Clinical, microbiological, and immunological characteristics in HIV-infected subjects at risk for disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex disease: an AACTG study

Risk Factors for Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Infections in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Multinational Case-Control Study

BACKGROUND

Risk factors for nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) infections after solid organ transplant (SOT) are not well characterized. Here we aimed to describe these factors.

METHODS

Retrospective, multinational, 1:2 matched case-control study that included SOT recipients ≥12 years old diagnosed with NTM infection from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2018. Controls were matched on transplanted organ, NTM treatment center, and post-transplant survival greater than or equal to the time to NTM diagnosis. Logistic regression on matched pairs was used to assess associations between risk factors and NTM infections.

RESULTS

Analyses included 85 cases and 169 controls (59% male, 88% White, median age at time of SOT of 54 years [interquartile range {IQR} 40-62]). NTM infection occurred in kidney (42%), lung (35%), heart and liver (11% each), and pancreas transplant recipients (1%). Median time from transplant to infection was 21.6 months (IQR 5.3-55.2). Most underlying comorbidities were evenly distributed between groups; however, cases were older at the time of NTM diagnosis, more frequently on systemic corticosteroids and had a lower lymphocyte count (all P < .05). In the multivariable model, older age at transplant (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.04; 95 confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.07), hospital admission within 90 days (aOR, 3.14; 95% CI, 1.41-6.98), receipt of antifungals (aOR, 5.35; 95% CI, 1.7-16.91), and lymphocyte-specific antibodies (aOR, 7.73; 95% CI, 1.07-56.14), were associated with NTM infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk of NTM infection in SOT recipients was associated with older age at SOT, prior hospital admission, receipt of antifungals or lymphocyte-specific antibodies. NTM infection should be considered in SOT patients with these risk factors.

Interventions for the prevention of mycobacterium avium complex in adults and children with HIV

BACKGROUND

Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) infection is a common complication of advanced acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) disease and is an independent predictor of mortality and shortened survival.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness and safety of interventions aimed at preventing MAC infection in adults and children with HIV infection.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library (search date December 2012).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing different strategies for preventing MAC infection in HIV-infected individuals.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed trial eligibility and quality, and extracted data. Where data were incomplete or unclear, a third reviewer resolved conflicts and/or trial authors were contacted for further details. Development of MAC infection and survival were compared using risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The quality of evidence has been assessed using the GRADE methodology.

MAIN RESULTS

Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Placebo-controlled trials: There was no statistically significant difference between clofazimine and no treatment groups in the number of patients that developed MAC infection (RR 1.01; 95% CI 0.37 to 2.80). Rifabutin (one study; RR 0.48; 95% CI 0.35 to 0.67), azithromycin (three studies; RR 0.37; 95% CI 0.19 to 0.74) and clarithromycin (one study; RR 0.35; 95% CI 0.21 to 0.58) were more effective than placebo in preventing the development of MAC infection. There was no statistically significant difference between those treated with clofazimine (one study; RR 0.98; 95% CI 0.41 to 2.32), rifabutin (one study RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.78 to 1.05), azithromycin (three studies, pooled RR 0.96; 95% CI 0.69 to 1.32) and placebo in number of reported deaths. One study found that the risk of death was reduced by 22% in patients treated with clarithromycin compared to those treated with placebo (RR 0.78; 95% CI 0.64 to 0.96). Monotherapy vs. monotherapy: Patients treated with clarithromycin (RR 0.60; 95% CI 0.41 to 0.89) and azithromycin (RR 0.60; 95% CI 0.40 to 0.89) were 40% less likely to develop MAC infection than those treated with rifabutin. There was no statistically significant difference between those treated with clarithromycin (RR 0.98; 95% CI 0.83 to 1.15), azithromycin (RR 0.98; 95% CI 0.77 to 1.24) and rifabutin in the number of reported deaths. Combination therapy versus monotherapy: There was no statistically significant difference between patients treated with a combination of rifabutin and clarithromycin and those treated with clarithromycin alone (RR 0.74; 95% CI 0.46 to 1.20); and those treated with combination of rifabutin and azithromycin and those treated with azithromycin alone (RR 0.59; 95% CI 1.03). Patients treated with a combination of rifabutin plus clarithromycin were 56% less likely to develop MAC infection than those treated with rifabutin alone (RR 0.44; 95% CI 0.29 to 0.69). Patients treated with a combination of rifabutin plus azithromycin were 65% less likely to develop MAC infection than those treated with rifabutin alone (RR 0.35; 95% CI 0.21 to 0.59). There was no statistically significant difference in the number of reported deaths in all the four different comparisons of prophylactic agents.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on limited data, azithromycin or clarithromycin appeared to be a prophylactic agent of choice for MAC infection. Further studies are needed, especially direct comparison of clarithromycin and azithromycin. In additions, studies that will compare different doses and regimens are needed.

Mediastinitis and pericardial effusion in a patient with AIDS and disseminated Mycobacterium avium infection: a case report

We report the case of a 36-year-old man who had acquired immune deficiency syndrome and developed suppurative mediastinitis extending over the left lung and anterior thoracic wall around the sternum, pericardial effusions, splenomegaly, and mesenteric and periaortic lymphadenomegaly due to Mycobacterium avium (genotype I). The organism was isolated from an axillary lymph node and the bone marrow. Mediastinitis associated with disseminated M. avium complex infection is uncommon and, to the best of our knowledge, this manifestation has not reported before.

Type I Interferon Signaling and B Cells Maintain Hemopoiesis duringPneumocystisInfection of the Lung

Loss of CD4 T cells is the hallmark of HIV infection. However, type I IFN-producing plasmacytoid dendritic cells may also be lost. This results in susceptibility to an opportunistic infection such as Pneumocystis pneumonia. In addition, regenerative bone marrow failure resulting in pancytopenia is another common problem in advanced stage AIDS. This may be linked to both the failing immune system and recurrent opportunistic infections. We generated lymphocyte-deficient type I IFN receptor-deficient mice (IFrag-/-) to study the effects on Pneumocystis infection of the lung. When IFrag-/- animals were infected with Pneumocystis they died between days 16 and 21 postinfection with minimal pneumonia but severe anemia due to complete bone marrow failure. This included the loss of uncommitted hemopoietic precursor cells. Bone marrow failure was prevented by the reconstitution of IFrag-/- mice with wild-type lymphocytes, especially B cells. T and B cells lacking type I IFN receptor signaling could only partially prevent bone marrow failure in response to Pneumocystis infection. However, the presence of T and B cells lacking type I IFN signaling resulted in compensatory extramedullary hemopoiesis in the liver and spleen. Lymphocyte support of the regenerative capacity of the bone marrow was provided by both type I IFN-dependent and -independent mechanisms that acted synergistically. Our findings point to the requirement of both type I IFNs and lymphocytes in the regenerative capabilities of the hemopoietic system under the pressure of Pneumocystis infection, but not during steady-state hemopoiesis. This may have implications in the management of pancytopenia in AIDS.

Change in T-Lymphocyte Count after Initiation of Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy in HIV-Infected Patients with History of Mycobacterium Avium Complex Infection

Objective

To compare changes in CD4+, CD8+ and total lymphocyte counts after initiation of highly active anti-retroviral therapy (HAART) between HIV-infected patients with and without a recent history of Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) infection.

Method

Matched exposed-non-exposed retrospective cohort study.

Results

Fifty-one patients with a recent history of MAC infection (MAC+) started a combination of at least three antiretroviral drugs. They were individually matched to 145 patients without any history of MAC infection (MAC-) according to CD4+ T-cell count (±30 cells/mm3), previous experience of antiretroviral treatment, AIDS clinical stage at the time of HAART initiation (baseline), age (±10 years) and gender. MAC+ and MAC- patients presented comparable median levels of total lymphocytes (488 vs 688/mm3, P=0.09), CD4+ (11 vs 16/mm3, P=0.15), CD8+ count (359 vs 386/mm3, P=0.39) and plasma HIV RNA (5.3 vs 5.1 log10 copies/ml, P=0.22) at baseline. After 6 months on HAART, the median increase of CD4+ T-cell count was 28 cells/mm3 (interquartile range [IQR]: 1–63) in MAC+ and 72 cells/mm3 (IQR: 34–120) in MAC- patients ( P<0.0001), whereas the percentage of CD4+ T cells was not significantly different between the two groups ( P=0.13). Comparable differences were observed for total lymphocytes and CD8+ T cells ( P<0.001). The 6 months decline of plasma HIV RNA was not significantly different according to MAC exposure (-1.6 in MAC+ vs -1.8 log10 copies/ml in MAC- patients, P=0.65). Results were confirmed after adjustment for other characteristics than the matching variables and after taking into account potential informative bias due to unbalanced number of deaths between the two groups.

Conclusion

MAC infection at the time of HAART initiation is an important deleterious factor for immune reconstitution. A better understanding of the underlying mechanism and an evaluation of additional treatment strategies are necessary to help immune restoration in such circumstances.