White noise analysis of a chromatic type horizontal cell in the Xenopus retina

Structure and function of photoreceptor and second-order cell mosaics in the retina of Xenopus

The structure, physiology, synaptology, and neurochemistry of photoreceptors and second-order (horizontal and bipolar) cells of Xenopus laevis retina is reviewed. Rods represent 53% of the photoreceptors; the majority (97%) are green light-sensitive. Cones belong to large long-wavelength-sensitive (86%), large short-wavelength-sensitive (10%), and miniature ultraviolet wavelength-sensitive (4%) groups. Photoreceptors release glutamate tonically in darkness, hyperpolarize upon light stimulation and their transmitter release decreases. Photoreceptors form ribbon synapses with second-order cells where postsynaptic elements are organized into triads. Their overall adaptational status is regulated by ambient light conditions and set by the extracellular dopamine concentration. The activity of photoreceptors is under circadian control and is independent of the central body clock. Bipolar cell density is about 6000 cells/mm2 They receive mixed inputs from rods and cones. Some bipolar cell types violate the rule of ON-OFF segregation, giving off terminal branches in both sublayers of the inner plexiform layer. The majority of them contain glutamate, a small fraction is GABA-positive and accumulates serotonin. Luminosity-type horizontal cells are more frequent (approximately 1,000 cells/mm2) than chromaticity cells (approximately 450 cells/mm2). The dendritic field size of the latter type was threefold bigger than that of the former. Luminosity cells contact all photoreceptor types, whereas chromatic cells receive their inputs from the short-wavelength-sensitive cones and rods. Luminosity cells are involved in generating depolarizing responses in chromatic horizontal cells by red light stimulation which form multiple synapses with blue-light-sensitive cones. Calculations indicate that convergence ratios in Xenopus are similar to those in central retinal regions of mammals, predicting comparable spatial resolution.

Cloning and expression of a Xenopus short wavelength cone pigment

The short wavelength visual pigment from Xenopus responsible for vision in the blue/violet portion of the spectrum was characterized by sequence spectroscopic analysis. The amino acid sequence was deduced by sequencing clones isolated by reverse transcription PCR, from retinal cDNA and genomic libraries. The gene contains 5 exons spanning 8.4 kb of genomic DNA and produces an mRNA of 2.4 kb in length. The deduced amino acid sequence predicts a protein of 347 amino acids with 76-78% identity to other short wavelength opsins. The mRNA encoding the Xenopus violet pigment was detected using in situ hybridization in cones, comprising a few percent of the total photoreceptors in the adult retina. The Xenopus violet opsin cDNA, modified to contain an epitope from the carboxyl terminus of bovine rhodopsin, was expressed in COS1 cells by transient transfection and analysed by UV-visible absorption spectroscopy. The protein expressed in COS1 cells migrated at 34 kD and was glycosylated at a single site in the amino terminus, exhibiting a diffuse pattern on SDS PAGE similar to bovine rhodopsin expressed in COS1 cells. Following incubation with 11-cis retinal, a light-sensitive pigment was formed with the lambdamax=425+/-2 nm. A Schiff base linkage between retinal and the violet opsin was demonstrated by acid denaturation. Xenopus violet opsin was sensitive to hydroxylamine in the dark, reacting with a half-time of 5 min at room temperature. This is the first group S pigment for amphibians. The pigment was expressed and purified from COS1 cells in a form that has permitted for the first time determination of the extinction coefficient, reactivity to hydroxylamine and presence of a Schiff base.

Processing of color- and noncolor-coded signals in the gourami retina. I. Horizontal cells

There are two types of horizontal cells, the luminosity and the chromaticity cells, in the retina of the kissing gourami, Helostoma rudolfi. Luminosity cells occupy the outermost layer proximal to the receptor terminals, whereas chromaticity cells form a layer proximal to the layer of luminosity cells. Neither type of cell has axons. Responses were evoked by light from red and green light-emitting diodes. The two stimuli were modulated either by a pulsatile or a white-noise signal. The luminosity cell always produced a hyperpolarizing response. The chromaticity cell produced a hyperpolarizing response when stimulated by only one color. However, in the presence of a steady or modulated green input, a red stimulus produced a depolarizing response. Such chromaticity cells were similar to the (spectral) biphasic chromaticity horizontal cells observed in other retinae. The depolarizing phase of the red response was produced by the balance of intensity of the two inputs, red and green. We used white-noise methodology to identify the dynamics of the horizontal cell's modulation response by taking advantage of the fact that a Wiener kernel is a measure of a cell's incremental sensitivity, which includes its response dynamics. Under all conditions, a steady state modulation response by both luminosity and chromaticity cells always was related linearly to the input modulation. The average mean square error (MSE) of the model predicted by the first-order kernel was approximately 8% for both luminosity (n = 116) and chromaticity (n = 23) cells. In some cases, the MSE was a few percent even when the peak-to-peak response amplitude was nearly 30 mV. The ratio of inputs from red and green cones to both types of horizontal cells was variable; the major input for luminosity cells came from red cones, whereas the major input for chromaticity cells came from green cones. First-order kernels generated by the major input were robust in terms of waveform in the sense that the waveform remained unchanged whether or not there was a steady or modulated illumination by the opposing color. The results reported here do not address the question of the neural circuitry that generates horizontal cell responses, in particular, the depolarizing response. However, whatever that circuitry might be, the high degree of linearity of the modulation response by both types of cell under various stimulus conditions imposes restrictions on the performance of any proposed model as well as on mechanisms that underlie the generation of the horizontal cell response.

Identification of cone classes in Xenopus retina by immunocytochemistry and staining with lectins and vital dyes

The aim of the present study was to determine the number of cone classes in the Xenopus retina. We examined the dimensions and staining properties of cones, utilizing two monoclonal antibodies, COS-1 and OS-2, developed by Szel and Rohlich (1985). Living cones also were reacted with the plant lectins peanut agglutinin (PNA) and wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) and with a fluorescent stilbene dye, DIDS, which binds selectively to red-sensitive cones (Kleinschmidt, 1991; Kleinschmidt & Harosi, 1992a,b). Three cone populations were distinguished based on differences in size and staining properties. Eighty-eight percent of all cones were stained strongly by COS-1, PNA, and DIDS, but weakly by OS-2. The group of cones stained by COS-1 had the largest mean dimensions of outer segment length, width, and oil droplet diameter. COS-1 negative cones were divisible into two groups: a subclass of miniature cones (approximately 4% total cones) was stained strongly by OS-2, PNA, and DIDS. The balance, constituting approximately 9% total cones, were of intermediate size, were not stained by PNA and reacted weakly to OS-2 and DIDS. WGA stained all cones. Large, COS-1+ cones appear to be red-sensitive and belong to the class of anion-tunable cone pigments. We suggest that the intermediate size, COS-1 negative cones are blue-sensitive based on the finding that blue-sensitive chromatic horizontal cells connect to them preferentially (Witkovsky et al., work in progress).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)