Paediatric inflammatory bowel disease: review with a focus on practice in low- to middle-income countries

The current state of pediatric gastroenterology in under-resourced nations

Background

Pediatric gastroenterology (GI) care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) faces substantial challenges due to limited healthcare infrastructure, inadequate resources, and a shortage of specialized healthcare professionals. These challenges lead to delayed diagnoses and treatment, exacerbating the morbidity and mortality associated with pediatric GI diseases, which include both infectious conditions like diarrhea and chronic conditions such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and liver diseases.

Aim

The aim of this review is to examine the current state of pediatric GI care in LMICs, identify the key challenges these regions face, and propose strategies to improve healthcare outcomes for children affected by GI disorders.

Methods

This review synthesizes existing literature from a range of LMICs, analyzing factors such as the economic burden of healthcare, barriers to access, the availability of diagnostic and therapeutic services, and the state of pediatric hepatology and endoscopy. Studies included in the review were sourced from countries in sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia, and other LMIC regions, focusing on pediatric GI disorders and healthcare delivery.

Results

Economic burden: Families in LMICs face significant economic barriers in accessing pediatric GI care, with treatment costs often exceeding household income, especially in private healthcare settings. Healthcare access: Limited access to healthcare facilities, especially in rural areas, coupled with the shortage of trained pediatric gastroenterologists and necessary medical equipment, leads to delayed diagnoses and inadequate care for conditions like Helicobacter pylori infections and chronic liver diseases. Sanitation and infectious diseases: Poor sanitation and lack of access to clean water contribute to the high prevalence of diarrheal diseases, which can be reduced through better hygiene practices and improved infrastructure. Training gaps: The shortage of trained healthcare workers, particularly pediatric specialists, hinders effective care delivery, with healthcare workers often overburdened due to workforce migration and low salaries. Hepatology and endoscopy: Pediatric hepatology, especially in the context of viral hepatitis, and the availability of pediatric GI endoscopy are severely limited in LMICs, further complicating the management of liver diseases and GI conditions in children.

Conclusion

Improving pediatric GI care in LMICs requires addressing systemic challenges such as inadequate healthcare infrastructure, limited financial resources, and a shortage of trained professionals. Prevention strategies like vaccination, sanitation improvements, and public health education campaigns are crucial for reducing the prevalence of pediatric GI diseases. In addition, enhancing access to specialized training, healthcare services, and diagnostic tools will improve outcomes for children in resource-limited settings. Continued international collaboration and investment in local healthcare systems are essential for creating sustainable solutions and bridging the gap in pediatric GI care.

Saudi consensus guidance for the diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel disease in children and adolescents

ABSTRACT

The management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in children and adolescents is challenging. Clear evidence-based guidelines are required for this population. This article provides recommendations for managing IBD in Saudi children and adolescents aged 6-19 years, developed by the Saudi Ministry of Health in collaboration with the Saudi Society of Clinical Pharmacy and the Saudi Gastroenterology Association. All 57 guideline statements are based on the most up-to-date information for the diagnosis and management of pediatric IBD.

Consenso colombiano de la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal pediátrica

Introducción: la colitis ulcerativa pediátrica (CUP), la enfermedad de Crohn pediátrica (ECP) y la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal pediátrica no clasificable (EIIPNC) tienen particularidades clínicas y psicosociales que las diferencian de las del adulto y pueden condicionar enfoques terapéuticos distintos por las posibles repercusiones nutricionales, crecimiento y desarrollo, lo que representa un desafío para el pediatra y el gastroenterólogo. Objetivo: desarrollar recomendaciones basadas en la evidencia por consenso de expertos para el diagnóstico y el tratamiento oportunos y seguros de la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal pediátrica (EIIP) en menores de 18 años, para los profesionales que atienden estos pacientes y los pagadores en salud. Metodología: a través de un panel de expertos del Colegio Colombiano de Gastroenterología, Hepatología y Nutrición Pediátrica (COLGAHNP) y un grupo multidisciplinario se formularon 35 preguntas en relación con el cuadro clínico, el diagnóstico y el tratamiento de la EIIP. A través de una revisión y un análisis crítico de la literatura, con especial énfasis en las principales guías de práctica clínica (GPC), estudios clínicos aleatorizados (ECA) y metaanálisis de los últimos 10 años, los expertos plantearon 77 recomendaciones que respondían a cada una de las preguntas de investigación con sus respectivos puntos prácticos. Posteriormente, cada una de las afirmaciones se sometieron a votación dentro del grupo desarrollador, incluyendo las afirmaciones que alcanzaron > 80 %. Resultados: todas las afirmaciones alcanzaron una votación > 80 %. La EIIP tiene mayor extensión, severidad y evolución hacia la estenosis, enfermedad perianal, manifestaciones extraintestinales y retraso en el crecimiento en comparación con los pacientes adultos, por lo que su manejo debe ser realizado por grupos multidisciplinarios liderados por gastroenterólogos pediatras y prepararlos para una transición a la edad adulta. Los criterios de Porto permiten una clasificación práctica de la EIIP. En la ECP, debemos usar la clasificación de París y debemos realizar ileocolonoscopia y esofagogastroduodenoscopia, ya que el 50 % tienen un compromiso superior, usando el SES-CD (UCEIS/Mayo en CUP) y tomando múltiples biopsias. Los laboratorios iniciales deben incluir marcadores de inflamación, calprotectina fecal y descartar infecciones intestinales. El tratamiento, la inducción y el mantenimiento de la EIIP deben ser individualizados y decididos según la estratificación de riesgo. En el seguimiento se debe usar el Pediatric Crohn Disease Activity Index (PCDAI) y Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index (PUCAI) de las últimas 48 horas. Los pacientes con EIIP temprana e infantil, deben ser valorados por inmunólogos y genetistas. Conclusión: se proporciona una guía de consenso con recomendaciones basadas en la evidencia sobre el diagnóstico y los tratamientos oportunos y seguros en los pacientes con EIIP.

Very early onset inflammatory bowel disease in a South Asian country where inflammatory bowel disease is emerging: a distinct clinical phenotype from later onset disease

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Information on pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (PIBD) and very early onset IBD (VEOIBD) are sparse in India, where IBD is emerging. We aimed to evaluate characteristics of VEOIBD and later onset PIBD (LO-PIBD) in India.

METHODS

We performed retrospective analysis of a large, prospectively maintained IBD registry. PIBD was divided in to VEOIBD ( < 6 years) and LO-PIBD (6-17 years). Demographic data, disease characteristics and treatment were compared between the PIBD groups and with other Asian/Western studies as well as the adult patients of the registry.

RESULTS

Of 3,752 IBD patients, 292 (7.8%) had PIBD (0-17 years) (175 Crohn's disease [CD], 113 ulcerative colitis [UC], 4 IBD-undifferentiated; 22 VEOIBD [7.5%], and 270 LO-PIBD [92.5%]). VEOIBD patients had more severe disease compared to LO-PIBD in both UC (P= 0.003) and CD (P< 0.001). Familial IBD was more common in VEOIBD (13.6%) compared to LO-PIBD (9.2%). Ileal disease (L1) was an independent risk factor for diagnostic delay in pediatric CD. Diagnostic delay ( > 6 months) was significantly lower in VEOIBD (40.9%) than in LO-PIBD (78.8%) (P< 0.001). Compared to other Asian and Western studies, extensive UC (72.5%) and complicated CD (stricturing/penetrating: 42.7%) were relatively more common. Perianal CD was relatively less frequent (7.4%). PIBD had a significantly higher number of complicated and ileal CD and extensive UC comparison to adult cohort of the registry.

CONCLUSIONS

VEOIBD has more aggressive phenotype than LO-PIBD. Disease appears distinct from other Asian and Western studies and adult onset disease, with more complicated CD and extensive UC.

Histopathology of inflammatory bowel disease - Position statement of the Pathologists of the Italian Group for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IG-IBD) and Italian Group of Gastrointestinal Pathologists (GIPAD-SIAPEC)

Diagnosis of the inflammatory bowel diseases ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) relies mainly on the histopathological examination of endoscopic biopsies of the gastrointestinal tract. To facilitate the accurate diagnosis of these two conditions, this paper addresses key issues on the: (A) gastrointestinal biopsy procedure, (B) histomorphological characteristics of UC and CD, and (C) diagnosis of dysplasia. The 13 statements presented here represent the consensus of two groups of Italian pathologists (IG-IBD and GIPAD).