Follow-up of antiretroviral treatment in liver transplant recipients with primary and chronic HIV type 1 infection

A time lag insensitive approach for estimating HIV-1 transmission direction

OBJECTIVES

Identifying the direction of transmission in transmission pairs is important both for forensic investigations and for the monitoring of HIV epidemics, however, reliable methods are not yet available due to the long time lag between infection and sampling in most real cases.

DESIGNS

Based on bottleneck effect and coreceptor switching, we aimed at identifying an estimator from sequences of viral gp120 proteins to determine transmission direction between transmission pairs. The estimator should be changed with HIV transmission but was independent of disease progression in an individual.

METHODS

Here, we present a novel and reliable approach for identifying transmission direction. We derived a set of conserved patterns, called common patterns, from the sequences of viruses, which differed in their coreceptor usage. The number of unique common patterns in viral sequences decreased with transmission but remained almost constant with the progress of disease in an individual. We used this number as an estimator to determine transmission direction in 73 transmission pairs for which the transmission direction was already known.

RESULTS

Our method predicted transmission direction with an accuracy of up to 94.5%. Of greater importance, our approach was not influenced by time lags between infection and sampling, and even transmission direction for transmission pairs with long time lags ranging from 2 years to more than 18 years were correctly determined.

CONCLUSION

Our approach for accurately determining transmission direction between transmission pairs is irrespective of the time lag between infection and sampling, which means a promising applications prospect.

Liver transplant outcomes in HIV-infected patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis with synthetic cohort

OBJECTIVES

The relative success of liver transplantation in those with HIV compared to HIV-uninfected individuals remains a point of intense debate. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of liver transplantation in HIV-hepatitis co-infected patients using a meta-analysis and individual patient data meta-analysis as a synthetic cohort.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, AIDSLINE (inception to 2010), AMED, CINAHL, TOXNET, Development and Reproductive Toxicology, Hazardous Substances Databank, Psych-info and relevant conferences. We included cohort studies and individual case-reports evaluating survival of co-infected transplant patients. We abstracted data on cohort and case demographics and outcomes. We pooled cohorts using a random-effects analysis and created a synthetic cohort of cases using individual patient data. We confirmed this with the pooled cohort analysis.

RESULTS

We included 15 cohort studies and 49 case series with individual patient data. At 12 months, 84.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 81.1-87.8%] of patients had survived. Within the HIV-infected population evaluated, HIV-hepatitis B virus (HBV) co-infection was associated with optimal survival. In an adjusted model, individuals positive for HBV were 8.28 (95% CI 2.26-30.33) times more likely to survive when compared to those without HBV. Further, individuals with an undetectable HIV viral load at the time of transplantation were 2.89 (95% CI 1.41-5.91) times more likely to survive when compared to those with detectable HIV viremia. Hepatitis C virus was not a predictor of patient survival when adjusted for by other key predictors [0.54 (95% CI 0.17-1.80)].

Liver transplant in patients with HIV: infection risk associated with HIV and post-transplant immunosuppression

Before the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy, HIV-infected patients who underwent liver transplantation (LT) had poor survival, mainly because of a rapid progression to AIDS and its infectious complications during the post-LT immunosuppression phase. However, in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy, under some specific and well-determined conditions, LT might be as safe and efficacious in HIV patients as it is in non-HIV-infected patients. End-stage liver failure as caused by hepatitis B virus, cirrhosis, and hepatotoxicity should be considered indications for LT in every transplant center. Because of the almost universal hepatitis C virus reinfection and its accelerated course post-LT, LT in hepatitis C virus-coinfected patients deserves more caution and more extended follow-up before it is accepted as a standard indication for LT in HIV-infected patients.

Orthotopic liver transplantation in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients: outcome of 7 patients from the Bonn cohort

The outcome and clinical features of 7 HIV-positive patients who were liver transplanted at Bonn University in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) between 1997 and 2004, analyzed by retrospective chart review, are reported. Reasons for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) were end-stage liver disease due to chronic hepatitis C (n = 4) or hepatitis B (n = 1) or acute liver failure due to fulminant hepatitis B (n = 2). Immunosuppression was based on cyclosporine A and prednisone. HAART was reinitiated 1 month after transplantation, and immunosuppression was carefully adapted to account for drug-drug interactions between cyclosporine A and protease inihibitors. Prednisone was withdrawn 5 months (median) after OLT when immunosuppression had been reliably established in the presence of HAART. One patient died 95 days after OLT due intrathoracic hemorrhage, whereas 6 patients were alive at a median of 24 months. A single episode of acute rejection was observed. The spectrum of postoperative complications was no different from HIV-negative patients apart from Kaposi's sarcoma and multicentric Castleman's disease in a single patient. Recurrent hepatitis B infection was efficiently prevented, whereas hepatitis C reinfection occurred in all 4 patients who had preexisting hepatitis C. Earlier reports on fatal courses of recurrent hepatitis C infection, high rates of organ rejection, and HAART-related liver toxicity were not observed in our patients. In conclusion, even though preliminary, our data suggest that outcomes after liver transplantation of HIV-infected patients can be improved.

Outcome after orthotopic liver transplantation in five HIV-infected patients with virus hepatitis-induced cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

We report on our experiences with orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in HIV-infected patients. Between July 1998 and October 2001, five HIV-infected patients underwent OLT because of virus-induced liver cirrhosis. One patient suffered from hepatitis B virus (HBV)-, three patients from hepatitis C virus (HCV)- and one patient from HCV/HBV/HDV-related cirrhosis (HDV, hepatitis D virus). The mean duration of HIV infection was 15 years. Patients were prospectively followed up with a mean duration of 25.6 months.

RESULTS

Three patients died 3, 10 and 31 months after OLT, respectively, due to graft failure. The causes of graft failure were: recurrent thrombosis of the hepatic artery, HCV-associated cholestatic hepatitis and chemotherapy-induced liver damage due to Hodgkin's disease, which was diagnosed 17 months after OLT, in addition to chronic HCV disease. The two survivors show a stable liver function and non-progredient HIV infection under antiretroviral therapy 61 and 23 months after OLT, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A medium- or even long-term survival after OLT can be achieved in HIV-infected patients without progression of HIV disease under antiretroviral therapy. However, in our study three out of five patients died due to graft failure. Therefore, prognostic criteria have to be defined for the selection of HIV-infected patients, who may benefit from OLT.

Review article: current status of liver transplantation in HIV-infected patients

The increases in survival of patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus is attributed to the introduction of combination human immunodeficiency virus antiviral therapy, better known as highly active anti-retroviral therapy. In fact, survival statistics have improved such that individuals often succumb to other disease entities, notably liver failure and not from acquired immunodeficiency syndrome complications. Liver transplantation has been introduction in this patient population in several centres around the world. This review will discuss the current clinical status of liver transplantation in individuals suffering from human immunodeficiency virus infection.

Antiretroviral and immunosuppressive drug-drug interactions: an update

With the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection has become a chronic disease with more frequent end-stage organ failures. As a result, the question of transplantation in HIV patients is raised more often. However, some of the HAART regimen medications require elimination or metabolism via the P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and multidrug-resistant protein (MRP) transporters or via the cytochrome P450 enzyme system. Since these transporters and enzymes are also responsible for the clearance of immunosuppressive drugs, drug-drug interactions are likely to occur. Indeed, profound drug-drug interactions between protease inhibitors and immunosuppressive drugs have been observed and they required reductions in drug dosage. In contrast, HAART using nucleoside or nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors without the use of protease inhibitors has been shown to produce less significant drug-drug interactions. It is thus crucial to take into account those potential pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic drug-drug interactions in order to avoid drug toxicity or a lack of efficacy. The aim of this work was to review and synthesize the international literature on this field in order to give practical recommendations on how to manage immunosuppressive drugs in HIV patients who get transplanted and on how to handle HAART therapy in transplant-recipient patients who get infected with HIV.

Liver transplantation in patients with HIV infection

1. Liver transplantation for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients with end-stage liver disease in the era of highly active retroviral therapy has proven to be an effective treatment. The concerns of HIV progression have not been borne out by the growing worldwide experience. 2. CD4 counts are stable and HIV viral load is controllable with medication following liver transplantation. 3. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection in HIV-positive recipients is universal, but the severity of recurrence does not appear to be different from that in HIV-negative patients with HCV liver disease. 4. Complex pharmacokinetic interactions between the calcineurin inhibitors used for immunosuppression along with protease inhibitors are present, but management directed at recognizing the need for monitoring levels does not appear to increase the risk of toxicity. 5. The degree of immunosuppression from iatrogenic drug therapy and HIV does not lead to increased risk of infectious complications.

Role of hepatitis C virus infection in malignant lymphoma in Spain

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) has been implicated in the etiology of malignant lymphomas. We estimated the risk of lymphoma associated with detection of HCV infection. Cases (n = 529) were consecutive patients newly diagnosed with a lymphoid malignancy between 1998 and 2002 in 4 centers in Spain. Lymphomas were diagnosed and classified using the WHO Classification. Controls (n = 600) were hospitalized patients matched to the cases by 5-year age group, gender and study center. Several medical conditions associated with severe immunosuppression precluded the eligibility of controls. Patients underwent a personal interview and blood sampling. HCV positive subjects were considered those with antibody response to third generation ELISA or detection of HCV RNA with Amplicor 2.0. Cases were systematically tested for HIV antibodies. We used the chi(2) test and unconditional logistic regression to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for lymphoma associated with HCV. HCV infection was detected in 40 cases (7.5%) and 23 (3.8%) control subjects. Six of 16 patients with HIV-related lymphomas and 4 of 8 organ-recipient-related lymphomas were HCV positive. The analysis, excluding HIV-infected subjects and organ recipients, led to a prevalence of HCV of 5.9% among cases and 3.8% among controls. The age-, gender- and center-adjusted OR for all lymphomas was 1.58 (95% CI = 0.89-2.79). Among all lymphoma categories, HCV was associated with an increased risk of low grade B-cell lymphomas not otherwise specified (NOS) (OR = 35.98, 95% CI = 4.70-275.4). A 2-fold excess risk associated to HCV was observed for marginal B-cell lymphomas, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and lymphoma B NOS but the associations were not statistically significant. HCV infection is associated with an increased risk of a broad spectrum of lymphoid neoplasms among non severely immunocompromised subjects in Spain.

Kidney and liver transplantation in HIV-infected patients: case presentations and review

Until recently, HIV-infected patients have been excluded from consideration for solid organ transplantation. The relatively high mortality rates among HIV-infected transplant recipients observed in the era prior to the use of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), coupled with long waiting times for cadaveric organs, made it difficult to support organ transplantation in this patient group. However, in response to the marked reductions in morbidity and mortality associated with HIV infection, several transplant centers have developed pilot studies or revised their clinical criteria to allow transplantation in this group of patients. We describe two cases, one kidney and one liver transplant recipient, and review the major clinical and research issues related to this topic. Reports of transplantations in the pre-HAART era highlight two important findings. First, some HIV-infected transplant recipients did very well with long survival periods. However, overall progression to AIDS and death appeared accelerated. We recently reported on our preliminary experience with 45 selected transplant recipients in the HAART era. One-year patient survival rates were similar to unmatched survival data from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database. Median CD4+ T-cell counts remained stable in the follow-up period compared to pretransplant. HIV-1 RNA nearly uniformly continued to be suppressed below the limits of detection. Preliminary data are promising and support the current efforts to evaluate patient and graft survival among HIV-infected transplant recipients and to explore the mechanisms underlying the many potential complications of transplantation in this population.