratory impedance (Z5Hz, p < 0.03), respiratory reactance (X5Hz, p < 0.01), resistance of the entire respiratory system (R5Hz, p < 0.03), central airway resistance (RCentral, p < 0.03), and peripheral airway resistance (RPeripheral, p < 0.02). Moreover, muscle strength gains were evident, with significant improvements observed in hand grip strength for both the right (p < 0.02) and left (p < 0.01) hands, as well as maximal inspiratory (p < 0.02) and expiratory (p < 0.03) pressures. Additionally, PR exhibited anti-inflammatory effects by reducing the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β (p < 0.0001) and IL-6 (p < 0.0001) and increasing the anti-inflammatory IL-1RA (p < 0.0004) and IL-10 (p < 0.003) and anti-viral IFN-γ (p < 0.0002) and IFN-β (p < 0.008) cytokines in breath condensate and serum samples. Conclusions: Collectively, these findings highlight the effectiveness of PR in ameliorating COVID-19 sequel across respiratory system, skeletal muscle, and immune responses. This highlights its promising potential as a therapeutic intervention for individuals recovering from COVID-19.

Pulmonary function 3-6 months after acute COVID-19: A systematic review and multicentre cohort study

Aims

To describe pulmonary function 3-6 months following acute COVID-19, to evaluate potential predictors of decreased pulmonary function and to review literature for the effect of COVID-19 on pulmonary function.

Materials and methods

A systematic review and cohort study were conducted. Within the P4O2 COVID-19 cohort, 95 patients aged 40-65 years were recruited from outpatient post-COVID-19 clinics in five Dutch hospitals between May 2021-September 2022. At 3-6 months post COVID-19, medical records data and biological samples were collected and questionnaires were administered. In addition, pulmonary function tests (PFTs), including spirometry and transfer factor, were performed. To identify factors associated with PFTs, linear regression analyses were conducted, adjusted for covariates.

Results

In PFTs (n = 90), mean ± SD % of predicted was 89.7 ± 18.2 for forced vital capacity (FVC) and 79.8 ± 20.0 for transfer factor for carbon monoxide (DLCO). FVC was

Conclusion

A low DLCO 3-6 months following acute COVID-19 was observed more often than a low FVC, both in the P4O2 COVID-19 study and the literature review.

Collapse

Key Words

• Long COVID
• Post COVID-19
• Pulmonary function
• Transfer factor for carbon monoxide

Collapse

MESH Headings Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Merel E.B. Cornelissen Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105, AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam, the Netherlands Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Asabi Leliveld Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105, AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam, the Netherlands Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Nadia Baalbaki Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105, AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam, the Netherlands Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Debbie Gach Department of Respiratory Medicine, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, the Netherlands
Ivo van der Lee Department of Pulmonology, Spaarne Hospital, the Netherlands
Esther J. Nossent Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105, AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Lizan D. Bloemsma Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105, AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam, the Netherlands Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Anke H. Maitland-van der Zee Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105, AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam, the Netherlands Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Collapse

The long-term impact of COVID-19 pneumonia on pulmonary function and exercise capacity

Background

The sequelae of post-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have been widely reported. However, the time point of the follow-up time in the previous studies varied ranging from 3-24 months and the interval time of the follow-up time was too long (6 or 12 months). Thus, a shorter interval time during recovery for assessment of the sequelae of post COVID-19 on lung function and exercise capacity is still required. Therefore, this study aims to explore the long-term impact of COVID-19 pneumonia on pulmonary function and exercise capacity.

Methods

A prospective observational study was conducted on post COVID-19 pneumonia at the Lung Health Center, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Allergy, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand between May 2021 and April 2022. Spirometry, impulse oscillometry (IOS), and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) were assessed at 1-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month post-hospital discharge when compared to healthy controls. The six-minute walk test (6-MWT) was also assessed.

Results

Thirty-eight post COVID-19 pneumonia with ages 41.1±14.8 years (52.6% male) and twenty-five healthy controls were enrolled. The %predicted of forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) were significantly lower in post COVID-19 pneumonia compared to healthy controls at month 1 and month 9. The improvement of %predicted FVC and FEV1 was observed in post COVID-19 pneumonia. The six-minute walk distance (6-MWD) was significantly lower in post COVID-19 pneumonia compared to healthy controls in all visits, while the 6-MWD improved overtime in post COVID-19 pneumonia.

Conclusions

The long term sequelae of post COVID-19 pneumonia on lung function and exercise capacity were observed. Pulmonary function tests and six-minutes walk test are useful tools for detection of long term sequelae of post COVID-19 pneumonia.

[Quality of life and functional status at hospital discharge of patients with COVID-19 in Colombia]

Objective

To determine the perception of quality of life and functional status after hospital discharge in Colombian patients with COVID-19.

Materials and Methods

A quantitative cross-sectional descriptive study was carried out in which the SF-36 questionnaire and the post-COVID-19 functional status scale were applied to Colombians in the post-hospital discharge period to assess quality of life and functionality after COVID-19.

Results

There were 151 participants, with a mean age of 56.43 years, 68% of whom were men. 79% were in the Care Unit, the average hospital stay was 28.46 days, 22% were smokers, and 64% had comorbidities. There was evidence of a decrease in the perception of health-related quality of life, mainly in the dimensions of vitality (0.47), general health (0.56), and physical role (0.56). There was evidence of functional limitations ranging from minimal to severe. The most frequent persistent symptoms were fatigue, dyspnea, and pain.

Conclusions

COVID-19 impacts the perception of quality of life and functionality of surviving patients, even beyond six months after hospital discharge.

Decrease in Health-Related Quality of Life and Post-COVID-19 Syndrome in Health Care Workers After SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to assess the persistence of symptoms, the prevalence of post-COVID-19 syndrome, and the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) among health care workers (HCWs) 6 months after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was conducted. All HCWs with confirmed COVID-19 from January to June 2021 were invited to participate. Health-related quality of life was evaluated in three moments: before COVID-19, after COVID-19 (on return to work), and after 6 months. Persistence of symptoms post-COVID-19 was also assessed.

RESULTS

There was a worsening in all dimensions of HRQOL. After 6 months, self-rated health on EuroQol visual analog scale did not return to pre-COVID-19 values. At total, 36.2% of HCWs were diagnosed with post-COVID-19 syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a significant deterioration in HRQOL among HCWs who had COVID-19 and a high frequency of post-COVID-19 syndrome.

Comparison of Long COVID-19 Caused by Different SARS-CoV-2 Strains: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Although many studies of long COVID-19 were reported, there was a lack of systematic research which assessed the differences of long COVID-19 in regard to what unique SARS-CoV-2 strains caused it. As such, this systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the characteristics of long COVID-19 that is caused by different SARS-CoV-2 strains. We systematically searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and ScienceDirect databases in order to find cohort studies of long COVID-19 as defined by the WHO (Geneva, Switzerland). The main outcomes were in determining the percentages of long COVID-19 among patients who were infected with different SARS-CoV-2 strains. Further, this study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022339964). A total of 51 studies with 33,573 patients was included, of which three studies possessed the Alpha and Delta variants, and five studies possessed the Omicron variant. The highest pooled estimate of long COVID-19 was found in the CT abnormalities (60.5%; 95% CI: 40.4%, 80.6%) for the wild-type strain; fatigue (66.1%; 95% CI: 42.2%, 89.9%) for the Alpha variant; and ≥1 general symptoms (28.4%; 95% CI: 7.9%, 49.0%) for the Omicron variant. The pooled estimates of ≥1 general symptoms (65.8%; 95% CI: 47.7%, 83.9%) and fatigue were the highest symptoms found among patients infected with the Alpha variant, followed by the wild-type strain, and then the Omicron variant. The pooled estimate of myalgia was highest among patients infected with the Omicron variant (11.7%; 95%: 8.3%, 15.1%), compared with those infected with the wild-type strain (9.4%; 95%: 6.3%, 12.5%). The pooled estimate of sleep difficulty was lowest among the patients infected with the Delta variant (2.5%; 95%: 0.2%, 4.9%) when compared with those infected with the wild-type strain (24.5%; 95%: 17.5%, 31.5%) and the Omicron variant (18.7%; 95%: 1.0%, 36.5%). The findings of this study suggest that there is no significant difference between long COVID-19 that has been caused by different strains, except in certain general symptoms (i.e., in the Alpha or Omicron variant) and in sleep difficulty (i.e., the wild-type strain). In the context of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and its emerging variants, directing more attention to long COVID-19 that is caused by unique strains, as well as implementing targeted intervention measures to address it are vital.

Sequelae of COVID-19 among previously hospitalized patients up to 1 year after discharge: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Although complications and clinical symptoms of COVID-19 have been elucidated, the prevalence of long-term sequelae of COVID-19 is less clear in previously hospitalized COVID-19 patients. This review and meta-analysis present the occurrence of different symptoms up to 1 year of follow-up for previously hospitalized patients.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review from PubMed and Web of Science using keywords such as "COVID-19", "SARS-CoV-2", "sequelae", "long-term effect" and included studies with at least 3-month of follow-up. Meta-analyses using random-effects models were performed to estimate the pooled prevalence for different sequelae. Subgroup analyses were conducted by different follow-up time, regions, age and ICU admission.

RESULTS

72 articles were included in the meta-analyses after screening 11,620 articles, identifying a total of 167 sequelae related to COVID-19 from 88,769 patients. Commonly reported sequelae included fatigue (27.5%, 95% CI 22.4-33.3%, range 1.5-84.9%), somnipathy (20.1%, 95% CI 14.7-26.9%, range 1.2-64.8%), anxiety (18.0%, 95% CI 13.8-23.1%, range 0.6-47.8%), dyspnea (15.5%, 95% CI 11.3-20.9%, range 0.8-58.4%), PTSD (14.6%, 95% CI 11.3-18.7%, range 1.2-32.0%), hypomnesia (13.4%, 95% CI 8.4-20.7%, range 0.6-53.8%), arthralgia (12.9%, 95% CI 8.4-19.2%, range 0.0-47.8%), depression (12.7%, 95% CI 9.3-17.2%, range 0.6-37.5%), alopecia (11.2%, 95% CI 6.9-17.6%, range 0.0-47.0%) over 3-13.2 months of follow-up. The prevalence of most symptoms reduced after > 9 months of follow-up, but fatigue and somnipathy persisted in 26.2% and 15.1%, respectively, of the patients over a year. COVID-19 patients from Asia reported a lower prevalence than those from other regions.

CONCLUSIONS

This review identified a wide spectrum of COVID-19 sequelae in previously hospitalized COVID-19 patients, with some symptoms persisting up to 1 year. Management and rehabilitation strategies targeting these symptoms may improve quality of life of recovered patients.

Fatigue Is a Major Symptom at COVID-19 Hospitalization Follow-Up

Persistent symptoms after hospitalization with COVID-19 are common, but the frequency and severity of these symptoms are insufficiently understood. We aimed to describe symptoms and pulmonary function after hospitalization with COVID-19. Patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in Central Denmark Region were invited for follow-up 3 months after discharge. Clinical characteristics, patient reported outcomes (Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS), anxiety and depression (HADS)), symptoms, pulmonary function test and 6-min walk test were collected. We included 218 patients (mean age 59.9 (95% CI: 58.2, 61.7), 59% males). Fatigue, dyspnea and impaired concentration were the most prevalent symptoms at follow-up. Using FAS, 47% reported mild-to-moderate fatigue and 18% severe fatigue. Mean HADS was 7.9 (95% CI: 6.9, 8.9). FAS was correlated to HADS (β = 0.52 (95% CI: 0.44, 0.59, p < 0.001)). Mean DLCO was 80.4% (95% CI: 77.8, 83.0) and 45% had DLCO ˂ 80%. Mean DLCO was significantly reduced in patients treated in the ICU (70.46% (95% CI 65.13, 75.79)). The highest FAS and HADS were seen in patients with the shortest period of hospitalization (2.1 days (95% CI: 1.4, 2.7)) with no need for oxygen. In conclusion, fatigue is a common symptom after hospitalization for COVID-19 and ICU treatment is associated to decreased diffusion capacity.