How to make effective HPV vaccine recommendations starting at age 9

Benefits, challenges, and strategies related to using presumptive recommendations for HPV vaccination: A qualitative study with rural and non-rural-serving primary care professionals

HPV vaccination coverage remains far below the national target of 80% among US adolescents, particularly in rural areas, which have vaccine uptake rates that are 10% points lower than non-rural areas on average. Primary care professionals (PCPs) can increase coverage by using presumptive recommendations to introduce HPV vaccination in a way that assumes parents want to vaccinate. Through semi-structured interviews, we explored PCPs' experiences and perceptions of using presumptive recommendations in rural- and non-rural-serving primary care clinics in North Carolina. Thematic analysis revealed that most PCPs in rural and non-rural contexts used presumptive recommendations and felt the strategy was an effective and concise way to introduce the topic of HPV vaccination to parents. At the same time, some PCPs raised concerns about presumptive recommendations potentially straining relationships with certain parents, including those who had previously declined HPV vaccine or who distrust medical authority due to their past experiences with the healthcare system. PCPs dealt with these challenges by using a more open-ended approach when introducing HPV vaccination to parents. In conclusion, our findings suggest that PCPs in both rural and non-rural settings see value in using presumptive recommendations to introduce HPV vaccination, but to adequately address concerns and ensure increased HPV vaccine uptake, PCPs can use simple and culturally sensitive language to ensure fully informed consent and to maintain parental trust. And to further strengthen HPV vaccine discussions, PCPs can utilize other effective HPV communication techniques, like the Announcement Approach, in discussing HPV vaccinations with hesitant parents.

HPV vaccine standing orders and communication in primary care: A qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Standing orders may improve HPV vaccination rates, but clinical staff's readiness to use them has not been well-explored. We sought to explore benefits and challenges to using HPV vaccine standing orders for adolescents ages 9 to 12, understand clinical staff roles in communication about HPV vaccine, and how standing orders can reduce barriers contributing to vaccine disparities among racial and ethnic marginalized groups.

METHODS

Participants were a sample of 16 U.S. nurses, medical assistants, and healthcare providers working in primary care, recruited from June to September 2022. Trained staff conducted virtual, semi-structured qualitative interviews. We analyzed the resulting data using reflexive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Themes reflected benefits and challenges to using HPV vaccine standing orders and strategies to address clinic barriers to improve vaccine access and HPV vaccine communication. Benefits included faster and efficient clinic flow; fewer missed vaccine opportunities and promotion of early vaccination; and normalization of HPV vaccination as routine care. Challenges included possible exacerbation of existing HPV vaccine communication and recommendation barriers; and how the complexity of the vaccine administration schedule lessens nurses' and medical assistants' confidence to use standing orders. Strategies to address vaccine access barriers included using nurse-only visits to empower nurse autonomy and catch up on HPV vaccination; engaging clinical staff to follow up with overdue children; and educating parents on HPV vaccine before their child is vaccine eligible.

CONCLUSION

Using HPV vaccine standing orders can promote autonomy for nurses and medical assistants and address vaccine access barriers. Clinical staff engagement and clinic support to mitigate existing vaccine communication barriers are needed to empower staff to use of HPV vaccine standing orders.

Cervical cancer: Part I human papilloma virus vaccination in Taiwan

A significant decline in both incidence and prevalence of cervical cancers after widespread-introducing cervical screening strategy by Papanicolau test (Pap test) has been found in the world, but cervical cancer is still one of the most common female cancers, reporting the fourth prevalence and also one of the leading causes to result in main women-associated morbidity and mortality, particularly for those women living in low- and middle-income countries. Cervical cancer is one of the most important health concerns directly destroying the global health-care system, partly because of not only increasing the disability either secondary to diseases themselves of victims or mediated by treatment-related adverse events to the survivors but also acting as a leading cause of death of diseased patients worldwide, alarming the urgent need to do something to minimize the catastrophic diseases-related heavy socioeconomic burden. It is fortunate that cervical cancer is a preventable disease, based on its strong association with human papillomavirus (HPV) infection (more than 95%), particularly for those high-risk HPV (HR-HPV) and its high possibility by detecting HPV infection before the development of cervical cancer as well as an effective prevention by HPV vaccination. That is why WHO (World Health Organization) considers cervical cancer as a public problem and attempts to accelerate the elimination of cervical cancer program by three-pillar approach (90:70:90% targets), including (1) 90% of girls are fully vaccinated with HPV vaccine by 15 years of age; (2) 70% of women are screened with a high-performance test by 35 and 45 years of age and precancerous lesions are treated early; and (3) 90% of women identified with cervical diseases receive appropriate and adequate treatment. Herein, this review focuses on the HPV vaccination as Part I, including global recommendations and Taiwan government's policy for HPV vaccination.

Impact of visit characteristics on intention to recommend HPV vaccine: An experiment with US health care professionals

OBJECTIVE

Presumptive recommendations that assume parents want to vaccinate can increase human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine uptake. We sought to examine how visit characteristics affect health care professionals' (HCPs) intention to use this evidence-based recommendation style.

METHODS

In 2022, we conducted an online experiment with 2527 HCPs who had a role in adolescent vaccination in the United States. Participants read 1 of 8 randomly assigned vignettes about a well-child visit. Using a 2 × 2 × 2 between-subjects factorial design, the vignettes varied the following visit characteristics: patient age (9 vs. 12-year-old), prior parental vaccine refusal (yes vs. no), and time pressure on the HCP (low vs. high). HCPs reported on their intention to use a presumptive HPV vaccine recommendation, as well as on related attitudes, subjective norms, and self-efficacy. Analyses used 3-way analysis of variance and parallel mediation.

RESULTS

Participants were pediatricians (26%), family/general medicine physicians (22%), advanced practitioners (24%), and nursing staff (28%). Overall, about two-thirds of HCPs (64%) intended to use a presumptive recommendation. Intentions were higher for older children (b = 0.23) and parents without prior vaccine refusal (b = 0.39, both p < 0.001). Time pressure had no main effect or interactions. HCPs' attitudes and self-efficacy partially mediated effects of patient age and prior vaccine refusal (range of b = 0.04-0.28, all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

To better support visits with younger children and parents who have refused vaccines, HCPs may need more training for making presumptive recommendations for HPV vaccine. Reinforcing positive attitudes and self-efficacy can help HCPs adopt this evidence-based recommendation style.

Age nine is possible: Improving age 9 HPV initiation through a national quality improvement initiative during the COVID-19 pandemic

The American Cancer Society collaborated with a range of healthcare partners in 2020-2022 to implement quality improvement clinical interventions with the goal of improving HPV vaccination rates among adolescents' ages 9-13. 2020 was the first cohort for which partners had been asked to submit HPV rate data for patients' ages 9-12. At least 80% of the partners across all reported project years were able and willing to report HPV rates for these ages. Partners submitted HPV initiation rates at the beginning and end of the 12-month project year along with project activities, including evidence-based interventions (EBIs) implemented. Mean initiation rates for ages 9-10 significantly increased 4.1% during 2020 compared to non-significant rate increases of 2.6% and 2.0% for ages 11-12 and age 13, respectively. In 2021, ages 9-10 initiation saw a non-significant increase of 2.2%, whereas ages 11-12 and age 13 decreased non-significantly by 0.3% and 0.1%, respectively. The 2022 cohort saw significant initiation rate increases of at least 4% across all ages, potentially a promising result of the myriad back on track HPV vaccination campaigns designed to reverse the damage of the COVID-19 pandemic on adolescent immunizations. These findings demonstrate an effective adaptation of quality improvement in increasing HPV vaccination coverage among younger ages even during a national pandemic.