Emergence of rifampin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae as a result of antimicrobial therapy for penicillin-resistant strains

African Tick Bite Fever Treated Successfully With Rifampin in a Patient With Doxycycline Intolerance

African tick bite fever is the most commonly encountered travel-associated rickettsiosis, occurring in as many as 5% of travelers returning from rural subequatorial Africa. This case report illustrates that rifampin represents an effective alternative to doxycycline for treatment of African tick bite fever in some selective situations.

Role of rifampin for the treatment of bacterial infections other than mycobacteriosis

OBJECTIVES

Rifampin was initially approved for the treatment of tuberculosis. Because of its low toxicity, broad-spectrum activity, and good bioavailability, rifampin is now commonly administered as combination antimicrobial therapy for the treatment of various infections caused by organisms other than mycobacteria. This review summarizes the most recent clinical studies on the use of rifampin combinations for treating four common non-mycobacterial infections: acute bacterial meningitis, infective endocarditis and bacteraemia, pneumonia, and biofilm-related infections.

METHODS

We performed a literature search of clinical studies published in English from January 2005 to June 2016 using the PubMed database with the search terms "rifampin" with "meningitis" or "infective endocarditis and bacteraemia" or "pneumonia" or "prosthetic joint infections.

RESULTS

Current evidence to support a rifampin combination therapy as a treatment for non-mycobacterial infections was largely based on in vitro/in vivo studies and non-comparable retrospective case series. Additionally, controlled clinical trials that directly compared outcomes resulting from rifampin treatment versus treatment without rifampin were limited.

CONCLUSIONS

Rifampin combination therapy appears promising for the treatment of non-mycobacterial infections. However, further definitive clinical trials are necessary to validate its use because the risk of adverse drug-drug interactions and of the emergence of rifampin resistance during treatment may outweigh the potential benefits.

Rifampin combination therapy for nonmycobacterial infections

The increasing emergence of antimicrobial-resistant organisms, especially methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), has resulted in the increased use of rifampin combination therapy. The data supporting rifampin combination therapy in nonmycobacterial infections are limited by a lack of significantly controlled clinical studies. Therefore, its current use is based upon in vitro or in vivo data or retrospective case series, all with major limitations. A prominent observation from this review is that rifampin combination therapy appears to have improved treatment outcomes in cases in which there is a low organism burden, such as biofilm infections, but is less effective when effective surgery to obtain source control is not performed. The clinical data support rifampin combination therapy for the treatment of prosthetic joint infections due to methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) after extensive debridement and for the treatment of prosthetic heart valve infections due to coagulase-negative staphylococci. Importantly, rifampin-vancomycin combination therapy has not shown any benefit over vancomycin monotherapy against MRSA infections either clinically or experimentally. Rifampin combination therapy with daptomycin, fusidic acid, and linezolid needs further exploration for these severe MRSA infections. Lastly, an assessment of the risk-benefits is needed before the addition of rifampin to other antimicrobials is considered to avoid drug interactions or other drug toxicities.

Evaluation of meropenem alone and combined with rifampin in the guinea pig model of pneumococcal meningitis

Meropenem is a broad-spectrum carbapenem antibiotic that is highly active against the pathogens causing meningitis. The aims of this study was to determine the efficacies of meropenem alone and combined with rifampin against two Streptococcus pneumoniae strains with different susceptibility to beta-lactams using the guinea pig meningitis model and compare them with the standard ceftriaxone plus vancomycin therapy. All treatments except rifampin were bactericidal from 6 h. The addition of rifampin did not improve the activity of meropenem alone. Our results provide good evidence of the efficacy of meropenem in the treatment of penicillin- and cephalosporin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococcal meningitis similar to that of ceftriaxone plus vancomycin, suggesting that meropenem might be a good option in the management of this infection.

Combined treatment with ceftriaxone and linezolid of pneumococcal meningitis: a case series including penicillin-resistant strains

This study evaluated the role of linezolid in the treatment of patients suffering from pneumococcal meningitis. Treatment included ceftriaxone (4000 mg every 24 h), linezolid (600 mg every 12 h) and dexamethasone (8 mg every 6 h). Linezolid was withdrawn if a penicillin-susceptible isolate of Streptococcus pneumoniae was identified. Of 16 patients studied, seven were infected with penicillin-non-susceptible isolates of S. pneumoniae, two died, and three reported sequelae. No toxicity was reported. It was concluded that linezolid can be used for the treatment of pneumococcal meningitis, as an alternative to vancomycin or rifampicin, in regimens including a third-generation cephalosporin.

New mutations and horizontal transfer of rpoB among rifampin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae from four Spanish hospitals

A total of 103 (0.7%) of 14,236 Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates collected in four Spanish hospitals from 1989 to 2003 were resistant to rifampin (MICs, 4 to 512 microg/ml). Only sixty-one (59.2%) of these isolates were available for molecular characterization. Resistance was mostly related to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in adult patients and to conjunctivitis in children. Thirty-six different pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns were identified among resistant isolates, five of which were related to international clones (Spain23F-1, Spain6B-2, Spain9V-3, Spain14-5, and clone C of serotype 19F), and accounted for 49.2% of resistant isolates. Single sense mutations at cluster N or I of the rpoB gene were found in 39 isolates, while double mutations, either at cluster I, at clusters I and II, or at clusters N and III, were found in 14 isolates. The involvement of the mutations in rifampin resistance was confirmed by genetic transformation. Single mutations at clusters N and I conferred MICs of 2 microg/ml and 4 to 32 microg/ml, respectively. Eight isolates showed high degrees of nucleotide sequence variations (2.3 to 10.8%) in rpoB, suggesting a recombinational origin for these isolates, for which viridans group streptococci are their potential gene donors. Although the majority of rifampin-resistant isolates were isolated from individual patients without temporal or geographical relationships, the clonal dissemination of rifampin-resistant isolates was observed among 12 HIV-infected patients in the two hospitals with higher rates of resistance.

Low-level resistance to rifampin in Streptococcus pneumoniae

Rifampin is recommended for combination therapy of meningitis due to beta-lactam-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. High-level rifampin resistance (MIC, > or =4 mg/liter) has been mapped to point mutations in clusters I and III of rpoB of the pneumococcus. The molecular basis of low-level resistance (MICs, > or =0.5 and <4 mg/liter) was analyzed. Spontaneous mutants of clinical pneumococcal isolates were selected on Columbia sheep blood agar plates containing rifampin at 0.5, 4, 10, or 50 mg/liter. Low-level resistance could be assigned to mutations in cluster II (I(545)N, I(545)L). Sensitive (MIC, <0.048 mg/liter) wild-type strains acquired low-level resistance at a rate approximately 10 times higher than that at which they acquired high-level resistance (average mutation frequencies, 2.4 x 10(-7) for low-level resistance versus 2.9 x 10(-8) for high-level resistance [P < 0.0001]). In second-step experiments, the frequencies of mutations from low- to high-level resistance were over 10 times higher than the frequencies of mutations from susceptibility to high-level resistance (average mutation frequencies, 7.2 x 10(-7) versus 5.0 x 10(-8) [P < 0.001]). Mutants with low-level resistance were stable upon passage. Sequencing of a clinical isolate with low-level resistance (MIC, 0.5 mg/liter) revealed a Q(150)R mutation upstream of cluster I. The frequencies of mutations to high-level resistance for this strain were even higher than the rates observed for the in vitro mutants. Therefore, a resistance-mediating mutation located outside clusters I, II, and III has been described for the first time in the pneumococcus. In vitro low-level rifampin resistance in S. pneumoniae could be mapped to cluster II of rpoB. Mutants of pneumococcus with low-level resistance may be selected in vivo during therapy in tissue compartments with low antibiotic concentrations and play a role in the development of resistance.