PET with 2-[F-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) in patients with cancer of unknown primary (CUP): influence on patients' diagnostic and therapeutic management

Impact of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography on management of cancer of unknown primary: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Cancers of unknown primary (CUP) have traditionally been treated empirically, with a dismal prognosis. Compared with standard diagnostic tests, including CT and MRI, imaging with ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET or PET/CT has shown the capacity to better identify the primary tumour site and detect additional sites of metastasis. However, its clinical impact is not well established. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of prior studies to assess the impact of FDG-PET or PET/CT on the management of patients with CUP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pubmed and EMBASE databases were searched up to 4th February 2021. Studies that reported the proportion of patients with CUP who experienced a management change after FDG-PET or PET/ computed tomography (CT) were included and the proportions were pooled using the random-effects model. Study quality was assessed using QUADAS-2. Subgroup analysis was conducted to explore heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight studies (involving 2795 patients) were included. The pooled proportion of patients with management changes was 35% (95% confidence interval 31%-40%). There was substantial heterogeneity among the studies (Q-test, p < 0.01; I² = 82%). The specific reason for management change was more commonly detection of the primary site (22% [95% CI 18-28%]) than detection of additional metastatic sites (14% [95% CI 10-19%]). The pooled proportions of patients with management changes were similar among numerous subgroups (range, 32.8%-38.2%).

CONCLUSION

FDG-PET or PET/CT had a meaningful impact on the management of patients with CUP. Approximately, a third of patients had their management changed because of FDG-PET or PET/CT results, and this finding was consistent across numerous subgroups.

Clinical value of whole-body F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with carcinoma of unknown primary

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of the study is to investigate the clinical value of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) in detecting the primary sites in patients with carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP).

METHODS

The reports of FDG PET/CT scans of 164 patients with CUP syndrome in consecutive 2589 patients referred to our department from January 2006 to June 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. The final results were obtained from the pathologic reports, other imaging modalities diagnoses and clinical follow-up data.

RESULTS

There were 142 cases in the results analysis, as 19 patients were lost to follow-up and three patients were excluded. FDG PET/CT successfully detected primary tumours in 67 (47.2%) out of 142 patients. Among this group, 53 were pathologically proved and 17 patients were confirmed by clinical follow-up. The primary sites of 38 (56.7%) were in lung, eight (11.9%) in nasopharynx and 13 (19.4%) in digestive system. Six patients were misdiagnosed by FDG PET/CT scan. FDG PET/CT could not detect the primary lesion in 66 patients, and three primary tumours were identified by conventional work-up after negative FDG PET/CT scan. The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of FDG PET/CT scan in detecting the primary site in this study were 93.7%, 95.7% and 91.7%, respectively. FDG PET/CT scan changed the medical management of about 33.8% of 142 CUP patients.

CONCLUSION

FDG PET/CT whole-body imaging is a valuable tool in detecting the primary tumour of patients with CUP site.

Contribution of positron emission tomography in pleural disease

INTRODUCTION

Positron emission tomography (PET) now plays a clear role in oncology, especially in chest tumours. We discuss the value of metabolic imaging in characterising pleural pathology in the light of our own experience and review the literature.

BACKGROUND

PET is particularly useful in characterising malignant pleural pathologies and is a factor of prognosis in mesothelioma. Metabolic imaging also provides clinical information for staging lung cancer, in researching the primary tumour in metastatic pleurisy and in monitoring chronic or recurrent pleural pathologies.

CONCLUSIONS

PET should therefore be considered as a useful tool in the diagnosis of liquid or solid pleural pathologies.

Impact of PET-FDG in the diagnosis and therapeutic care of patients presenting with metastases of unknown primary

We carried out a study to evaluate the contribution of positron emission tomography with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (PET-FDG) in the diagnosis and therapeutic care of patients presenting with metastases of unknown primary. PET-FDG was prospectively performed in 51 patients. The PET-FDG data were confirmed histologically or by a follow-up on average at 13 months. PET-FDG identified the primary in 24 percent of cases, and detected the presence of additional metastases in 41 percent of cases. PET-FDG led to a therapeutic modification for 12 patients (24 percent). Furthermore, the therapeutic impact seems more marked in localized forms than in the multifocal. This broad exploratory study confirms the important role of PET-FDG in the diagnosis and therapeutic management of patients with metastases of unknown primary.

[Metastases with CUP syndrome]

Carcinoma of unknown primary is common, accounting for 2-6% of all cancer patients. The primary site is found in less than 25% of patients before death and frequently goes undiscovered at postmortem examination. At the time point of first diagnosis of CUP syndrome, usually more than 80% of the patients present a disseminated situation. Prognosis depends on the involved site and is unaffected by whether or not the primary site is ever found. For patients presenting with metastasis to peripheral lymph nodes, node dissection may be curative. In patients with small cell malignancies, peritoneal carcinomatosis (in women), poorly differentiated carcinomas involving external lymph nodes, mediastinum, or retroperitoneum, but without metastases to viscera or bone, objective long-term responses are possible with combination chemotherapy. For all other patients, toxic therapies are recommended only for patients with good functional status, for palliation of symptoms when they develop, and for continuous support of the quality of life.

The role of 2-deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography in disseminated carcinoma of unknown primary site

BACKGROUND

The authors conducted a comprehensive review of the efficacy of 2-deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in the detection of primary tumors in patients with disseminated carcinoma of unknown primary site.

METHODS

Ten studies (involving a total of 221 patients) tat were published between 1998 and 2006 were reviewed. Each study evaluated the role of FDG-PET in the detection of unknown primary tumors after a conventional diagnostic workup. Although 94% of patients had a single site of metastases, the studies otherwise were very heterogeneous in the studied population, study design, and additional diagnostic workup.

RESULTS

In 41% of patients, FDG-PET detected primary tumors that were not apparent after conventional workup. In this group of patients, the overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rates of FDG-PET in detecting unknown primary tumors were 91.9%, 81.9%, and 80.5%, respectively. FDG-PET imaging also led to the detection of previously unrecognized metastases in 37% of patients. Lung cancers represented 59% of the detected tumors. FDG-PET had a notably high false-positive rate (58.3%) in tumors of the lower digestive tract. FDG-PET altered the clinical management in 34.7% of patients. Most of those patients (53%) received specific chemotherapy for lung and pancreatic cancers; whereas 12% received specific therapy for breast, ovarian, and prostate cancers; and 14% underwent surgery with curative intent.

CONCLUSIONS

FDG-PET was an efficient method for detecting primary tumors that were undetected by other modalities and was sensitive for the detection of previously unrecognized metastases. FDG-PET significantly changed clinical management in approximately one-third of the patients studied.

Place de la TEP au FDG dans la localisation des cancers de primitif inconnu

FDG-PET can be successful in localizing the primary cancer when a metastasis is discovered but no primary tumor can be identified (cancer of unknown primary, or CUP) by physical examination, laboratory testing (for tumor markers, for example) or conventional imaging. The greatest number of PET studies in CUP concern secondary lesions in cervical lymph nodes, and PET is an established clinical use (highest ranking, 1A) according to the 3rd German Consensus Conference and an "option" in the French Standards, Options, and Recommendations. Success rates range from 30% to 50% in most studies using PET; a higher rate was reported recently with PET/CT. FDG-PET should be performed sufficiently early in cases of neurological paraneoplastic syndrome, because established lesions become irreversible. Identification of the antibody present helps to specify the organ and FDG-PET can then localize the lesion; together these techniques make it possible to perform curative surgery even when the primary tumor is not visible. The success rate is somewhat lower than in cases of metastasis, around 35%. The clinical utility of PET in other paraneoplastic syndromes has not yet been sufficiently studied, but these conditions are rare. It is precisely in cases with a kind of 'orphan' indication that FDG PET should be considered, as an effective "problem solver".

Dual modality of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with cervical carcinoma of unknown primary

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate an optimized F-18-flurodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) acquisition protocol for head and neck cancer and assess the usefulness of combined FDG-PET/CT in locating unknown primary tumors in patients with biopsy-proven cervical lymph node metastases.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Twenty-one patients with cervical lymph node metastases of unknown primary tumors underwent staging with FDG-PET/CT. The images of FDG-PET alone, CT alone, FDG-PET/CT read side by side and fused and FDG-PET/CT were evaluated separately by 2 physicians. Imaging results were correlated with either histology (n = 14) or clinical follow-up (n = 7).

RESULTS

On the fused FDG-PET/CT images, primary tumors were identified in 12 patients (57%); with FDG-PET alone and FDG-PET and CT read side by side 11 (52%) primary tumors were found while CT alone identified 5 (23%) primary tumors.

CONCLUSION

Our data indicate that fused FDG-PET and CT images increased the sensitivity of detecting carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) tumors compared to CT alone, but not to FDG-PET alone or FDG-PET and CT read side by side. Hence accurate fusion of functional and morphologic data by FDG-PET/CT is a promising imaging modality in the clinical workup of patients with cervical CUP tumors.

The Utility of 2-Deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-d-glucose Positron Emission Tomography in the Investigation of Patients with Disseminated Carcinoma of Unknown Primary Origin

PURPOSE

A retrospective analysis of the use of 2-deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) was performed in patients with histologically proven disseminated carcinoma of unknown primary tumor (CUP).

PROCEDURES

The records of 31 patients with CUP, excluding patients with isolated neck metastases, were reviewed to identify the ability of PET to detect the putative primary site (PPS) and/or to change therapeutic management.

RESULTS

In eight out of 31 cases (26%), a PPS was confirmed, either definitively (one pathologically, one radiologically) (true positive) or clinically (six cases). For three cases (10%), histological evidence of a primary tumor distant from the PPS was found (false positive). In a further seven cases (23%), the PPS remained unconfirmed, whereas for 13 cases (42%) no PPS was identified. In five out of seven patients in whom the PET suggested a high probability of having identified the primary site, the PPS was confirmed definitively or clinically. PET altered clinical management in at least 12 cases (38%).

CONCLUSIONS

PET contributed to the management of previously extensively investigated patients with CUP. Identification of a PPS and/or change in management was documented in 38% of cases, the majority of which were lung or pancreatic cancer. These findings are worthy of evaluation in a prospective study.

[PET/CT imaging in head and neck tumors]

AIM

To evaluate the usefulness of combined PET/CT examinations for detection of malignant tumors and their metastases in head and neck oncology.

METHODS

51 patients received whole body scans on a dual modality PET/CT system. CT was performed without i.v. contrast. The results were compared concerning the diagnostic impact of native CT scan on FDG-PET images and the additional value of fused imaging.

RESULTS

From 153 lesions were 97 classified as malignant on CT and 136 on FDG/PET images, as suspicious for malignancy in 33 on CT and 7 on FDG-PET and as benign in 23 on CT and 10 on FDG-PET. With combined PET/CT all primary and recurrent tumors could be found, the detection rate in patients with unknown primary tumors was 45%. Compared to PET or CT alone the sensitivity, specifity and accuracy could be significantly improved by means of combined PET/CT.

CONCLUSION

Fused PET/CT imaging with [F18]-FDG and native CT-scanning enables accurate diagnosis in 93% of lesions and 90% of patients with head and neck oncology.

Management of cervical metastasis

Cervical metastasis from head and neck cancer is a common occurrence. Despite improvements in diagnostic modalities and treatment options, survival in this group of patients has not changed appreciably over the past few decades. Cervical metastasis portends a poor prognosis and also presents a diagnostic and treatment dilemma for the head and neck oncologist. This article reviews the current state of the art in the diagnosis and treatment of this difficult group of patients and the literature on the topic.