Prognostic value of labs ordered on patients hospitalized with COVID-19

Cardiac auscultation predicts mortality in elderly patients admitted for COVID-19

INTRODUCTION

COVID-19 has had a great impact on the elderly population. All admitted patients underwent cardiac auscultation at the Emergency Department. However, to our knowledge, there is no literature that explains the implications of cardiac auscultation at the Emergency Department.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data collection from our hospital records. Our cohort consists of 300 admissions with a mean age of 81.6 years and 50.7% men.

RESULTS

Pathological cardiac auscultation at the Emergency Department was a risk factor for in-hospital mortality (RR = 1.9; 95% CI 1.3-2.8), heart failure (RR = 3.2; 95% CI = 1.8-5.6), respiratory failure (RR = 1.8; 95% CI = 1.3-2.5), acute kidney injury (RR = 2.6; 95% CI = 2-3.2), and ICU admission (RR = 3.3; 95% CI = 1.3-8.2). The findings in patients with pathological cardiac auscultation were that oxygen saturation in the Emergency Department, arterial pH, and HCO3^- were significantly lower, and the ALT/GPT, LDH, and lactate determinations were significantly higher, which is compatible and correlates with the fact that the main variable is indeed a risk factor for a more severe clinical course. Among the findings from pathological auscultation, arrhythmic tone/arrhythmia was the most frequent (50%) and a risk factor for in-hospital mortality (RR = 2.3; 95% CI = 1.6-3.4). Logistic regression was performed from a multivariate analysis that showed that the initial ex novo arrhythmia correlated with pathological cardiac auscultation is an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality.

CONCLUSION

Continuous rhythm monitoring makes it possible to detect ex novo arrhythmias and act proactively, and to offer greater care and attention to these patients who have a higher risk of in-hospital mortality and a worse prognosis. Cardiac auscultation can alert us in order to perform more electrocardiograms in these patients and thus have better monitoring.

The deadliest lung lobe in COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study of elderly patients hospitalized for COVID-19

INTRODUCTION

The relationship between which lung lobe is affected on the chest X-ray (CXR) performed at the Emergency Department (ED) and mortality from COVID-19 has not been studied. With this in mind, the present study aimed to discern which lung lobe was the one with the highest associated mortality rate in the elderly population.

METHODS

Information was collected from the 2020 hospital admissions records of our hospital. Our cohort consists of 300 admissions.

RESULTS

The presence of the left lower lobe (RR = 1.6; 95% CI: 1.1-2.4) and right middle lobe involvement (RR =1.8; 95% CI: 1.2-2.7) on CXR at the ED were both predictive factors of in-hospital mortality. Right middle lobe involvement on CXR at the ED was the risk factor with the highest relative risk value (RR = 1.8). Furthermore, right middle lobe involvement on CXR at ED was a predictor for persistent organ failure (RR = 1.7; 95% CI: 1.2-2.3), respiratory failure (RR = 1.7; 95% CI: 1.2-2.4) and acute kidney injury (RR = 1.5; 95% CI: 1.2-2). The isolated right middle lobe involvement on CXR at ED was a risk factor for in-hospital mortality (RR = 2.6; 95% CI = 1.8 - 3.7). However, the affected right middle lobe along with another/other lobe/s was a null factor.

CONCLUSION

Right middle lobe involvement was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality.

A new predictor for indicating clinical severity and prognosis in COVID-19 patients: Frontal QRS-T angle

Objective

COVID-19; It spread rapidly around the world and led to a global pandemic. Indicators of poor prognosis are important in the treatment and follow-up of COVID-19 patients and have always been a matter of interest to researchers. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between frontal QRS-T angle values and clinical severity and prognosis in COVID-19 patients.

Methods

This prospective case-control study was conducted with 130 COVID-19 patients whose diagnosis was confirmed by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and 100 healthy controls. The CURB-65 score was used as the clinical severity score.

Results

A total of 130 patients and 100 healthy controls were included in the study. When the patient and control groups were compared a significant difference was found between QT (378.07 ± 33.75 vs. 368.63 ± 19.65, p < 0.001), QTc (410.79 ± 28.19 vs. 403.68 ± 11.70, p < 0.001), QRS time (95.04 ± 21.67 vs. 91.42 ± 11.08, p < 0.001) and frontal QRS-T angle (36.57 ± 22.86 vs. 22.72 ± 14.08, p < 0.001). According to clinical severity scoring, QT (370.27 ± 25.20 vs. 387.75 ± 40.19, p = 0.003), QTc (402.18 ± 19.92 vs. 421.48 ± 33.08, p < 0.001), frontal QRS-T angle (32.25 ± 18.79 vs. 41.94 ± 26.27), p = 0.0.16) parameters were found to be significantly different. Age (odds ratio [OR], 1.201; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.111–1.298; p < 0.001) and frontal QRS-T angle ([OR], 1.045; 95% [CI], 1.015–1.075; p = 0.003) values were found to be an independent predictor for the severity of the disease. Frontal QRS-T angle ([OR], 1.101; 95% [CI], 1.030–1.176; p = 0.004), and CRP ([OR], 1.029; 95% [CI], 1.007–1.051; p = 0.01) parameters were found to be independent predictors for the mortality of the disease. As a mortality indicator; for the frontal QRS-T angle of ≥44.5°, specificity and sensitivity were 93.8% and 84.2%, respectively.

Conclusion

Frontal QRS-T angle can be used as a reproducible, convenient, inexpensive, new and powerful predictor in determining the clinical severity and prognosis of COVID-19 patients.