Pharmacokinetic profile of edaravone: a comparison between Japanese and Caucasian populations

Pharmacokinetics of Edaravone Oral Suspension in Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

PURPOSE

Edaravone is a neuroprotective agent approved as an intravenous treatment for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). The intravenous administration of edaravone places a burden on patients and there is a clinical need for oral agents for the treatment of ALS. This report aimed to assess the pharmacokinetics and safety of an edaravone oral suspension in patients with ALS after oral and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube administration.

METHODS

Two single-dose, open-label phase 1 clinical studies were conducted. Edaravone oral suspension (105 mg of edaravone in 5 mL aqueous suspension) was administered orally and via PEG tube to 9 and 6 Japanese patients with ALS, respectively. Plasma and urinary pharmacokinetics of unchanged edaravone and its metabolites (sulfate and glucuronide conjugates) were determined. Safety was also evaluated.

FINDINGS

After reaching maximum plasma concentration, the mean plasma concentration-time of unchanged edaravone showed a triphasic elimination. Mean plasma concentration-time profiles of the metabolites were higher than those of unchanged edaravone. The mean urinary excretion ratios were higher for the glucuronide conjugate than for either unchanged edaravone or the sulfate conjugate. In patients administered edaravone orally, a single adverse event occurred (blood urine present), which was mild and improved without medical intervention. No adverse drug reactions or serious adverse events were reported. In patients administered edaravone via PEG tube, 5 treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 3 patients; none were related to the study drug. No adverse drug reactions were reported.

IMPLICATIONS

In patients with ALS, a single dose of edaravone oral suspension was well absorbed and mainly eliminated in urine as the glucuronide conjugate. No safety concerns emerged. Pharmacokinetics were similar to those previously reported in healthy participants following oral administration. This indicates that effective drug concentrations were achieved and edaravone can be successfully administered both orally and via a PEG tube in patients with ALS.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04176224 (oral administration) and NCT04254913 (PEG tube administration), www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov.

The effects of intervention with intravenous edaravone in Study 19 on hospitalization, tracheostomy, ventilation, and death in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

Intravenous (IV) edaravone is a US Food and Drug Administration-approved treatment for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), shown in clinical trials to slow physical functional decline. In this study we compared the effect of IV edaravone (edaravone-first group) versus placebo followed by IV edaravone (placebo-first group) on survival and additional milestone events.

METHODS

This work is a post hoc analysis of Study 19/MCI186-19, which was a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study investigating IV edaravone versus placebo. Study 19 and its 24-week extension have been described previously (NCT01492686). Edaravone-first versus placebo-first group time to events for specific milestone(s) were analyzed post hoc. Time-to-event composite endpoints were time to death; time to death, tracheostomy, or permanent assisted ventilation (PAV); and time to death, tracheostomy, PAV, or hospitalization.

RESULTS

The risk for death, tracheostomy, PAV, or hospitalization was 53% lower among patients in the edaravone-first vs placebo-first groups (hazard ratio = 0.47 [95% confidence interval 0.25 to 0.88], P = .02). The overall effect of IV edaravone on ALS progression could be seen in the significant separation of time-to-event curves for time to death, tracheostomy, PAV, or hospitalization. ALS survival composite endpoint analyses (ALS/SURV) suggested a treatment benefit (least-squares mean difference) for the edaravone-first versus the placebo-first group at week 24 (0.15 ± 0.05 [95% confidence interval 0.06 to 0.25], P < .01) and week 48 (0.11 ± 0.05 [95% confidence interval 0.02 to 0.21], P = .02).

DISCUSSION

These analyses illustrate the value of timely and continued IV edaravone treatment, as earlier initiation was associated with a lower risk of death, tracheostomy, PAV, or hospitalization in patients with ALS.

Oral Edaravone - Introducing a Flexible Treatment Option for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

INTRODUCTION

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive and incurable neurodegenerative disease. While pharmacotherapy options remain limited, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved intravenous (IV) and oral edaravone for the treatment of ALS in 2017 and 2022, respectively. With the addition of oral edaravone, patients with ALS may exclusively use oral medications.

AREAS COVERED

The authors performed a review of the published literature using the United States (US) National Library of Medicine's PubMed.gov resource to describe the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and efficacy of oral edaravone, as well as pertinent completed and ongoing clinical trials, including the oral edaravone clinical trial development program. The clinical profile of oral edaravone is also discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

Edaravone has been shown to slow the rate of motor function deterioration experienced by patients with ALS. As the oral formulation has been approved, patients with ALS may use it alone or in combination with other approved therapeutics. Additional clinical trials and real-world evidence are ongoing to gain further understanding of the clinical profile of oral edaravone.

Intranasal administration of edaravone nanoparticles improves its stability and brain bioavailability

The clinical application of EDV, a potent antioxidant drug approved for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), is limited by its short biological half-life and poor water solubility necessitating hospitalization during intravenous infusion. Nanotechnology-based drug delivery constitutes a powerful tool through inferring drug stability and targeted drug delivery improving drug bioavailability at the diseased site. Nose-to-brain drug delivery offers direct access to the brain bypassing the blood brain barrier and reducing systemic biodistribution. In this study, we designed EDV-loaded poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA)-based polymeric nanoparticles (NP-EDV) for intranasal administration. NPs were formulated by the nanoprecipitation method. Morphology, EDV loading, physicochemical properties, shelf-life stability, in vitro release and pharmacokinetic assessment in mice were conducted. EDV was efficiently loaded into ∼90 nm NPs, stable up to 30 days of storage, at ∼3% drug loading. NP-EDV reduced H2O2-induced oxidative stress toxicity in mouse microglial cell line BV-2. Optical imaging and ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) showed that intranasal delivery of NP-EDV offered higher and more sustained brain uptake of EDV compared to intravenous administration. This study is the first of its kind to develop an ALS drug in a nanoparticulate formulation for nose-to-brain delivery raising hope to ALS patients where currently treatment options are limited to two clinically approved drugs only.

Intermolecular Interactions of Edaravone in Aqueous Solutions of Ethaline and Glyceline Inferred from Experiments and Quantum Chemistry Computations

Edaravone, acting as a cerebral protective agent, is administered to treat acute brain infarction. Its poor solubility is addressed here by means of optimizing the composition of the aqueous choline chloride (ChCl)-based eutectic solvents prepared with ethylene glycol (EG) or glycerol (GL) in the three different designed solvents compositions. The slurry method was used for spectroscopic solubility determination in temperatures between 298.15 K and 313.15 K. Measurements confirmed that ethaline (ETA = ChCl:EG = 1:2) and glyceline (GLE = ChCl:GL = 1:2) are very effective solvents for edaravone. The solubility at 298.15 K in the optimal compositions was found to be equal x_E = 0.158 (c_E = 302.96 mg/mL) and x_E = 0.105 (c_E = 191.06 mg/mL) for glyceline and ethaline, respectively. In addition, it was documented that wetting of neat eutectic mixtures increases edaravone solubility which is a fortunate circumstance not only from the perspective of a solubility advantage but also addresses high hygroscopicity of eutectic mixtures. The aqueous mixture with 0.6 mole fraction of the optimal composition yielded solubility values at 298.15 K equal to x_E = 0.193 (c_E = 459.69 mg/mL) and x_E = 0.145 (c_E = 344.22 mg/mL) for glyceline and ethaline, respectively. Since GLE is a pharmaceutically acceptable solvent, it is possible to consider this as a potential new liquid form of this drug with a tunable dosage. In fact, the recommended amount of edaravone administered to patients can be easily achieved using the studied systems. The observed high solubility is interpreted in terms of intermolecular interactions computed using the Conductor-like Screening Model for Real Solvents (COSMO-RS) approach and corrected for accounting of electron correlation, zero-point vibrational energy and basis set superposition errors. Extensive conformational search allowed for identifying the most probable contacts, the thermodynamic and geometric features of which were collected and discussed. It was documented that edaravone can form stable dimers stabilized via stacking interactions between five-membered heterocyclic rings. In addition, edaravone can act as a hydrogen bond acceptor with all components of the studied systems with the highest affinities to ion pairs of ETA and GLE. Finally, the linear regression model was formulated, which can accurately estimate edaravone solubility utilizing molecular descriptors obtained from COSMO-RS computations. This enables the screening of new eutectic solvents for finding greener replacers of designed solvents. The theoretical analysis of tautomeric equilibria confirmed that keto-isomer edaravone is predominant in the bulk liquid phase of all considered deep eutectic solvents (DES).

Bioequivalence Study of Oral Suspension and Intravenous Formulation of Edaravone in Healthy Adult Subjects

The neuroprotective agent edaravone is an intravenous treatment for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. As intravenous administration burdens patients, orally administered treatments are needed. This phase 1, open‐label, single‐dose crossover study in 42 healthy adults evaluated bioequivalence of a 105‐mg edaravone oral suspension and intravenous edaravone (60 mg/60 min). The evaluation was whether the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the ratio of the maximum plasma concentration (C_max) and area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable time point and to infinity of unchanged edaravone were between the bioequivalence limit of 0.80 and 1.25. Metabolic profiles and elimination pathways were also compared between the 2 routes. Geometric mean ratios and 90%CIs of area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable time point and to infinity for unchanged edaravone satisfied bioequivalence limits. The geometric mean ratio and its lower limit of 90%CI of C_max of the 105‐mg oral suspension compared with 60‐mg intravenous formulations for unchanged edaravone fell within bioequivalence limits. Both formulations showed triphasic plasma concentration–time profiles of unchanged edaravone after reaching C_max. Plasma concentrations of edaravone inactive metabolites after oral administration were higher than with intravenous administration. Edaravone in both routes underwent urinary excretion, mainly as the glucuronide conjugate and, to a lesser extent, as the sulfate conjugate. Urinary excretion of unchanged edaravone was low, and urinary relative composition ratios of unchanged edaravone and metabolites were similar for both formulations. These findings showed equivalent exposure of the 105‐mg oral suspension of edaravone to the 60‐mg intravenous formulation, supporting further investigation of the oral suspension for treating amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Evaluation of Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Drug-Drug Interactions of an Oral Suspension of Edaravone in Healthy Adults

Intravenous (IV) edaravone is approved as an amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) treatment. Because IV administration places a burden on patients, development of orally administered ALS treatments is needed. Therefore, 2 phase 1 studies of oral formulations of edaravone in healthy subjects examined the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, racial differences, and drug‐drug interactions (DDIs) and investigated the dose of the oral formulation considered to be bioequivalent to the approved dose of the IV formulation. Study 1 was a placebo‐controlled, randomized, single‐blind study of single‐ascending‐dose oral edaravone with the dose range of 30 to 300 mg (n = 56). Study 2 was conducted in 2 cohorts (n = 84); the first assessed DDIs with multiple‐dose edaravone 120 mg/day given over 5 or 8 days (coadministered with single‐dose rosuvastatin, sildenafil, or furosemide), and the second evaluated PK and racial (Japanese/White) differences in PK parameters with doses of 100‐mg edaravone. The oral formulation of edaravone was well absorbed, and plasma concentrations of unchanged edaravone increased more than dose proportionally within the dose range of 30 to 300 mg. No effect of race on oral edaravone PK and no notable DDI effects possibly caused by orally administered edaravone were observed. The oral edaravone formulations were safe and tolerable under the assessed conditions. Mathematical modeling determined that equivalent exposures in plasma with the approved dose of the IV edaravone formulation, as reported previously, could be achieved when the oral edaravone formulation was administered at a dose of  ≈100 mg, with an absolute bioavailability of ≈60%.

An Open-label, Single-dose Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetic Variables of Edaravone in Subjects with Mild, Moderate, or No Renal Impairment

PURPOSE

The goal of this study was to compare edaravone pharmacokinetic (PK) variables and tolerability after a single intravenous (IV) infusion of 30 mg over 60 min in subjects with mild renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate 60-89 mL/min/1.73 m²), moderate renal impairment (30-59 mL/min/1.73 m²), or normal renal function (≥90 mL/min/1.73 m²).

METHODS

This open-label, single-dose study was conducted in Japan. After a screening period of up to 3 weeks, all subjects received a single IV dose of edaravone 30 mg/h on day 1. Blood samples were collected for PK analysis of edaravone and its sulfate conjugate for up to 48 h postdose.

FINDINGS

Edaravone was administered to 30 subjects: 11 with mild (Group 1), 8 with moderate (Group 2), and 11 with no (Group 3) renal impairment. Although geometric least-squares mean values for C_max and AUC_0-∞ for unchanged edaravone were 1.15- and 1.20-fold greater in Group 1 than in Group 3, and were 1.25- and 1.30-fold greater in Group 2 than in Group 3, no statistically significant differences in exposure (C_max and AUC) to edaravone were noted between the 3 groups (P > 0.05). The geometric least-squares mean values for C_max and AUC_0-∞ for the sulfate conjugate were 1.41- and 1.50-fold greater in Group 1 than in Group 3, and 1.41- and 1.97-fold greater in Group 2 than in Group 3. Differences in exposure (C_max and AUC) to the sulfate conjugate of edaravone were statistically significant between the 3 study groups (P < 0.0001). A total of 5 treatment-emergent adverse events in 3 subjects in Group 1 were considered by the investigator to be reasonably related to edaravone: headache (2 events/2 subjects), vomiting (2 events/1 subjects), and increased blood bilirubin level (n = 1). These treatment-emergent adverse events were mild and recovered without sequelae.

IMPLICATIONS

Mild to moderate renal impairment had no clinically significant effects on the PK profile of edaravone in Japanese subjects, relative to individuals with normal renal function, and there were no significant safety concerns. Thus, edaravone dosage adjustments are unlikely to be needed in patients with mild to moderate renal impairment. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03289208.

Open-label, Single-dose Studies of the Pharmacokinetics of Edaravone in Subjects with Mild, Moderate, or Severe Hepatic Impairment Compared to Subjects with Normal Hepatic Functioning

PURPOSE

Two studies were conducted to assess the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties and tolerability of edaravone in Japanese subjects with mild to moderate hepatic impairment or normal hepatic functioning (study 1), and in white subjects with severe hepatic impairment compared to subjects with normal hepatic functioning (study 2).

METHODS

Studies 1 and 2 were multicenter, open-label, single-dose studies that included subjects aged 18-75 years. In study 1, subjects were stratified into 3 different groups of hepatic functioning according to Child-Pugh score: mild hepatic impairment, score 5 or 6 (n = 8); moderate hepatic impairment, score 7-9 (n = 6); or normal hepatic functioning (n = 8). In study 2, subjects had severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh score 10-14; n = 6) or normal hepatic functioning (n = 6). In both studies, all subjects were given edaravone 30 mg IV infused over 60 min on the morning of day 1. Blood samples for use in PK analyses were collected from days 1-3. The PK properties (C_max, AUC_0-last, and AUC_0-∞) of edaravone and its sulfate conjugate metabolite were measured.

FINDINGS

In study 1, the geometric least-squares mean (GLSM) C_max and AUC_0-∞ of unchanged edaravone were 1.203- and 1.065-fold greater, respectively, in subjects with mild hepatic impairment versus normal hepatic functioning, and were 1.235- and 1.142-fold greater, respectively, in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment versus normal hepatic functioning. In study 2, GLSM C_max and AUC_0-∞ of unchanged edaravone were 1.203- and 1.190-fold greater, respectively, in subjects with severe hepatic impairment versus normal hepatic functioning. In both studies the AUC_0-last, AUC_0-∞, unbound AUC from time zero to infinity, and C_max of unchanged edaravone were increased slightly with increases in Child-Pugh classification. No adverse events considered related to edaravone were reported, except for 1 case of sinus bradycardia in a subject with normal hepatic functioning in study 2. The event was moderate in severity, considered as possibly related to edaravone, and resolved during the study.

IMPLICATIONS

Mild to moderate and severe hepatic impairment had no apparent clinically significant effects on the PK profile of edaravone in Japanese and white subjects, respectively, relative to individuals with normal hepatic functioning, and there were no notable tolerability concerns. Thus, edaravone dosage adjustments are unlikely to be needed in edaravone-treated patients with mild to moderate and severe hepatic impairment. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT03289234 (mild to moderate hepatic impairment) and NCT03664544 (severe hepatic impairment).

A Randomized, Single-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 3-Way Crossover Study to Evaluate the Effect of Therapeutic and Supratherapeutic Doses of Edaravone on QT/QTc Interval in Healthy Subjects

This randomized, single-blind, 3-way crossover study assessed the effect of edaravone on QT interval, including an exposure-response analysis. Twenty-seven healthy Japanese male volunteers, aged 20 to 49 years, were randomly assigned to receive a single intravenous dose of each treatment in 1 of 3 sequences (n = 9 each): ACB, BAC, and CBA, where A was edaravone 60 mg (therapeutic dose), B was edaravone 300 mg (supratherapeutic dose), and C was normal saline (placebo). Electrocardiographs were collected to assess treatment effects. In an exposure-response analysis, a linear model was determined to be valid and indicated no statistically significant positive slope for the relationship between change from baseline in QTcF (ΔQTcF) and edaravone concentration (0.000155 ms/(ng/mL); P = .1478); upper bounds of 2-sided 90% confidence intervals after placebo adjustment (ΔΔQTcF) were <10 milliseconds at the geometric mean maximum concentration for each edaravone dose. Overall estimated values by time point of ΔΔQTcF ≤0.9 milliseconds, no outlier values, and no morphologic changes suggestive of repolarization abnormalities were observed. Analysis of heart rate, PR interval, and QRS duration also revealed no adverse findings. These data indicate that edaravone, even at supratherapeutic doses, does not produce clinically meaningful QT prolongation and has no clinically relevant cardiac effects.

Predicting the Pharmacokinetic Characteristics of Edaravone Intravenous Injection and Sublingual Tablet Through Modeling and Simulation

PURPOSE

Edaravone is a free-radical scavenger with relatively favorable properties of brain penetration. It has been approved for the indications of acute ischemic stroke and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). This study aimed to establish a pharmacokinetic (PK) model to fit the PK profile of edaravone after a single sublingual (SL) dose of a novel edaravone tablet and single IV infusion of injectable edaravone in healthy Chinese volunteers participating in a bioavailability study. The model is expected to be useful for predicting the concentration-time profiles of edaravone following different dosing regimens in a healthy Chinese population. The purposes were to identify an optimal dose and dosing regimen for the new SL formulation and to support future clinical exploration of this tablet product in its approved indications and other therapeutic fields being developed.

METHODS

The PK profiles after a single SL dose or IV infusion of edaravone 30 mg can be well described by a 3-compartment linear disposition model, on which a first-order absorption model with a lag time and a parameter for bioavailability was incorporated to fit the absorption phase of the SL dose. Performance of these PK models was evaluated for goodness of fit, residual trends, visual predictive checks, as well as precision of model predictions against external data. The validated models were employed for simulating the PK profiles of edaravone after a single SL dose of 60 mg and IV infusion of 60 mg for 60 min.

FINDINGS

The resultant estimates support the possibility and feasibility of demonstrating bioequivalence between an SL administration of edaravone 60 mg and the currently approved dosing regimen for ALS (ie, 60 mg IV over 60 min) once per day. The calculation of sample size suggested that the requirement for subject number was acceptable considering the general capacity of a Phase I study center, and so were the procedures defined in the protocol.

IMPLICATION

The models can be further applied to simulate favorable concentration-time profiles in diseases with different underlying courses of oxidative stress, and hence facilitate the optimization of current dosing regimens.

Two Decades-Long Journey from Riluzole to Edaravone: Revisiting the Clinical Pharmacokinetics of the Only Two Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Therapeutics

The recent approval of edaravone has provided an intravenous option to treat amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) in addition to the existing oral agent, riluzole. The present work was primarily undertaken to provide a comprehensive clinical pharmacokinetic summary of the two approved ALS therapeutics. The key objectives of the review were to (i) tabulate the clinical pharmacokinetics of riluzole and edaravone with emphasis on absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion (ADME) properties; (ii) provide a comparative scenario of the pharmacokinetics of the two drugs wherever possible; and (iii) provide perspectives and introspection on the gathered clinical pharmacokinetic data of the two drugs with appropriate conjectures to quench scientific curiosity. Based on this review, the following key highlights were deduced: (i) as a result of both presystemic metabolism and polymorphic hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) metabolism, the oral drug riluzole exhibited more inter-subject variability than that of intravenous edaravone; (ii) using various parameters for comparison, including the published intravenous data for riluzole, it was apparent that edaravone was achieving the desired systemic concentrations to possibly drive the local brain concentrations for its efficacy in ALS patients with lesser variability than riluzole; (iii) using scientific conjectures, it was deduced that the availability of intravenous riluzole may not be beneficial in therapy due to its fast systemic clearance; (iv) on the contrary, however, there appeared to be an opportunity for the development of an oral dosage form of edaravone, which may potentially benefit the therapy option for ALS patients by avoiding hospitalization costs; and (v) because of the existence of pharmaco-resistance for the brain entry in ALS patients, it appeared prudent to consider combination strategies of edaravone and/or riluzole with suitable P-glycoprotein efflux-blocking drugs to gain more favorable outcomes in ALS patients.

Safety and efficacy of edaravone compared to historical controls in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis from North-Eastern Italy

OBJECTIVE

To test efficacy and tolerability of edaravone in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) originating from North-Eastern Italy.

METHODS

We compared 3-month and 6-month changes of ALSFRS-R score, FVC value, and MRC score of 31 consecutive patients with ALS who were treated with edaravone to those of 50 historical ALS patients who were not treated with edaravone.

RESULTS

No significant difference for any functional measures was found between the two groups at each time point as compared to baseline. In treated patients, we also observed creatinine values to significantly decrease at 3 and 6 months (p = 0.0078 and 0.030, respectively) and ALSAQ5 score to significantly increase (i.e. worse quality of life) at 3 and 6 months (p = 0.0005 and 0.0078, respectively). Yet, we observed an overall safety of the medication over the 6-month period of observation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our retrospective study suggests no benefit of edaravone on ALS in populations of Caucasian ancestry.

Edaravone for the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

INTRODUCTION

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive fatal disorder that affects all skeletal muscles, leading to death, mostly within 2-4 years from onset. To date, the anti-glutamatergic drug riluzole is the only drug that has been approved for the treatment of this disease; however, its efficacy is modest. Oxidative stress is considered to be involved in the pathology of ALS, and in this regard, the free radical scavenger edaravone, which was originally developed for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke, has also been developed for the treatment of ALS. Areas covered: This review describes the pharmacological properties of edaravone and the progress of clinical trials conducted to evaluate the efficacy of this drug in the treatment of ALS. Expert commentary: Edaravone is the first drug to show effective inhibition of the motor function deterioration experienced by ALS patients with early-stage probable and definite types. In order to effectively prolong the quality of motor function, edaravone treatment should be initiated as soon as the diagnosis has been confirmed; however, the respiratory function should be carefully monitored when a deterioration in breathing capacity is detected.

Utilization of data below the analytical limit of quantitation in pharmacokinetic analysis and modeling: promoting interdisciplinary debate

Traditionally, bioanalytical laboratories do not report actual concentrations for samples with results below the LOQ (BLQ) in pharmacokinetic studies. BLQ values are outside the method calibration range established during validation and no data are available to support the reliability of these values. However, ignoring BLQ data can contribute to bias and imprecision in model-based pharmacokinetic analyses. From this perspective, routine use of BLQ data would be advantageous. We would like to initiate an interdisciplinary debate on this important topic by summarizing the current concepts and use of BLQ data by regulators, pharmacometricians and bioanalysts. Through introducing the limit of detection and evaluating its variability, BLQ data could be released and utilized appropriately for pharmacokinetic research.

What can we learn from the edaravone development program for ALS?

Edaravone's development into an ALS therapeutic has been a process which began with preclinical studies regarding its potential in targeting ALS. Despite edaravone's inability to show benefit in a general ALS population, an important post-hoc analysis showed that a clinical subset of patients had benefit. Most importantly, a subsequent study examining the capacity of edaravone to have benefit in this specific subset of ALS patients was successful in meeting its primary outcome measures. Questions regarding whether the dosing regimen could be simplified or improved, the duration of the effects, and the timing of the potential treatment to different stages of disease remain to be answered. However, the benefit of this compound in delivering a meaningful therapy to ALS patients and the lessons learned with regard to its development should widen interest in clinical research so that additional strategies for treating ALS may become available to patients.

Discussing edaravone with the ALS patient: an ethical framework from a U.S. perspective

The recent approval of edaravone by the United States Food and Drug Administration has generated a mix of hope tempered by reality. The costs of the drug, both monetarily and with regard to intensity of treatment, are high. The benefits, while modest, will be viewed through a very different lens by individuals depending on their goals of care. By virtue of our training and experience, physicians are ideally suited to understand and explain new treatments to our patients. As healthcare providers with a fiduciary responsibility to our patients, we must make sure they are fully informed about both the costs and benefits of non-curative therapies such as edaravone, and be prepared to discuss these in the context of their goals of care and potential impact on quality of life. Respect for our patients' autonomy is critical when discussing these issues, but we should always be guided by the ethical principles of beneficence and non-maleficence.