1
|
Russo S, Saez J, Esposito M, Bruschi A, Ghirelli A, Pini S, Scoccianti S, Hernandez V. Incorporating plan complexity into the statistical process control of volumetric modulated arc therapy pre-treatment verifications. Med Phys 2024; 51:3961-3971. [PMID: 38630979 DOI: 10.1002/mp.17081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2023] [Revised: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 03/30/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Statistical process control (SPC) is a powerful statistical tool for process monitoring that has been highly recommended in healthcare applications, including radiation therapy quality assurance (QA). The AAPM TG-218 report described the clinical implementation of SPC for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) pre-treatment verifications, pointing out the need to adjust tolerance limits based on plan complexity. However, the quantification of plan complexity and its integration into SPC remains an unresolved challenge. PURPOSE The primary aim of this study is to investigate the incorporation of plan complexity into the SPC framework for VMAT pre-treatment verifications. The study explores and evaluates various strategies for this incorporation, discussing their merits and limitations, and provides recommendations for clinical application. METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted on 309 VMAT plans from diverse anatomical sites using the PTW OCTAVIUS 4D device for QA measurements. Gamma Passing Rates (GPR) were obtained, and lower control limits were computed using both the conventional Shewhart method and three heuristic methods (scaled weighted variance, weighted standard deviations, and skewness correction) to accommodate non-normal data distributions. The 'Identify-Eliminate-Recalculate' method was employed for robust analysis. Eight complexity metrics were analyzed and two distinct strategies for incorporating plan complexity into SPC were assessed. The first strategy focused on establishing control limits for different treatment sites, while the second was based on the determination of control limits as a function of individual plan complexity. The study extensively examines the correlation between control limits and plan complexity and assesses the impact of complexity metrics on the control process. RESULTS The control limits established using SPC were strongly influenced by the complexity of treatment plans. In the first strategy, a clear correlation was found between control limits and average plan complexity for each site. The second approach derived control limits based on individual plan complexity metrics, enabling tailored tolerance limits. In both strategies, tolerance limits inversely correlated with plan complexity, resulting in all highly complex plans being classified as in control. In contrast, when plans were collectively analyzed without considering complexity, all the out-of-control plans were highly complex. CONCLUSIONS Incorporating plan complexity into SPC for VMAT verifications requires meticulous and comprehensive analysis. To ensure overall process control, we advocate for stringent control and minimization of plan complexity during treatment planning, especially when control limits are adjusted based on plan complexity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serenella Russo
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy
| | - Jordi Saez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marco Esposito
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy
- Medical Physics Program, The Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics Trieste-Italy, Trieste, Italy
| | - Andrea Bruschi
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Silvia Pini
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Victor Hernandez
- Department of Medical Physics, Hospital Sant Joan de Reus, IISPV, Reus, Spain
- Universitat Rovira i Virgili (URV), Tarragona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Uher K, Ehrbar S, Tanadini-Lang S, Dal Bello R. Reduction of patient specific quality assurance through plan complexity metrics for VMAT plans with an open-source TPS script. Z Med Phys 2023:S0939-3889(23)00011-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Revised: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023]
|
3
|
Hernandez V, Angerud A, Bogaert E, Hussein M, Lemire M, García-Miguel J, Saez J. Challenges in modeling the Agility multileaf collimator in treatment planning systems and current needs for improvement. Med Phys 2022; 49:7404-7416. [PMID: 36217283 PMCID: PMC10092639 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Revised: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Agility multileaf collimator (MLC) mounted in Elekta linear accelerators features some unique design characteristics, such as large leaf thickness, eccentric curvature at the leaf tip, and defocused leaf sides ('tilting'). These characteristics offer several advantages but modeling them in treatment planning systems (TPSs) is challenging. PURPOSE The goals of this study were to investigate the challenges faced when modeling the Agility in two commercial TPSs (Monaco and RayStation) and to explore how the implemented MLC models could be improved in the future. METHODS Four linear accelerators equipped with the Agility, located at different centers, were used for the study. Three centers use the RayStation TPS and the other one uses Monaco. For comparison purposes, data from four Varian linear accelerators with the Millennium 120 MLC were also included. Average doses measured with asynchronous sweeping gap tests were used to characterize and compare the characteristics of the Millennium and the Agility MLCs and to assess the MLC model in the TPSs. The FOURL test included in the ExpressQA package, provided by Elekta, was also used to evaluate the tongue-and-groove with radiochromic films. Finally, raytracing was used to investigate the impact of the MLC geometry and to understand the results obtained for each MLC. RESULTS The geometry of the Agility produces dosimetric effects associated with the rounded leaf end up to a distance 20 mm away from the leaf tip end measured at the isocenter plane. This affects the tongue-and-groove shadowing, which progressively increases along the distance to the tip end. The RayStation and Monaco TPSs did not account for this effect, which made trade-offs in the MLC parameters necessary and greatly varied the final MLC parameters used by different centers. Raytracing showed that these challenging leaf tip effects were directly related to the MLC geometry and that the characteristics mainly responsible for the large leaf tip effects of the Agility were its tilting design and its small source-to-collimator distance. CONCLUSIONS The MLC models implemented in RayStation and Monaco could not accurately reproduce the leaf tip effects for the Agility. Therefore, trade-offs are needed and the optimal MLC parameters are dependent on the specific characteristics of treatment plans. Refining the MLC models for the Agility to better approximate the measured leaf tip and tongue-and-groove effects would extend the validity of the MLC model, reduce the variability in the MLC parameters used by the community, and facilitate the standardization of the MLC configuration process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Hernandez
- Department of Medical Physics, Hospital Sant Joan de Reus, IISPV, Tarragona, Spain.,Universitat Rovira i Virgili (URV), Tarragona, Spain
| | - A Angerud
- RaySearch Laboratories AB, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - E Bogaert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - M Hussein
- Metrology for Medical Physics Centre, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK
| | - M Lemire
- Department of Medical Physics, CIUSSS de l'Est-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - J García-Miguel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Saez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dosimetric effect of modelling non-homogeneous LINAC couch using cone-beam computed tomography on quality assurance (QA) results. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2022. [DOI: 10.1017/s1460396921000716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Aim:
To evaluate the dosimetric effect of modelling a non-homogeneous couch on patients’ quality assurance (QA) gamma pass rates for intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) techniques.
Materials and Methods:
A non-homogeneous treatment couch (TxT 550 TTM, CIVCO, USA) was imaged using the LINAC mounted cone-beam computer tomography (CBCT) system. Modelling this couch in different situations, including incomplete (homogeneous model), correct model and not defined situations in the treatment planning system (TPS), was performed based on the geometrical and material densities data extracted from the CBCT images. Calculated gamma pass rates between TPS dose calculations and the measurements in a phantom for different couch models were obtained and compared at two gamma criteria (2%-2 mm and 3%-3 mm).
Results:
Comparing TPS calculations for the correct modelled couch and the measurements showed high gamma pass rates for both the IMRT and VMAT techniques (96·5 ± 0·9%, 99·2 ± 0·5% for IMRT in 2%-2 mm and 3%-3 mm criteria; 97·5 ± 0·8%, 99·4 ± 0·5% for VMAT). The overall gamma pass rate of the IMRT plan QAs was reduced by about 2% and 3% on average for incomplete and no couch modelling, respectively. These reductions for VMAT techniques were 2·5% and 4·3%, respectively.
Conclusions:
Non-homogeneous couches have different parts with different attenuations, which can be correctly defined using LINAC CBCT. Modelling of treatment couch has a significant effect on patient QA results for VMAT and IMRT plans, especially in radiation fields/subfield transmitting from the couch. We suggest using LINAC CBCTs as an appropriate device for couch modelling in modulated radiotherapy techniques.
Collapse
|
5
|
Kron T, Fox C, Ebert MA, Thwaites D. Quality management in radiotherapy treatment delivery. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2022; 66:279-290. [PMID: 35243785 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Radiation Oncology continues to rely on accurate delivery of radiation, in particular where patients can benefit from more modulated and hypofractioned treatments that can deliver higher dose to the target while optimising dose to normal structures. These deliveries are more complex, and the treatment units are more computerised, leading to a re-evaluation of quality assurance (QA) to test a larger range of options with more stringent criteria without becoming too time and resource consuming. This review explores how modern approaches of risk management and automation can be used to develop and maintain an effective and efficient QA programme. It considers various tools to control and guide radiation delivery including image guidance and motion management. Links with typical maintenance and repair activities are discussed, as well as patient-specific quality control activities. It is demonstrated that a quality management programme applied to treatment delivery can have an impact on individual patients but also on the quality of treatment techniques and future planning. Developing and customising a QA programme for treatment delivery is an important part of radiotherapy. Using modern multidisciplinary approaches can make this also a useful tool for department management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomas Kron
- Department of Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Institute of Oncology, Melbourne University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Chris Fox
- Department of Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Martin A Ebert
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,5D Clinics, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - David Thwaites
- Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Medical Physics Group, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine and Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hansen CR, Hussein M, Bernchou U, Zukauskaite R, Thwaites D. Plan quality in radiotherapy treatment planning - Review of the factors and challenges. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2022; 66:267-278. [PMID: 35243775 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
A high-quality treatment plan aims to best achieve the clinical prescription, balancing high target dose to maximise tumour control against sufficiently low organ-at-risk dose for acceptably low toxicity. Treatment planning (TP) includes multiple steps from simulation/imaging and segmentation to technical plan production and reporting. Consistent quality across this process requires close collaboration and communication between clinical and technical experts, to clearly understand clinical requirements and priorities and also practical uncertainties, limitations and compromises. TP quality depends on many aspects, starting from commissioning and quality management of the treatment planning system (TPS), including its measured input data and detailed understanding of TPS models and limitations. It requires rigorous quality assurance of the whole planning process and it links to plan deliverability, assessable by measurement-based verification. This review highlights some factors influencing plan quality, for consideration for optimal plan construction and hence optimal outcomes for each patient. It also indicates some challenges, sources of difference and current developments. The topics considered include: the evolution of TP techniques; dose prescription issues; tools and methods to evaluate plan quality; and some aspects of practical TP. The understanding of what constitutes a high-quality treatment plan continues to evolve with new techniques, delivery methods and related evidence-based science. This review summarises the current position, noting developments in the concept and the need for further robust tools to help achieve it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Rønn Hansen
- Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Mohammad Hussein
- Metrology for Medical Physics Centre, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK
| | - Uffe Bernchou
- Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Ruta Zukauskaite
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - David Thwaites
- Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Szeverinski P, Kowatsch M, Künzler T, Meinschad M, Clemens P, DeVries AF. Evaluation of 4-Hz log files and secondary Monte Carlo dose calculation as patient-specific quality assurance for VMAT prostate plans. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2021; 22:235-244. [PMID: 34151502 PMCID: PMC8292700 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2020] [Revised: 05/08/2021] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose In this study, 4‐Hz log files were evaluated with an independent secondary Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm to reduce the workload for patient‐specific quality assurance (QA) in clinical routine. Materials and Methods A total of 30 randomly selected clinical prostate VMAT plans were included. The used treatment planning system (TPS) was Monaco (Elekta, Crawley), and the secondary dose calculation software was SciMoCa (Scientific‐RT, Munich). Monaco and SciMoCa work with a Monte Carlo algorithm. A plausibility check of Monaco and SciMoCa was performed using an ionization chamber in the BodyPhantom (BP). First, the original Monaco RT plans were verified with SciMoCa (pretreatment QA). Second, the corresponding 4‐Hz log files were converted into RT log file plans and sent to SciMoCa as on‐treatment QA. MLC shift errors were introduced for one prostate plan to determine the sensitivity of on‐treatment QA. For pretreatment and on‐treatment QA, a gamma analysis (2%/1mm/20%) was performed and dosimetric values of PTV and OARs were ascertained in SciMoCa. Results Plausibility check of TPS Monaco vs. BP measurement and SciMoCa vs. BP measurement showed valid accuracy for clinical VMAT QA. Using SciMoCa, there was no significant difference in PTV Dmean between RT plan and RT log file plan. Between pretreatment and on‐treatment QA, PTV metrics, femur right and left showed no significant dosimetric differences as opposed to OARs rectum and bladder. The overall gamma passing rate (GPR) ranged from 96.10% to 100% in pretreatment QA and from 93.50% to 99.80% in on‐treatment QA. MLC shift errors were identified for deviations larger than −0.50 mm and +0.75 mm using overall gamma criterion and PTV Dmean. Conclusion SciMoCa calculations of Monaco RT plans and RT log file plans are in excellent agreement to each other. Therefore, 4‐Hz log files and SciMoCa can replace labor‐intensive phantom‐based measurements as patient‐specific QA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Szeverinski
- Institute of Medical Physics, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, Feldkirch, Austria.,Private University in the Principality of Liechtenstein, Triesen, Liechtenstein
| | - Matthias Kowatsch
- Institute of Medical Physics, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, Feldkirch, Austria
| | - Thomas Künzler
- Institute of Medical Physics, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, Feldkirch, Austria
| | - Marco Meinschad
- Institute of Medical Physics, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, Feldkirch, Austria
| | - Patrick Clemens
- Department of Radio-Oncology, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, Feldkirch, Austria
| | - Alexander F DeVries
- Department of Radio-Oncology, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, Feldkirch, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chan GH, Chin LCL, Abdellatif A, Bissonnette JP, Buckley L, Comsa D, Granville D, King J, Rapley PL, Vandermeer A. Survey of patient-specific quality assurance practice for IMRT and VMAT. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2021; 22:155-164. [PMID: 34145732 PMCID: PMC8292698 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2021] [Revised: 04/03/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
A first‐time survey across 15 cancer centers in Ontario, Canada, on the current practice of patient‐specific quality assurance (PSQA) for intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) delivery was conducted. The objectives were to assess the current state of PSQA practice, identify areas for potential improvement, and facilitate the continued improvement in standardization, consistency, efficacy, and efficiency of PSQA regionally. The survey asked 40 questions related to PSQA practice for IMRT/VMAT delivery. The questions addressed PSQA policy and procedure, delivery log evaluation, instrumentation, measurement setup and methodology, data analysis and interpretation, documentation, process, failure modes, and feedback. The focus of this survey was on PSQA activities related to routine IMRT/VMAT treatments on conventional linacs, including stereotactic body radiation therapy but excluding stereotactic radiosurgery. The participating centers were instructed to submit answers that reflected the collective view or opinion of their department and represented the most typical process practiced. The results of the survey provided a snapshot of the current state of PSQA practice in Ontario and demonstrated considerable variations in the practice. A large majority (80%) of centers performed PSQA measurements on all VMAT plans. Most employed pseudo‐3D array detectors with a true composite (TC) geometry. No standard approach was found for stopping or reducing frequency of measurements. The sole use of delivery log evaluation was not widely implemented, though most centers expressed interest in adopting this technology. All used the Gamma evaluation method for analyzing PSQA measurements; however, no universal approach was reported on how Gamma evaluation and pass determination criteria were determined. All or some PSQA results were reviewed regularly in two‐thirds of the centers. Planning related issues were considered the most frequent source for PSQA failures (40%), whereas the most frequent course of action for a failed PSQA was to review the result and decide whether to proceed to treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gordon H Chan
- Department of Medical Physics, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lee C L Chin
- Department of Medical Physics, Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ady Abdellatif
- Department of Medical Physics, R.S. McLaughlin Durham Regional Cancer Centre, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jean-Pierre Bissonnette
- Department of Medical Physics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre-UHN, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lesley Buckley
- Department of Medical Physics, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daria Comsa
- Radiation Physics Department, Southlake Regional Cancer Centre, Newmarket, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dal Granville
- Department of Medical Physics, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jenna King
- Radiation Oncology Physics, Simcoe Muskoka Regional Cancer Centre, Barrie, Ontario, Canada
| | - Patrick L Rapley
- Medical Physics Department, Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aaron Vandermeer
- Department of Medical Physics, R.S. McLaughlin Durham Regional Cancer Centre, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Saez J, Hernandez V, Goossens J, De Kerf G, Verellen D. A novel procedure for determining the optimal MLC configuration parameters in treatment planning systems based on measurements with a Farmer chamber. Phys Med Biol 2020; 65:155006. [PMID: 32330917 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab8cd5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Modelling of the multi-leaf collimator (MLC) in treatment planning systems (TPS) is crucial for the dose calculation accuracy of intensity-modulated radiation therapy plans. However, no standardised methodology for their configuration exists to date. In this study we present a method that separates the effect of each dosimetric characteristic of the MLC, offering comprehensive equations for the determination of the configuration parameters used in the TPS model. The main advantage of the method is that it only requires prior knowledge of the nominal leaf width and is based on doses measured with a Farmer chamber, which is a very well established and robust methodology. Another significant advantage is the required time, since measuring the tests takes only about 30 minutes per energy. Firstly, we provide a theoretical general formalism in terms of the primary fluence constructed from the transmission map obtained from an MLC model for synchronous and asynchronous sweeping beams. Secondly, we apply the formalism to the RayStation TPS as a proof of concept and we derive analytical expressions that allow the determination of the configuration parameters (leaf tip width, tongue-and-groove width, x-position offset and MLC transmission) and describe how they intertwine. Finally, we apply the method to Varian's Millennium120 and HD120 MLCs in a TrueBeam linear accelerator for different energies and determine the optimal configuration parameters. The proposed procedure is much faster and streamlined than the typical trial-and-error methods and increases the accuracy of dose calculation in clinical plans. Additionally, the procedure can be useful for standardising the MLC configuration process and it exposes the limitations of the implemented MLC model, providing guidance for further improvement of these models in TPSs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordi Saez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain. The first two authors contributed equally to this work
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dosimetric variations for high-risk prostate cancer by VMAT plans due to patient’s weight changes. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2019. [DOI: 10.1017/s1460396919000177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
AbstractPurpose:The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of anatomical changes in prostate cancer patients on the target coverage when using 6 MV beams-VMAT therapy and to propose strategies that allow us to evaluate the dose or correct it by normalization without having to perform a new simulation.Methods and materials:Ten patients of high-risk prostate cancer were chosen for the study. All test plans were delivered using the same isocenter and monitor units as the original plan and compared against the original unedited plan. The expansion and contraction of body contours due to size changes was mimicked by increasing and decreasing the body contour with depths of −2, −1·5, …, 1·5, 2 cm, in the anterior, and both lateral directions of the patient. A total of 90 plans were evaluated, 9 for each patient. Dose-volume histogram statistics were extracted from each plan and normalized to prescription dose.Results:Weight changes resulted in considerable dose modifications to the target and critical structures. Plans were found to be varied with 2·9% ± 0·3% per cm SSD change for VMAT treatment with a correlation index close to one. Therefore, doses variations were linear to the changes of depth. Gamma index evaluation was performed for the 10 renormalized plans. All of them passed criteria of 3%/3 mm in at least 98.2% of points. Eight of them passed criteria in 99% points. Gamma index 4%/4 mm passed 100% points in all patients for the chosen region of interest.Conclusions:The dosimetry estimation presented in this study shows important data for the radiation oncology staff to justify whether a CT rescan is necessary or not when a patient experiences weight changes during treatment. Based on the results of our study, discrepancies between real dose and planned dose were >5% for 1·7 cm of difference in external contour in the anterior and both lateral directions of the patient.
Collapse
|
11
|
Sterckx B, Steinseifer I, Wendling M. In vivo dosimetry with an electronic portal imaging device for prostate cancer radiotherapy with an endorectal balloon. PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY 2019; 12:7-9. [PMID: 33458288 PMCID: PMC7807678 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2019.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2019] [Revised: 09/09/2019] [Accepted: 10/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Electronic portal imaging device-based in vivo dosimetry with a commercial product was performed for 10 prostate cancer patients treated with an air-filled endorectal balloon. With the conventional in vivo method the verification results were outside of our clinical acceptance criteria for all patients. The in aqua vivo method, originally developed for lung cancer treatments, proved to be a practical solution to this problem. On average the percentage of points within γ agreement of 3% and 3 mm significantly improved from 90.9% ± 2.5% (1SD) for the conventional in vivo method to 99.0% ± 1.0% (1SD) for the in aqua vivo method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Sterckx
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Isabell Steinseifer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Markus Wendling
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Medical physics aspects of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy practice in Malaysia. Phys Med 2019; 67:34-39. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.10.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2019] [Revised: 10/05/2019] [Accepted: 10/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
|
13
|
Chiavassa S, Bessieres I, Edouard M, Mathot M, Moignier A. Complexity metrics for IMRT and VMAT plans: a review of current literature and applications. Br J Radiol 2019; 92:20190270. [PMID: 31295002 PMCID: PMC6774599 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2019] [Revised: 07/04/2019] [Accepted: 07/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Modulated radiotherapy with multileaf collimators is widely used to improve target conformity and normal tissue sparing. This introduced an additional degree of complexity, studied by multiple teams through different properties. Three categories of complexity metrics were considered in this review: fluence, deliverability and accuracy metrics. The first part of this review is dedicated to the inventory of these complexity metrics. Different applications of these metrics emerged. Influencing the optimizer by integrating complexity metrics into the cost function has been little explored and requires more investigations. In modern treatment planning system, it remains confined to MUs or treatment time limitation. A large majority of studies calculated metrics only for analysis, without plan modification. The main application was to streamline the patient specific quality assurance workload, investigating the capability of complexity metrics to predict patient specific quality assurance results. Additionally complexity metrics were used to analyze behaviour of TPS optimizer, compare TPS, operators and plan properties, and perform multicentre audit. Their potential was also explored in the context of adaptive radiotherapy and automation planning. The second part of the review gives an overview of these studies based on the complexity metrics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Chiavassa
- Department of Medical Physics, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest Centre René Gauducheau, 44805 Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Igor Bessieres
- Departement of Medical Physics, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, 1 rue Professeur Marion, 21000 Dijon, France
| | - Magali Edouard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, 114 rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Michel Mathot
- Liege University Hospital, Domaine du Sart Tilman - B.35 - B-4000 LIEGE1, Belgium
| | - Alexandra Moignier
- Department of Medical Physics, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest Centre René Gauducheau, 44805 Saint-Herblain, France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Vieillevigne L, Khamphan C, Saez J, Hernandez V. On the need for tuning the dosimetric leaf gap for stereotactic treatment plans in the Eclipse treatment planning system. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2019; 20:68-77. [PMID: 31225938 PMCID: PMC6612699 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2019] [Revised: 04/03/2019] [Accepted: 05/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
The dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) and tongue-and-groove (T&G) effects are critical aspects in the modeling of multileaf collimators (MLC) in the treatment planning system (TPS). In this study, we investigated the dosimetric impact of limitations associated with the T&G modeling in stereotactic plans and its relationship with the need for tuning the DLG in the Eclipse TPS. Measurements were carried out using Varian TrueBeam STx systems from two different institutions. Test fields presenting MLC patterns with several MLC gap sizes (meanGap) and different amounts of T&G effect (TGi) were first evaluated. Secondly, dynamic conformal arc (DCA) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) deliveries of stereotactic cases were analyzed in terms of meanGap and TGi. Two DLG values were used in the TPS: the measured DLG (DLGmeas ) and an optimal DLG (DLGopt ). Measured and calculated doses were compared according to dose differences and gamma passing rates (GPR) with strict local gamma criteria of 2%/2 mm. The discrepancies were analyzed for DLGmeas and DLGopt , and their relationships with both TGi and meanGap were investigated. DCA arcs involved significantly lower TGi and larger meanGap than VMAT arcs (P < 0.0001). By using DLGmeas in the TPS, the dose discrepancies increased as TGi increased and meanGap decreased for both test fields and clinical plans. Dose discrepancies dramatically increased with the ratio TGi/meanGap. Adjusting the DLG value was then required to achieve acceptable calculations and configuring the TPS with DLGopt led to an excellent agreement with median GPRs (2%/2 mm) > 99% for both institutions. We also showed that DLGopt could be obtained from the results of the test fields. We demonstrated that the need for tuning the DLG is due to the limitations of the T&G modeling in the Eclipse TPS. A set of sweeping gap tests modified to incorporate T&G effects can be used to determine the optimal DLG value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laure Vieillevigne
- Department of Medical PhysicsInstitut Claudius Regaud Institut Universitaire du Cancer de ToulouseToulouseFrance
- Centre de Recherches et de Cancérologie de Toulouse UMR1037 INSERM ‐ Université Toulouse 3 – ERL5294 CNRS OncopoleToulouseFrance
| | | | - Jordi Saez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Clınic de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
| | - Victor Hernandez
- Department of Medical Physics HospitalSant Joan de ReusIISPVTarragonaSpain
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Pan Y, Yang R, Zhang S, Li J, Dai J, Wang J, Cai J. National survey of patient specific IMRT quality assurance in China. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14:69. [PMID: 31023348 PMCID: PMC6482589 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1273-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2018] [Accepted: 04/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To analyze and present the China's national survey on patient-specific IMRT quality assurance (QA). METHODS A national survey was conducted in all radiotherapy centers in China to collect comprehensive information on status of IMRT QA practice, including machine, technique, equipment, issues and suggestions. RESULTS Four hundred and three centers responded to this survey, accounting for 56.92% of all the centers implementing IMRT in China. The total number of medical physicists and the total number of patients treated with IMRT annually in these centers was 1599 and 305,000 respectively. All centers implemented measurement-based verification. Point dose verification and 2D dose verification was implemented in 331 and 399 centers, respectively. Three hundred forty-eight centers had 2D arrays, and 52 centers had detector devices designed to measure VMAT beams. EPID and film were used in 78 and 70 centers, respectively. Seventeen and 20 centers used log file and 3D DVH analysis, respectively. One hundred sixty-eight centers performed measurement-based verification not for each patient based on different selection criteria. The techniques and methods varied significantly in both point dose and dose distribution verification, from evaluation metrics, criteria, tolerance limit, and steps to check failed IMRT QA plans. Major issues identified in this survey were the limited resources of physicists, QA devices, and linacs. CONCLUSIONS IMRT QA was implemented in all the surveyed centers. The practice of IMRT QA varied significantly between centers. An increase in personnel, QA devices and linacs is highly desired. National standard, guideline, regulation and training programs are urgently needed in China for consistent and effective implementation of IMRT QA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuxi Pan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49th North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China
| | - Ruijie Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49th North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China.
| | - Shuming Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49th North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China
| | - Jiaqi Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49th North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China
| | - Jianrong Dai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chinese Academy of Medical Science Cancer Institute, 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Junjie Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49th North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China
| | - Jing Cai
- Department of Health Technology and Informatics, The Hongkong Polytechnic University, Hongkong, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Smyth G, Evans PM, Bamber JC, Mandeville HC, Rollo Moore A, Welsh LC, Saran FH, Bedford JL. Dosimetric accuracy of dynamic couch rotation during volumetric modulated arc therapy (DCR-VMAT) for primary brain tumours. Phys Med Biol 2019; 64:08NT01. [PMID: 30808011 PMCID: PMC6877349 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab0a8e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Radiotherapy treatment plans using dynamic couch rotation during volumetric modulated arc therapy (DCR-VMAT) reduce the dose to organs at risk (OARs) compared to coplanar VMAT, while maintaining the dose to the planning target volume (PTV). This paper seeks to validate this finding with measurements. DCR-VMAT treatment plans were produced for five patients with primary brain tumours and delivered using a commercial linear accelerator (linac). Dosimetric accuracy was assessed using point dose and radiochromic film measurements. Linac-recorded mechanical errors were assessed by extracting deviations from log files for multi-leaf collimator (MLC), couch, and gantry positions every 20 ms. Dose distributions, reconstructed from every fifth log file sample, were calculated and used to determine deviations from the treatment plans. Median (range) treatment delivery times were 125 s (123-133 s) for DCR-VMAT, compared to 78 s (64-130 s) for coplanar VMAT. Absolute point doses were 0.8% (0.6%-1.7%) higher than prediction. For coronal and sagittal films, respectively, 99.2% (96.7%-100%) and 98.1% (92.9%-99.0%) of pixels above a 20% low dose threshold reported gamma <1 for 3% and 3 mm criteria. Log file analysis showed similar gantry rotation root-mean-square error (RMSE) for VMAT and DCR-VMAT. Couch rotation RMSE for DCR-VMAT was 0.091° (0.086-0.102°). For delivered dose reconstructions, 100% of pixels above a 5% low dose threshold reported gamma <1 for 2% and 2 mm criteria in all cases. DCR-VMAT, for the primary brain tumour cases studied, can be delivered accurately using a commercial linac.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory Smyth
- Joint Department of Physics at The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom. Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hernandez V, Vera-Sánchez JA, Vieillevigne L, Khamphan C, Saez J. A new method for modelling the tongue-and-groove in treatment planning systems. Phys Med Biol 2018; 63:245005. [PMID: 30523940 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aaf098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Commercial TPSs typically model the tongue-and-groove (TG) by extending the projections of the leaf sides by a certain constant width. However, this model may produce discrepancies of as much as 7%-10% in the calculated average doses, especially for the High Definition multi-leaf collimator (MLC) (Hernandez et al 2017 Phys. Med. Biol. 62 6688-707). The purpose of the present study is to introduce and validate a new method for modelling the TG that uses a non constant TG width. We provide the theoretical background and a detailed methodology to determine the optimal shape of this TG width from measurements and we fit an empirical function to the TG width that depended on two parameters [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. Parameter [Formula: see text] represents the TG width and [Formula: see text] introduces a curvature correction in the width near the leaf tip end. The new TG model was implemented in MATLAB and when the curvature correction was zero ([Formula: see text]) it caused the same discrepancies as the constant width model used by the Eclipse TPS. On the other hand, when the experimentally determined [Formula: see text] was used the new model's calculations were in close agreement with measurements, with all differences in average doses [Formula: see text]1%. Additionally, film dosimetry was used to successfully validate the potential of the new TG model to recreate the fine spatial details associated to TG effects. We also showed that the parameters [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] depend solely on the MLC design by evaluating three different linear accelerators for each MLC model considered, namely Varian's High Definition and Millennium120 MLCs. In conclusion, a new method was presented that greatly improves the TG modelling. The present method can be easily implemented in commercial TPSs and has the potential to further increase their accuracy, especially for MLCs with rounded leaf ends.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor Hernandez
- Department of Medical Physics, Hospital Sant Joan de Reus, IISPV, 43204 Tarragona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Mijnheer B, Jomehzadeh A, González P, Olaciregui-Ruiz I, Rozendaal R, Shokrani P, Spreeuw H, Tielenburg R, Mans A. Error detection during VMAT delivery using EPID-based 3D transit dosimetry. Phys Med 2018; 54:137-145. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2018] [Revised: 09/14/2018] [Accepted: 10/02/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
|
19
|
Seravalli E, Houweling AC, Van Battum L, Raaben TA, Kuik M, de Pooter JA, Van Gellekom MP, Kaas J, de Vries W, Loeff EA, Van de Kamer JB. Auditing local methods for quality assurance in radiotherapy using the same set of predefined treatment plans. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2018; 5:19-25. [PMID: 33458364 PMCID: PMC7807668 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2018.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2017] [Revised: 01/13/2018] [Accepted: 01/15/2018] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Local implementation of plan-specific quality assurance (QA) methods for intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment plans may vary because of dissimilarities in procedures, equipment and software. The purpose of this work is detecting possible differences between local QA findings and those of an audit, using the same set of treatment plans. METHODS A pre-defined set of clinical plans was devised and imported in the participating institute's treatment planning system for dose computation. The dose distribution was measured using an ionisation chamber, radiochromic film and an ionisation chamber array. The centres performed their own QA, which was compared to the audit findings. The agreement/disagreement between the audit and the institute QA results were assessed along with the differences between the dose distributions measured by the audit team and computed by the institute. RESULTS For the majority of the cases the results of the audit were in agreement with the institute QA findings: ionisation chamber: 92%, array: 88%, film: 76% of the total measurements. In only a few of these cases the evaluated measurements failed for both: ionisation chamber: 2%, array: 4%, film: 0% of the total measurements. CONCLUSION Using predefined treatment plans, we found that in approximately 80% of the evaluated measurements the results of local QA of IMRT and VMAT plans were in line with the findings of the audit. However, the percentage of agreement/disagreement depended on the characteristics of the measurement equipment used and on the analysis metric.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrica Seravalli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Antonetta C. Houweling
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Leo Van Battum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marc Kuik
- Department of Radiotherapy, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Jochem Kaas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wilfred de Vries
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Erik A. Loeff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC-Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen B. Van de Kamer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Fuangrod T, Greer PB, Zwan BJ, Barnes MP, Lehmann J. A novel and independent method for time-resolved gantry angle quality assurance for VMAT. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2017; 18:134-142. [PMID: 28703451 PMCID: PMC5874941 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2017] [Revised: 05/21/2017] [Accepted: 06/05/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment delivery requires three key dynamic components; gantry rotation, dose rate modulation, and multi‐leaf collimator motion, which are all simultaneously varied during the delivery. Misalignment of the gantry angle can potentially affect clinical outcome due to the steep dose gradients and complex MLC shapes involved. It is essential to develop independent gantry angle quality assurance (QA) appropriate to VMAT that can be performed simultaneously with other key VMAT QA testing. In this work, a simple and inexpensive fully independent gantry angle measurement methodology was developed that allows quantitation of the gantry angle accuracy as a function of time. This method is based on the analysis of video footage of a “Double dot” pattern attached to the front cover of the linear accelerator that consists of red and green circles printed on A4 paper sheet. A standard mobile phone is placed on the couch to record the video footage during gantry rotation. The video file is subsequently analyzed and used to determine the gantry angle from each video frame using the relative position of the two dots. There were two types of validation tests performed including the static mode with manual gantry angle rotation and dynamic mode with three complex test plans. The accuracy was 0.26° ± 0.04° and 0.46° ± 0.31° (mean ± 1 SD) for the static and dynamic modes, respectively. This method is user friendly, cost effective, easy to setup, has high temporal resolution, and can be combined with existing time‐resolved method for QA of MLC and dose rate to form a comprehensive set of procedures for time‐resolved QA of VMAT delivery system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Todsaporn Fuangrod
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Peter B Greer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.,School of Mathematical and Physics Sciences, Faculty of Science and IT, the University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Benjamin J Zwan
- School of Mathematical and Physics Sciences, Faculty of Science and IT, the University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.,Central Coast Cancer Centre, Gosford Hospital, Gosford, NSW, Australia
| | - Michael P Barnes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.,School of Mathematical and Physics Sciences, Faculty of Science and IT, the University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.,School of Medical Radiation Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Joerg Lehmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.,School of Mathematical and Physics Sciences, Faculty of Science and IT, the University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ramos Garcia LI, Pérez Azorín JF, Aguilar-Redondo PB, Moran-Velasco V. Improving the gamma analysis comparison using an unbinned multivariate test. Phys Med Biol 2017; 62:N417-N427. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa848f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
22
|
Jurado-Bruggeman D, Hernández V, Sáez J, Navarro D, Pino F, Martínez T, Alayrach ME, Ailleres N, Melero A, Jornet N. Multi-centre audit of VMAT planning and pre-treatment verification. Radiother Oncol 2017; 124:302-310. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.05.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2016] [Revised: 05/24/2017] [Accepted: 05/24/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
23
|
Hernandez V, Vera-Sánchez JA, Vieillevigne L, Saez J. Commissioning of the tongue-and-groove modelling in treatment planning systems: from static fields to VMAT treatments. Phys Med Biol 2017. [PMID: 28639942 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa7b1a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Adequate modelling of the multi-leaf collimator (MLC) by treatment planning systems (TPS) is essential for accurate dose calculations in intensity-modulated radiation-therapy. For this reason modern TPSs incorporate MLC characteristics such as the leaf end curvature, MLC transmission and the tongue-and-groove. However, the modelling of the tongue-and-groove is often neglected during TPS commissioning and it is not known how accurate it is. This study evaluates the dosimetric consequences of the tongue-and-groove effect for two different MLC models using both film dosimetry and ionisation chambers. A set of comprehensive tests are presented that evaluate the ability of TPSs to accurately model this effect in (a) static fields, (b) sliding window beams and (c) VMAT arcs. The tests proposed are useful for the commissioning of TPSs and for the validation of major upgrades. With the ECLIPSE TPS, relevant differences were found between calculations and measurements for beams with dynamic MLCs in the presence of the TG effect, especially for the High Definition MLC, small gap sizes and the 1 mm calculation grid. For this combination, dose differences as high as 10% and 7% were obtained for dynamic MLC gaps of 5 mm and 10 mm, respectively. These differences indicate inadequate modelling of the tongue-and-groove effect, which might not be identified without the proposed tests. In particular, the TPS tended to underestimate the calculated dose, which may require tuning of other configuration parameters in the TPS (such as the dosimetric leaf gap) in order to maximise the agreement between calculations and measurements in clinical plans. In conclusion, a need for better modelling of the MLC by TPSs is demonstrated, one of the relevant aspects being the tongue-and-groove effect. This would improve the accuracy of TPS calculations, especially for plans using small MLC gaps, such as plans with small target volumes or high complexities. Improved modelling of the MLC would also reduce the need for tuning parameters in the TPS, facilitating a more comprehensive configuration and commissioning of TPSs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor Hernandez
- Department of Medical Physics, Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus, IISPV, 43204 Tarragona, Spain
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Zwan BJ, Barnes MP, Hindmarsh J, Lim SB, Lovelock DM, Fuangrod T, O'Connor DJ, Keall PJ, Greer PB. Commissioning and quality assurance for VMAT delivery systems: An efficient time-resolved system using real-time EPID imaging. Med Phys 2017; 44:3909-3922. [PMID: 28564208 DOI: 10.1002/mp.12387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2017] [Revised: 05/22/2017] [Accepted: 05/22/2017] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE An ideal commissioning and quality assurance (QA) program for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) delivery systems should assess the performance of each individual dynamic component as a function of gantry angle. Procedures within such a program should also be time-efficient, independent of the delivery system and be sensitive to all types of errors. The purpose of this work is to develop a system for automated time-resolved commissioning and QA of VMAT control systems which meets these criteria. METHODS The procedures developed within this work rely solely on images obtained, using an electronic portal imaging device (EPID) without the presence of a phantom. During the delivery of specially designed VMAT test plans, EPID frames were acquired at 9.5 Hz, using a frame grabber. The set of test plans was developed to individually assess the performance of the dose delivery and multileaf collimator (MLC) control systems under varying levels of delivery complexities. An in-house software tool was developed to automatically extract features from the EPID images and evaluate the following characteristics as a function of gantry angle: dose delivery accuracy, dose rate constancy, beam profile constancy, gantry speed constancy, dynamic MLC positioning accuracy, MLC speed and acceleration constancy, and synchronization between gantry angle, MLC positioning and dose rate. Machine log files were also acquired during each delivery and subsequently compared to information extracted from EPID image frames. RESULTS The largest difference between measured and planned dose at any gantry angle was 0.8% which correlated with rapid changes in dose rate and gantry speed. For all other test plans, the dose delivered was within 0.25% of the planned dose for all gantry angles. Profile constancy was not found to vary with gantry angle for tests where gantry speed and dose rate were constant, however, for tests with varying dose rate and gantry speed, segments with lower dose rate and higher gantry speed exhibited less profile stability. MLC positional accuracy was not observed to be dependent on the degree of interdigitation. MLC speed was measured for each individual leaf and slower leaf speeds were shown to be compensated for by lower dose rates. The test procedures were found to be sensitive to 1 mm systematic MLC errors, 1 mm random MLC errors, 0.4 mm MLC gap errors and synchronization errors between the MLC, dose rate and gantry angle controls systems of 1°. In general, parameters measured by both EPID and log files agreed with the plan, however, a greater average departure from the plan was evidenced by the EPID measurements. CONCLUSION QA test plans and analysis methods have been developed to assess the performance of each dynamic component of VMAT deliveries individually and as a function of gantry angle. This methodology relies solely on time-resolved EPID imaging without the presence of a phantom and has been shown to be sensitive to a range of delivery errors. The procedures developed in this work are both comprehensive and time-efficient and can be used for streamlined commissioning and QA of VMAT delivery systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin J Zwan
- Central Coast Cancer Centre, Gosford Hospital, Gosford, NSW, 2250, Australia
- School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, 2308, Australia
| | - Michael P Barnes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, 2298, Australia
- School of Medical Radiation Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, 2308, Australia
| | - Jonathan Hindmarsh
- Central Coast Cancer Centre, Gosford Hospital, Gosford, NSW, 2250, Australia
| | - Seng B Lim
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centre, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Dale M Lovelock
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centre, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Todsaporn Fuangrod
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, 2298, Australia
| | - Daryl J O'Connor
- School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, 2308, Australia
| | - Paul J Keall
- Radiation Physics Laboratory, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Peter B Greer
- School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, 2308, Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, 2298, Australia
| |
Collapse
|