1
|
Hlouschek J, König B, Bos D, Santiago A, Zensen S, Haubold J, Pöttgen C, Herz A, Opitz M, Wetter A, Guberina M, Stuschke M, Zylka W, Kühl H, Guberina N. Experimental Examination of Conventional, Semi-Automatic, and Automatic Volumetry Tools for Segmentation of Pulmonary Nodules in a Phantom Study. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 14:28. [PMID: 38201337 PMCID: PMC10804383 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14010028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2023] [Revised: 12/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study is to examine the precision of semi-automatic, conventional and automatic volumetry tools for pulmonary nodules in chest CT with phantom N1 LUNGMAN. The phantom is a life-size anatomical chest model with pulmonary nodules representing solid and subsolid metastases. Gross tumor volumes (GTVis) were contoured using various approaches: manually (0); as a means of semi-automated, conventional contouring with (I) adaptive-brush function; (II) flood-fill function; and (III) image-thresholding function. Furthermore, a deep-learning algorithm for automatic contouring was applied (IV). An intermodality comparison of the above-mentioned strategies for contouring GTVis was performed. For the mean GTVref (standard deviation (SD)), the interquartile range (IQR)) was 0.68 mL (0.33; 0.34-1.1). GTV segmentation was distributed as follows: (I) 0.61 mL (0.27; 0.36-0.92); (II) 0.41 mL (0.28; 0.23-0.63); (III) 0.65 mL (0.35; 0.32-0.90); and (IV) 0.61 mL (0.29; 0.33-0.95). GTVref was found to be significantly correlated with GTVis (I) p < 0.001, r = 0.989 (III) p = 0.001, r = 0.916, and (IV) p < 0.001, r = 0.986, but not with (II) p = 0.091, r = 0.595. The Sørensen-Dice indices for the semi-automatic tools were 0.74 (I), 0.57 (II) and 0.71 (III). For the semi-automatic, conventional segmentation tools evaluated, the adaptive-brush function (I) performed closest to the reference standard (0). The automatic deep learning tool (IV) showed high performance for auto-segmentation and was close to the reference standard. For high precision radiation therapy, visual control, and, where necessary, manual correction, are mandatory for all evaluated tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian Hlouschek
- Department of Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Britta König
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Muenster (UKM), Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Gebäude A1, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Denise Bos
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Alina Santiago
- Department of Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zensen
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Johannes Haubold
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Christoph Pöttgen
- Department of Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Andreas Herz
- Department of Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Marcel Opitz
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Axel Wetter
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Neuroradiology, Asklepios Klinikum Harburg, Eißendorfer Pferdeweg 52, 21075 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Maja Guberina
- Department of Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Martin Stuschke
- Department of Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Waldemar Zylka
- Westphalian University, Campus Gelsenkirchen, Neidenburger Str. 43, 45897 Gelsenkirchen, Germany
| | - Hilmar Kühl
- Department of Radiology, St. Bernhard-Hospital Kamp-Lintfort, Bürgermeister-Schmelzing-Str. 90, 47475 Kamp-Lintfort, Germany
| | - Nika Guberina
- Department of Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zeng D, Zeng C, Zeng Z, Li S, Deng Z, Chen S, Bian Z, Ma J. Basis and current state of computed tomography perfusion imaging: a review. Phys Med Biol 2022; 67. [PMID: 35926503 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac8717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Computed tomography perfusion (CTP) is a functional imaging that allows for providing capillary-level hemodynamics information of the desired tissue in clinics. In this paper, we aim to offer insight into CTP imaging which covers the basics and current state of CTP imaging, then summarize the technical applications in the CTP imaging as well as the future technological potential. At first, we focus on the fundamentals of CTP imaging including systematically summarized CTP image acquisition and hemodynamic parameter map estimation techniques. A short assessment is presented to outline the clinical applications with CTP imaging, and then a review of radiation dose effect of the CTP imaging on the different applications is presented. We present a categorized methodology review on known and potential solvable challenges of radiation dose reduction in CTP imaging. To evaluate the quality of CTP images, we list various standardized performance metrics. Moreover, we present a review on the determination of infarct and penumbra. Finally, we reveal the popularity and future trend of CTP imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong Zeng
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangdong 510515, China; and Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Medical Radiation Imaging and Detection Technology, Southern Medical University, Guangdong 510515, People's Republic of China
| | - Cuidie Zeng
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangdong 510515, China; and Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Medical Radiation Imaging and Detection Technology, Southern Medical University, Guangdong 510515, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhixiong Zeng
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangdong 510515, China; and Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Medical Radiation Imaging and Detection Technology, Southern Medical University, Guangdong 510515, People's Republic of China
| | - Sui Li
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangdong 510515, China; and Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Medical Radiation Imaging and Detection Technology, Southern Medical University, Guangdong 510515, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhen Deng
- Department of Neurology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangdong 510515, People's Republic of China
| | - Sijin Chen
- Department of Medical Imaging Center, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangdong 510515, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhaoying Bian
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangdong 510515, China; and Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Medical Radiation Imaging and Detection Technology, Southern Medical University, Guangdong 510515, People's Republic of China
| | - Jianhua Ma
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangdong 510515, China; and Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Medical Radiation Imaging and Detection Technology, Southern Medical University, Guangdong 510515, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|