Vulnerable Patients' Psychosocial Experiences in a Group-Based, Integrative Pain Management Program

Consumer perspectives of the group itself in group-delivered programs for people with chronic pain: A systematic review and meta-synthesis

Group-delivered programs for chronic pain are evidence-based and frequently used. The contribution of group factors to outcomes is unclear and there are no integrated findings on consumer perceptions of the group itself in programs for people with chronic pain. The aim of this systematic review was to search and synthesise qualitative data specifically related to the group itself in studies investigating group-delivered programs for people with chronic pain (PROSPERO, CRD42023382447). MEDLINE, EMBASE, EmCare, PsycINFO, Scopus, and CINAHL databases were searched, and qualitative studies that explored the experiences of consumers who had attended any style of group-delivered program for people with chronic pain were included. Methodological quality was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist and meta-synthesis was guided by a thematic synthesis approach. Ninety-three studies were included, with 1806 participants. Programs were predominantly multi-component, with diverse interventions and facilitators. Three analytical themes were generated: (1) Peer interaction: a program component in and of itself; (2) Comparison: frequently used and mostly helpful; and (3) Beyond the program: when the group itself contributes to change. Findings highlighted that most consumers valued the group itself, finding interaction, and comparing themselves with peers useful. Future research related to group factors in programs for people with chronic pain should include consumer participation and co-design. PERSPECTIVE: This review demonstrates that many consumers valued peer interaction and used comparison-based cognitive processing within group-delivered programs for chronic pain. Dialogue-based interactions with similar others promoted cognitive, affect, and behaviour changes. Group factors may have been underestimated and outcomes could be influenced if peer interactions within programs were optimised.

Use of Complementary and Integrative Medicine Among Low-Income Persons With Mental Health Disorders

Objective

To evaluate the use of complementary and integrative medicine (CIM) among a low-income population with mental health diagnoses and to assess differences in social determinants of health (SDOH) on the basis of CIM use.

Patients and Methods

We surveyed patients with mental health diagnoses and/or substance use disorders during outpatient evaluations between August 11, 2020, and November 18, 2021, at a community behavioral health center in Rochester, MN. We measured knowledge of current CIM, interest in future use of CIM, and SDOH. Differences in mean number of SDOH risk factors were compared by use or nonuse of any CIM.

Results

Among 102 patients, depression (87%) and anxiety (85%) diagnoses were common. Moreover, 72% of patients used at least 1 CIM. The 3 most common modalities were prayer (41%), spirituality (37%), and music (36%). CIM use had perceived benefits for mood (49%), stress (49%), and sadness (43%). One-third of patients added CIM to conventional treatments, and 19% reported that traditional medical treatments did not work well for their symptoms. More than two-thirds had not discussed their use of CIM with their physicians. Social isolation and loneliness were common. The number of SDOH risk factors did differ by use of CIM.

Conclusion

Prayer, spirituality, and music are frequently used by patients with mental health disorders and were perceived to be helpful in relieving symptoms. CIM use was not related to SDOH risk factors. Integrating CIM therapies may be beneficial for improving mental health in this population.

Food as medicine, community as medicine: Mental health effects of a social care intervention

OBJECTIVE

To assess mental health related outcomes of Recipe4Health, a multisectoral social care partnership implementing produce prescriptions with or without group medical visits (GMVs).

STUDY SETTING AND DESIGN

Recipe4Health was implemented at five community health centers from 2020 to 2023. Primary care teams referred patients with food insecurity and/or nutrition-sensitive chronic conditions (e.g., diabetes, depression) to 16 weeks of Food Farmacy (produce prescriptions) with the option of GMV participation. We used a convergent mixed-methods design including survey and interview data.

DATA SOURCES AND ANALYTIC SAMPLE

We conducted (1) participant surveys pre- and post-intervention and (2) semi-structured interviews with Recipe4Health participants and partner organization staff. Linear mixed effects models examined changes in mental health and related outcomes. Interviews were analyzed using codebook thematic analysis.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Program participants were middle-aged, primarily women, and from diverse racial/ethnic backgrounds (majority Latine and Black). At baseline, moderate or severe depression and/or anxiety symptoms were reported by 77/188 (41%) of Food Farmacy-only participants, and 113/284 (40%) of Food Farmacy +GMV participants. Among Food Farmacy-only participants, post-intervention depression and anxiety symptoms significantly improved only among those who did not have baseline depression/anxiety (PHQ9: -1.7 [95% CI: -2.8, -0.6]; GAD7: -1.8 [95% CI: -2.9, -0.8]). Among Food Farmacy +GMV participants, mental health symptoms improved regardless of baseline mental health; among those with baseline depression/anxiety: PHQ9: -2.4 (95% CI: -3.6, -1.2); GAD7: -0.9 (95% CI: -2.0, 0.1); among those without: PHQ9: -2.2 (95% CI: -3.2, -1.2); GAD7: -2.2 (95% CI: -3.1, -1.2). Improvements in social needs (food insecurity, loneliness) and health-related behaviors (fruit/vegetable intake, physical activity) varied by intervention arm and baseline depression/anxiety symptom level. In interviews, staff and patients endorsed produce prescriptions for improving nutrition and food insecurity, and GMVs for increasing social support.

CONCLUSION

Social care interventions providing vegetables and fruit, with or without group medical visits, may concurrently address mental health symptoms and social needs.

Effect of Reiki on Measures of Well-Being in Low-Income Patients with Mental Health Diagnoses

Background

More than 1 in 5 US adults live with mental illness. Novel therapies as complements to standard therapies are needed to improve patient well-being. Reiki is a biofield therapy that may improve well-being in mental health.

Objective

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of providing Reiki at a behavioral health clinic serving a low-income population. The secondary aim was to evaluate outcomes in terms of patients' symptoms, emotions, and feelings before and after Reiki.

Methods

This was a mixed-methods, feasibility pilot study with a pre-post experimental design. Reiki was offered to adult outpatients at a community behavioral health center in Rochester, Minnesota. Patients with a stable mental health diagnosis seen between July 22, 2021, and May 18, 2023, completed surveys before and after the Reiki intervention and provided qualitative feedback. Patients were asked to report their ratings of pain, anxiety, fatigue, and feelings (eg, happy, calm) on 0- to 10-point numeric rating scales. Data were analyzed with Wilcoxon signed rank tests.

Results

Among 91 patients who completed a Reiki session during the study period, 74 (81%) were women. Major depressive disorder (71%), posttraumatic stress disorder (47%), and generalized anxiety disorder (43%) were the most common diagnoses. The study was feasible in terms of recruitment, retention, data quality, acceptability, and fidelity of the intervention. Patient ratings of pain, fatigue, anxiety, stress, sadness, and agitation were significantly lower, and ratings of happiness, energy levels, relaxation, and calmness were significantly higher after a single Reiki session.

Conclusion

The results of this study suggest that Reiki is feasible and could be fit into the flow of clinical care in an outpatient behavioral health clinic. It improved positive emotions and feelings and decreased negative measures. Implementing Reiki in clinical practice should be further explored to improve mental health and well-being.

Social Capital and Cultural Health Capital in Primary Care: The Case of Group Medical Visits

This article focuses on an empirical setting that upends the clinician-patient dyadic norm: group medical visits (GMVs), in which multiple patients gather in the same space for medical care, health education and peer support. Our grounded theory analysis draws on participant observation and interviews (N = 53) with patients and staff of GMVs at four safety-net healthcare organisations in the United States. We delineate (1) how group medical visits provide health-focused social networks that facilitate the mobilisation of social capital, (2) how the organisationally embedded relationships that comprise group visits are made possible through extended time that is part of the GMV field and (3) how clinicians have opportunities rarely found in other settings to learn from patients, using knowledge accrued from GMV networks to advance their own skills, thereby converting social capital into provider cultural health capital. GMVs provide a rich empirical site for understanding the ways in which organisational arrangements can shape opportunities for patients and clinicians to cultivate and mobilise social capital and cultural health capital, and in doing so, materially shift experiences of receiving and providing healthcare.

Implementing Food as Medicine During COVID-19: Produce Prescriptions and Integrative Group Medical Visits in Federally Qualified Health Centers

Background

Food as Medicine is a rapidly developing area of health care in the United States, aimed at concurrently addressing nutrition-sensitive chronic conditions and food and nutrition insecurity. Recipe4Health (R4H) is a Food as Medicine program with an integrative health equity focus. It provides prescriptions for locally grown produce ('Food Farmacy') with or without integrative group medical visits, alongside training for clinic staff.

Objectives

To describe the initial implementation of R4H in four Federally Qualified Health Centers in Northern California, using a convergent mixed-methods approach.

Methods

We used the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) implementation science framework to assess the first two years of R4H (2020-2022). We draw from 40 interviews (26 partner organization staff, 14 patients) and program data on reach and adoption. Qualitative data were analyzed using codebook thematic analysis.

Results

Reach: From January 2020 to August 2022, 3255 patients were referred to the program; 1997 of those referred (61%) enrolled in the Food Farmacy only (N = 1681) or Food Farmacy + integrative group medical visits (N = 316). Participating patients included a wide range of ages (mean age 41.4, [SD 20]; 18% < 18 years old) and racial and ethnic backgrounds (3% American Indian or Alaska Native, 6% Asian or Pacific Islander, 19% Black, 57% Hispanic/Latine, 7% white). 69% were female; 43% primarily spoke Spanish. Adoption: 84% of trained clinic staff referred two or more patients to R4H. Implementation: Elements of successful implementation included: (1) support from county government leadership, (2) centralized coordination of the multi-sector partnership, and (3) a flexible approach responsive to organizational and COVID-related shifts. R4H implementation informed statewide Medicaid policy changes. Maintenance: To date, all four clinics continue to participate in R4H.

Conclusion

Centralized implementation, training, and administration of Food as Medicine programs can strengthen community health centers' capacities to concurrently address chronic conditions and food insecurity. Multi-sector partnerships can support Food as Medicine program sustainability.

Interventions in ambulatory healthcare settings to reduce social isolation among adults aged 18-64: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Social isolation is associated with increased all-cause and premature mortality, poor chronic disease management, and mental health concerns. Limited research exists on interventions addressing social isolation among individuals under 65 despite its increasing prevalence among young and middle-aged adults.

AIM

To identify interventions from the extant literature that address social isolation and loneliness in ambulatory healthcare settings in adults aged 18-64 and to identify elements of successful studies for future intervention design.

DESIGN & SETTING

Systematic review of interventions targeting social isolation in community-dwelling adults aged 18-64 within ambulatory healthcare settings.

METHOD

A search strategy was developed to identify relevant articles in the following databases: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, EBM Reviews, Scopus, CINAHL, and PsychInfo. Data were extracted on study design and setting, intervention type, outcome related to social isolation/loneliness, and scale of measure used.

RESULTS

25 078 citations were identified and underwent title and abstract screening. 75 articles met our inclusion criteria and were synthesised, including an assessment of bias. Effective interventions were delivered in community health settings, incorporated a group component, and used digital technologies. They also addressed the association between mental health and social isolation using cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) approaches and enhanced self-management and coping strategies for chronic conditions through psycho-educational interventions.

CONCLUSION

Future research should prioritise adults living in low-income and middle-income countries, racialised individuals, as well as those with fewer educational opportunities. There is also a need to advance research in primary care settings, where longitudinal patient-provider relationships would facilitate the success of interventions.

Interdisciplinary pain program participants with high catastrophizing scores improve function utilizing enriched therapeutic encounters and integrative health techniques: a retrospective study

Introduction

Pain catastrophizing describes helplessness, rumination, and magnification of a pain experience. High pain catastrophizing is an independent risk factor for disability, pain severity, inadequate treatment response, chronicity, and opioid misuse. Interdisciplinary pain programs (IPPs) are beneficial and cost-effective for individuals with chronic pain, but their functional impact on individuals with high pain catastrophizing is not well established. The emerging field of placebo studies suggests that patient-provider relationships, positive treatment expectations, and sociobiologically informed care trigger physiological responses that may enhance therapeutic interventions.

Methods

In this retrospective observational cohort study, we compared admission and discharge data for 428 adults with high-impact chronic pain (mean 8.5 years) who completed the Spaulding-Medford Functional Restoration Program (FRP). The interdisciplinary FRP team of physiatrists, behavioral health clinicians, physical therapists, and occupational therapists specializes in evidenced-based conventional rehabilitation, integrative health, and pain psychoeducation via enriched therapeutic encounters, fostering collaboration, validation, trust, self-efficacy, and positive expectations. Clinical outcome measures included the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) assessing functional performance (COPM-PS) and satisfaction with function (COPM-SS), the Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9).

Results

FRP participants with clinically elevated catastrophizing at baseline (PCS ≥30, mean PCS 39) achieved statistically significant improvements in function (mean delta -2.09, CHI2 = 15.56, p < 0.001), satisfaction with function (COPM-SS mean delta -2.50, CHI2 = 7.42, p = 0.007), pain (NRS mean delta 2.7), mood (PHQ-9 mean delta 1.87, p = 0.002), and catastrophizing (PCS mean delta 4.16, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed racial disparities in pain scores, and exploratory analysis showed a trend toward reducing opiate consumption.

Discussion

Despite the known association of adverse outcomes with high catastrophizing, FRP participation was associated with increased productive engagement, reduced pain, reduced maladaptive thought processes, and improved mood. Although causation and efficacy cannot be established from a retrospective design, this is the first study to identify functional improvement in patients with high-impact chronic pain and clinically relevant high pain catastrophizing who participate in an IPP combining conventional and complementary rehabilitation with psychoeducation. These enriched therapeutic encounters may enhance the treatment process by promoting trust, empathy, collaboration, and beneficial reframing of patients' experiences, expectations, and goals.

Attending to Marginalization in The Chronic Pain Literature: A Scoping Review

Background

There has been a recent and, for many within the chronic pain space, long-overdue increase in literature that focuses on equity, diversity, inclusion, and decolonization (EDI-D) to understand chronic pain among people who are historically and structurally marginalized.

Aims

In light of this growing attention in chronic pain research, we undertook a scoping review of studies that focus on people living with chronic pain and marginalization to map how these studies were carried out, how marginalization was conceptualized and operationalized by researchers, and identify suggestions for moving forward with marginalization and EDI-D in mind to better support people living with chronic pain.

Methods

We conducted this scoping review using critical analysis in a manner that aligns with dominant scoping review frameworks and recent developments made to scoping review methodology as well as reporting guidelines.

Results

Drawing on 67 studies, we begin with a descriptive review of the literature followed by a critical review that aims to identify fissures within the field through the following themes: (1) varying considerations of sociopolitical and socioeconomic contexts, (2) conceptual conflations between sex and gender, and (3) differing approaches to how people living with chronic pain and marginalization are described.

Conclusion

By identifying strengths and limitations in the research literature, we aim to highlight opportunities for researchers to contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of marginalization in chronic pain experiences.

Group-Based Integrative Pain Management in Primary Care: A Study Protocol for Multilevel Interventions to Address Health Disparities

Background

Socioeconomically disadvantaged populations have a high prevalence of chronic pain, exacerbated by social isolation, intersectional stigma, and disparities in pain assessment and treatment. Effective interventions using a multilevel, biopsychosocial approach are needed to decrease the unequal burden of pain. Group-based integrative pain management in primary care safety net clinics is a promising model to improve pain care for racially and ethnically diverse low-income people.

Objective

To describe a study protocol to test the impacts of 2 group-based models - group acupuncture and integrative group medical visits - on multilevel pain-related outcomes.

Methods

The study uses a 2x2 factorial randomized clinical trial to test two 12 week group-based models: group acupuncture and integrative group medical visits (IGMV, with psychoeducation, mind-body approaches, and social support). English or Spanish-speaking adults with chronic pain for ≥3 months receiving care in San Francisco Department of Public Health primary care clinics are eligible for the trial. All participants will receive usual care and be randomized to group acupuncture, IGMV, both, or waitlist control. The primary outcomes are changes from baseline to 3 month follow-up in pain impact and in social support for chronic pain. Secondary outcomes include pain interference, pain intensity, depression, anxiety, quality of life, and social isolation. Data will include patient-reported outcomes, electronic health record data, and qualitative interviews, focus groups and observations to assess multilevel individual, interpersonal and organizational outcomes.

Discussion

Multilevel approaches are needed to advance health equity in pain management. Our study contributes to knowledge of group-based integrative pain management in primary care safety net clinics to address multilevel barriers and disparities in pain care.

Improving Health for Older Adults With Pain Through Engagement: Protocol for Tailoring and Open Pilot Testing of a Mind-Body Activity Program Delivered Within Shared Medical Visits in an Underserved Community Clinic

BACKGROUND

Chronic musculoskeletal pain is prevalent and disabling among older adults in underserved communities. Psychosocial pain management is more effective than pharmacological treatment in older adults. However, underserved community clinics often lack psychosocial treatments, in part because of a lack of trained providers. Shared medical appointments, in which patients undergo brief medical evaluation, monitoring, counseling, and group support, are an efficacious and cost-effective method for chronic disease management in underserved clinics, reducing the need for specialized providers. However, shared medical visits are often ineffective for chronic pain, possibly owing to lack of inclusion of skills most relevant for older adults (eg, pacing to increase engagement in daily activities).

OBJECTIVE

We have described the protocol for the development and initial pilot effectiveness testing of the GetActive+ mind-body activity intervention for older adults with chronic pain. GetActive+ was adapted from GetActive, an evidence-based intervention that improved pain outcomes among mostly affluent White adults. We aim to establish the initial feasibility, acceptability, fidelity, and effectiveness of GetActive+ when delivered as part of shared medical appointments in a community clinic.

METHODS

We conducted qualitative focus groups and individual interviews with providers (n=25) and English-speaking older adults (aged ≥55 y; n=18) with chronic pain to understand the pain experience in this population, perceptions about intervention content, and barriers to and facilitators of intervention participation and implementation in this setting. Qualitative interviews with Spanish-speaking older adults are in progress and will inform a future open pilot of the intervention in Spanish. We are currently conducting an open pilot study with exit interviews in English (n=30 individuals in total). Primary outcomes are feasibility (≥75% of patients who are approached agree to participate), acceptability (≥75% of patients who enrolled complete 8 out of 10 sessions; qualitative), and fidelity (≥75% of session components are delivered as intended). Secondary outcomes include physical function-self-reported, performance based (6-minute walk test), and objective (step count)-and emotional function (depression and anxiety). Other assessments include putative mechanisms (eg, mindfulness and pain catastrophizing).

RESULTS

We began enrolling participants for the qualitative phase in November 2022 and the open pilot phase in May 2023. We completed the qualitative phase with providers and English-speaking patients, and the results are being analyzed using a hybrid, inductive-deductive approach. We conducted rapid analysis of these data to develop GetActive+ before the open pilot in English, including increasing readability and clarity of language, reducing the number of skills taught to increase time for individual check-ins and group participation, and increasing experiential exercises for skill uptake.

CONCLUSIONS

We provide a blueprint for the refinement of a mind-body activity intervention for older adults with chronic pain in underserved community clinics and for incorporation within shared medical visits. It will inform a future, fully powered, effectiveness-implementation trial of GetActive+ to help address the chronic pain epidemic among older adults.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05782231; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05782231.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/52117.

Patient Outcomes from Multidisciplinary Chronic Pain Programs in Safety Net Clinics: A Scoping Review

Patients within the safety net, defined as gap healthcare services for un- or under-insured persons, disproportionately suffer high impact chronic pain. The purpose of this review was to examine pain-related outcomes from multidisciplinary programs for patients with chronic pain within the safety net. A scoping review was conducted based on the Arksey and O'Malley framework coupled with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses-Scoping Review checklist. CINAHL, MEDLINE, PubMed, and Google Scholar were searched for eligible articles published between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2020. Grey literature was searched by typing relevant keywords into Google. Quantitative and qualitative outcomes were included. Data collected were charted and analyzed. Ten articles were included, with five demonstrating primarily quantitative results, three demonstrating primarily qualitative results, and the remaining two demonstrating primarily mixed results. Of the studies that utilized qualitative measures, themes included reduction in pain symptoms and the positive reception of a group-based pain management approach. Of the studies that employed quantitative measures, most demonstrated improvements in pain-related outcomes post-intervention, although not all statistically significant. Multidisciplinary pain programs may be of benefit to safety net patients with chronic pain. Further data collection is needed to determine the efficacy of these programs.

Telehealth for management of chronic non-cancer pain and opioid use disorder in safety net primary care

BACKGROUND

The SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic increased use of telehealth for the management of opioid use disorder and chronic non-cancer pain in primary care safety net clinical systems. Significant barriers to telehealth exist, little is known about how these barriers impact urban safety net, primary care providers and their patients. The objective of this study was to qualitatively assess the benefits and challenges of telehealth for management of chronic non-cancer pain, opioid use disorder, and multi-morbidity in primary care, safety net clinical systems.

METHODS

We interviewed patients with chronic non-cancer pain and history of substance use (n = 22) and their primary care clinicians (n = 7) in the San Francisco Bay Area, March-July 2020. We recorded, transcribed, coded, and content analyzed interviews.

RESULTS

COVID-19 shelter-in-place orders contributed to increases in substance use and uncontrolled pain, and posed challenges for monitoring opioid safety and misuse through telehealth. None of the clinics used video visits due to low digital literacy/access. Benefits of telehealth included decreased patient burden and missed appointments and increased convenience and control of some chronic conditions (e.g., diabetes, hypertension). Telehealth challenges included loss of contact, greater miscommunication, and less comprehensive care interactions.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is one of the first to examine telehealth use in urban safety net primary care patients with co-occurring chronic non-cancer pain and substance use. Decisions to continue or expand telehealth should consider patient burden, communication and technology challenges, pain control, opioid misuse, and medical complexity.

The relationship between patients' income and education and their access to pharmacological chronic pain management: A scoping review

Background

Though chronic pain is widespread, affecting about one-fifth of the world's population, its impacts are disproportionately felt across the population according to socioeconomic determinants such as education and income. These factors also influence patients' access to treatment, including pharmacological pain management.

Aim

A scoping review was undertaken to better understand the association of socioeconomic factors with physicians' pain management prescribing patterns for adults living with chronic pain.

Methods

An electronic literature search was conducted using the EMBASE, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and Ovid MEDLINE databases and 31 retrieved articles deemed relevant for analyses were critically appraised.

Results

The available evidence indicates that patients' lower socioeconomic status is associated with a greater likelihood of being prescribed opioids to manage their chronic pain and a decreased likelihood of receiving prescription medications to manage migraines, rheumatoid arthritis, and osteoarthritis.

Conclusions

These results suggest that individuals with lower socioeconomic status do not receive equal prescription medicine opportunities to manage their chronic pain conditions. This is influenced by a variety of intersecting variables, including access to care, the potential unaffordability of certain therapies, patients' health literacy, and prescribing biases. Future research is needed to identify interventions to improve equity of access to therapies for patients with chronic pain living in lower socioeconomic situations as well as to explain the mechanism through which socioeconomic status affects chronic pain treatment choices by health care providers.

Abbreviation

SES: socioeconomic status; RA: rheumatoid arthritis; IV: intravenous; SC: subcutaneous; bDMARDs: biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs; DMARDS; disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs; TNFi: tumour necrosis factor inhibitors; NSAIDs: non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Evaluating chronic pain interventions in recent refugees and immigrant populations: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Many studies investigating the management of chronic pain often exclude participation of people from refugee and immigrant backgrounds. This review seeks to understand and evaluate the effectiveness of interventions for chronic pain management when applied in the context of refugee and immigrant populations.

METHODS

A systematic review was undertaken using six databases and the PICO search strategy. Included studies were published in English, comprised of patients over 18 years of age and excluded cancer-related chronic pain.

RESULTS

Twenty-one papers met the inclusion criteria: 13 cohort studies and eight randomised control trials. The majority of interventions involved multidisciplinary or psychological interventions, with the remaining studies based on education, exercise therapy or culturally adapted information. Studies integrating multidisciplinary care to manage chronic pain showed more consistent improvements in pain intensity and function than other unimodal interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

Multidisciplinary interventions reduce pain intensity, improve functional impairment, and alleviate other psychosocial symptoms exhibited chronic pain patients from refugee or immigrant backgrounds. Additional well-designed, large-scale studies are needed to decisively estimate the effectiveness of culturally adapted, multidisciplinary intervention programs over time.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Clinical practice may benefit from adapting interventions to better support the management of chronic pain in refugee and immigrant populations.

"The Pain Left, I Was Off and Running": A Qualitative Analysis of Group Acupuncture and Yoga Therapy for Chronic Pain in a Low-Income and Ethnically Diverse Population

Introduction: Chronic pain and the current opioid epidemic are pressing public health concerns, especially in low-income and ethnically diverse communities. Nonpharmacologic therapies that are safe, effective, and acceptable for the treatment of chronic pain conditions may provide a solution for addressing this issue. This qualitative analysis explores the experience of study participants who received combined acupuncture and yoga therapy (YT) to treat chronic pain delivered in a primary care setting. Methods: The group acupuncture with yoga therapy for chronic neck, low back, and osteoarthritic pain trial (GAPYOGA) assessed the feasibility and effectiveness of group acupuncture (GA) combined with YT in a low-income, racial, and ethnically diverse population. Individual in-depth interviews were conducted with a subset of patients in the trial. Nineteen participants were interviewed for qualitative analysis of their experience. Using the immersion and crystallization method, transcribed interviews were analyzed for themes meaningfully representing participant experience. Results: The combined GA and YT resulted in significant pain relief and transformative healing experiences. Three themes emerged from participant narratives: (1) transformative engagement with self in the healing process through pain relief, psychological well-being, and self-efficacy; (2) therapeutic relationship with acupuncture and yoga providers; and (3) fostering relationships with fellow participants in the group. Discussion: In this study of a low-income and ethnically diverse population, the combination of acupuncture and YT was found to alleviate pain, improve function, promote psychological well-being, and engage participants in self-care practices in a transformative healing process-resulting in physical and psychological benefits.

Characterizing Pain Leading to Emergency Medical Services Activation in Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

Pain is a common but understudied symptom among patients with heart failure (HF) transported by emergency medical services (EMS). The aims were to determine explanatory factors of a primary complaint of pain and pain severity, and characterize pain among patients with HF transported by EMS.

METHODS

Data from electronic health records of patients with HF transported by EMS within a midwestern United States county from 2009 to 2017 were analyzed. Descriptive statistics, χ 2 , analysis of variance, and logistic and multiple linear regression analyses were used.

RESULTS

The sample (N = 4663) was predominantly women (58.1%) with self-reported race as Black (57.7%). The mean age was 64.2 ± 14.3 years. Pain was the primary complaint in 22.2% of the sample, with an average pain score of 6.8 ± 3.1 out of 10. The most common pain complaint was chest pain (68.1%). Factors associated with a primary pain complaint were younger age (odds ratio [OR], 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96-0.97), history of myocardial infarction (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.55-2.49), and absence of shortness of breath (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.58-0.77). Factors associated with higher pain severity were younger age ( b = -0.05, SE = 0.013), being a woman ( b = 1.17, SE = 0.357), and White race ( b = -1.11, SE = 0.349).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical and demographic factors need consideration in understanding pain in HF during EMS transport. Additional research is needed to examine these factors to improve pain management and reduce transports due to pain.

Role of Rehabilitation in Opioid Tapering: A Scoping Review

Purpose: Among industrialized countries, Canada has the second-highest opioid prescribing rate for pain management. Physiotherapy and occupational therapy interventions are potential non-pharmacological alternatives. We undertook a scoping review to explore and summarize the current evidence describing the interventions included or used in physiotherapy and occupational therapy in opioid tapering for individuals with chronic pain. Method: A systematic search of the peer-reviewed health databases was conducted, with data synthesis guided by Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review methodology. Articles were included in the narrative synthesis if (1) interventions within the scope of practice for physiotherapists or occupational therapists were described or these professionals were part of interdisciplinary care and (2) opioid tapering or reduction was addressed. Results: The 39 articles identified included 2 systematic reviews, 9 narrative reviews or commentaries, 2 case reports, 11 uncontrolled cohort studies, 1 cross-sectional study, 5 randomized controlled trials, 4 programme evaluations, and 4 qualitative studies. Of the 28 studies reporting specific outcomes, 25 reported positive outcomes of rehabilitation interventions for opioid tapering. There was greater representation of interventions from physiotherapy than from occupational therapy: few articles contained substantive descriptions (e.g., dosage and duration). Conclusions: The evidence to guide therapists in supporting opioid tapering for people with chronic pain seems to be limited. Further research is needed to establish effectiveness for stand-alone interventions and as part of a comprehensive rehabilitation approach.

Power over pain - An interprofessional approach to chronic pain: Program feedback from a medically underserved community

INTRODUCTION

The management of chronic pain is challenging. Biopsychosocial models recommend interprofessional approaches to treatment, but there is sparse information about participants' experiences of these programs, especially in medically underserved populations coping with the intersectionality of racial bias, low socioeconomic status, and psychosocial stressors. This study explored the perspectives and experiences of black participants with low socioeconomic status and concomitant psychosocial stressors in an outpatient interprofessional pain management program, Power over Pain. The program incorporates cognitive-behavioural techniques, creative arts therapies, pain education, and psychoeducation about stress management, self-care, exercise, and medication.

METHOD

This study employed thematic analysis as the qualitative research method. We conducted semi-structured interviews with nine program participants. Interview questions focused on the impact of the program on participants' overall health and wellbeing and ability to manage chronic pain.

RESULTS

Thematic analysis revealed the following treatment benefits as perceived by the participants: (a) moving from feeling stuck to feeling empowered, (b) enhanced understanding of chronic pain resulting in cognitive reframing and debunking certain myths and stigmas, (c) learning new pain management strategies, and (d) social support.

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest that the Power over Pain program may be an effective way to improve self-management and empower medically underserved people who have chronic pain.

Função, atividade e participação na percepção do paciente com dor lombar crônica: estudo em um grupo focal

Objetivo: Identificar a percepção da dor lombar (DL) crônica em usuários de uma unidade de reabilitação fisioterapêutica de um município de Minas Gerais, Brasil. Métodos: Trata-se de uma pesquisa exploratória descritiva e qualitativa. Realizaram-se grupos focais com usuários do serviço de saúde de ambos os sexos com idade superior a 18 anos, diagnóstico médico de DL crônica, e em reabilitação física. As unidades norteadoras foram: conversando sobre dor e tratamentos prévios para alívio da dor, programadas por roteiro semiestruturado. Emergiram as unidades: fala dos profissionais de saúde e a fala dos colegas de trabalho e familiares. As falas foram gravadas, transcritas e analisadas utilizando a Técnica de Elaboração e Análise de Unidades de Significado. Utilizou-se o escore de dor do Índice de Incapacidade de Oswestry (IIO) e o IIO completo para avaliação da dor e da funcionalidade. Resultados: 14 pacientes (média de idade 52 ± 3 anos), na maioria mulheres, relataram DL crônica em média há 5 ± 5 anos. O valor médio do escore de dor foi de 1,37 ± 1,72 e média de incapacidade de 21,96% (IC95% 15,43 – 28,50%).  Os relatos sobre a dor foram: ‘um incômodo’, ‘uma doença’, ‘incapacidade’, tratada com remédios e Fisioterapia; profissionais da saúde demonstram ‘negligência’, ‘agressão’ ou ‘proibição’; enquanto família e colegas de trabalho demonstram ‘desprezo’, ‘represália’ ou ‘apoio’. Conclusão: A percepção da DL crônica equivale a incômodo, desconforto, doença, restrições, agressão, negligência, desprezo, represália ou apoio a um misto de sensações físicas e psicológicas.

"Chasing the pain relief, not the high": Experiences managing pain after opioid reductions among patients with HIV and a history of substance use

BACKGROUND

Opioid overdose mortality continues to increase in the United States despite significant investments to reverse the epidemic. The national response to-date has focused primarily on reducing opioid prescribing, yet reductions in prescribing have been associated with patients reporting uncontrolled pain, psychological distress, and transition to illicit substances. The aim of this study is to qualitatively explore chronic pain management experiences among PLWH with a history of illicit substance use after long-term opioid therapy reductions or discontinuations.

METHODS

We analyzed 18 interviews, stopping upon reaching thematic saturation, with HIV-positive participants with a history of substance use who were enrolled in a longitudinal cohort study to assess the impact of prescribing changes among patients with chronic pain. Participants in this nested qualitative study had been reduced/discontinued from opioid pain relievers (OPRs) within the 12 months prior to interview. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Two analysts coded all interviews, interrater reliability was measured, and coding discrepancies discussed. The study took place in San Francisco, California in 2018.

RESULTS

Eleven participants were male with a mean age of 55; 8 were African American and 8 were White. All participants were HIV-positive, actively engaged in primary care, and had a lifetime history of illicit substance use. Twelve reported using illicit substances within the past year, including non-prescription opioids/heroin (10), and stimulant use (10). After being reduced/discontinued from their long-term opioid therapy, patients reported developing complex multimodal pain management systems that often included both nonpharmacological approaches and illicit substance use. Participants encountered a range of barriers to nonpharmacological therapies including issues related to accessibility and availability. Participants often reported attempts to replicate their prior OPR prescription by seeking out the same medication and dose from illicit sources and reported transitioning to heroin after exhausting other options.

CONCLUSION

After being reduced/discontinued from OPRs, HIV-positive patients with a history of substance use reported experimenting with a range of pain management modalities including nonpharmacological therapies and illicit substance use to manage symptoms of opioid withdrawal and pain. Providers should consider that any change to a patients' long-term opioid therapy may result in experimentation with pain management outside of the medical setting and may want to employ patient-centered, holistic approaches when managing patients' opioid prescriptions and chronic pain.