Loss of a DNA-protein complex correlates with extinguished major histocompatibility complex class II expression in a human B cell

Repression of I-A beta gene expression by the transcription factor PU.1

The PU.1 protein is an ets-related transcription factor that is expressed in macrophages and B lymphocytes. We present evidence that PU.1 binds to the promoter of the I-A beta gene, i.e. a PU box located next to the Y box. Transfection of PU.1 in B lymphocytes or in interferon-gamma-treated macrophages represses I-A beta gene expression. The inhibitory effect of PU.1 was obtained with the DNA binding domain of the protein, but not with the activation domain. Using the gel shift retardation assay we found that in vitro transcribed/translated NF-YA and NF-YB bind to the Y box of the I-A beta promoter. When PU.1 was added to the assay, a supershifted DNA band was found, indicating that PU.1 and NFY proteins bind to the same DNA molecule. We conclude that I-A beta gene expression is repressed by PU.1 binding to the PU box domain.

Repression of major histocompatibility complex I-A beta gene expression by dbpA and dbpB (mYB-1) proteins

The induction of major histocompatibility complex class II gene expression is mediated by three DNA elements in the promoters of these genes (W, X, and Y boxes). The Y box contains an inverted CCAAT box sequence, and the binding activity to the CAAT box is mediated by factor NF-Y, which is composed of subunits NF-YA and NF-YB. We have found that transfection of either dbpA or dbpB (mYB-1) or both inhibits I-A beta gene expression. Although the genes for some members of the Y-box family of binding proteins have been isolated by screening an expression library using the Y-box sequence, under our conditions no binding of dbpA or dbpB to the Y box of the I-A beta or I-E alpha promoter was detected. This suggested that repression of I-A beta gene expression by dbpA and dbpB was not due to competition for binding to the Y-box sequence. The results suggest two other mechanisms by which dbpA and dbpB can inhibit transcription from the I-A beta promoter. When dbpA was added, the binding of NF-YA to DNA increased, which could be explained by interaction between these two proteins whose purpose is to increase the binding affinity of NF-YA for DNA. However, this complex was unable to stimulate transcription from the I-A beta promoter. Thus, dbpA competed for the interaction between NF-YA and NF-YB by binding to NF-YA. When dbpB factor was added together with NF-YA and NF-YB, the binding of the NF-YA--NF-YB complex was reduced. This suggested that dbpB may complete with NF-YB for interaction with NF-YA. These results provide an example of how dbpA and dbpB may regulate transcription of promoters that utilize NF-Y as a transcription factor.

Mapping of the interaction site of the defective transcription factor in the class II major histocompatibility complex mutant cell line clone-13 to the divergent X2-box

We have previously described a mutant B lymphoblastoid cell line, Clone-13, that expresses HLA-DQ in the absence of HLA-DR and -DP. Several criteria indicated that the defect in this cell line influences the activity of an isotype-specific transcription factor. Indeed, transient transfection of HLA-DRA and DQB reporter constructs indicated that the affected factor operates via cis-elements located between -141 base pairs and the transcription initiation site. A series of hybrid DRA/DQB reporter constructs was generated to further map the relevant cis-elements in this system. Insertion of oligonucleotides spanning the DQB X-box (but not the DQB-W region or the DQB Y-box) upstream of -141 in a DRA reporter plasmid rescued expression to nearly wild-type levels. Substitution promoters were then generated where the entire X-box, or only the X1- or X2-boxes of HLA-DRA were replaced with the analogous regions of HLA-DQB. The DQB X2-box was able to restore expression to the silent DRA reporter construct. Moreover, replacement of the DQB X2-box with the DRA X2-box markedly diminished the activity of the DQB promoter in the mutant cell. None of the hybrid reporter constructs were defective when transfected into the wild-type, HLA-DR/-DQ positive parental cell line, Jijoye. These studies suggest that the divergent X2-box of the class II major histocompatibility complex promoters plays an important role in influencing differential expression of the human class II isotypes.

Transcriptional suppression by interleukin-1 and interferon-gamma of type II collagen gene expression in human chondrocytes

Type II collagen is one of the predominant extracellular matrix macromolecules in cartilage responsible for maintenance of integrity of this specialized tissue. We showed previously that interleukin-1 (IL-1) and interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) are capable of decreasing the levels of alpha 1(II) procollagen mRNA and suppressing the synthesis of type II collagen in cultured human chondrocytes. Data reported here show that these effects of IL-1 and IFN-gamma on the expression of the human type II collagen gene (COL2A1) are mediated primarily at the transcriptional level. This conclusion is based on three types of experimental evidence: (1) in nuclear run-off assays, preincubation of chondrocytes with either IL-1 or IFN-gamma decreased COL2A1 transcription; (2) experiments with the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide and the transcriptional inhibitor 5,6-dichloro-1-beta-D-ribofuranosylbenzimidazole (DRB) indicated that the suppression of alpha 1(II) procollagen mRNA by IL-1 could not be ascribed to decreased mRNA stability; and (3) a plasmid (pCAT-B/4.0) containing 4.0 kb of 5'-flanking sequences of COL2A1 (-577/+3428), encompassing the promoter, exon 1 and the putative enhancer sequence in the first intron, linked to the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) reporter gene, was transfected in human chondrocytes. A high level of expression of pCAT-B/4.0 was observed in human chondrocytes incubated with an insulin-containing serum substitute that is permissive for expression of the COL2A1 gene. Expression of pCAT-B/4.0 in these cells was inhibited by either IL-1 or IFN-gamma. Furthermore, expression of pCAT-B/4.0 was not detected in human dermal fibroblasts. When the putative enhancer fragment in the first intron was removed, the expression in chondrocytes was greatly reduced. These studies demonstrate that expression of COL2A1 is tissue specific and that suppression by either IL-1 or IFN-gamma is mediated primarily at the transcriptional level.

Repression of major histocompatibility complex IA expression by glucocorticoids: the glucocorticoid receptor inhibits the DNA binding of the X box DNA binding protein

Glucocorticoids are effective repressors of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II gene expression. The repression occurs in B cells, which constitutively express MHC class II, as well as in macrophages, which only express MHC class II after the cells are treated with interferon gamma. For the MHC class II gene IA beta, this negative regulation has been linked to the X box DNA sequence, located with the IA beta promoter. The addition of the glucocorticoid receptor was shown to inhibit the DNA binding of the X box DNA binding protein to the X box. The DNA binding of two other DNA binding proteins that recognize elements within this promoter was unaffected by the addition of glucocorticoid receptor. It is likely that the repression of IA beta gene expression by glucocorticoids occurs because the X box DNA binding protein is prevented from binding to the DNA and activating transcription.

An HLA-DR alpha promoter DNA-binding protein is expressed ubiquitously and maps to human chromosomes 22 and 5

The class II major histocompatibility complex antigens are a family of integral membrane proteins whose expression is tissue-specific and developmentally regulated. Three consensus sequences, X1, X2, and Y, separated by an interspace element, is found upstream from all class II genes. Deletion of each of these sequences eliminates expression of class II genes in vitro or in transgenic mice. Here we further characterize the expression of a cDNA encoding a DNA binding protein (human X-box binding protein, hXBP-1) which, like the proteins in whole nuclear extract, recognizes both the X2 promoter element of the human DR alpha and DP beta and mouse A alpha genes. The hXBP-1 cDNA hybridizes to human RNA species of approximately 2.2 kilobases (kb) and 1.6 kb, which are expressed in class II negative as well as class II positive cells. hXBP-1 transcripts are present in several class II deficient mutant B cell lines, although in one such line, 6.1.6, levels were somewhat reduced. Chromosome mapping studies demonstrate that hXBP-1 arises from a small gene family, two of whose members map to human chromosomes 5 and 22. Taken together, these data suggest a high degree of complexity in the transcriptional control of the class II gene family.

Regulation of MHC expression

The level of expression of class I and class II MHC antigens in any particular cell is not a fixed characteristic, but is subject to wide fluctuation. The "resting" level of expression varies widely in different cell types, e.g., the cells of the exocrine pancreas and the myocardial cell express neither class I nor class II MHC antigens, whereas B lymphocytes express high levels of both class I and class II. The factors regulating these resting levels are beginning to be elucidated at the DNA level. The resting levels of class I and class II MHC antigen expression can be very greatly increased, primarily as a consequence of exposure to various cytokines released during inflammatory responses, but also in response to other non-specific stimuli. This probably represents an evolutionary adaptation to increase the capacity of infected tissues to present foreign peptides to the immune system, and thereby favour the survival of the host. However, when this phenomenon occurs in a transplanted organ, the increased expression of the now foreign MHC antigens in the context of the new host very likely plays a role in the graft's own destruction. The increased expression of class I MHC antigens, especially if the cell does not express these antigens at all at the time of grafting, will very likely render the cell susceptible to CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Regulation of MHC class II gene transcription

The transcriptional regulation of MHC class II genes involves the interaction of DNA-binding proteins with specific DNA sequences. The cis elements of the promoter region have now been well delineated functionally, while the proteins that interact with these elements are just beginning to be identified and their functional importance assessed.

Cell lineage-specific and developmental stage-specific controls of MHC class-II-antigen expression

In this report we present evidence and we review data from our laboratory which indicate the genetic complexity of regulatory mechanisms controlling MHC class-II-gene expression. The MHC class-II genes can be expressed in 2 ways: in a constitutive fashion, as in B cells, and in an inducible fashion, as in macrophages, endothelial cells and certain tumors. In both cases the regulatory controls are mainly exerted at transcriptional level as a result of interactions between cis-acting regulatory DNA elements and trans-acting factors. The constitutive class-II-gene expression in B cells is under the control of developmentally regulated trans-acting factors with activator function and encoded by a series of genes, the AIR genes, one of which has been mapped in the mouse on chromosome 16. Interestingly, these regulatory mechanisms are conserved across species for at least 70 million years, because murine AIR-gene products can complement AIR gene defects of human B-cell mutants. The constitutive B-cell phenotype behaves as a dominant trait up to the plasma cell stage in which class-II-gene expression is lost because of the activation of suppressor factors which repress transcription and which, in turn, behave as a dominant trait in somatic cell hybrids between B cells and plasma cells. Thus positive and negative signals regulating class-II-gene expression may behave as dominant or recessive traits, depending upon the particular developmental stage of the cell in which they operate. The mechanisms controlling class-II expression in inducible cells are distinct from those mediating constitutive expression. Indeed, induction of these genes is not sufficient to complement AIR-gene defects in hybrids between macrophages and class-II-negative mutant B cells. In contrast, constitutive expression is dominant in hybrids between class-II-positive B cells and macrophages, suggesting that in uninduced cells class-II-gene activation does not take place more because of lack of activator factors than because of the presence of constitutive transcriptional suppressors. On the basis of these results, we propose a model for developmentally controlled MHC class-II-gene expression during ontogeny.