Changes in indices of airway hyperresponsiveness during one year of treatment with inhaled corticosteroids in patients with asthma

Methacholine challenge testing: comparative pharmacology

Standardization of the methacholine inhalation challenge, the most common direct bronchoprovocation test, is important. One aspect of standardization is the appropriate washout period for pharmacologic agents which affect the response. This review summarizes the available data on pharmacologic inhibition of the methacholine response. Specific (anti-muscarinic) agents demonstrate marked bronchoprotection (up to 7 days for the long-acting drugs) which lasts longer than the duration of bronchodilation. The functional antagonist (beta 2 agonist class of medications) shows marked, but less, bronchoprotection which is relatively short lived and is similar to the duration of bronchodilator efficacy. Tolerance develops quickly, especially to the long-acting agents. Single doses of controller medications, such as inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and leukotriene receptor antagonists, have no effect on the methacholine test, while regular use, at least for ICS, has a modest protective effect whose duration is uncertain and likely variable. Theophylline has a small effect and H1 blockers (all generations) have a negligible effect.

The effect of glycopyrronium and indacaterol, as monotherapy and in combination, on the methacholine dose-response curve of mild asthmatics: a randomized three-way crossover study

BACKGROUND

Methacholine dose-response curves illustrate pharmacologic bronchoprotection against methacholine-induced airway hyperresponsiveness and can be used to quantitate changes in airway sensitivity (position), reactivity (slope), and maximal responsiveness following drug administration. Our objective was to determine the influence of single-dose glycopyrronium (long-acting muscarinic antagonist) and indacaterol (ultra-long acting β₂ agonist), as monotherapy and in combination, on the methacholine dose-response curve of mild asthmatics and to compare these findings with a non-asthmatic control curve.

METHODS

This was a randomized, double blind, double dummy, three-way crossover study. For asthmatic participants (n = 14), each treatment arm included a baseline methacholine challenge, drug administration, and repeat methacholine challenges at 1, 24, and 48 h. Non-asthmatic control participants (n = 15) underwent a single methacholine challenge and did not receive any study treatment. Methacholine dose-response curves were graphed as the percent fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁) for each methacholine concentration administered. Best-fit curves were then generated. Differences in airway reactivity were calculated through linear regression. Changes in airway sensitivity were assessed as the shift in the provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV₁.

RESULTS

Compared to baseline, all treatments significantly reduced airway sensitivity to methacholine at 1 h post-dose (indacaterol ~1.5 doubling concentrations; glycopyrronium ~5 doubling concentrations; combination ~5 doubling concentrations). Bronchoprotection at 24 and 48 h remained significant with glycopyrronium and combination therapy only. Airway reactivity was not influenced by indacaterol whereas glycopyrronium significantly reduced airway reactivity at all time-points (p = 0.003-0.027). The combination significantly decreased slope at 1 (p = 0.021) and 24 (p = 0.039) hours only. The non-asthmatic control and 1-h glycopyrronium curves are nearly identical. Only the non-asthmatic control and 1-h post-combination therapy curves appeared to generate a true response plateau (three data points within 5%), which occurred at a 14% fall in FEV₁.

CONCLUSIONS

Methacholine dose-response curves differentiate the bronchoprotective mechanisms triggered by different classes of asthma medications. Assessment of bronchoprotection using methacholine dose-response curves may be useful during clinical development of respiratory medications when performing superiority, equivalence, or non-inferiority trials.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT02953041 ). Retrospectively registered on October 24th 2016.

Duration of bronchoprotection of the long-acting muscarinic antagonists tiotropium & glycopyrronium against methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction in mild asthmatics

The duration of bronchoprotection against methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction by long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA's) in asthmatics and whether these drugs differ in their pharmacodynamic properties remain to be determined. The most recent published guidelines for methacholine challenge testing (MCT) suggest that LAMA's should be abstained from for 48 h prior to testing, perhaps one week in the case of tiotropium. The objectives were to determine and compare the duration of protection of a single dose of two different LAMA's, tiotropium and glycopyrronium, against methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction. Thirteen mild-to-moderate asthmatics [with a forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) > 65% of predicted and a baseline methacholine provocation concentration causing a 20% reduction in FEV1 (PC20) ≤ 8 mg/mL] completed this double-blind, double-dummy, crossover study. Methacholine challenges were performed before treatment (5 μg tiotropium or 50 μg glycopyrronium) and at 1, 24, 48, 72, 96 and 168 h post-treatment. The minimum duration between treatment administration was 11 days. Both drugs provided significant bronchoprotection, each producing greater than a 16-fold increase in mean PC20 by 1 h. Tiotropium still provided statistically significant protection at 7 days (p = 0.0282) while glycopyrronium provided bronchoprotection until day 7 (p = 0.0590). Tiotropium provided statistically superior bronchoprotection at 24 and 72 h compared to glycopyrronium. To minimize the occurrence of false negatives, MCT guidelines should be updated to recommend a minimum one-week abstinence period from all LAMA's. MCT was also able to statistically differentiate between tiotropium and glycopyrronium with respect to the degree and duration of bronchoprotection provided by each.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02622243.

Comparison of percentage fall in FVC at the provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV(1) between patients with asymptomatic bronchial hyperresponsiveness and mild asthma

BACKGROUND

A significant proportion of individuals who have no symptoms of asthma or other respiratory diseases show bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR). BHR is usually assessed by measuring the provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV(1) (PC(20)). The percentage fall in FVC at the PC(20) (DeltaFVC) has been suggested to reflect maximal airway response and to be a more useful index of disease severity in asthma than PC(20). The aim of this study was to investigate whether asymptomatic BHR would differ from symptomatic BHR with regard to DeltaFVC.

METHODS

Methacholine bronchial challenge tests were conducted in children with no past or current symptoms of asthma, allergic rhinitis, or other respiratory diseases, who were identified among siblings of children with asthma. Forty-three children with asymptomatic BHR (PC(20) < 16 mg/mL) were recruited, and 43 children with mild asthma who were matched for age, sex, and PC(20) were selected (mild asthma group). The DeltaFVC on methacholine concentration-response curves was retrospectively analyzed in the two groups.

RESULTS

There were no differences in the frequency of atopy, blood eosinophil counts, serum IgE levels, and spirometric values between the asymptomatic BHR and mild asthma groups. Mean (+/- SD) DeltaFVC was significantly (p = 0.005) lower in the asymptomatic BHR group (14.5 +/- 3.6%) than in the mild asthma group (16.9 +/- 4.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that children with asymptomatic BHR have a lower level of maximal airway response than mild asthmatics with a similar degree of BHR. This may be a possible explanation for the lack of symptoms in subjects with asymptomatic BHR.

Comparison of Delta FVC (% decrease in FVC at the PC(20)) between cough-variant asthma and classic asthma

The percentage decrease in forced vital capacity (FVC) at the methacholine PC(20) (Delta FVC) has been proposed as a surrogate marker of maximal airway response. The aim of this study was to compare the Delta FVC between patients with cough-variant asthma (CVA) and those with classic asthma (CA). We performed a retrospective analysis of methacholine challenge test data from 47 children who were diagnosed as having CVA and from 75 children who had CA of mild severity. The mean (+/- SD) Delta FVC was significantly (p = 0.001) lower in the CVA group (14.7 +/- 3.4%) compared with the CA group (17.1 +/- 4.4%), whereas PC(20) was not different between the two groups. Our results suggest that CVA is associated with a lower level of maximal airway response than CA.

Comparison of deltaFVC between patients with allergic rhinitis with airway hypersensitivity and patients with mild asthma

BACKGROUND

In asthmatic individuals, airway sensitivity and maximal airway response are increased. Airway sensitivity is usually evaluated by measuring the provocation concentration of inhaled methacholine or histamine that causes a decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second of 20% (PC20). The percentage decrease in forced vital capacity at the PC20 (deltaFVC) has been proposed as a surrogate marker for maximal airway response. Individuals with allergic rhinitis and no clinical evidence of asthma frequently exhibit airway hypersensitivity.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the deltaFVC between patients with allergic rhinitis and mild asthmatic patients with a similar degree of airway hypersensitivity.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of methacholine challenge test data from 72 children with allergic rhinitis and airway hypersensitivity (methacholine PC20 < 16 mg/mL) (rhinitis group) and from 72 children with mild atopic asthma matched to the rhinitis group regarding the methacholine PC20 (asthma group). The deltaFVC was calculated on the concentration-response curve to methacholine.

RESULTS

The mean +/- SD deltaFVC was significantly lower in the rhinitis group (15.0% +/- 3.6%) vs the asthma group (17.4% +/- 5.3%) (P = .002). There was no significant correlation between the deltaFVC and PC20 in the rhinitis (r = -0.101; P = .41) and asthma (r = -0.023; P = .85) groups when 2 patients with PC20 less than 1 mg/mL were excluded from each group.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with allergic rhinitis and airway hypersensitivity had a significantly lower deltaFVC than methacholine PC20-matched mild asthmatic patients, suggesting that the level of maximal airway response in patients with allergic rhinitis is lower than that in mild asthmatic patients with a similar degree of airway hypersensitivity.

Percentage fall in FVC at the provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 in symptomatic asthma and clinical remission during adolescence

BACKGROUND

Many children with asthma go into long-term clinical remission at adolescence, but bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) persists in approximately one half of these subjects. BHR is usually assessed by measuring the provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20). The percentage fall in FVC at the PC20 (deltaFVC) has been suggested to be a more useful index of disease severity in asthma than PC20.

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine whether deltaFVC is higher in adolescents with symptomatic asthma than in those with clinical remission.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty adolescents with symptomatic asthma and 80 adolescents with asthma remission underwent methacholine challenge testing. DeltaFVC and PC20 were measured on the methacholine dose-response curve.

RESULTS

The mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) deltaFVC (15.5% [95% CI, 14.1 to 16.9%]) in the symptomatic group (n = 40) was significantly higher (p = 0.017) than that (12.8% [95% CI, 11.5 to 14.1%]) in the BHR-positive (PC20 < 16 mg/mL) remission group (n = 44) or that (11.5% [95% CI, 10.2 to 12.8%]) of the BHR-negative remission group (n = 36), with no difference between the two latter groups (p = 0.581). No significant correlation was found between deltaFVC and PC20 in the symptomatic group (r = -0.156, p = 0.336) or in the whole remission group (r = -0.187, p = 0.097).

CONCLUSIONS

Adolescents with symptomatic asthma had a higher deltaFVC than those with clinical remission, irrespective of the presence of BHR in the latter group. This finding suggests that deltaFVC may serve as an adjunct marker for differentiating between asthma persistence and remission during adolescence.

Exhaled markers in the monitoring of airways inflammation and its response to steroid's treatment in mild persistent asthma

The measure of inflammatory cytokines in the exhaled breath condensate has been recently proposed for use in monitoring asthma and the therapeutic response to steroids. The aim of the present study was to investigate the usefulness of measuring exhaled IL-6, IL-4 and pH in mild persistent asthma. Furthermore the effects on these markers of inhaled steroids were assessed. The study enrolled 28 asthmatic (15 males, 38+/-12 years) and 15 healthy subjects (5 males, 35+/-6 years). IL-6, IL-4 and pH were measured in the exhaled breath condensate of the subjects studied. Significantly higher concentrations of IL-6 and IL-4 were observed in the breath condensate of asthmatic patients (7.1+/-1.1 and 64.4+/-8.3 pg/ml) compared to controls (2.7+/-0.6 and 31.7+/-3.5 pg/ml), p<0.001. Furthermore, exhaled IL-4 fell significantly after treatment with inhaled steroids for 6 months (47.9+/-3.2 pg/ml, p<0.001) while exhaled IL-6 did not (6.4+/-1.0 pg/ml, p=0.8). The exhaled pH turned out to be lower in asthmatic subjects than in controls (7.39+/-0.11 vs. 7.85+/-0.14; P<0.001) but trended towards control levels after steroid treatment (7.65+/-0.16, P<0.001). We conclude that the measurement of exhaled IL-4 and pH in mild asthmatic subjects could be a useful way of monitoring their airway inflammation as well as their response to the treatment.

Longitudinal changes in patient vs. physician-based outcome measures did not significantly correlate in asthma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Although improving health status is one important aim in managing asthmatic patients, few studies have evaluated their health status longitudinally. Therefore, we examined longitudinal changes in health status of asthma patients, and compared them with changes in physiological measures.

METHODS

Eighty-seven outpatients with stable asthma after 6 months of treatment were recruited. Health status using the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) and the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), pulmonary function, peak expiratory flow (PEF) values, and airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) were evaluated at entry and every year over a 5-year period.

RESULTS

Using mixed effects models to estimate the slopes, the overall AQLQ score declined statistically at a mean rate of 0.06 units/year (P=.0091). However, this decline did not reach a clinically significant level at 5 years. The total SGRQ score did not change significantly (P=.54). Although the forced expiratory volume in 1 sec declined at a mean rate of 53 mL/year, the PEF variability and AHR improved significantly.

CONCLUSION

Health status was clinically stable over the 5-year study period in patients with asthma, which contrasted with the changes in the physiological outcome measures. As a patient centered outcome measure, health status should be followed separately.

Longitudinal changes in airflow limitation and airway hyperresponsiveness in patients with stable asthma

BACKGROUND

There are few long-term studies of the effects of treatment on the natural course of asthma.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the longitudinal changes in airflow limitation and airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) in asthma.

METHODS

We recruited 81 outpatients (never smokers) with stable asthma from the Kyoto University Hospital. They were evaluated for pulmonary function and AHR, expressed by forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and the provocation dose that caused a 20% fall in FEV1 (PD20-FEV1), respectively, at entry and every 6 months over 3 years. We used random effects models to estimate the slopes of these changes, and then evaluated the relationship between these changes and their predictive factors.

RESULTS

Using random effects models, the percentage of the predicted FEV1 (%FEV1) declined significantly but slightly at a mean rate of 0.5%/year (P = 0.002; 95% confidence interval, 0.3 to 0.8). The mean decline rate of FEV1 was 34 mL/year. However, Log(PD20-FEV1) showed significant improvement at a mean rate of 0.088 cumulative units/year (P < 0.001; 95% confidence interval, 0.053 to 0.122). Multiple regression analysis showed that the baseline values of %FEV1 and Log(PD20-FEV1) were the most significant predictive factors for their subsequent changes, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In stable asthmatic patients treated according to international guidelines, airflow limitation progressed at a nearly normal rate over 3 years. However, AHR continued to improve despite its ceiling effects. Multiple regression analysis revealed a significant negative relationship between the initial values and the subsequent changes in airflow limitation and AHR, respectively.