1
|
Colombo C, Pistoljevic-Kristiansen N, Saupstad M, Bergenheim SJ, Spangmose AL, Klajnbard A, la Cour Freiesleben N, Løkkegaard EC, Englund AL, Husth M, Breth Knudsen U, Alsbjerg B, Prætorius L, Løssl K, Schmidt L, Pinborg A. Does luteal phase progesterone supplementation affect physical and psychosocial well-being among women undergoing modified natural cycle-FET? A sub-study of a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2023; 38:1970-1980. [PMID: 37634089 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dead171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/28/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Are there any differences in physical and psychosocial well-being among women undergoing modified natural cycle frozen embryo transfer (mNC-FET) with or without vaginal progesterone as luteal phase support (LPS)? SUMMARY ANSWER Women undergoing mNC-FET with vaginal progesterone supplementation were more likely to experience physical discomfort but there was no difference in psychosocial well-being between the two groups. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY mNC-FET can be carried out with or without vaginal progesterone as LPS, which has several side-effects. It is commonly known that fertility treatment can cause stress and psychosocial strain, however, most studies on this subject are conducted in fresh cycle regimes, which differ from NC-FET and results may not be comparable. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This is a sub-study of an ongoing RCT investigating whether progesterone supplementation has a positive effect on live birth rate in mNC-FET. The RCT is conducted at eight fertility clinics in Denmark from 2019 and is planned to end primo 2024. The sub-study is based on two questionnaires on physical and psychosocial well-being added to the RCT in August 2019. On the time of data extraction 286 women had answered both questionnaires. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Women who had answered both questionnaires were included in the sub-study. Participants were equally distributed, with 143 in each of the two groups. Participants in both groups received the same questionnaires at two time-points: on cycle day 2-5 (baseline) and after blastocyst transfer. Participants in the progesterone group had administered progesterone for 7 days upon answering the second questionnaire. All items in the questionnaires were validated. Items on psychosocial well-being originate from the Copenhagen Multi-Centre Psychosocial Infertility-Fertility Problem Stress Scale (COMPI-FPSS) and from the Mental Health Inventory-5. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Women receiving progesterone experienced more vaginal itching and/or burning than women in the non-progesterone group (P < 0.001). Women in the progesterone group also experienced more self-reported vaginal yeast infection, this was, however, not significant after adjustment for multiple testing (P/adjusted P = 0.049/0.881). No differences regarding psychosocial well-being were found between the two groups. Within the progesterone group, a shift toward feeling less 'downhearted and blue' was found when comparing response distribution at baseline and after blastocyst transfer (P < 0.001). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION All items on physical symptoms were self-reported. The item on vaginal yeast infection was therefore not diagnosed by a doctor. Inclusion in the study required a few extra visits to the clinic, participants who felt more burdened by fertility treatment might have been more likely to decline participation. Women who experienced a lot of side-effects to progesterone prior to this FET cycle, might be less likely to participate. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Our results are in line with previous known side-effects to progesterone. Physical side-effects of progesterone should be considered before administration. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) The RCT is fully supported by Rigshospitalet's Research Foundation and a grant from Gedeon Richter. Gedeon Richter were not involved in the design of protocol nor in the conduction of the study or analysis of results. A.P., L.P., and N.I.-C.F. report grants from Gedeon Richter, Ferring and Merck with no relations to this study. N.I.-C.F. has received travel support from Ferring, Merck A/S, & Gideon Richter, and is the head of the steering committee for the Danish Fertility Guidelines made by the members of from the Danish Fertility Society. A.P. reports consulting fees from Preglem, Novo Nordisk, Ferring, Gedeon Richter, Cryos, & Merck A/S, honoraria from Gedeon Richter, Ferring, Merck A/S, Theramex, and Organon, has received travel support from Gedeon Richter (payment to institution), participated on an advisory board for Preglem and was loaned an embryoscope from Gedeon Richter to their institution. A.L.S. has stock options for Novo Nordisk B A/S. B.A. have received unrestricted grant from Gedeon Richter Nordic and Merck and honoraria for lectures from Gedeon Richter, Merck, IBSA, and Marckyrl Pharma. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER The RCT is registered on ClinicalTrials. gov (NCT03795220) and in EudraCT (2018-002207-34).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clara Colombo
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, The Fertility Department, Section 4071, The Juliane Marie Centre for Women, Children and Reproduction, University Hospital of Copenhagen, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen N, Denmark
| | - Nina Pistoljevic-Kristiansen
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, The Fertility Department, Section 4071, The Juliane Marie Centre for Women, Children and Reproduction, University Hospital of Copenhagen, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen N, Denmark
| | - Marte Saupstad
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, The Fertility Department, Section 4071, The Juliane Marie Centre for Women, Children and Reproduction, University Hospital of Copenhagen, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen N, Denmark
| | - Sara Johanna Bergenheim
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, The Fertility Department, Section 4071, The Juliane Marie Centre for Women, Children and Reproduction, University Hospital of Copenhagen, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen N, Denmark
| | - Anne Lærke Spangmose
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, The Fertility Department, Section 4071, The Juliane Marie Centre for Women, Children and Reproduction, University Hospital of Copenhagen, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen N, Denmark
| | - Anna Klajnbard
- Fertility Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Nina la Cour Freiesleben
- Fertility Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ellen Christine Løkkegaard
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Fertility Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital-North Zealand, Hillerød, Denmark
| | | | - Merete Husth
- Fertility Unit and Centre for Preimplantation Genetic Test, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Ulla Breth Knudsen
- Fertility Clinic, Horsens Regional Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Horsens, Denmark
| | | | - Lisbeth Prætorius
- Fertility Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Kristine Løssl
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, The Fertility Department, Section 4071, The Juliane Marie Centre for Women, Children and Reproduction, University Hospital of Copenhagen, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen N, Denmark
| | - Lone Schmidt
- Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anja Pinborg
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, The Fertility Department, Section 4071, The Juliane Marie Centre for Women, Children and Reproduction, University Hospital of Copenhagen, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen N, Denmark
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mohammed Y, Holmes A, Kwok PCL, Kumeria T, Namjoshi S, Imran M, Matteucci L, Ali M, Tai W, Benson HA, Roberts MS. Advances and future perspectives in epithelial drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2022; 186:114293. [PMID: 35483435 DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2022.114293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Epithelial surfaces protect exposed tissues in the body against intrusion of foreign materials, including xenobiotics, pollen and microbiota. The relative permeability of the various epithelia reflects their extent of exposure to the external environment and is in the ranking: intestinal≈ nasal ≥ bronchial ≥ tracheal > vaginal ≥ rectal > blood-perilymph barrier (otic), corneal > buccal > skin. Each epithelium also varies in their morphology, biochemistry, physiology, immunology and external fluid in line with their function. Each epithelium is also used as drug delivery sites to treat local conditions and, in some cases, for systemic delivery. The associated delivery systems have had to evolve to enable the delivery of larger drugs and biologicals, such as peptides, proteins, antibodies and biologicals and now include a range of physical, chemical, electrical, light, sound and other enhancement technologies. In addition, the quality-by-design approach to product regulation and the growth of generic products have also fostered advancement in epithelial drug delivery systems.
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aims to obtain preliminary data on the efficacy of yoga for reducing self-reported menopausal hot flashes in a randomized study including an attention control group. METHODS We randomized 54 late perimenopausal women (2-12 mo of amenorrhea) and postmenopausal women (>12 mo of amenorrhea)--aged 45 to 58 years and who experienced at least four hot flashes per day, on average, for at least 4 weeks--to one of three groups: yoga, health and wellness education (HW), and wait list (WL). Yoga and HW classes consisted of weekly 90-minute classes for 10 weeks. All women completed daily hot flash diaries throughout the trial (10 wk) to track the frequency and severity of hot flashes. The mean hot flash index score is based on the number of mild, moderate, severe, and very severe hot flashes. RESULTS Hot flash frequency declined significantly across time for all three groups, with the strongest decline occurring during the first week. There was no overall significant difference in hot flash frequency decrease over time by treatment groups, but the yoga and HW groups followed similar patterns and showed greater decreases than the WL group. On week 10, women in the yoga group reported an approximately 66% decrease in hot flash frequency, women in the HW group reported a 63% decrease, and women in the WL group reported a 36% decrease. The hot flash index showed a similar pattern. CONCLUSIONS Results suggest that yoga can serve as a behavioral option for reducing hot flashes but may not offer any advantage over other types of interventions.
Collapse
|
5
|
Cicinelli E. Intravaginal oestrogen and progestin administration: advantages and disadvantages. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2007; 22:391-405. [PMID: 17981510 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2007.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
The vagina provides a local and a systemic route for delivering hormones for systemic effects and uterine targeting. Due to the 'uterine first-pass effect', hormones concentrate in the uterus and nearby tissues with low systemic exposure. Vaginal oestrogens, progesterone/progestins and danazol are currently used to obtain local (vagina and urethra), regional (uterus, pelvic structures) and systemic effects or contraception. Very low dosages of transvaginal oestrogens in the forms of creams, tablets and rings are effective for vaginal atrophy and urinary incontinence. To avoid endometrial stimulation, no deep vaginal application of low dosages for less than 6 months is recommended. For postmenopausal hormonal therapy by the vaginal route, progesterone is delivered directly to the uterus; the target organ for which it is designed. Worldwide, vaginal progesterone is employed for luteal phase support. Contraceptive vaginal rings offer the advantages of non-oral administration and sustained release. Vaginal administration of steroids is a promising option for the treatment of endometriosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ettore Cicinelli
- 4th Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Bari, Policlinico, Piazza Giulio Cesare, 70124 Bari, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|