Posttransplant microbiological surveillance

Modulatory immune responses in fungal infection associated with organ transplant - advancements, management, and challenges

Organ transplantation stands as a pivotal achievement in modern medicine, offering hope to individuals with end-stage organ diseases. Advancements in immunology led to improved organ transplant survival through the development of immunosuppressants, but this heightened susceptibility to fungal infections with nonspecific symptoms in recipients. This review aims to establish an intricate balance between immune responses and fungal infections in organ transplant recipients. It explores the fundamental immune mechanisms, recent advances in immune response dynamics, and strategies for immune modulation, encompassing responses to fungal infections, immunomodulatory approaches, diagnostics, treatment challenges, and management. Early diagnosis of fungal infections in transplant patients is emphasized with the understanding that innate immune responses could potentially reduce immunosuppression and promise efficient and safe immuno-modulating treatments. Advances in fungal research and genetic influences on immune-fungal interactions are underscored, as well as the potential of single-cell technologies integrated with machine learning for biomarker discovery. This review provides a snapshot of the complex interplay between immune responses and fungal infections in organ transplantation and underscores key research directions.

Antibiotics versus no therapy in kidney transplant recipients with asymptomatic bacteriuria (BiRT): a pragmatic, multicentre, randomized, controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

Many transplant physicians screen for and treat asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) during post-kidney-transplant surveillance. We investigated whether antibiotics are effective in reducing the occurrence of symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI) in kidney transplant recipients with ASB.

METHODS

We performed this multicentre, randomized, open-label trial in kidney transplant recipients who had ASB and were ≥2 months post-transplantation. We randomly assigned participants to receive antibiotics or no therapy. The primary outcome was the incidence of symptomatic UTI over the subsequent 12 months.

RESULTS

One hundred and ninety-nine kidney transplant recipients with ASB were randomly assigned to antibiotics (100 participants) or no therapy (99 participants). There was no significant difference in the occurrence of symptomatic UTI between the antibiotic and no-therapy groups (27%, 27/100 versus 31%, 31/99; univariate Cox model: hazard ratio 0.83, 95%CI: 0.50-1.40; log-rank test: p 0.49). Over the 1-year study period, antibiotic use was five times higher in the antibiotic group than in the no-therapy group (30 antibiotic days/participant, interquartile range 20-41, versus 6, interquartile range 0-15, p < 0.001). Overall, 155/199 participants (78%) had at least one further episode of bacteriuria during the follow-up. Compared with the participant's baseline episode of ASB, the second episode of bacteriuria was more frequently caused by bacteria resistant to clinically relevant antibiotics (ciprofloxacin, cotrimoxazole, third-generation cephalosporin) in the antibiotic group than in the no-therapy group (18%, 13/72 versus 4%, 3/83, p 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Applying a screen-and-treat strategy for ASB does not reduce the occurrence of symptomatic UTI in kidney transplant recipients who are more than 2 months post-transplantation. Furthermore, this strategy increases antibiotic use and promotes the emergence of resistant organisms.

Prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria among kidney transplant recipients beyond two months post-transplant: A multicenter, prospective, cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

During routine post-kidney transplant care, most European transplant physicians screen patients for asymptomatic bacteriuria. The usefulness of this strategy is debated. To make screening cost-effective, asymptomatic bacteriuria should be prevalent enough to justify the expense, and antibiotics should improve patient outcomes significantly if asymptomatic bacteriuria is detected. Regrettably, the prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria among kidney transplant recipients is not well defined.

METHODS

To determine the prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria among kidney transplant recipients, we did a cross-sectional study among kidney transplant recipients undergoing routine surveillance in three outpatient transplant clinics in Belgium and France. We excluded patients who were in the first two months post-transplantation and/or had a urinary catheter. Asymptomatic participants who had a urine culture with one organism isolated at ≥ 105 CFU/mL were asked to provide a confirmatory urine specimen. Asymptomatic bacteriuria was defined per Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines.

RESULTS

We screened 500 consecutive kidney transplant recipients. Overall, the prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria was 3.4% (17/500 patients). It was similarly low among kidney transplant recipients who were between 2 and 12 months after transplantation (1.3%, 1/76 patients) and those who were farther after transplantation (3.8%, 16/424 patients: p = 0.49). Asymptomatic bacteriuria was significantly associated with female gender (risk ratio 3.7, 95% CI 1.3-10.3, p = 0.007) and older age (mean age: 61 ± 12 years [bacteriuric participants], versus 53 ± 15 years [non-bacteriuric participants], p = 0.03). One participant's colistin-resistant Escherichia coli isolate carried the globally disseminated mcr-1 gene.

CONCLUSIONS

Among kidney transplant recipients who are beyond the second month post-transplant, the prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria is low. Further studies are needed to ascertain the cost-effectiveness of a screen-and-treat strategy for asymptomatic bacteriuria in this population.

Should Asymptomatic Bacteriuria Be Systematically Treated in Kidney Transplant Recipients? Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial

The indication for antimicrobial treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria (AB) after kidney transplantation (KT) remains controversial. Between January 2011 and December 2013, 112 KT recipients that developed one episode or more of AB beyond the second month after transplantation were included in this open-label trial. Participants were randomized (1:1 ratio) to the treatment group (systematic antimicrobial therapy for all episodes of AB occurring ≤24 mo after transplantation [53 patients]) or control group (no antimicrobial therapy [59 patients]). Systematic screening for AB was performed similarly in both groups. The primary outcome was the occurrence of acute pyelonephritis at 24-mo follow-up. Secondary outcomes included lower urinary tract infection, acute rejection, Clostridium difficile infection, colonization or infection by multidrug-resistant bacteria, graft function and all-cause mortality. There were no differences in the primary outcome in the intention-to-treat population (7.5% [4 of 53] in the treatment group vs. 8.4% [5 of 59] in the control group; odds ratio [OR] 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22-3.47) or the per-protocol population (3.8% [1 of 26] in the treatment group vs. 8.0% [4 of 50] in the control group; OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.05-4.34). Moreover, we found no differences in any of the secondary outcomes. In conclusion, systematic screening and treatment of AB beyond the second month after transplantation provided no apparent benefit among KT recipients (NCT02373085).

Management of urinary tract infection in solid organ transplant recipients: Consensus statement of the Group for the Study of Infection in Transplant Recipients (GESITRA) of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC) and the Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI)

BACKGROUND

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are one of the most common infections in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients.

METHODS

Experienced SOT researchers and clinicians have developed and implemented this consensus document in support of the optimal management of these patients. A systematic review was conducted, and evidence levels based on the available literature are given for each recommendation. This article was written in accordance with international recommendations on consensus statements and the recommendations of the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II).

RESULTS

Recommendations are provided on the management of asymptomatic bacteriuria, and prophylaxis and treatment of UTI in SOT recipients. The diagnostic-therapeutic management of recurrent UTI and the role of infection in kidney graft rejection or dysfunction are reviewed. Finally, recommendations on antimicrobials and immunosuppressant interactions are also included.

CONCLUSIONS

The latest scientific information on UTI in SOT is incorporated in this consensus document.

Management of infections pre- and post-liver transplantation: report of an AISF consensus conference

The burden of infectious diseases both before and after liver transplantation is clearly attributable to the dysfunction of defensive mechanisms of the host, both as a result of cirrhosis, as well as the use of immunosuppressive agents. The present document represents the recommendations of an expert panel commended by the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver (AISF), on the prevention and management of infectious complications excluding hepatitis B, D, C, and HIV in the setting of liver transplantation. Due to a decreased response to vaccinations in cirrhosis as well as within the first six months after transplantation, the best timing for immunization is likely before transplant and early in the course of disease. Before transplantation, a vaccination panel including inactivated as well as live attenuated vaccines is recommended, while oral polio vaccine, Calmette-Guerin's bacillus, and Smallpox are contraindicated, whereas after transplantation, live attenuated vaccines are contraindicated. Before transplant, screening protocols should be divided into different levels according to the likelihood of infection, in order to reduce costs for the National Health Service. Recommended preoperative and postoperative prophylaxis varies according to the pathologic agent to which it is directed (bacterial vs. viral vs. fungal). Timing after transplantation greatly determines the most likely agent involved in post-transplant infections, and specific high-risk categories of patients have been identified that warrant closer surveillance. Clearly, specifically targeted treatment protocols are needed upon diagnosis of infections in both the pre- as well as the post-transplant scenarios, not without considering local microbiology and resistance patterns.

Favorable outcome in a renal transplant recipient with donor-derived infection due to multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Most cases of donor-derived infection due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa reported in the literature are associated with vascular dehiscence, all of which resulted either in death or graft failure requiring graft removal. We report the successful treatment of donor-derived infection due to multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa in a 64-year-old male who presented with bacteremia and peritransplant renal fluid collection after undergoing deceased-donor renal transplantation. As a result of the report of positive donor cultures by the host Organ Procurement Organization, the infection was promptly identified by blood cultures drawn before appearance of symptoms. Surveillance blood cultures in recipients are not usually recommended. However, they should be done if donor cultures turn positive. Therefore, it is crucial to perform cultures in donors and to closely follow them up for early identification and prompt treatment of donor-transmitted infections due to organisms like P. aeruginosa that can be graft and/or life threatening.

Complicated urinary tract infection in adults

BACKGROUND

Complicated urinary tract infection occurs in individuals with functional or structural abnormalities of the genitourinary tract.

OBJECTIVE

To review current knowledge relevant to complicated urinary tract infection, and to provide evidence-based recommendations for management.

METHODS

The literature was reviewed through a PubMed search, and additional articles were identified by journal reference review. A draft guideline was prepared and critically reviewed by members of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada Guidelines Committee, with modifications incorporated following the review.

RESULTS

Many urological abnormalities may be associated with complicated urinary infection. There is a wide spectrum of potential infecting organisms, and isolated bacteria tend to be more resistant to antimicrobial therapy. Morbidity and infection outcomes in subjects with complicated urinary infection are principally determined by the underlying abnormality rather than the infection. Principles of management include uniform collection of a urine specimen for culture before antimicrobial therapy, characterization of the underlying genitourinary abnormality, and nontreatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria except before an invasive genitourinary procedure. The antimicrobial regimen is determined by clinical presentation, patient tolerance, renal function and known or anticipated infecting organisms. If the underlying abnormality contributing to the urinary infection cannot be corrected, then early post-treatment recurrence of infection is anticipated.

CONCLUSIONS

The management of complicated urinary infection is individualized depending on patient variables and the infecting organism. Further clinical investigations are necessary to assist in determining optimal antimicrobial regimens.

[The microbiology laboratory: a key participant in transplantation]

Together with organ rejection, infectious complications are still the most important cause of morbidity and mortality in organ transplant recipients. Many infectious complications have an exogenous origin, including those produced by organ-transmitted pathogens, whereas others are caused by latent microorganisms that become reactivated in the recipient. Accurate pre-transplantation assessment of the organ donor as well as the recipient can prevent some infectious complications or reduce their detrimental effects during the post-transplant period. A wide range of primary and opportunistic microorganisms can affect transplant recipients, and a detailed description of these pathogens is beyond the scope of this study. However, the importance of microbiology laboratories in centers with transplant programs and the need for integration and active participation of clinical microbiologists in multidisciplinary transplant teams should be emphasized. The work of these professionals is a key requisite to establish accurate diagnoses of infectious complications, which will benefit the patient and optimize the expenditure of resources.

Infectious risk in pediatric organ transplant recipients: is it increased with the new immunosuppressive agents?

The risk of infection in pediatric organ transplant recipients is determined by several factors, including age, the types of organ transplanted and the immunosuppressive treatment which has dramatically changed over the past 10 yr. Little information has been reported regarding the infectious complications related to the current immunosuppressive protocols used in these children. This paper reviews (i) the immunosuppressive agents, focusing on their mechanisms of action and on the new regimens, (ii) the infections related to excessive immunosuppression and also anti-infectious properties or infectious adverse reactions associated with specific immunosuppressive agents. With the new immunosuppressive protocols, the advances in immunologic monitoring, microbiological diagnosis, anti-infectious prophylactic and preemptive treatments, strategies to minimize the risk of infection related to the immunosuppressive therapy are proposed.

Asymptomatic bacteriuria: when to screen and when to treat

Asymptomatic bacteriuria is common. Populations with structural or functional abnormalities of the genitourinary tract may have an exceedingly high prevalence of bacteriuria, but even healthy individuals frequently have positive urine cultures. Asymptomatic bacteriuria is seldom associated with adverse outcomes. Pregnant women and individuals who are to undergo traumatic genitourinary interventions are at risk for complications of bacteriuria and benefit from screening and treatment programs. Although screening is recommended for renal transplant recipients, the benefits for these patients are less clear. For other populations, including most bacteriuric individuals, negative outcomes attributable to asymptomatic bacteriuria have not been described. Treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria in these patients is not beneficial and, in fact, may be associated with harmful outcomes, such as increased short-term frequency of symptomatic infection, adverse drug effects, and reinfection with organisms of increased antimicrobial resistance. Screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria and treatment is recommended for only selected groups where benefit has been shown. Many research questions still need to be addressed. Different populations have unique risk factors, and the benefits and risks of different management approaches for asymptomatic bacteriuria must continue to be addressed systematically in appropriate clinical trials.

Benzothiadiazine dioxide human cytomegalovirus inhibitors: synthesis and antiviral evaluation of main heterocycle modified derivatives

The benzothiadiazine dioxide derivatives are potent non-nucleoside human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) inhibitors. As part of our comprehensive structure-activity relationship (SAR) study of these compounds, we have now proposed structural modifications on the heterocyclic moiety both on the number and the nature of the fused heterocycle and on the kind of heteroatoms present on it. Synthesis of these new compounds (benzyl derivatives of thiadiazines, thienothiadiazines, benzothienothiadiazines and quinazolines) and the antiviral evaluation against HCMV has been performed. SAR investigation on this class of compounds has defined the structural requirements for potency and toxicity. They have revealed two important clues: i) a fused ring to the thiadiazine framework is necessary to maintain the anti-HCMV action, and ii) the sulfamido moiety in the main heterocycle is crucial to avoid cytotoxicity.

Antimicrobial treatment in diabetic women with asymptomatic bacteriuria

BACKGROUND

Asymptomatic bacteriuria is common among women with diabetes, and the treatment of such infections has been recommended to prevent complications related to symptomatic urinary tract infection.

METHODS

We enrolled women (>16 years of age) with diabetes, bacteriuria (> or =105 colony-forming units of an organism per milliliter in cultures of two consecutive urine specimens), and no urinary symptoms; 50 were randomly assigned to receive placebo and 55 to receive antimicrobial therapy. For the first six weeks, which included the initial course of treatment, the study was placebo-controlled and double-blind. Subsequently, the women were screened for bacteriuria every three months for up to three years; antimicrobial therapy was provided to women in the antimicrobial-therapy group who had asymptomatic bacteriuria.

RESULTS

Four weeks after the end of the initial course of therapy, 78 percent of placebo recipients had bacteriuria, as compared with 20 percent of women who received antimicrobial agents (P<0.001). During a mean follow-up of 27 months, 20 of 50 women in the placebo group (40 percent) and 23 of 55 women in the antimicrobial-therapy group (42 percent) had at least one episode of symptomatic urinary tract infection. The time to a first symptomatic episode was similar in the placebo group and the antimicrobial-therapy group (P=0.67 by the log-rank test), as were the (+/-SD) rates of any symptomatic urinary tract infection (1.10+/-0.17 and 0.93+/-0.14 per 1000 days of follow-up, respectively; relative risk, 1.19; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.28 to 1.81), pyelonephritis (0.28+/-0.08 and 0.13+/-0.05 per 1000 days of follow-up; relative risk, 2.13; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.81 to 5.62), and hospitalization for urinary tract infection (0.10+/-0.36 and 0.06+/-0.22 per 1000 days of follow-up; relative risk, 1.93; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.47 to 7.89). The women in the antimicrobial-therapy group had almost five times as many days of antibiotic use for urinary tract infection as did the women in the placebo group (158.2+/-1.7 vs. 33.7+/-0.91 per 1000 days of follow-up; relative risk, 0.21; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.20 to 0.22).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria in women with diabetes does not appear to reduce complications. Diabetes itself should not be an indication for screening for or treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria.