Evaluation of an automatic MR-based gold fiducial marker localisation method for MR-only prostate radiotherapy

Verification imaging in prostate MR-only radiotherapy: Are fiducial markers necessary?

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE

MR-only radiotherapy planning exploits the benefits of MRI soft-tissue delineation, whilst negating the registration inaccuracies caused by MRI CT fusion. Fiducial markers have conventionally been used in prostate radiotherapy to reduce on-treatment image matching variability. However, this is an invasive procedure for the patient, and presents technical difficulties in an MR-only pathway as fiducial markers are difficult to visualise on MRI. This study compares MR-CBCT soft-tissue matching to fiducial matching in an MR-only prostate pathway.

MATERIAL/METHODS

Four therapeutic radiographers reviewed first fraction CBCTs for 25 patients. The CBCT was compared to the planning MRI, a T2 weighted sequence for the soft-tissue match and compared to a T1 weighted MRI sequence for the fiducial match. Inter-observer variability was quantified using the inter-observer error and 95 % limits of agreement from a modified Bland-Altman analysis. Accuracy of the soft-tissue match was quantified by calculating the difference from the fiducial match.

RESULTS

Limits of agreement on the MR soft-tissue match were 1.5 mm, 4.0 mm, 3.5 mm and fiducial match 2.5 mm, 3.6 mm, 2.5 mm (lateral, longitudinal, vertical). Inter-observer error (±standard deviation) on the MR soft-tissue match were 0.6(±0.5) mm, 1.8(±1.1) mm, 1.7(±0.7) mm and fiducial match 0.7(±1.1) mm, 1.1(±1.5) mm, 0.8(±0.7) mm (lateral, longitudinal, vertical). The difference of the soft-tissue match from the fiducial match was 0.3(±1.1) mm, -0.1(±2.7) mm, 0.1(±1.9) mm (lateral, longitudinal, vertical).

CONCLUSION

MR-CBCT soft-tissue matching has similar accuracy and inter-observer variability as fiducial matching. This suggests fiducial markers are not necessary in an MR-only prostate radiotherapy pathway.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

MR-only prostate radiotherapy does not require fiducial markers since MR-CBCT soft tissue matching can be used for IGRT.

The first patients treated with MR-CBCT soft-tissue matching in a MR-only prostate radiotherapy pathway

INTRODUCTION

Magnetic Resonance (MR)-only radiotherapy for prostate cancer has previously been reported using fiducial markers for on-treatment verification. MR-Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) soft-tissue matching does not require invasive fiducial markers and enables MR-only treatments to other pelvic cancers. This study evaluated the first clinical implementation of MR-only prostate radiotherapy using MR-CBCT soft-tissue matching.

METHODS

Twenty prostate patients were treated with MR-only radiotherapy using a synthetic (s)CT-optimised plan with MR-CBCT soft-tissue matching. Two MR sequences were acquired: small Field Of View (FOV) for target delineation and large FOV for organs at risk delineation, sCT generation and on-treatment verification. Patients also received a CT for validation. The prostate was independently contoured on the small FOV MR, copied to the registered CT and modified if there were MR-CT soft-tissue alignment differences (MR-CT volume). This was compared to the MR-only volume with a paired t-test. The treatment plan was recalculated on CT and the doses compared. Independent offline CT-CBCT matches for 5/20 fractions were performed by three therapeutic radiographers using the MR-only contours and compared to the online MR-CBCT matches using two one-sided paired t-tests for equivalence within ±1 mm.

RESULTS

The MR-only volumes were significantly smaller than MR-CT (p = 0.003), with a volume ratio 0.92 ± 0.02 (mean ± standard error). The sCT isocentre dose difference to CT was 0.2 ± 0.1%. MR-CBCT soft-tissue matching was equivalent to CT-CBCT (p < 0.001), with differences of 0.1 ± 0.2 mm (vertical), -0.1 ± 0.2 mm (longitudinal) and 0.0 ± 0.1 mm (lateral).

CONCLUSIONS

MR-only radiotherapy with soft-tissue matching has been successfully clinically implemented. It produced significantly smaller target volumes with high dosimetric and on-treatment matching accuracy.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

MR-only prostate radiotherapy can be safely delivered without using invasive fiducial markers. This enables MR-only radiotherapy to be extended to other pelvic cancers where fiducial markers cannot be used.

Are cone beam CT image matching skills transferrable from planning CT to planning MRI for MR-only prostate radiotherapy?

Objectives:

Treatment verification for MR-only planning has focused on fiducial marker matching, however, these are difficult to identify on MR. An alternative is using the MRI for soft-tissue matching with cone beam computed tomography images (MR-CBCT). However, therapeutic radiographers have limited experience of MRI. This study aimed to assess transferability of therapeutic radiographers CT-CBCT prostate image matching skills to MR-CBCT image matching.

Methods:

23 therapeutic radiographers with 3 months–5 years’ experience of online daily CT-CBCT soft-tissue matching prostate cancer patients participated. Each observer completed a baseline assessment of 10 CT-CBCT prostate soft-tissue image matches, followed by 10 MR-CBCT prostate soft-tissue image match assessment. A MRI anatomy training intervention was delivered and the 10 MR-CBCT prostate soft-tissue image match assessment was repeated. Limits of agreement were calculated as the disagreement of the observers with mean of all observers.

Results:

Limits of agreement at CT-CBCT baseline were 2.8 mm, 2.8 mm, 0.7 mm (vertical, longitudinal, lateral). MR-CBCT matches prior to training were 3.3 mm, 3.1 mm, 0.9 mm, and after training 2.6 mm, 2.4 mm, 1.1 mm (vertical, longitudinal, lateral). Results show similar limits of agreement across the assessments, and variation reduced following the training intervention.

Conclusion:

This suggests therapeutic radiographers’ prostate CBCT image matching skills are transferrable to a MRI planning scan, since MR-CBCT matching has comparable observer variation to CT-CBCT matching.

Advances in knowledge:

This is the first publication assessing interobserver MR-CBCT prostate soft tissue matching in an MR-only pathway.

Feasibility of using a single MRI acquisition for fiducial marker localization and synthetic CT generation towards MRI-only prostate radiation therapy treatment planning

Purpose.To investigate the feasibility of using a single MRI acquisition for fiducial marker identification and synthetic CT (sCT) generation towards MRI-only treatment planning for prostate external beam radiation therapy (EBRT).Methods.Seven prostate cancer patients undergoing EBRT, each with three implanted gold fiducial markers, participated in this study. In addition to the planning CT scan, all patients were scanned on a 3 T MR scanner with a 3D double-echo gradient echo (GRE) sequence. Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) was performed for marker localization. QSM-derived marker positions were compared to those from CT. The bulk density assignment technique for sCT generation was adopted. The magnitude GRE images were segmented into muscle, bone, fat, and air using a combination of unsupervised intensity-based classification of soft tissue and convolutional neural networks (CNN) for bone segmentation.Results.All implanted markers were visualized and accurately identified (average error: 0.7 ± 0.5 mm). QSM generated distinctive contrast for hemorrhage, calcifications, and gold fiducial markers. The estimated susceptibility/HU values on QSM/CT for gold and calcifications were 31.5 ± 2.9 ppm/1220 ± 100 HU and 14.6 ± 0.9 ppm/440 ± 100 HU, respectively. The intensity-based soft tissue classification resulted in an average Dice score of 0.97 ± 0.02; bone segmentation using CNN resulted in an average Dice score of 0.93 ± 0.03.Conclusion.This work indicates the feasibility of simultaneous fiducial marker identification and sCT generation using a single MRI acquisition. Future works includes evaluation of the proposed method in a large cohort of patients with optimized acquisition parameters as well as dosimetric evaluations.

Accuracy of an MR-only workflow for prostate radiotherapy using semi-automatically burned-in fiducial markers

BACKGROUND

The benefit of MR-only workflow compared to current CT-based workflow for prostate radiotherapy is reduction of systematic errors in the radiotherapy chain by 2-3 mm. Nowadays, MRI is used for target delineation while CT is needed for position verification. In MR-only workflows, MRI based synthetic CT (sCT) replaces CT. Intraprostatic fiducial markers (FMs) are used as a surrogate for the position of the prostate improving targeting. However, FMs are not visible on sCT. Therefore, a semi-automatic method for burning-in FMs on sCT was developed. Accuracy of MR-only workflow using semi-automatically burned-in FMs was assessed and compared to CT/MR workflow.

METHODS

Thirty-one prostate cancer patients receiving radiotherapy, underwent an additional MR sequence (mDIXON) to create an sCT for MR-only workflow simulation. Three sources of accuracy in the CT/MR- and MR-only workflow were investigated. To compare image registrations for target delineation, the inter-observer error (IOE) of FM-based CT-to-MR image registrations and soft-tissue-based MR-to-MR image registrations were determined on twenty patients. Secondly, the inter-observer variation of the resulting FM positions was determined on twenty patients. Thirdly, on 26 patients CBCTs were retrospectively registered on sCT with burned-in FMs and compared to CT-CBCT registrations.

RESULTS

Image registration for target delineation shows a three times smaller IOE for MR-only workflow compared to CT/MR workflow. All observers agreed in correctly identifying all FMs for 18 out of 20 patients (90%). The IOE in CC direction of the center of mass (COM) position of the markers was within the CT slice thickness (2.5 mm), the IOE in AP and RL direction were below 1.0 mm and 1.5 mm, respectively. Registrations for IGRT position verification in MR-only workflow compared to CT/MR workflow were equivalent in RL-, CC- and AP-direction, except for a significant difference for random error in rotation.

CONCLUSIONS

MR-only workflow using sCT with burned-in FMs is an improvement compared to the current CT/MR workflow, with a three times smaller inter observer error in CT-MR registration and comparable CBCT registration results between CT and sCT reference scans. Trial registry Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO) does apply to this study and was approved by the Medical Ethics review Committee of the Academic Medical Center. Registration number: NL65414.018.18. Date of registration: 21-08-2018.

Development and evaluation of a deep learning based artificial intelligence for automatic identification of gold fiducial markers in an MRI-only prostate radiotherapy workflow

Identification of prostate gold fiducial markers in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images is challenging when CT images are not available, due to misclassifications from intra-prostatic calcifications. It is also a time consuming task and automated identification methods have been suggested as an improvement for both objectives. Multi-echo gradient echo (MEGRE) images have been utilized for manual fiducial identification with 100% detection accuracy. The aim is therefore to develop an automatic deep learning based method for fiducial identification in MRI images intended for MRI-only prostate radiotherapy. MEGRE images from 326 prostate cancer patients with fiducials were acquired on a 3T MRI, post-processed with N4 bias correction, and the fiducial center of mass (CoM) was identified. A 9 mm radius sphere was created around the CoM as ground truth. A deep learning HighRes3DNet model for semantic segmentation was trained using image augmentation. The model was applied to 39 MRI-only patients and 3D probability maps for fiducial location and segmentation were produced and spatially smoothed. In each of the three largest probability peaks, a 9 mm radius sphere was defined. Detection sensitivity and geometric accuracy was assessed. To raise awareness of potential false findings a 'BeAware' score was developed, calculated from the total number and quality of the probability peaks. All datasets, annotations and source code used were made publicly available. The detection sensitivity for all fiducials were 97.4%. Thirty-six out of thirty-nine patients had all fiducial markers correctly identified. All three failed patients generated a user notification using the BeAware score. The mean absolute difference between the detected fiducial and ground truth CoM was 0.7 ± 0.9 [0 3.1] mm. A deep learning method for automatic fiducial identification in MRI images was developed and evaluated with state-of-the-art results. The BeAware score has the potential to notify the user regarding patients where the proposed method is uncertain.

MR-PROTECT: Clinical feasibility of a prostate MRI-only radiotherapy treatment workflow and investigation of acceptance criteria

BACKGROUND

Retrospective studies on MRI-only radiotherapy have been presented. Widespread clinical implementations of MRI-only workflows are however limited by the absence of guidelines. The MR-PROTECT trial presents an MRI-only radiotherapy workflow for prostate cancer using a new single sequence strategy. The workflow incorporated the commercial synthetic CT (sCT) generation software MriPlanner™ (Spectronic Medical, Helsingborg, Sweden). Feasibility of the workflow and limits for acceptance criteria were investigated for the suggested workflow with the aim to facilitate future clinical implementations.

METHODS

An MRI-only workflow including imaging, post imaging tasks, treatment plan creation, quality assurance and treatment delivery was created with questionnaires. All tasks were performed in a single MR-sequence geometry, eliminating image registrations. Prospective CT-quality assurance (QA) was performed prior treatment comparing the PTV mean dose between sCT and CT dose-distributions. Retrospective analysis of the MRI-only gold fiducial marker (GFM) identification, DVH- analysis, gamma evaluation and patient set-up verification using GFMs and cone beam CT were performed.

RESULTS

An MRI-only treatment was delivered to 39 out of 40 patients. The excluded patient was too large for the predefined imaging field-of-view. All tasks could successfully be performed for the treated patients. There was a maximum deviation of 1.2% in PTV mean dose was seen in the prospective CT-QA. Retrospective analysis showed a maximum deviation below 2% in the DVH-analysis after correction for rectal gas and gamma pass-rates above 98%. MRI-only patient set-up deviation was below 2 mm for all but one investigated case and a maximum of 2.2 mm deviation in the GFM-identification compared to CT.

CONCLUSIONS

The MR-PROTECT trial shows the feasibility of an MRI-only prostate radiotherapy workflow. A major advantage with the presented workflow is the incorporation of a sCT-generation method with multi-vendor capability. The presented single sequence approach are easily adapted by other clinics and the general implementation procedure can be replicated. The dose deviation and the gamma pass-rate acceptance criteria earlier suggested was achievable, and these limits can thereby be confirmed. GFM-identification acceptance criteria are depending on the choice of identification method and slice thickness. Patient positioning strategies needs further investigations to establish acceptance criteria.

Quantification of fiducial marker visibility for MRI-only prostate radiotherapy simulation

To objectively compare the suitability of MRI pulse sequences and commercially available fiducial markers (FMs) for MRI-only prostate radiotherapy simulation. Most FMs appear as small signal voids in MRI images making them difficult to differentiate from tissue heterogeneities such as calcifications. In this study we use quantitative metrics to objectively evaluate the visibility of FMs in 27 patients and an anthropomorphic phantom with a variety of standard clinical MRI pulse sequences and commercially available FMs. FM visibility was quantified using the local contrast-to-noise-ratio (lCNR), the difference between the 80th and 20th percentile iso-intensity FM volumes (V _fall) and the largest iso-intensity volume that can be distinguished from background: apparent-marker-volume (AMV). A larger lCNR and AMV, and smaller V _fall represents a more easily identifiable FM. The number of non-marker objects visualized by each pulse sequence was calculated using FM-derived template-matching. The FM-based target-registration-error (TRE) between each MRI and the planning-CT image was calculated. Fiducial marker visibility was rated by two medical physicists with over three years of experience examining MRI-only prostate simulation images. The rater's classification accuracy was quantified using the F ₁ score, which is the harmonic mean of the rater's precision and recall. These quantitative metrics and human observer ratings were used to evaluate FM identifiability in images from nine subtypes of T ₁-weighted, T ₂-weighted and gradient echo (GRE) pulse sequences in a 27-patient study. A phantom study was conducted to quantify the visibility of 8 commercially available FMs. In the patient study, the largest mean lCNR and AMV and, smallest normalized V _fall were produced by the 3.0 T multiple-echo GRE pulse sequence (T ₁-VIBE, 2° flip angle, 1.23 ms and 2.45 ms echo-times). This pulse sequence produced no false marker detections and TREs less than 2 mm in the left-right, anterior-posterior and cranial-caudal directions, respectively. Human observers rated the 1.23 ms echo-time GRE images with the best average marker visibility score of 100% and an F ₁ score of 1. In the phantom study, the Gold-Anchor GA-200X-20-B (deployed in a folded configuration) produced the largest sequence averaged lCNR and AMV measurements at 16.1 and 16.7 mm³, respectively. Using quantitative visibility and distinguishability metrics and human observer ratings, the patient study demonstrated that multiple-echo GRE images produced the best gold FM visibility and distinguishability. The phantom study demonstrated that markers manufactured from platinum or iron-doped gold quantitatively produced superior visibility compared to their pure gold counterparts.

The rationale for MR-only treatment planning for external radiotherapy

•MR-only treatment planning could improve the spatial accuracy of radiotherapy.•The benefit compared to a mixed MR-CT workflow will vary between patient groups.•Further development of QA tools is needed before the procedure will save resources.

A Multi-center Prospective Study for Implementation of an MRI-Only Prostate Treatment Planning Workflow

Purpose: This project investigates the feasibility of implementation of MRI-only prostate planning in a prospective multi-center study.

Method and Materials: A two-phase implementation model was utilized where centers performed retrospective analysis of MRI-only plans for five patients followed by prospective MRI-only planning for subsequent patients. Feasibility was assessed if at least 23/25 patients recruited to phase 2 received MRI-only treatment workflow. Whole-pelvic MRI scans (T2 weighted, isotropic 1.6 mm voxel 3D sequence) were converted to pseudo-CT using an established atlas-based method. Dose plans were generated using MRI contoured anatomy with pseudo-CT for dose calculation. A conventional CT scan was acquired subsequent to MRI-only plan approval for quality assurance purposes (QA-CT). 3D Gamma evaluation was performed between pseudo-CT calculated plan dose and recalculation on QA-CT. Criteria was 2%, 2 mm criteria with 20% low dose threshold. Gold fiducial marker positions for image guidance were compared between pseudo-CT and QA-CT scan prior to treatment.

Results: All 25 patients recruited to phase 2 were treated using the MRI-only workflow. Isocenter dose differences between pseudo-CT and QA-CT were −0.04 ± 0.93% (mean ± SD). 3D Gamma dose comparison pass-rates were 99.7% ± 0.5% with mean gamma 0.22 ± 0.07. Results were similar for the two centers using two different scanners. All gamma comparisons exceeded the 90% pass-rate tolerance with a minimum gamma pass-rate of 98.0%. In all cases the gold fiducial markers were correctly identified on MRI and the distances of all seeds to centroid were within the tolerance of 1.0 mm of the distances on QA-CT (0.07 ± 0.41 mm), with a root-mean-square difference of 0.42 mm.

Conclusion: The results support the hypothesis that an MRI-only prostate workflow can be implemented safely and accurately with appropriate quality assurance methods.

MRI artifact simulation for clinically relevant MRI sequences for guidance of prostate HDR brachytherapy

For the purpose of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guidance of prostate high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy, this paper presents a study on the potential of clinically relevant MRI sequences to facilitate tracking or localization of brachytherapy devices (HDR source/titanium needle), and which could simultaneously be used to visualize the anatomy. The tracking or localization involves simulation of the MRI artifact in combination with a template matching algorithm. Simulations of the MRI artifacts induced by an HDR brachytherapy source and a titanium needle were implemented for four types of sequences: spoiled gradient echo, spin echo, balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) and bSSFP with spectral attenuated inversion recovery (SPAIR) fat suppression. A phantom study was conducted in which mentioned sequences (in 2D) as well as the volumetric MRI sequences of the current clinical scan protocol were applied to obtain the induced MRI artifacts for an HDR source and a titanium needle. Localization of the objects was performed by a phase correlation based template matching algorithm. The simulated images demonstrated high correspondences with the acquired MR images, and allowed localization of the objects. A comparison between the object positions obtained for all applied MRI sequences showed deviations (from the average position) of 0.2-0.3 mm, proving that all MRI sequences were suitable for localization of the objects, irrespective of their 2D or volumetric nature. This study demonstrated that the MRI artifact induced by an HDR source or a titanium needle could be simulated for the four investigated types of MRI sequences (spoiled gradient echo, spin echo, bSSFP and bSSFP-SPAIR), valuable for real-time object localization in clinical practice. This leads to more flexibility in the choice of MRI sequences for guidance of HDR brachytherapy, as they are suitable for both object localization and anatomy visualization.

Differentiating platinum coated brachytherapy seeds and gold fiducial markers with varying off-resonant frequency offsets

PURPOSE

To develop an off-resonant frequency filtered method to selectively differentiate between implanted gold fiducial markers and platinum coated brachytherapy seeds.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The magnetic susceptibilities for gold fiducial markers and brachytherapy seeds differ in magnitude and also in their signs, resulting in B₀-field inhomogeneity patterns with opposite main lobes. A pulse sequence used to localize brachytherapy seeds with positive contrast, centre-out radial sampling with off-resonance reception (co-RASOR), was used to reconstruct images with a range of off-resonant frequency offsets. The proposed method utilizes two frequency filters to selectively reconstruct maximum intensity projections through band-pass regions where each seed has its maximal localized hyperintensity. Seeds were simulated and then placed in gel and tissue phantoms to validate the technique using orthogonal 2D slices with seeds both parallel and perpendicular to the B₀-field.

RESULTS

Dual-plane 2D co-RASOR sequences were reconstructed off-resonance with applied frequency filters to create two projections displaying each seed, which were then colour-coded to negative and positive frequencies. Phantom validation showed that each seed contains its maximal CNR in opposing frequency regions as predicted. Local maxima can also appear in both negative and positive frequency regions. The relative difference between the signal of each seed and these local maxima ranged from 1.19 to 3.73, and an image threshold was determined in all cases. Tissue validation showed the technique differentiates seeds correctly and is limited by the hyperintensity patterns observed in the co-RASOR method.

CONCLUSIONS

Dual-plane co-RASOR offers sub-millimetre positive contrast from implanted seeds that contain unique off-resonant frequency maxima, which frequency filters can selectively differentiate.

Fiducial marker based intra-fraction motion assessment on cine-MR for MR-linac treatment of prostate cancer

We have developed a method to determine intrafraction motion of the prostate through automatic fiducial marker (FM) tracking on 3D cine-magnetic resonance (MR) images with high spatial and temporal resolution. Twenty-nine patients undergoing prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), with four implanted cylindrical gold FMs, had cine-MR imaging sessions after each of five weekly fractions. Each cine-MR examination consisted of 55 sequentially obtained 3D datasets ('dynamics'), acquired over a 11 s period, covering a total of 10 min. FM locations in the first dynamic were manually identified by a clinician, FM centers in subsequent dynamics were automatically determined. Center of mass (COM) translations and rotations were determined by calculating the rigid transformations between the FM template of the first and subsequent dynamics. The algorithm was applied to 7315 dynamics over 133 scans of 29 patients and the obtained results were validated by comparing the COM locations recorded by the clinician at the halfway-dynamic (after 5 min) and end dynamic (after 10 min). The mean COM translations at 10 min were X: 0.0 [Formula: see text] 0.8 mm, Y: 1.0 [Formula: see text] 1.9 mm and Z: 0.9 [Formula: see text] 2.0 mm. The mean rotation results at 10 min were X: 0.1 [Formula: see text] 3.9°, Y: 0.0 [Formula: see text] 1.3° and Z: 0.1 [Formula: see text] 1.2°. The tracking success rate was 97.7% with a mean 3D COM error of 1.1 mm. We have developed a robust, fast and accurate FM tracking algorithm for cine-MR data, which allows for continuous monitoring of prostate motion during MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT). These results will be used to validate automatic prostate tracking based on soft-tissue contrast.

Improving fiducial and prostate capsule visualization for radiotherapy planning using MRI

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Intraprostatic fiducial markers (FM) improve the accuracy of radiotherapy (RT) delivery. Here we assess geometric integrity and contouring consistency using a T2*-weighted (T2*W) sequence alone, which allows visualization of the FM.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Ten patients scanned within the Prostate Advances in Comparative Evidence (PACE) trial (NCT01584258) had prostate images acquired with computed tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance (MR) Imaging: T2-weighted (T2W) and T2*W sequences. The prostate was contoured independently on each imaging dataset by three clinicians. Interobserver variability was assessed using comparison indices with Monaco ADMIRE (research version 2.0, Elekta AB) and examined for statistical differences between imaging sets. CT and MR images of two test objects were acquired to assess geometric distortion and accuracy of marker positioning. The first was a linear test object comprising straight tubes in three orthogonal directions, the second was a smaller test object with markers suspended in gel.

RESULTS

Interobserver variability for prostate contouring was lower for both T2W and T2*W compared to CT, this was statistically significant when comparing CT and T2*W images. All markers are visible in T2*W images with 29/30 correctly identified, only 3/30 are visible in T2W images. Assessment of geometric distortion revealed in-plane displacements were under 0.375 mm in MRI, and through plane displacements could not be detected. The signal loss in the MR images is symmetric in relation to the true marker position shown in CT images.

CONCLUSION

Prostate T2*W images are geometrically accurate, and yield consistent prostate contours. This single sequence can be used to identify FM and for prostate delineation in a mixed MR-CT workflow.

Precision of T2 TSE MRI-CT-image fusions based on gold fiducials and repetitive T2 TSE MRI-MRI-fusions for adaptive IGRT of prostate cancer by using phantom and patient data

INTRODUCTION

To increase precision of radiation treatment (RT) delivery in prostate cancer, MRI-based RT as well as the use of fiducials like gold markers (GMs) have shown promising results. Their combined use is currently under investigation in clinical trials. Here, we aimed to evaluate a workflow of image registration based on GMs between CT and MRI as well as weekly MRI-MRI adaption based on T2 TSE sequence.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A gel-phantom with two inserted GMs was scanned with CT and three different MR-scanners of 1.5 and 3 T (T2 TSE and T1 VIBE-Dixon, isotropic, voxel size 2 × 2 × 2 mm). After image fusion, deviations for fiducial and gel match were measured and artifacts were evaluated. Additionally, CT-MRI-match deviations and MRI-MRI-match deviations of 10 Patients from the M-basePro study using GMs were assessed.

RESULTS

GMs were visible in all imaging modalities. The outer gel contours were matched with <1 mm deviation, contour volumes varied between 0 and 1%. The deviations of the GMs were less than 2 mm in any direction of MRI/CT. Shifts of peripherally or centrally located GMs were randomly distributed. The average MRI-CT-match precision of 10 patients with GMs was 1.9 mm (range 1.1-3.1 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

Match inaccuracies for GMs between reference CT and voxel-isotropic T2-TSE sequences are small. Spatial deviations of CT- and MR-contoured fiducials were less than 2 mm, i.e., below SLT of the applied modalities. In patients, the average CT-MRI-match precision for GMs was 1.9 mm supporting their use in MR-guided high precision RT.

Using C-Arm X-ray images from marker insertion to confirm the gold fiducial marker identification in an MRI-only prostate radiotherapy workflow

Prostate cancer radiotherapy workflows, solely based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), are now in clinical use. In these workflows, intraprostatic gold fiducial markers (GFM) show similar signal behavior as calcifications and bleeding in T2‐weighted MRI‐images. Accurate GFM identification in MRI‐only radiotherapy workflows is therefore a major challenge. C‐arm X‐ray images (CkV‐images), acquired at GFM implantation, could provide GFM position information and be used to confirm correct identification in T2‐weighted MRI‐images. This would require negligible GFM migration between implantation and MRI‐imaging. Marker migration was therefore investigated. The aim of this study was to show the feasibility of using CkV‐images to confirm GFM identification in an MRI‐only prostate radiotherapy workflow. An anterior‐posterior digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR)‐image and a mirrored posterior‐anterior CkV‐image were acquired two weeks apart for 16 patients in an MRI‐only radiotherapy workflow. The DRR‐image originated from synthetic CT‐images (created from MRI‐images). A common image geometry was defined between the DRR‐ and CkV‐image for each patient. A rigid registration between the GFM center of mass (CoM) coordinates was performed and the distance between each of the GFM in the DRR‐ and registered CkV‐image was calculated. The same methodology was used to assess GFM migration for 31 patients in a CT‐based radiotherapy workflow. The distance calculated was considered a measure of GFM migration. A statistical test was performed to assess any difference between the cohorts. The mean absolute distance difference for the GFM CoM between the DRR‐ and CkV‐image in the MRI‐only cohort was 1.7 ± 1.4 mm. The mean GFM migration was 1.2 ± 0.7 mm. No significant difference between the measured total distances of the two cohorts could be detected (P = 0.37). This demonstrated that, a C‐Arm X‐ray image acquired from the GFM implantation procedure could be used to confirm GFM identification from MRI‐images. GFM migration was present but did not constitute a problem.

Resolution and registration in dual-plane co-RASOR MR

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has superior soft tissue contrast and lower interobserver variability compared to computed tomography and advances in equipment and pseudo-CT estimation have allowed for MR-only radiation therapy planning. Dedicated MR sequences have been used to localize paramagnetic structures with positive contrast, and most implanted seeds are gold fiducial markers (GFMs). We used a fast, dual-plane co-RASOR sequence to localize implanted GFMs with positive contrast in phantom and tissue to assess their resolution and registration accuracy of registration to CT. Off-resonant reconstructions of co-RASOR images were able to resolve GFMs down to 5 mm apart at 12 cm FOV. No systematic biases were observed by comparing registration of co-RASOR and bSSFP to CT images in an MR-compatible Lego phantom with a set of highly visible known points. The standard deviations of the MR to CT distance errors were  <0.5 mm in all directions. We separated the component due to registration by comparing the two MR sequences, which had a maximum standard deviation of 0.36 mm in the SI-direction. Registration using the positive contrast points in a porcine sample phantom showed increased errors, but co-RASOR still performs acceptably with a target registration error of  <0.75 mm. The dual-plane co-RASOR sequence could then be used for both registration and image tracking when performing MR-only radiation therapy planning.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging only Workflow for Radiotherapy Simulation and Planning in Prostate Cancer

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often combined with computed tomography (CT) in prostate radiotherapy to optimise delineation of the target and organs-at-risk (OAR) while maintaining accurate dose calculation. Such a dual-modality workflow requires two separate imaging sessions, and it has some fundamental and logistical drawbacks. Due to the availability of new MRI hardware and software solutions, CT examinations can be omitted for prostate radiotherapy simulations. All information for treatment planning, including electron density maps and bony anatomy, can nowadays be obtained with MRI. Such an MRI-only simulation workflow reduces delineation ambiguities, eases planning logistics, and improves patient comfort; however, careful validation of the complete MRI-only workflow is warranted. The first institutes are now adopting this MRI-only workflow for prostate radiotherapy. In this article, we will review technology and workflow requirements for an MRI-only prostate simulation workflow.

Evaluation of gold fiducial marker manual localisation for magnetic resonance-only prostate radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

The use of intraprostatic gold fiducial markers (FMs) ensures highly accurate and precise image-guided radiation therapy for patients diagnosed with prostate cancer thanks to the ease of localising FMs on photon-based imaging, like Computed Tomography (CT) images. Recently, Magnetic Resonance (MR)-only radiotherapy has been proposed to simplify the workflow and reduce possible systematic uncertainties. A critical, determining factor in the accuracy of such an MR-only simulation will be accurate FM localisation using solely MR images.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to evaluate the performances of manual MR-based FM localisation within a clinical environment.

METHODS

We designed a study in which 5 clinically involved radiation therapy technicians (RTTs) independently localised the gold FMs implanted in 16 prostate cancer patients in two scenarios: employing a single MR sequence or a combination of sequences. Inter-observer precision and accuracy were assessed for the two scenarios for localisation in terms of 95% limit of agreement on single FMs (LoA)/ centre of mass (LoA _CM) and inter-marker distances (IDs), respectively.

RESULTS

The number of precisely located FMs (LoA <2 mm) increased from 38/48 to 45/48 FMs when localisation was performed using multiple sequences instead of single one. When performing localisation on multiple sequences, imprecise localisation of the FMs (3/48 FMs) occurred for 1/3 implanted FMs in three different patients. In terms of precision, we obtained LoA _CM within 0.25 mm in all directions over the precisely located FMs. In terms of accuracy, IDs difference of manual MR-based localisation versus CT-based localisation was on average (±1 STD) 0.6 ±0.6 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

For both the investigated scenarios, the results indicate that when FM classification was correct, the precision and accuracy are high and comparable to CT-based FM localisation. We found that use of multiple sequences led to better localisation performances compared with the use of single sequence. However, we observed that, due to the presence of calcification and motion, the risk of mislocated patient positioning is still too high to allow the sole use of manual FM localisation. Finally, strategies to possibly overcome the current challenges were proposed.

Accuracy and precision of patient positioning for pelvic MR-only radiation therapy using digitally reconstructed radiographs

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has in recent years emerged as an imaging modality to drive precise contouring of targets and organs at risk in external beam radiation therapy. Moreover, recent advances in MRI enable treatment of cancer without computed tomography (CT) simulation. A commercially available MR-only solution, MRCAT, offers a single-modality approach that provides density information for dose calculation and generation of positioning reference images. We evaluated the accuracy of patient positioning based on MRCAT digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) by comparing to standard CT based workflow.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty consecutive prostate cancer patients being treated with external beam radiation therapy were included in the study. DRRs were generated for each patient based on the planning CT and MRCAT. The accuracy assessment was performed by manually registering the DRR images to planar kV setup images using bony landmarks. A Bayesian linear mixed effects model was used to separate systematic and random components (inter- and intra-observer variation) in the assessment. In addition, method agreement was assessed using a Bland-Altman analysis.

RESULTS

The systematic difference between MRCAT and CT based patient positioning, averaged over the study population, were found to be (mean [95% CI])  -0.49 [-0.85 to  -0.13] mm, 0.11 [-0.33 to  +0.57] mm and  -0.05 [-0.23 to  +0.36] mm in vertical, longitudinal and lateral directions, respectively. The increases in total random uncertainty were estimated to be below 0.5 mm for all directions, when using MR-only workflow instead of CT.

CONCLUSIONS

The MRCAT pseudo-CT method provides clinically acceptable accuracy and precision for patient positioning for pelvic radiation therapy based on planar DRR images. Furthermore, due to the reduction of geometric uncertainty, compared to dual-modality workflow, the approach is likely to improve the total geometric accuracy of pelvic radiation therapy.

MRI-only treatment planning: benefits and challenges

Over the past decade, the application of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has increased, and there is growing evidence to suggest that improvements in the accuracy of target delineation in MRI-guided radiation therapy may improve clinical outcomes in a variety of cancer types. However, some considerations should be recognized including patient motion during image acquisition and geometric accuracy of images. Moreover, MR-compatible immobilization devices need to be used when acquiring images in the treatment position while minimizing patient motion during the scan time. Finally, synthetic CT images (i.e. electron density maps) and digitally reconstructed radiograph images should be generated from MRI images for dose calculation and image guidance prior to treatment. A short review of the concepts and techniques that have been developed for implementation of MRI-only workflows in radiation therapy is provided in this document.