1
|
Bower KL, Noecker AM, Frankemolle-Gilbert AM, McIntyre CC. Model-Based Analysis of Pathway Recruitment During Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation. Neuromodulation 2024; 27:455-463. [PMID: 37097269 PMCID: PMC10598236 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2023.02.084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Revised: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Subthalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established clinical therapy, but an anatomically clear definition of the underlying neural target(s) of the stimulation remains elusive. Patient-specific models of DBS are commonly used tools in the search for stimulation targets, and recent iterations of those models are focused on characterizing the brain connections that are activated by DBS. OBJECTIVE The goal of this study was to quantify axonal pathway activation in the subthalamic region from DBS at different electrode locations and stimulation settings. MATERIALS AND METHODS We used an anatomically and electrically detailed computational model of subthalamic DBS to generate recruitment curves for eight different axonal pathways of interest, at three generalized DBS electrode locations in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) (ie, central STN, dorsal STN, posterior STN). These simulations were performed with three levels of DBS electrode localization uncertainty (ie, 0.5 mm, 1.0 mm, 1.5 mm). RESULTS The recruitment curves highlight the diversity of pathways that are theoretically activated with subthalamic DBS, in addition to the dependence of the stimulation location and parameter settings on the pathway activation estimates. The three generalized DBS locations exhibited distinct pathway recruitment curve profiles, suggesting that each stimulation location would have a different effect on network activity patterns. We also found that the use of anodic stimuli could help limit activation of the internal capsule relative to other pathways. However, incorporating realistic levels of DBS electrode localization uncertainty in the models substantially limits their predictive capabilities. CONCLUSIONS Subtle differences in stimulation location and/or parameter settings can impact the collection of pathways that are activated during subthalamic DBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelsey L Bower
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Angela M Noecker
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Cameron C McIntyre
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Njeru DK, Athawale TM, France JJ, Johnson CR. Quantifying and Visualizing Uncertainty for Source Localization in Electrocardiographic Imaging. COMPUTER METHODS IN BIOMECHANICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING. IMAGING & VISUALIZATION 2022; 11:812-822. [PMID: 37284179 PMCID: PMC10241371 DOI: 10.1080/21681163.2022.2113824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2021] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) presents a clinical opportunity to noninvasively understand the sources of arrhythmias for individual patients. To help increase the effectiveness of ECGI, we provide new ways to visualize associated measurement and modeling errors. In this paper, we study source localization uncertainty in two steps: First, we perform Monte Carlo simulations of a simple inverse ECGI source localization model with error sampling to understand the variations in ECGI solutions. Second, we present multiple visualization techniques, including confidence maps, level-sets, and topology-based visualizations, to better understand uncertainty in source localization. Our approach offers a new way to study uncertainty in the ECGI pipeline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis K Njeru
- Scientific Computing and Imaging (SCI) Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - Tushar M Athawale
- Scientific Computing and Imaging (SCI) Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - Jessie J France
- Scientific Computing and Imaging (SCI) Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - Chris R Johnson
- Scientific Computing and Imaging (SCI) Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wårdell K, Nordin T, Vogel D, Zsigmond P, Westin CF, Hariz M, Hemm S. Deep Brain Stimulation: Emerging Tools for Simulation, Data Analysis, and Visualization. Front Neurosci 2022; 16:834026. [PMID: 35478842 PMCID: PMC9036439 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.834026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a well-established neurosurgical procedure for movement disorders that is also being explored for treatment-resistant psychiatric conditions. This review highlights important consideration for DBS simulation and data analysis. The literature on DBS has expanded considerably in recent years, and this article aims to identify important trends in the field. During DBS planning, surgery, and follow up sessions, several large data sets are created for each patient, and it becomes clear that any group analysis of such data is a big data analysis problem and has to be handled with care. The aim of this review is to provide an update and overview from a neuroengineering perspective of the current DBS techniques, technical aids, and emerging tools with the focus on patient-specific electric field (EF) simulations, group analysis, and visualization in the DBS domain. Examples are given from the state-of-the-art literature including our own research. This work reviews different analysis methods for EF simulations, tractography, deep brain anatomical templates, and group analysis. Our analysis highlights that group analysis in DBS is a complex multi-level problem and selected parameters will highly influence the result. DBS analysis can only provide clinically relevant information if the EF simulations, tractography results, and derived brain atlases are based on as much patient-specific data as possible. A trend in DBS research is creation of more advanced and intuitive visualization of the complex analysis results suitable for the clinical environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Wårdell
- Neuroengineering Lab, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Teresa Nordin
- Neuroengineering Lab, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Dorian Vogel
- Neuroengineering Lab, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Institute for Medical Engineering and Medical Informatics, School of Life Sciences, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, Muttenz, Switzerland
| | - Peter Zsigmond
- Department of Neurosurgery and Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Carl-Fredrik Westin
- Neuroengineering Lab, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Marwan Hariz
- Unit of Functional Neurosurgery, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Neuroscience, Ume University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Simone Hemm
- Neuroengineering Lab, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Institute for Medical Engineering and Medical Informatics, School of Life Sciences, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, Muttenz, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhou L, Fan M, Hansen C, Johnson CR, Weiskopf D. A Review of Three-Dimensional Medical Image Visualization. HEALTH DATA SCIENCE 2022; 2022:9840519. [PMID: 38487486 PMCID: PMC10880180 DOI: 10.34133/2022/9840519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
Importance. Medical images are essential for modern medicine and an important research subject in visualization. However, medical experts are often not aware of the many advanced three-dimensional (3D) medical image visualization techniques that could increase their capabilities in data analysis and assist the decision-making process for specific medical problems. Our paper provides a review of 3D visualization techniques for medical images, intending to bridge the gap between medical experts and visualization researchers.Highlights. Fundamental visualization techniques are revisited for various medical imaging modalities, from computational tomography to diffusion tensor imaging, featuring techniques that enhance spatial perception, which is critical for medical practices. The state-of-the-art of medical visualization is reviewed based on a procedure-oriented classification of medical problems for studies of individuals and populations. This paper summarizes free software tools for different modalities of medical images designed for various purposes, including visualization, analysis, and segmentation, and it provides respective Internet links.Conclusions. Visualization techniques are a useful tool for medical experts to tackle specific medical problems in their daily work. Our review provides a quick reference to such techniques given the medical problem and modalities of associated medical images. We summarize fundamental techniques and readily available visualization tools to help medical experts to better understand and utilize medical imaging data. This paper could contribute to the joint effort of the medical and visualization communities to advance precision medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liang Zhou
- National Institute of Health Data Science, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Mengjie Fan
- National Institute of Health Data Science, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Charles Hansen
- Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - Chris R. Johnson
- Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - Daniel Weiskopf
- Visualization Research Center (VISUS), University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Makarov SN, Golestanirad L, Wartman WA, Nguyen BT, Noetscher GM, Ahveninen JP, Fujimoto K, Weise K, Nummenmaa AR. Boundary element fast multipole method for modeling electrical brain stimulation with voltage and current electrodes. J Neural Eng 2021; 18. [PMID: 34311449 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac17d7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Objective. To formulate, validate, and apply an alternative to the finite element method (FEM) high-resolution modeling technique for electrical brain stimulation-the boundary element fast multipole method (BEM-FMM). To include practical electrode models for both surface and embedded electrodes.Approach. Integral equations of the boundary element method in terms of surface charge density are combined with a general-purpose fast multipole method and are expanded for voltage, shunt, current, and floating electrodes. The solution of coupled and properly weighted/preconditioned integral equations is accompanied by enforcing global conservation laws: charge conservation law and Kirchhoff's current law.Main results.A sub-percent accuracy is reported as compared to the analytical solutions and simple validation geometries. Comparison to FEM considering realistic head models resulted in relative differences of the electric field magnitude in the range of 3%-6% or less. Quantities that contain higher order spatial derivatives, such as the activating function, are determined with a higher accuracy and a faster speed as compared to the FEM. The method can be easily combined with existing head modeling pipelines such as headreco or mri2mesh.Significance.The BEM-FMM does not rely on a volumetric mesh and is therefore particularly suitable for modeling some mesoscale problems with submillimeter (and possibly finer) resolution with high accuracy at moderate computational cost. Utilizing Helmholtz reciprocity principle makes it possible to expand the method to a solution of EEG forward problems with a very large number of cortical dipoles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergey N Makarov
- Electrical & Computer Engineering Department, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609, United States of America.,Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, United States of America
| | - Laleh Golestanirad
- Biomedical Engineering and Radiology Depts., Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, United States of America
| | - William A Wartman
- Electrical & Computer Engineering Department, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609, United States of America
| | - Bach Thanh Nguyen
- Biomedical Engineering and Radiology Depts., Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, United States of America
| | - Gregory M Noetscher
- Electrical & Computer Engineering Department, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609, United States of America
| | - Jyrki P Ahveninen
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, United States of America
| | - Kyoko Fujimoto
- Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH), FDA, Silver Spring, MD 20993, United States of America
| | - Konstantin Weise
- Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Stephanstr. 1a, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Aapo R Nummenmaa
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Howell B, Isbaine F, Willie JT, Opri E, Gross RE, De Hemptinne C, Starr PA, McIntyre CC, Miocinovic S. Image-based biophysical modeling predicts cortical potentials evoked with subthalamic deep brain stimulation. Brain Stimul 2021; 14:549-563. [PMID: 33757931 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2021.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2020] [Revised: 02/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Subthalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective surgical treatment for Parkinson's disease and continues to advance technologically with an enormous parameter space. As such, in-silico DBS modeling systems have become common tools for research and development, but their underlying methods have yet to be standardized and validated. OBJECTIVE Evaluate the accuracy of patient-specific estimates of neural pathway activations in the subthalamic region against intracranial, cortical evoked potential (EP) recordings. METHODS Pathway activations were modeled in eleven patients using the latest advances in connectomic modeling of subthalamic DBS, focusing on the hyperdirect pathway (HDP) and corticospinal/bulbar tract (CSBT) for their relevance in human research studies. Correlations between pathway activations and respective EP amplitudes were quantified. RESULTS Good model performance required accurate lead localization and image fusions, as well as appropriate selection of fiber diameter in the biophysical model. While optimal model parameters varied across patients, good performance could be achieved using a global set of parameters that explained 60% and 73% of electrophysiologic activations of CSBT and HDP, respectively. Moreover, restricted models fit to only EP amplitudes of eight standard (monopolar and bipolar) electrode configurations were able to extrapolate variation in EP amplitudes across other directional electrode configurations and stimulation parameters, with no significant reduction in model performance across the cohort. CONCLUSIONS Our findings demonstrate that connectomic models of DBS with sufficient anatomical and electrical details can predict recruitment dynamics of white matter. These results will help to define connectomic modeling standards for preoperative surgical targeting and postoperative patient programming applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan Howell
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, USA
| | | | - Jon T Willie
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University, USA
| | - Enrico Opri
- Department of Neurology, Emory University, USA
| | | | | | - Philip A Starr
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, USA
| | - Cameron C McIntyre
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Butenko K, Bahls C, Schröder M, Köhling R, van Rienen U. OSS-DBS: Open-source simulation platform for deep brain stimulation with a comprehensive automated modeling. PLoS Comput Biol 2020; 16:e1008023. [PMID: 32628719 PMCID: PMC7384674 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2020] [Revised: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 06/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
In this study, we propose a new open-source simulation platform that comprises computer-aided design and computer-aided engineering tools for highly automated evaluation of electric field distribution and neural activation during Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS). It will be shown how a Volume Conductor Model (VCM) is constructed and examined using Python-controlled algorithms for generation, discretization and adaptive mesh refinement of the computational domain, as well as for incorporation of heterogeneous and anisotropic properties of the tissue and allocation of neuron models. The utilization of the platform is facilitated by a collection of predefined input setups and quick visualization routines. The accuracy of a VCM, created and optimized by the platform, was estimated by comparison with a commercial software. The results demonstrate no significant deviation between the models in the electric potential distribution. A qualitative estimation of different physics for the VCM shows an agreement with previous computational studies. The proposed computational platform is suitable for an accurate estimation of electric fields during DBS in scientific modeling studies. In future, we intend to acquire SDA and EMA approval. Successful incorporation of open-source software, controlled by in-house developed algorithms, provides a highly automated solution. The platform allows for optimization and uncertainty quantification (UQ) studies, while employment of the open-source software facilitates accessibility and reproducibility of simulations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Konstantin Butenko
- Institute of General Electrical Engineering, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
- * E-mail:
| | - Christian Bahls
- Institute of General Electrical Engineering, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Max Schröder
- Institute of Communications Engineering, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Rüdiger Köhling
- Oscar-Langendorff-Institute of Physiology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
- Interdisciplinary Faculty, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Ursula van Rienen
- Institute of General Electrical Engineering, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
- Department Life, Light & Matter, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Johnson KA, Fletcher PT, Servello D, Bona A, Porta M, Ostrem JL, Bardinet E, Welter ML, Lozano AM, Baldermann JC, Kuhn J, Huys D, Foltynie T, Hariz M, Joyce EM, Zrinzo L, Kefalopoulou Z, Zhang JG, Meng FG, Zhang C, Ling Z, Xu X, Yu X, Smeets AY, Ackermans L, Visser-Vandewalle V, Mogilner AY, Pourfar MH, Almeida L, Gunduz A, Hu W, Foote KD, Okun MS, Butson CR. Image-based analysis and long-term clinical outcomes of deep brain stimulation for Tourette syndrome: a multisite study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2019; 90:1078-1090. [PMID: 31129620 PMCID: PMC6744301 DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2019-320379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2019] [Revised: 04/11/2019] [Accepted: 04/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deep brain stimulation (DBS) can be an effective therapy for tics and comorbidities in select cases of severe, treatment-refractory Tourette syndrome (TS). Clinical responses remain variable across patients, which may be attributed to differences in the location of the neuroanatomical regions being stimulated. We evaluated active contact locations and regions of stimulation across a large cohort of patients with TS in an effort to guide future targeting. METHODS We collected retrospective clinical data and imaging from 13 international sites on 123 patients. We assessed the effects of DBS over time in 110 patients who were implanted in the centromedial (CM) thalamus (n=51), globus pallidus internus (GPi) (n=47), nucleus accumbens/anterior limb of the internal capsule (n=4) or a combination of targets (n=8). Contact locations (n=70 patients) and volumes of tissue activated (n=63 patients) were coregistered to create probabilistic stimulation atlases. RESULTS Tics and obsessive-compulsive behaviour (OCB) significantly improved over time (p<0.01), and there were no significant differences across brain targets (p>0.05). The median time was 13 months to reach a 40% improvement in tics, and there were no significant differences across targets (p=0.84), presence of OCB (p=0.09) or age at implantation (p=0.08). Active contacts were generally clustered near the target nuclei, with some variability that may reflect differences in targeting protocols, lead models and contact configurations. There were regions within and surrounding GPi and CM thalamus that improved tics for some patients but were ineffective for others. Regions within, superior or medial to GPi were associated with a greater improvement in OCB than regions inferior to GPi. CONCLUSION The results collectively indicate that DBS may improve tics and OCB, the effects may develop over several months, and stimulation locations relative to structural anatomy alone may not predict response. This study was the first to visualise and evaluate the regions of stimulation across a large cohort of patients with TS to generate new hypotheses about potential targets for improving tics and comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kara A Johnson
- Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - P Thomas Fletcher
- Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.,School of Computing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Domenico Servello
- Neurosurgical Department, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Lombardia, Italy
| | - Alberto Bona
- Neurosurgical Department, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Lombardia, Italy
| | - Mauro Porta
- Tourette's Syndrome and Movement Disorders Center, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Lombardia, Italy
| | - Jill L Ostrem
- Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Eric Bardinet
- Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Epiniere, Paris, Île-de-France, France
| | - Marie-Laure Welter
- Sorbonne Universités, University of Pierre and Marie Curie University of Paris, the French National Institute of Health and Medical Research U 1127, the National Center for Scientific Research 7225, Paris, France
| | - Andres M Lozano
- Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Juan Carlos Baldermann
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne, Koln, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | - Jens Kuhn
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne, Koln, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | - Daniel Huys
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne, Koln, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | - Thomas Foltynie
- Queen Square, Unit of Functional Neurosurgery, Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience, University College London Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Marwan Hariz
- Queen Square, Unit of Functional Neurosurgery, Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience, University College London Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Eileen M Joyce
- Queen Square, Unit of Functional Neurosurgery, Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience, University College London Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Ludvic Zrinzo
- Queen Square, Unit of Functional Neurosurgery, Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience, University College London Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Zinovia Kefalopoulou
- Queen Square, Unit of Functional Neurosurgery, Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience, University College London Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Jian-Guo Zhang
- Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Fan-Gang Meng
- Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - ChenCheng Zhang
- Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Rui Jin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhipei Ling
- Department of Neurosurgery, PLA Army General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xin Xu
- Department of Neurosurgery, PLA Army General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xinguang Yu
- Department of Neurosurgery, PLA Army General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Anouk Yjm Smeets
- Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands
| | - Linda Ackermans
- Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands
| | - Veerle Visser-Vandewalle
- Department of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, University Hospital Cologne, Koln, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | - Alon Y Mogilner
- Center for Neuromodulation, Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, New York University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Michael H Pourfar
- Center for Neuromodulation, Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, New York University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Leonardo Almeida
- Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Aysegul Gunduz
- Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.,J Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Wei Hu
- Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Kelly D Foote
- Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Michael S Okun
- Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Christopher R Butson
- Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA .,Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.,Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|